Validation of the Mindful Self-Care Scale (MSCS) and development of the Brief-MSCS among hospice and healthcare professionals: a confirmatory factor analysis approach to validation

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 628-636
Author(s):  
Jason T. Hotchkiss ◽  
Catherine P. Cook-Cottone
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analysis ◽  
Root Mean Square Error ◽  
Mean Square Error ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Self Care ◽  
Mean Square ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Fit Index

AbstractObjectiveIn the emotionally intense field of healthcare, the ability to peacefully inhabit one's body, maintain good boundaries, and be fully present during care is essential. This study aimed to validate the recently developed Mindful Self-Care Scale (MSCS) among hospice and healthcare professionals and develop a brief version of the 33-item MSCS.MethodA sample of hospice and healthcare professionals from all 50 states (n = 858) was used. A confirmatory factor analysis was run using a rigorous methodology for validation and item reduction to develop a brief version of the 33-item MSCS. The brief MSCS (B-MSCS) was developed by identifying items for exclusion through examination of conceptual overlap, descriptive statistics by detecting sources of improvement model fit using confirmatory factor analysis. Model modifications were done sequentially and with regard to theoretical considerations.ResultThe existing model, 33-item MSCS with six subscales, had good fit to the data with all indicators in acceptable ranges (chi-square/df = 3.08, df (480), p < 0.01, root mean square error of approximation = 0.059, comparative fit index = 0.915, Tucker and Lewis's index of fit = 0.907). Nine items were excluded on the basis of very low loadings and conceptual and empirical overlap with other items.Significance of resultsThe final 24-item, B-MSCS model was consistent with the original conceptual model and had a closer fit to the data (chi-square/df = 1.85, df (215), p < 0.01, root mean square error of approximation = 0.041, comparative fit index = 0.961, Tucker and Lewis's index of fit = 0.955). In addition, the reliability, construct, and concurrent validity of the MSCS and B-MSCS were in the acceptable and good ranges, respectively. Mean and standard deviation of the MSCS and B-MSCS scores were similar; B-MSCS mean scores well approximated the MSCS scores. Informal mindful self-care, in the process of everyday life, was practiced more regularly and associated with increased wellness and reduced burnout risk than formal mind-body practices.

scholarly journals VALIDITAS KONSTRAK INSTRUMEN ADAPTABILITAS KARIER BIDANG KELISTRIKAN

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Yafie Nuha
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analysis ◽  
Root Mean Square Error ◽  
Mean Square Error ◽  
P Value ◽  
Mean Square ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Fit Index

AbstractThis research aims to get a proof of the validity career adapt-ability scale in the field of electrical construction. The samples in this research are electrical engineering education students, amounting to 146 students. The data analysis technique used in this research is second order confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The compatibility of theoretical models with empirical data is determined with the coefficients of Chi-Square, p-value, CFI (Comparative Fit Index), and RMSEA (Root Mean Square Error of Approximation). The validity of each item in the career adapt-ability scale is determined with the value of factor loading, t value, and the significance level. Item is considered valid if the factor load is more than 0.3, the t-value is greater than 1.96, and the significance level is less than 5%. The validity of each factor of career adapt-ability is determined with CR (Construct Reliability) and average variance extracted (AVE). Based on the results of the analysis, it is found that the career adapt-ability instrument in the field of electricity consists of 20 items representing four factors, namely concern, control, curiosity, and confidence are categorized valid. Keywords: Construct Validity, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, and Career Adaptability. AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk memperoleh bukti validitas instrumen pengukur konstrak adaptabilitas karier bidang kelistrikan. Sampel dalam penelitian adalah mahasiswa pendidikan teknik elektro yang berjumlah 146 mahasiswa. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah analisis faktor konfirmatori orde kedua. Kesusuaian model teoritis dengan data empiris ditentukan dengan melihat koefisien Chi-Square, p-value, CFI (Comparatie Fit Index), dan RMSEA (Root Mean Square Error of Approxiamation). Validititas tiap item dalam konstrak adaptabilitas karier ditentukan dengan melihat nilai muatan faktor, nilai t, dan taraf signifikasinsi. Item dianggap valid jika muatan faktor lebih dari 0,3, nilai-t lebih besar daripada 1,96, dan taraf signifikansi kurang dari  5%. Validitas tiap faktor dari adaptabilitas karier ditentukan dengan melihat nilai CR (Construct Reliability) dan rerata varian terekstrak. Berdasarkan hasil analisis diperoleh bahwa instrumen adaptabilitas karier bidang kelistrikan terdiri atas 20 butir yang mewakili empat faktor, yaitu perhatian, kontrol, kengintahuan, dan kepercayaan  dapat dinyatakan valid.   Kata Kunci: Validitas Konstrak, Analisis Faktor Konfirmatori, dan Adaptabilitas Karier.

scholarly journals KONSTRUK KINERJA KEPALA SEKOLAH DASAR DI DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA

2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Samsul Hadi
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analysis ◽  
Root Mean Square Error ◽  
Mean Square Error ◽  
Root Mean Square ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Second Order ◽  
Mean Square ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Fit Index

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui model konstruk dan struktural kinerja kepala sekolah. Hasil penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberi sumbangan terhadap pengukuran kinerja kepala sekolah di masa yang akan datang. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian expost facto dengan populasi guru dan kepala sekolah dasar di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Sampel sebanyak 1239 guru dan 208 kepala sekolah dasar dipilih secara acak. Data guru dan kepala sekolah dianalisis dengan Second-Order Confirmatory Factor Analysis (Second-Order CFA) secara terpisah dan divalidasi silang dengan multi-sample CFA. Pengujian kecocokan model dilakukan menggunakan χ2 Satorra-Bentler dengan taraf signifikansi 5%, Comparative Goodness of Fit Index (CFI), dan Root Mean Square Error Approximation (RMSAE). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan hal-hal sebagai berikut. 1) Kinerja kepala sekolah mempunyai dimensi kepemimpinan, manajemen, dan kepribadian. 2) Berdasarkan data kepala sekolah, koefisien jalur dari dimensi dan muatan faktor dari indikator yang ada dalam model cukup tinggi, bernilai positif, dan signifikan. 3) Hasil validasi silang model konstruk kinerja kepala sekolah menggunakan data guru dan data kepala sekolah menunjukkan tidak ada perbedaan model. Kata kunci: model konstruk, persamaan pengukuran, persamaan struktural, kinerja kepala sekolah

scholarly journals Development and External Validity of a Short-Form Version of the INICIARE Scale to Classify Nursing Care Dependency Level in Acute Hospitals

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (22) ◽  
pp. 8511
Author(s):  
Ana María Porcel-Gálvez ◽  
Sergio Barrientos-Trigo ◽  
Elena Fernández-García ◽  
Regina Allande-Cussó ◽  
María Dolores Quiñoz-Gallardo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analysis ◽  
Degrees Of Freedom ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Mean Square ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Care Dependency ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Acute Hospitals ◽  
Fit Index

Background: The increasing dependence care in patients hospitalized in acute hospitals around the world entails classification systems heeding the wide range of care dependency levels generated by the many different types of dependent patients. This article is a report of a study assessing the validity and reliability of a short-from version of the instrument (Inventario del NIvel de Cuidados mediante Indicadores de Resultados de Enfermería (INICIARE)) used to classify inpatients according to their care dependency level. Methods: The validation, carried out in a multicenter longitudinal study, included three different samples: the first sample of 1800 patients to evaluate the reliability and validity, a second of 762 patients for confirmatory factor analysis, and a third of 762 to test the short-form version. Patients over 16 years of age, admitted to medical or surgical units at 11 public hospitals, were included. Results: The final sample included 3605 patients. Patients had a mean age of 64.5 years, 60% were admitted to medical units, with severe dependency. The validation process yielded two versions of the instrument: a 40-item version, with eight factors with 83.6% of total variance explained and Cronbach’s alpha values between 0.98 and 0.92, and a short-form with 26 items, with five factors and Cronbach’s alpha values between 0.96 and 0.90. The Confirmatory Factor Analysis yielded a good fit model to the 40-item version (Chi Square on Degrees of Freedom CMIN/DF) = 1.335; Normed Fit Index (NFI); Tucker–Lewis Index (TLI); Comparative Fit Index (CFI) > 0.90; Standardized Residual Root Mean Square (RMSEA) = 0.02; and Standardized Residual Root Mean Square (SRMR) = 0.027) and 26-item version (Chi Square on Degrees of Freedom CMIN/DF = 1.385; NFI = 0.998; CFI = 0.999; RMSEA = 0.02; and SRMR 0.02). Both INICIARE versions obtained a high correlation between them (r = 0.96; p < 0.001). Conclusion: INICIARE has proved to be a valid and reliable instrument for the assessment of the level of care dependency of acutely hospitalized patients.

The Self-Transcendence Scale

2011 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 147-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gørill Haugan ◽  
Toril Rannestad ◽  
Helge Garåsen ◽  
Randi Hammervold ◽  
Geir Arild Espnes
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analysis ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Well Being ◽  
The Self ◽  
Mean Square ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Self Transcendence ◽  
Fit Index

Purpose: Self-transcendence, the ability to expand personal boundaries in multiple ways, has been found to provide well-being. The purpose of this study was to examine the dimensionality of the Norwegian version of the Self-Transcendence Scale, which comprises 15 items. Background: Reed’s empirical nursing theory of self-transcendence provided the theoretical framework; self-transcendence includes an interpersonal, intrapersonal, transpersonal, and temporal dimension. Design: Cross-sectional data were obtained from a sample of 202 cognitively intact elderly patients in 44 Norwegian nursing homes. Results: Exploratory factor analysis revealed two and four internally consistent dimensions of self-transcendence, explaining 35.3% (two factors) and 50.7% (four factors) of the variance, respectively. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the hypothesized two- and four-factor models fitted better than the one-factor model (c x2, root mean square error of approximation, standardized root mean square residual, normed fit index, nonnormed fit index, comparative fit index, goodness-of-fit index, and adjusted goodness-of-fit index). Conclusions: The findings indicate self-transcendence as a multifactorial construct; at present, we conclude that the two-factor model might be the most accurate and reasonable measure of self-transcendence. Implications: This research generates insights in the application of the widely used Self-Transcendence Scale by investigating its psychometric properties by applying a confirmatory factor analysis. It also generates new research-questions on the associations between self-transcendence and well-being.

scholarly journals PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF SPIRITUAL INDEX OF WELL-BEING AMONG FILIPINO WOMEN WITH BREAST CANCER

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 177-181
Author(s):  
Gil P Soriano
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analysis ◽  
Content Validity ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Mean Square ◽  
Validity Index ◽  
Filipino Women ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Fit Index

Background: Breast cancer patients need to be treated not only physically and emotionally but also spiritually. Hence, the assessment of the spirituality of patients is essential to provide holistic nursing care. However, there was no culturally valid and reliable instrument that measures spirituality among Filipino women with breast cancer.Objective: The study was conducted to determine the psychometric properties of the spiritual index of well-being among Filipino women with breast cancer.Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional design was utilized in the study, and a sample of 170 Filipino women with breast cancer were included. The World Health Organization guidelines were used to translate the original instrument to Filipino, and content validity was computed using the Davis technique. Also, confirmatory factor analysis with maximum likelihood estimation was performed to assess the construct validity of the instrument. Cronbach’s α and item-total correlations were done to assess the internal consistency of the Filipino version of the spiritual index of well-being.Results: The Filipino version of the spiritual index of well-being had an item content validity index (I-CVI) ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 and a scale content validity index (S-CVI) of 0.95. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed factor loadings of 0.42 to 0.72. Also, the CFA model revealed a 𝜒2/df = 2.51, root mean square error of approximation= 0.074, comparative fit index= 0.091, goodness of fit index=0.98, Tucker-Lewis index= 0.93, incremental fit index= 0.91, and standard root mean square residual== 0.072.Conclusion: The Filipino version of the spiritual index of well-being was cross-culturally valid and reliable in measuring the spiritual index of well-being among Filipino women with breast cancer.

scholarly journals The Sports Mental Toughness Questionnaire (SMTQ): A psychometric evaluation of the Turkish version

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bulent Okan Miçooğulları
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analysis ◽  
Degrees Of Freedom ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Psychometric Evaluation ◽  
Mental Toughness ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Fit Index

The objective of this study was to adapt the Sports Mental Toughness Questionnaire (SMTQ) for use in Turkey, and to test its reliability and validity. With a sample of 184 males (mean ± s: age 24.22 ± 3.01 years) and 153 females (mean ± s: age 21.54 ± 3.82 years) total 337 athletes (mean ± s: age 21.76 ± 4.2 years) drawn from 20 sport classifications, confirmatory factor analysis technique to evaluate the psychometric properties of the SMTQ. Athletes completed 14 item SMTQ was applied to all volunteered participants. Afterwards Confirmatory Factor Analysis was conducted by Analysis Moments of Structures 18. Comparative fit index, non-normed fit index and root mean square error of approximation were used to check if the model fit the data. Chi-square/degrees of freedom ratio was found as (χ2/df) 1.46. The other parameters were determined as RMSEA= .74, NNFI= .90, and CFI= .90. The confirmatory factor analysis results supported the three-factor structure and indicated proper models should include correlations among the three factors. Internal consistency estimates ranged from .69 to .78 and were consistent with values reported by previous studies. Based on these findings, “Sports Mental Toughness Questionnaire” was found to be a valid and reliable instrument.

The Psychometric Properties of the Difficult Behavior Self-Efficacy Scale

2010 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun-Kyoung Oh ◽  
Francis M. Kozub
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analysis ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Root Mean Square ◽  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Mean Square ◽  
Two Samples ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Fit Index

The study was designed to estimate the psychometric properties of Hastings and Brown’s (2002a) Difficult Behavior Self-efficacy Scale. Participants were two samples of physical educators teaching in Korea (n = 229) and the United States (U.S.; n = 139). An initial translation of the questionnaire to Korean and pilot study were conducted along with the larger study using a confirmatory factor analysis procedure. Internal consistency estimates (weighed Omega) for the five-item scale were 0.88 both the Korean and U.S. samples. The average variances extracted for the one factor were 0.59 for the total data set and 0.57 each for the Korean and U.S. samples. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a five-item, unidimensional model for self-efficacy for the total sample: Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) = 0.97, Nonnormed Fit Index (NNFI) = 0.95, Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.98, and Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) = 0.03. Only the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA = 0.12) fell below criterion levels of acceptable fit, with similar fit indices occurring in separate analyses of the Korean and U.S. samples. Invariance testing across the two samples supported metric invariance (similarity of factor loadings) but not scalar invariance (U.S. means higher on all five items). The factor structure for the self-efficacy scale provides an initial estimate of validity and internal consistency for use with different teacher groups.

scholarly journals PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN EVALUASI CIPP PADA PROGRAM PEMBELAJARAN TAHFIZ AL-QUR’AN DI PONDOK PESANTREN

2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-233
Author(s):  
Muyasaroh Muyasaroh ◽  
Sutrisno Sutrisno
Keyword(s):  
Root Mean Square Error ◽  
Mean Square Error ◽  
Root Mean Square ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Evaluation Model ◽  
Mean Square ◽  
Learning Program ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Cronbach Alpha ◽  
Fit Index

Studi ini bertujuan untuk: (1) menghasilkan model pengembangan evaluasi program pembelajar’an tahfiẓ al-Quran diberi nama Coni P2, (2) menghasilkan teknik pelaksanaan evaluasi program pembelajaran tahfiẓ al-Qur’an, dan (3) menghasilkan struktur komponen dan indikator model evaluasi. Studi ini merupakan penelitian dan pengembangan (R&D) dengan menggunakan sembilan langkah dari 10 langkah model Borg dan Gall. Jumlah subjek uji coba pertama 33 orang, uji coba kedua 49 orang, dan uji coba ketiga 224 orang. Komponen model evaluasi yang digunakan adalah model evaluasi Stufflebeam (CIPP). Langkah-langkah evaluasi yang digunakan adalah langkah Malcolm Provus. Teknik pengumpul data yang digunakan adalah Delphi, FGD, kuesioner, observasi, wawancara, dan studi dokumentasi. Validitas konstruk dianalisis menggunakan CFA dan Reliabilitas menggunakan Cronbach Alpha. Hasil penelitian: (1) model evaluasi program Coni P2 dikembangkan dengan cara kajian teori, temuan di lapangan, Delphi, FGD, uji coba sebanyak tiga kali; (2) evaluasi di tiga pondok pesantren: Al-Ittifaqiah, Raudhatul Ulum, dan Raudhatul Qur’an ditemukan kesenjangan sarana belajar, kinerja guru, dan motivasi belajar santri; (3) komponen konstruk model evaluasi Coni P2 terdiri atas konteks, input, proses, dan produk, yang terbagi menjadi 13 indikator. Hasil analisis CFA: (1) Chi Square (χ²) = kecil; (2) ρ-value > 0,05; (3) Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) < 0,08; dan (4) Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) < 0,90.Kata kunci: pengembangan, evaluasi, tahfiẓ al-Qur’an______________________________________________________________ DEVELOPING CIPP EVALUATION INSTRUMENT FOR TAHFIZ AL-QUR’AN IN PONDOK PESANTRENAbstract The study aimed to: (1) generate an evaluation development  model of tahfiz Al-Qur’an learning program entitled Coni P2; (2) generate a technique of tahfiz Al-Qur’an learning program evaluation implementation; and (3) generate component structures and an indicators of evaluation model. The study was a research and development (R&D) type by implementing 9 of 10 steps in Borg and Gall’s model. The subject for the first trial the 33 people, for the second trial were 49 people, and for the third trial were 224 people. The implemented component of evaluation model was Stufflebeam Evaluation Model (CIPP). The evaluation steps that the researchers implemented were the ones taken from Malcolm Provus. The data gathering techniques that the researchers implemented were Delphi, FGD, questionnaires, observation, interview and study of documentation. The construct validity was analyzed by implementing CFA and the construct reliability was analyzed by implementing Cronbach Alpha. The results of the research were as follows: (1) the model of Coni P2 evaluation program was developed by implementing theoretical review, field findings, Delphi, FGD and three-time experiments; (2) from the evaluations performed in three pondok pesantren, namely Al-Ittifaqiah, Raudhatul Ulum and Raudhatul Qur’an, the researchers found discrepancy in learning facilities, teacher performance and santri’s learning motivation; and (3) the construct components of Coni P2 evaluation model consisted of context, input, process and product that were divided into 13 indicators. The results of CFA analysis were as follows: (1) (1) Chi Square (χ²) = kecil; (2) ρ-value > 0.05; (3) Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) < 0.08; dan (4) Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) < 0.90.Keywords: development, evaluation, tahfiz Al-Qur’an

scholarly journals Examining and Adapting the Psychometric Properties of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Health Services Survey (MBI-HSS) among Healthcare Professionals

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 1890
Author(s):  
Abbas Al Mutair ◽  
Alya Al Mutairi ◽  
Hiba Chagla ◽  
Khalid Alawam ◽  
Khulud Alsalman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Maslach Burnout Inventory ◽  
Gulf Cooperation Council ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Fit Index

Burnout is known to negatively impact healthcare providers both physically and mentally and is assessed using the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS). Many versions of this tool have been developed for different parts of the world, but there is currently no valid version specifically designed for use in the Gulf Cooperation Council Region. This study aims to use data collected across six different regions in the Gulf Cooperation Council Region to assess the validity and reliability of the MBI-HSS model and develop a version of the MBI-HSS best suited for evaluating burnout levels among the healthcare providers in this region. The MBI-HSS questionnaire adapted by Maslach was distributed to 888 healthcare providers aged 32 years ± 7 years, 231 (26.1%) of whom were males and 651 (73.9%) of whom were females, between 2017 and 2018. The data collected were randomly divided into two subsamples, resulting in a sample with the data of 300 healthcare professionals for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and 588 healthcare professionals for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The CFA of the original version of the MBI-HSS yielded a chi-square value of 1897 (p < 0.001), indicating the need for revision. EFA was then used to construct a new model of the MBI-HSS, and a CFA was performed on the second subsample to evaluate the model fit to the data. The EFA produced a 3-factor version that accounted for 56.3% of the total variance, with item 11 of the MBI moved to the Emotional Exhaustion (EE) subscale and item 16 loaded onto Depersonalisation (DP) instead of EE. Additionally, items 18 and 20 were omitted. The reconstructed version had a Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) value of 0.065 (<0.08), a goodness of fit index (GFI) value of 0.915 (>0.90) and an adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI) value of 0.893 (>0.8). These results when compared to the CFA of the original model, which produced a GFI value of 0.79, an AGFI value of 0.74 and an RMSEA value of 0.09 (>0.08), indicate that this new version has a more satisfactory fit to the data and should be used when assessing burnout in the Gulf Cooperation Council Region.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document