scholarly journals Tabling, Rational Terms, and Coinduction Finally Together!

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 429-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
THEOFRASTOS MANTADELIS ◽  
RICARDO ROCHA ◽  
PAULO MOURA
Keyword(s):  
Logic Programming ◽  
Internal Representation ◽  
Canonical Representation ◽  
Constraint Handling ◽  
Cyclic Behavior ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Finite Representation ◽  
Computational Performance ◽  
Definite Clause Grammars ◽  
Rational Term

AbstractTabling is a commonly used technique in logic programming for avoiding cyclic behavior of logic programs and enabling more declarative program definitions. Furthermore, tabling often improves computational performance. Rational term are terms with one or more infinite sub-terms but with a finite representation. Rational terms can be generated in Prolog by omitting the occurs check when unifying two terms. Applications of rational terms include definite clause grammars, constraint handling systems, and coinduction. In this paper, we report our extension of YAP's Prolog tabling mechanism to support rational terms. We describe the internal representation of rational terms within the table space and prove its correctness. We then use this extension to implement a tabling based approach to coinduction. We compare our approach with current coinductive transformations and describe the implementation. In addition, we present an algorithm that ensures a canonical representation for rational terms.

Practical Tools for Reasoning About Linear Constraints

1991 ◽  
Vol 15 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 357-379
Author(s):  
Tien Huynh ◽  
Leo Joskowicz ◽  
Catherine Lassez ◽  
Jean-Louis Lassez
Keyword(s):  
Logic Programming ◽  
Intelligent Systems ◽  
Optimization Problem ◽  
Spatial Reasoning ◽  
Quantifier Elimination ◽  
Canonical Representation ◽  
Linear Constraints ◽  
Practical Applications ◽  
Variable Elimination ◽  
Fourier Algorithm

We address the problem of building intelligent systems to reason about linear arithmetic constraints. We develop, along the lines of Logic Programming, a unifying framework based on the concept of Parametric Queries and a quasi-dual generalization of the classical Linear Programming optimization problem. Variable (quantifier) elimination is the key underlying operation which provides an oracle to answer all queries and plays a role similar to Resolution in Logic Programming. We discuss three methods for variable elimination, compare their feasibility, and establish their applicability. We then address practical issues of solvability and canonical representation, as well as dynamical updates and feedback. In particular, we show how the quasi-dual formulation can be used to achieve the discriminating characteristics of the classical Fourier algorithm regarding solvability, detection of implicit equalities and, in case of unsolvability, the detection of minimal unsolvable subsets. We illustrate the relevance of our approach with examples from the domain of spatial reasoning and demonstrate its viability with empirical results from two practical applications: computation of canonical forms and convex hull construction.

CHR grammars

2005 ◽  
Vol 5 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 467-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
HENNING CHRISTIANSEN
Keyword(s):  
Logic Programming ◽  
Integrity Constraints ◽  
Bottom Up ◽  
Context Sensitive ◽  
Language Analysis ◽  
Definite Clause Grammars ◽  
Grammar Rules ◽  
High Flexibility ◽  
Definite Clause ◽  
Specification And Implementation

A grammar formalism based upon CHR is proposed analogously to the way Definite Clause Grammars are defined and implemented on top of Prolog. These grammars execute as robust bottom-up parsers with an inherent treatment of ambiguity and a high flexibility to model various linguistic phenomena. The formalism extends previous logic programming based grammars with a form of context-sensitive rules and the possibility to include extra-grammatical hypotheses in both head and body of grammar rules. Among the applications are straightforward implementations of Assumption Grammars and abduction under integrity constraints for language analysis. CHR grammars appear as a powerful tool for specification and implementation of language processors and may be proposed as a new standard for bottom-up grammars in logic programming.

A Modal Semantics of Negation in Logic Programming

1992 ◽  
Vol 16 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 231-262
Author(s):  
Philippe Balbiani
Keyword(s):  
Modal Logic ◽  
Logic Programming ◽  
Modal Logics ◽  
Kripke Models ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Modal Semantics ◽  
Soundness And Completeness ◽  
Modal Completion ◽  
Well Foundedness

The beauty of modal logics and their interest lie in their ability to represent such different intensional concepts as knowledge, time, obligation, provability in arithmetic, … according to the properties satisfied by the accessibility relations of their Kripke models (transitivity, reflexivity, symmetry, well-foundedness, …). The purpose of this paper is to study the ability of modal logics to represent the concepts of provability and unprovability in logic programming. The use of modal logic to study the semantics of logic programming with negation is defended with the help of a modal completion formula. This formula is a modal translation of Clack’s formula. It gives soundness and completeness proofs for the negation as failure rule. It offers a formal characterization of unprovability in logic programs. It characterizes as well its stratified semantics.

scholarly journals Learning Large Logic Programs By Going Beyond Entailment

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Cropper ◽  
Sebastijan Dumančic
Keyword(s):  
Logic Programming ◽  
Loss Function ◽  
Inductive Logic Programming ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Inductive Logic ◽  
Program Synthesis ◽  
Loss Functions ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Binary Decision ◽  
Best First Search

A major challenge in inductive logic programming (ILP) is learning large programs. We argue that a key limitation of existing systems is that they use entailment to guide the hypothesis search. This approach is limited because entailment is a binary decision: a hypothesis either entails an example or does not, and there is no intermediate position. To address this limitation, we go beyond entailment and use 'example-dependent' loss functions to guide the search, where a hypothesis can partially cover an example. We implement our idea in Brute, a new ILP system which uses best-first search, guided by an example-dependent loss function, to incrementally build programs. Our experiments on three diverse program synthesis domains (robot planning, string transformations, and ASCII art), show that Brute can substantially outperform existing ILP systems, both in terms of predictive accuracies and learning times, and can learn programs 20 times larger than state-of-the-art systems.

scholarly journals Program Verification using Constraint Handling Rules and Array Constraint Generalizations

10.29007/dkxs ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuele De Angelis ◽  
Fabio Fioravanti ◽  
Alberto Pettorossi ◽  
Maurizio Proietti
Keyword(s):  
Data Structures ◽  
Program Verification ◽  
Linear Constraints ◽  
Constraint Handling ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Replacement Strategy ◽  
Partial Correctness ◽  
Transformation Rules ◽  
Constraint Logic Programs ◽  
Additional Constraints

The transformation of constraint logic programs (CLP programs)has been shown to be an effective methodologyfor verifying properties of imperative programs.By following this methodology, we encode the negationof a partial correctness property of an imperativeprogram prog as a predicate incorrect defined by a CLP program P, and we show thatprog is correct by transforming P intothe empty program through the applicationof semantics preserving transformation rules.Some of these rules perform replacements of constraintsthat encode properties of the data structures manipulatedby the program prog.In this paper we show that Constraint Handling Rules (CHR)are a suitable formalism for representing and applyingconstraint replacements during the transformation of CLP programs.In particular, we consider programs that manipulate integerarrays and we present a CHR encoding of a constraint replacementstrategy based on the theory of arrays.We also propose a novel generalization strategy forconstraints on integer arrays that combinesthe CHR constraint replacement strategywith various generalization operator for linear constraints,such as widening and convex hull.Generalization is controlled by additional constraintsthat relate the variable identifiers in the imperativeprogram and the CLP representation of their values.The method presented in this paper has been implemented andwe have demonstrated itseffectiveness on a set ofbenchmark programs taken from the literature.

scholarly journals onlineSPARC: A Programming Environment for Answer Set Programming

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 262-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
ELIAS MARCOPOULOS ◽  
YUANLIN ZHANG
Keyword(s):  
High School Students ◽  
Logic Programming ◽  
Answer Set Programming ◽  
Programming Environment ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
School Students ◽  
Major Barrier ◽  
Simple Interface ◽  
Answer Sets ◽  
Answer Set

AbstractRecent progress in logic programming (e.g. the development of the answer set programming (ASP) paradigm) has made it possible to teach it to general undergraduate and even middle/high school students. Given the limited exposure of these students to computer science, the complexity of downloading, installing, and using tools for writing logic programs could be a major barrier for logic programming to reach a much wider audience. We developed onlineSPARC, an online ASP environment with a self-contained file system and a simple interface. It allows users to type/edit logic programs and perform several tasks over programs, including asking a query to a program, getting the answer sets of a program, and producing a drawing/animation based on the answer sets of a program.

scholarly journals Induction of Non-Monotonic Logic Programs to Explain Boosted Tree Models Using LIME

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. 3052-3059 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farhad Shakerin ◽  
Gopal Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Logic Programming ◽  
Inductive Logic Programming ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Inductive Logic ◽  
Nonmonotonic Logic ◽  
Global Behavior ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Tree Models ◽  
Boosted Tree ◽  
Classification Evaluation

We present a heuristic based algorithm to induce nonmonotonic logic programs that will explain the behavior of XGBoost trained classifiers. We use the technique based on the LIME approach to locally select the most important features contributing to the classification decision. Then, in order to explain the model’s global behavior, we propose the LIME-FOLD algorithm —a heuristic-based inductive logic programming (ILP) algorithm capable of learning nonmonotonic logic programs—that we apply to a transformed dataset produced by LIME. Our proposed approach is agnostic to the choice of the ILP algorithm. Our experiments with UCI standard benchmarks suggest a significant improvement in terms of classification evaluation metrics. Meanwhile, the number of induced rules dramatically decreases compared to ALEPH, a state-of-the-art ILP system.

scholarly journals Products of weighted logic programs

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 263-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
SHAY B. COHEN ◽  
ROBERT J. SIMMONS ◽  
NOAH A. SMITH
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Dynamic Programming ◽  
Logic Programming ◽  
Scoring Function ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Information Theoretic ◽  
Optimal Score ◽  
Leibler Divergence ◽  
Programming Algorithms ◽  
Output Space

AbstractWeighted logic programming, a generalization of bottom-up logic programming, is a well-suited framework for specifying dynamic programming algorithms. In this setting, proofs correspond to the algorithm's output space, such as a path through a graph or a grammatical derivation, and are given a real-valued score (often interpreted as a probability) that depends on the real weights of the base axioms used in the proof. The desired output is a function over all possible proofs, such as a sum of scores or an optimal score. We describe the product transformation, which can merge two weighted logic programs into a new one. The resulting program optimizes a product of proof scores from the original programs, constituting a scoring function known in machine learning as a “product of experts.” Through the addition of intuitive constraining side conditions, we show that several important dynamic programming algorithms can be derived by applying product to weighted logic programs corresponding to simpler weighted logic programs. In addition, we show how the computation of Kullback–Leibler divergence, an information-theoretic measure, can be interpreted using product.

scholarly journals Interdefinability of defeasible logic and logic programming under the well-founded semantics

2011 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
FREDERICK MAIER
Keyword(s):  
Logic Programming ◽  
Opposite Direction ◽  
Stable Model ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Defeasible Logic ◽  
Normal Logic

AbstractWe provide a method of translating theories of Nute's defeasible logic into logic programs, and a corresponding translation in the opposite direction. Under certain natural restrictions, the conclusions of defeasible theories under the ambiguity propagating defeasible logic ADL correspond to those of the well-founded semantics for normal logic programs, and so it turns out that the two formalisms are closely related. Using the same translation of logic programs into defeasible theories, the semantics for the ambiguity blocking defeasible logic NDL can be seen as indirectly providing an ambiguity blocking semantics for logic programs. We also provide antimonotone operators for both ADL and NDL, each based on the Gelfond–Lifschitz (GL) operator for logic programs. For defeasible theories without defeaters or priorities on rules, the operator for ADL corresponds to the GL operator and so can be seen as partially capturing the consequences according to ADL. Similarly, the operator for NDL captures the consequences according to NDL, though in this case no restrictions on theories apply. Both operators can be used to define stable model semantics for defeasible theories.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document