Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Response to Herbicides Applied at Three Growth Stages

1989 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duane A. Martin ◽  
Stephen D. Miller ◽  
Harold P. Alley
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Seed Protein ◽  
Kernel Weight ◽  
Growth Stages ◽  
Seed Protein Content ◽  
Volume Weight ◽  
Herbicide Treatments ◽  
Wheat Kernels ◽  
Different Growth Stages

Several labeled herbicide treatments reduced winter wheat height and grain yield when applied at different growth stages in 1984 and 1985. Yield reductions were related to reduced spike production. Wheat height and yield generally were greatest when herbicides were applied at Zadoks' Stage 29 and lowest at Stage 13. Herbicide treatments did not affect wheat kernels per spike, kernel weight, volume weight, or germination either year. However, most herbicide treatments either increased or decreased seed protein content, depending on the year.

Control of Weeds in Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Untilled Stubble with Herbicides

Weed Science ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Ghadiri ◽  
G. A. Wicks ◽  
C. R. Fenster ◽  
O. C. Burnside
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Weed Control ◽  
Yield Reduction ◽  
Wheat Protein ◽  
Annual Grass ◽  
Volume Weight ◽  
Herbicide Treatments ◽  
Wheat Stubble ◽  
Bloom Date

Visible wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) injury, delay in bloom date, and yield reduction were observed following herbicide treatments in growing wheat. Protein content and volume weight of winter wheat were not significantly affected by any herbicide treatment. Some treatments reduced annual grass and broadleaf population by 90% or more 6 weeks after spraying and maintained weed control 8 weeks in untilled winter wheat stubble. Effective herbicide treatments that caused the least winter wheat injury in 1977 and 1978 included metribuzin [4-amino-6-tert-butyl-3-(methylthio)-as-triazin-5(4H)-one] + alachlor [2-chloro-2′,6′-diethyl-N-(methoxymethyl)acetanilide] at 0.3 + 2.8 kg/ha, metribuzin + oryzalin (3,5-dinitro-N4,N4-dipropylsufanilamide) at 0.3 + 1.8 kg/ha, metribuzin + pendimethalin [N-(1-ethylpropyl)-3,4-dimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzenamine] at 0.3 + 2.2 kg/ha, metribuzin + SN-533 [N-ethyl-N-propyl-3-(propylsulfonyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazole-1-carboxamide] at 0.3 + 0.8 kg/ha, and R-40244 [1-m-trifluoromethylphenyl)-3-chloro-4-chloromethyl-2-pyrrolidone] at 1.1 kg/ha. Herbicide treatments that showed the most potential to control annual grass and broadleaf weeds selectively in tillered winter wheat and stubble in 1978 include metribuzin + metolachlor [2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamide] at 0.3 + 2 kg/ha, metribuzin + oryzalin at 0.3 + 1.4 kg/ha, and metribuzin + pendimethalin at 0.3 + 2 kg/ha.

Cultural Practices in Wheat (Triticum aestivum), on Weeds in Subsequent Fallow and Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)

Weed Science ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 434-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gail A. Wicks ◽  
Duane A. Martin ◽  
Garold W. Mahnken
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Grain Yield ◽  
Cultural Practices ◽  
Growth Stages ◽  
Annual Grass ◽  
Wheat Grain ◽  
Grain Yields ◽  
Herbicide Treatments ◽  
Urea Ammonium Nitrate ◽  
Different Growth Stages

The effect of herbicide and urea-ammonium nitrate (UAN) combinations on winter wheat injury in absence of noncompetitive weeds and weed control during a winter wheat-fallow and a winter wheat-sorghum-fallow rotation were investigated. Winter wheat was planted at different dates to obtain different growth stages for spraying in the spring. Winter wheat produced greater grain yields when planted Sept. 15 or Sept. 25, 1987, 1988, and 1989 vs. Sept. 1 at North Platte, NE, while at Sidney, NE, grain yield was higher in wheat planted on Sept. 10 or Sept. 20, 1988, compared to Aug. 26. Spring-applied UAN increased grain yield on wheat planted Sept. 10 compared to no UAN in 1988–89 at Sidney, but not in 1987–88, while at North Platte, grain yields were not affected by UAN. At Sidney 2,4-D ester at 0.6 kg ae ha−1, 2,4-D amine plus dicamba at 0.3 plus 0.1 kg ae ha−1, metsulfuron at 0.007 kg ai ha−1plus 0.25% nonionic surfactant (NIS), and metsulfuron plus 2,4-D ester at 0.007 plus 0.3 kg ha−1plus NIS decreased grain yields compared to one handweeding. At North Platte in 1988–89, when UAN was applied with 2,4-D ester, 2,4-D amine plus dicamba, or metsulfuron plus 2,4-D plus NIS grain yields were reduced compared to the handweeded check on wheat planted Sept. 15. Occasionally, metsulfuron plus 2,4-D ester plus NIS treated wheat yielded less grain than metsulfuron plus NIS treated wheat. One or more herbicide treatments reduced wheat grain yields 4 of 15 application dates. Crop injury was related to growth stage and health of winter wheat when treatments were applied. Wheat under stress was more susceptible to herbicide damage than healthy wheat. Metsulfuron and metsulfuron plus 2,4-D controlled kochia, tumble thistle, and redroot pigweed better after wheat harvest than 2,4-D or 2,4-D plus dicamba at North Platte, but allowed summer annual grass weeds to grow. Yields of grain sorghum planted after a 10-mo fallow period were higher following winter wheat treated with three of four herbicides than the handweeded treatment.

Barley (Hordeum vulgare) Response to Herbicides Applied at Three Growth Stages

1988 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duane A. Martin ◽  
Stephen D. Miller ◽  
Harold P. Alley
Keyword(s):  
Acetic Acid ◽  
Hordeum Vulgare ◽  
Seed Protein ◽  
Spring Barley ◽  
Kernel Weight ◽  
Growth Stages ◽  
Seed Protein Content ◽  
Boot Stage ◽  
Dichlorophenoxy Acetic Acid ◽  
Methoxybenzoic Acid

The response of irrigated spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L. ‘Steptoe’) to broadleaf herbicides applied at three growth stages was studied at Torrington, WY, in 1984 and 1985. Dicamba (3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acid), dicamba plus 2,4-D [(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid], and dicamba plus MCPA [(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)acetic acid] visibly injured barley when applied at all growth stages. These same treatments reduced barley height when applied at the 2- to 4-leaf and fully tillered stages. Yield differences among treatments were not significant. However, kernels/spike and kernel weight were reduced by dicamba or dicamba plus MCPA when applied at the fully tillered or boot stages, and test weight was reduced when dicamba was applied at all growth stages. Seed protein content did not differ in 1984. However, several herbicide treatments increased seed protein in 1985, especially when applied at the boot stage. Proline or lysine content did not differ among treatments.

scholarly journals   Effects of high concentrations of soil arsenic on the growth of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L) and rape (Brassica napus)

2012 ◽  
Vol 58 (No. 1) ◽  
pp. 22-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Q. Liu ◽  
C. Zheng ◽  
C.X. Hu ◽  
Q. Tan ◽  
X.C. Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Food Production ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L ◽  
Growth Stages ◽  
Wheat Shoot ◽  
Soil Arsenic ◽  
High Concentrations ◽  
As Stress ◽  
Different Growth Stages

Soil arsenic (As) levels are particularly high in parts of China, where wheat and rape are widely grown. Understanding the effects of As concentration on the growth of these two major crops is of significance for food production and security in China. A pot experiment was carried out to study the uptake of As and phosphorus (P), and the soil As bioavailability at different growth stages of wheat and rape. The results indicated that winter wheat was much more sensitive to As stress than rape. Wheat yields were elevated at low rates of As addition (< 60 mg/kg) but reduced at high rates of As concentrations (80–100 mg/kg); while the growth of rape hadn’t showed significant responses to As addition. Phosphorus concentrations in wheat at jointing and ear sprouting stages increased with increasing soil As concentrations, and these increases were assumed to contribute a lot to enhanced growth of wheat at low As treatments. Arsenic did not significantly affect P concentrations in rape either. The highest As concentrations in wheat shoot and rape leaf were 8.31 and 3.63 mg/kg, respectively. Arsenic concentrations in wheat and rape grains did not exceed the maximum permissible limit for food stuffs of 1.0 mg/kg. When soil As concentration was less than 60 mg/kg, both wheat and rape could grow satisfactorily without adverse effects; when soil As concentration was 80–100 mg/kg, rape was more suitable to be planted than wheat.    

Evaluation of Registered Herbicides for Cheat (Bromus secalinus) Control in Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum)

1997 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-34
Author(s):  
Jeffrey A. Koscelny ◽  
Thomas F. Peeper
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Field Experiments ◽  
Wheat Yield ◽  
Wheat Grain ◽  
Grain Yields ◽  
Bromus Secalinus ◽  
Herbicide Treatments ◽  
Early Fall

Seven field experiments were conducted in Oklahoma to compare efficacy and wheat response to currently registered cheat suppression or control herbicide treatments. Chlorsulfuron + metsulfuron premix (5:1 w/w) at 26 g ai/ha applied PRE controlled cheat 20 to 61%, increased wheat grain yields at two of seven locations, and decreased dockage due to cheat at five of seven locations. Chlorsulfuron + metsulfuron at 21 g/ha tank-mixed with metribuzin at 210 g/ha, applied early fall POST, controlled cheat 36 to 98% and increased wheat yield at four of seven locations. Metribuzin applied POST in the fall at 420 g/ha controlled cheat 56 to 98% and increased wheat yields at five of seven locations. Both POST treatments decreased dockage at all locations.

Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Growth Stage Effect on Paraquat Bioactivity

1991 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 439-441
Author(s):  
Randy L. Anderson ◽  
David C. Nielsen
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Growth Stage ◽  
Time Of Day ◽  
Growth Stages ◽  
Leaf Stage ◽  
Time Of Application ◽  
Biomass Reduction

Paraquat was applied at 0.28 and 0.56 kg ai ha-1to winter wheat at five growth stages at 0800, 1300, and 1600 hr to determine whether growth stage or time of application influenced winter wheat response to paraquat. Paraquat bioactivity was affected by growth stage. Biomass reduction by paraquat was 84% when winter wheat was in the 1 to 3 leaf stage, but only 68% when application was delayed until tillering. Paraquat bioactivity continued to decrease at later growth stages. The time of day when paraquat was applied did not affect its bioactivity on winter wheat.

scholarly journals The Modification of Difference Vegetation Index (DVI) in middle and late growing period of winter wheat and its application in soil moisture inversion

2019 ◽  
Vol 131 ◽  
pp. 01098
Author(s):  
Zhang Hong-wei ◽  
Huai-liang Chen ◽  
Fei-na Zha
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Vegetation Index ◽  
Vegetation Coverage ◽  
Growth Stages ◽  
Wheat Growth ◽  
Inversion Result ◽  
Growing Period ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Different Growth Stages

In the middle and late growing period of winter wheat, soil moisture is easily affected by saturation when using MODIS data to retrieve soil moisture. In this paper, in order to reduce the effect of the saturation caused by increasing vegetation coverage in middle and late stage of winter wheat, the Difference Vegetation Index (DVI) model was modified with different coefficients in different growth stages of winter wheat based on MODIS spectral data and LAI characteristics of variation. LAI was divided into three stages, LAI ≤ 1 < LAI ≤, 3 < LAI, and the adjusting coefficient of α=1, α=3, α=5, were taken to modifying the Difference Vegetation Index(DVI). The results show that the Modified Difference Vegetation Index (MDVIα) can effectively reduce the interference of saturation, and the inversion result of soil moisture in the middle and late period of winter wheat growth is obviously superior to the uncorrected inversion model of DVI.

scholarly journals Stability of quality traits in winter wheat cultivars

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (No. 6) ◽  
pp. 403-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Mikulíková ◽  
Š. Masár ◽  
V. Horváthová ◽  
J. Kraic
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Starch Content ◽  
Kernel Weight ◽  
Quality Traits ◽  
Wheat Cultivars ◽  
Vegetative Period ◽  
Volume Weight ◽  
Winter Wheat Cultivars ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Better Than

We investigated the stability of 15 traits of quality in 45 winter wheat cultivars grown in two seasons in the Borovce locality of Slovakia. The gluten swelling, SDS test, starch content, α-amylase (α-AMS) activity, and volume weight were affected simultaneously by the cultivar, growing year, and the country of origin. Other traits were affected by only one or two of these factors. The English cultivars, when compared to the Slovak cultivars, demonstrated lower gluten swelling and volume weight, a higher α-AMS activity, and a longer vegetative period. We observed a higher α-AMS activity in the Czech, a lower starch content in the Austrian, and a longer vegetative period in the German cultivars. In the Hungarian cultivars, we detected a lower starch and a reduced amylose contents. The most stable quality traits in both growing years were identified in the Ilona (gluten swelling), Spartakus (SDS test), Cubus (falling number), Komfort (starch), GK Margit (amylose), GK Verecke (α-AMS), Saturnus (volume weight), and Vanda (thousand-kernel weight) cultivars. Other traits, such as protein, wet gluten, sedimentation index, grain hardness, grain weight per spike, grain yield, and duration of the vegetative period, were strongly affected by the environment (growing year). The foreign cultivars such as the Komfort (AUT), Saturnus (AUT), GK Rába (HUN), GK Csongrád (HUN), Silvius (AUT), GK Bagoly (HUN), and GK Forrás (HUN) were superior for growing in Slovakia. Each of them had more quality traits that were stable, comparable, and ultimately better than the control Slovak cultivars.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document