scholarly journals Westgate Shootings: An Emergency Department Approach to a Mass-casualty Incident

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 538-541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin W. Wachira ◽  
Ramadhani O. Abdalla ◽  
Lee A. Wallis
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Emergency Preparedness ◽  
Mass Casualty Incident ◽  
Mass Casualty ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Shopping Mall ◽  
Major Incident ◽  
Local Health ◽  
Publication Type ◽  
Communication Assessment

AbstractAt approximately 12:30 pm on Saturday September 21, 2013, armed assailants attacked the upscale Westgate shopping mall in the Westlands area of Nairobi, Kenya. Using the seven key Major Incident Medical Management and Support (MIMMS) principles, command, safety, communication, assessment, triage, treatment, and transport, the Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi (AKUH,N) emergency department (ED) successfully coordinated the reception and care of all the casualties brought to the hospital.This report describes the AKUH,N ED response to the first civilian mass-casualty shooting incident in Kenya, with the hope of informing the development and implementation of mass-casualty emergency preparedness plans by other EDs and hospitals in Kenya, appropriate for the local health care system.WachiraBW, AbdallaRO, WallisLA. Westgate shootings: an emergency department approach to a mass-casualty incident. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29(5):1-4.

scholarly journals A Surprise Mass Casualty Incident Simulation: Does It Improve Knowledge or Is It Just a Bit of Fun?

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (s1) ◽  
pp. s18-s19
Author(s):  
Brad Mitchell ◽  
Karen Hammad ◽  
Dana Aldwin
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Mass Casualty Incident ◽  
Mass Casualty ◽  
Major Incident ◽  
Likert Scales ◽  
The Past ◽  
Emergency Department Nurses ◽  
Major Incidents ◽  
Simulation Scenario

Introduction:We opened a national conference in Australia with a surprise mass casualty simulation scenario of a van versus multiple persons outside the conference venue. The purpose of this exercise was to increase awareness of, and preparation for, mass casualty incident (MCI) events for the conference delegates who were paramedics, emergency department nurses, and doctors.Aim:The aim of the research is to understand whether a surprise MCI simulation is a useful way to increase knowledge and motivate preparedness.Methods:A survey hosted on Qualtrics was circulated to delegates via email. The survey was designed by the research team and had 38 questions about demographics and respondents’ experience with MCIs, as well as their perceptions of the simulation exercise. The questions were a mixture of 5-point Likert scales, multiple choice, and short answers.Results:The majority of respondents were clinicians (n = 66, 76%) and those who worked in emergency departments or the prehospital setting (n = 75, 86%). While the majority had not responded to an MCI in the past 5 years (n = 67, 77%), more than half (n = 50, 57%) had undertaken MCI training during this time. Overall, a vast majority of respondents found the simulation to be a worthwhile exercise that increased knowledge and preparedness. An overwhelming majority also reported that the simulation was relevant to practice, of high quality, and a useful way to teach about major incidents.Discussion:Our surprise major incident simulation was a fun and effective way to raise awareness and increase knowledge in prehospital and emergency department clinicians about MCI response. This approach to simulation can be easily replicated at relatively low cost and is, therefore, a useful solution to training a group of multidisciplinary health professionals outside of the workplace.

The effect of training and experience on mass casualty incident triage performance: Evidence from emergency personnel in a high complexity university hospital

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan P. Vargas, MD, MSc ◽  
Ives Hubloue, MD, PhD ◽  
Jazmín J. Pinzón, MD ◽  
Alejandra Caycedo Duque, MD
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Mass Casualty Incident ◽  
Mass Casualty ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Emergency Department Staff ◽  
Department Staff ◽  
Before And After

Mass casualty incident (MCI) can occur at any time and place and health care institutions must be prepared to deal with these incidents. Emergency department staff rarely learn how to triage MCI patients during their medical or nurse degrees, or through on-the-job training. This study aims to evaluate the effect of training and experience on the MCI triage performance of emergency personnel.Methodology: This was a cross-sectional prospective study that analyzed the performance of 94 emergency department staff on the triage classifications of 50 trauma patients, before and after a short training in MCI triage, while taking into account their academic background and work experience.Results: The participants were assigned initially to one of two groups: low experience if they had less than 5 years of practice, and high experience if they had more than 5 years of practice. In the low experience group, the initial accuracy was 45.76 percent, over triage 45.84 percent, and subtriage 8.38 percent. In the high experience group, the initial accuracy was 53.80 percent, over triage 37.66 percent, and sub triage 8.57 percent.Postintervention Results: In the low experience group, the post intervention accuracy was 63.57 percent, over triage 21.15 percent, and subtriage 15.30 percentage. In the high experience group, the post-intervention accuracy was 67.66 percentage, over triage 15.19 percentage, and subtriage 17.14 percentage.  Conclusion: Upon completion of this study, it can be concluded that MCI triage training significantly improved the performance of all those involved in the workshop and that experience plays an important role in MCI triage performance.

Challenges of Major Incident Management When Excess Resources are Allocated: Experiences from a Mass Casualty Incident after Roof Collapse of a Military Command Center

2004 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 179-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Romundstad ◽  
Knut Ole Sundnes ◽  
Johan Pillgram-Larsen ◽  
Geir K. Røste ◽  
Mads Gilbert
Keyword(s):  
Mass Casualty Incident ◽  
Mass Casualty ◽  
Major Incident ◽  
Incident Management ◽  
Field Hospital ◽  
Rescue Work ◽  
Incident Command ◽  
Set Up ◽  
Minor Injuries ◽  
Command Center

AbstractDuring a military exercise in northern Norway in March 2000, the snowladen roof of a command center collapsed with 76 persons inside. Twentyfive persons were entrapped and/or buried under snow masses. There were three deaths. Seven patients had serious injuries, three had moderate injuries, and 16 had minor injuries.A military Convalescence Camp that had been set up in a Sports Hall 125 meters from the scene was reorganized as a causality clearing station. Officers from the Convalescence Camp initially organized search and rescue. In all, 417 persons took part in the rescue work with 36 ambulances, 17 helicopters, three ambulance airplanes and one transport plane available. Two ambulances, five helicopters and one transport aircraft were used. Four patients were evacuated to a civilian hospital and six to a field hospital.The stretcher and treatment teams initially could have been more effectively organized. As resources were ample, this was a mass casualty, not a disaster. Firm incident command prevented the influx of excess resources.

Medical record keeping during a mass casualty incident: Development of a disaster medical record

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-15
Author(s):  
Salomon Willem Koning, MD ◽  
Mark J. J. Haverkort, MD, PhD ◽  
Luke P. H. Leenen, MD, PhD, FACS
Keyword(s):  
Medical Record ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Mass Casualty Incident ◽  
Mass Casualty ◽  
Major Incident ◽  
Fisher Exact Test ◽  
Daily Routine ◽  
Primary Survey ◽  
Record Keeping ◽  
Survey Form

Objective: Improve documentation during a mass casualty incident (MCI).Design: This is a retrospective chart review.Setting: This chart review was done in the Major Incident Hospital (MIH). The MIH is a highly prepared back-up hospital in the center of the Netherland that can be deployed in case of a major incident.Patients, participants: Until recently, the MIH used an extensive paper medical record: the hospital in special circumstances medical record (HSCMR). A concise primary survey form was developed and attached to the HSCMR, forming the pilot disaster medical record (pDMR). In this retrospective chart review, primary survey data documented in the HSCMR (during a MCI) were compared to the pDMR (during a drill exercise). Three triage categories were used: T1, immediate; T2, urgent; and T3, delayed.Main outcome: The MIH hypothesized that a dedicated, concise, and practical primary survey form could improve quantitative patient documentation during an MCI. Significant differences were tested with the chi square and Fisher exact test (p 0.05).Results: The pDMR was used significantly more often 61 percent vs 89 percent (p = 0.001), especially in T1 and T2 patients. Quantitative documentation in the pDMR improved significantly on airway, breathing, breathing frequency, saturation, circulation, heart rate, blood pressure, Glasgow Coma Score, exposure, and medication given but not in cervical spine and temperature. Conclusion: Significantly more primary survey forms were used and more data were documented using the pDMR, especially in the most critical patients. An MCI medical record should be simple and concise and should not deviate from daily routine.

Level of Disaster Preparedness in Patients Visiting the Emergency Department: Results of the Civilian Assessment of Readiness for Disaster (CARD) Survey

2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas A. True ◽  
Juliana D. Adedoyin ◽  
Frances S. Shofer ◽  
Eddie K. Hasty ◽  
Jane H. Brice
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Vulnerable Populations ◽  
Disaster Preparedness ◽  
Single Parents ◽  
Public Hospitals ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Publication Type ◽  
Cross Sectional

AbstractBackgroundPatients seeking care in public hospitals are often resource-limited populations who have in past disasters become the most vulnerable. The objective of this study was to determine the personal disaster preparedness of emergency department (ED) patients and to identify predictors of low levels of preparedness. It was hypothesized that vulnerable populations would be better prepared for disasters.MethodsA prospective cross-sectional survey was conducted over a one-year period of patients seeking care in a public university hospital ED (census 65,000). Exclusion criteria were mentally impaired, institutionalized, or non-English speaking subjects. Subjects completed an anonymous survey detailing the 15 personal preparedness items from the Federal Emergency Management Agency's disaster preparedness checklist as well as demographic characteristics. Summary statistics were used to describe general preparedness. Chi-square tests were used to compare preparedness by demographics.ResultsDuring the study period, 857/1000 subjects completed the survey. Participants were predominantly male (57%), Caucasian (65%), middle-aged (mean 45 years), and high school graduates (83%). Seventeen percent (n = 146) reported having special needs and 8% were single parents. Most participants were not prepared: 451 (53%) had >75% of checklist items, 393 (46%) had food and water for 3 days, and 318 (37%) had food, water, and >75% of items. Level of preparedness was associated with age and parenting. Those aged 44 and older were more likely to be prepared for a disaster compared to younger respondents. (43.3% vs 31.1%, P = .0002). Similarly, single parents were more likely to be prepared than dual parenting households (47.1 vs 32.9%, P = .03).ConclusionsThis study and others have found that only the minority of any group is actually prepared for disaster. Future research should focus on ways to implement disaster preparedness education, specifically targeting vulnerable populations, then measuring the effects of educational programs to demonstrate that preparedness has increased as a result.TrueNA, AdedoyinJD, ShoferFS, HastyEK, BriceJH. Level of disaster preparedness in patients visiting the emergency department: results of the Civilian Assessment of Readiness for Disaster (CARD) survey. Prehosp Disaster Med.2013;28(2):1-5.

scholarly journals An armed assailant in our hospital: Are we prepared?

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (9) ◽  
pp. 712-716
Author(s):  
Sohil Pothiawala ◽  
Rabind Charles ◽  
Wai Kein Chow ◽  
Kheng Wee Ang ◽  
Karen Hsien Ling Tan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Preparedness ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Mass Casualty Incident ◽  
Mass Casualty ◽  
Incident Response ◽  
Potential Threat ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
Response Strategies ◽  
Hospital Preparedness ◽  
Response Plan

ABSTRACT While armed assailant attacks are rare in the hospital setting, they pose a potential risk to healthcare staff, patients, visitors and the infrastructure. Singapore hospitals have well-developed disaster plans to respond to a mass casualty incident occurring outside the hospital. However, lack of an armed assailant incident response plan can significantly reduce the hospital’s ability to appropriately respond to such an incident. The authors describe various strategies that can be adopted in the development of an armed assailant incident response plan. Regular staff training will increase staff resilience and capability to respond to a potential threat in the future. The aim of this article is to highlight the need for the emergency preparedness units of all hospitals to work together with various stakeholders to develop an armed assailant incident response plan. This will be of great benefit for keeping healthcare facilities safe, both for staff as well as for the community. Keywords: Armed assailant, hospital, preparedness, response, strategies

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document