The Low Voltage Scanning Electron Microscope

1997 ◽  
Vol 3 (S2) ◽  
pp. 1213-1214
Author(s):  
David C Joy

A majority of the scanning electron microscopes (SEMs) now in use are probably employed as low voltage SEMs (LVSEMs), that is to say they are operated to produce beams with energies below 5keV. This trend away from the more conventional mode of operation at 20 or 30keV has gathered momentum over the past decade and has been driven by both theoretical and practical considera-tions.Firstly, the distance travelled by an electron falls rapidly (in fact as about E1.6 ) as the incident ener-gy E is reduced. Images generated by low energy electron beams therefore contain enhanced surface information compared to those images recorded at higher energies. Since surfaces are of great inter-est in both the life sciences and in materials science this has been a persuasive factor. Secondly, both the secondary and the backscattered electrons now come from essentially the same interaction volume, rather than from volumes which are widely different in size and shape.

Author(s):  
Klaus-Ruediger Peters

A new generation of high performance field emission scanning electron microscopes (FSEM) is now commercially available (JEOL 890, Hitachi S 900, ISI OS 130-F) characterized by an "in lens" position of the specimen where probe diameters are reduced and signal collection improved. Additionally, low voltage operation is extended to 1 kV. Compared to the first generation of FSEM (JE0L JSM 30, Hitachi S 800), which utilized a specimen position below the final lens, specimen size had to be reduced but useful magnification could be impressively increased in both low (1-4 kV) and high (5-40 kV) voltage operation, i.e. from 50,000 to 200,000 and 250,000 to 1,000,000 x respectively.At high accelerating voltage and magnification, contrasts on biological specimens are well characterized1 and are produced by the entering probe electrons in the outmost surface layer within -vl nm depth. Backscattered electrons produce only a background signal. Under these conditions (FIG. 1) image quality is similar to conventional TEM (FIG. 2) and only limited at magnifications >1,000,000 x by probe size (0.5 nm) or non-localization effects (%0.5 nm).


2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (S2) ◽  
pp. 776-777
Author(s):  
John F. Mansfield

The environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM™) and variable pressure electron microscope (VPSEM) have become accepted tools in the contemporary electron microscopy facility. Their flexibility and their ability to image almost any sample with little, and often no, specimen preparation has proved so attractive that each manufacturer of scanning electron microscopes now markets a low vacuum model.The University of Michigan Electron Microbeam Analysis Laboratory (EMAL) operates two variable pressure instruments, an ElectroScan E3 ESEM and a Hitachi S3200N VPSEM. The E3 ESEM was acquired in the early 1990s with funding from the Amoco Foundation and it has been used to examine an extremely wide variety of different materials. Since EMAL serves the entire university community, and offers support to neighboring institutions and local industry, the types of materials examined span a wide range. There are users from Materials Science & Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Nuclear Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Physics, Chemistry, Geology, Biology, Biophysics, Pharmacy and Pharmacology.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document