PRN medication: beliefs and practices of psychiatrists and nurses working in PICUs and secure units

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilla Haw ◽  
Helen Sasegbon ◽  
Imadeldin Ismail ◽  
Malathi Pushpanathan

AbstractIntroductionPRN (as required) medication is commonly used in inpatient psychiatry but little is known about staff opinions concerning its use.Aims & objectivesToexplore views about PRN medication among nurses and psychiatrists working in PICUs or secure care at a charitable hospital.MethodA structured questionnaire with visual analogue scales was used to examine staff views about PRN medication. Participants were: 21 PICU nurses, 20 nurses working on medium secure admission units (MSAUs) and 27 psychiatrists. Inquiry was made about preferences and avoidance of PRN drugs and when PRN administration becomes rapid tranquillisation (RT).ResultsNurses working in PICUs and MSAUs held similar views about PRN medication. Nurses were more in favour of PRN medication than psychiatrists, whereas psychiatrists felt more strongly that PRN sedation was sometimes over-used. PICU staff favoured promethazine whereas non-PICU staff preferred lorazepam/lorazepam and haloperidol combined. There was no consensus as to when PRN administration becomes RT.ConclusionsNurses hold more positive views about PRN sedation than psychiatrists. Despite the ECG requirement, many staff favour haloperidol. The NICE definition of RT was not quoted by most participants. RT and PRN medication is a grey area which deserves further exploration.

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roy Thewissen ◽  
Steffie J. B. D. Snijders ◽  
Remco C. Havermans ◽  
Marcel van den Hout ◽  
Anita Jansen

2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 572-583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Ligon ◽  
Katie Ehlman ◽  
Gabriele Moriello ◽  
Colleen Russo ◽  
Kamila Miller

Pain ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 425-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Ogon ◽  
Martin Krismer ◽  
Wolfgang Söllner ◽  
Wilhelm Kantner-Rumplmair ◽  
Astrid Lampe

1975 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 415-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. R. B. Joyce ◽  
D. W. Zutshi ◽  
V. Hrubes ◽  
R. M. Mason

2007 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. S71-S72
Author(s):  
P.C. Zee ◽  
J.W. Winkelman ◽  
K.D. Sethi ◽  
C.A. Kushida ◽  
P.M. Becker ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 209-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nnamdi Callistus D. Ukwandu ◽  
O. P. G. Nmorsi

Well-structured questionnaire on the perception, impression and response to genitourinary bilharziasis (Genitourinary schistosomiasis) was administered and explained in local languages: 'Igbo' 'Esan' 'Ezon' Itshekiri and Bini to 33815 inhabitants of selected endemic areas in south-eastern Nigeria from January, 1999 to December, 2001. Out of this number, 3815 (11.3%) were properly filled and returned. About 42.0% of the inhabitants admitted knowledge of the disease, while 14 (0.4%) knew about the aetiologic agent. About 181 (5.0%) who responded, admitted procuring treatment, while 100 (5.0%) declined to seek treatment of any sort. The relationships between water-bodies and human activities, and infection were well discussed. Amongst those who admitted knowledge of the disease but no knowledge of its etiologic agent, declined seeking treatment of any kind, but believe the disease is a natural phenomenon in ones developmental stage and therefore of no morbidity and mortality. Laboratory analysis of urine, faeces, semen and HVS was employed to assess questionnaire responses, and in some cases, physical examination was utilized to augment laboratory analysis in confirming urinal diagnosis. Haematuria was only directly related to egg count in the early part of life. Females were significantly haematuric and excreted more ova than males (p < 0.05). Headache (43.0%) and fever (31.0%) were major clinical signs while sexual pains (22.0%) were the least.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramin Shiraly ◽  
Mehrdad Askarian ◽  
Yves Longtin ◽  
Seyed Sadeq Seyed Nematian

Although alcohol-containing liquid cleansers have been increasingly used by healthcare workers, their application is still suboptimal. This study was carried out to assess the beliefs and practices of Muslim nurses with respect to alcohol-based hand rub solutions (ABHRs). A total of 374 hospital nurses from a large tertiary referral medical centre in Southern Iran were recruited. Beliefs and self-reported practices toward ABHRs were measured using a structured questionnaire. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire were shown to be satisfactory (Cronbach’s alpha value: 0.77 for beliefs and 0.86 for practices.) Overall, 16% of Muslim nurses believed that the use of ABHRs is religiously prohibited; approximately the same proportion of respondents believed that there may be concerns related to the fact that the alcoholic content of these hand rubs might be absorbed through the skin or respiratory tract. Overall, more than half of participants reported use of ABHRs before (60%) and after (75%) touching patients. Religious believers were less likely to report performing hand hygiene with ABHRs before patient contact. However, the total mean practice scores were not statistically different between religious believers and non-believers (t (372)=-0.88, P=0.413). Mean practice scores of nurses who had participated in hand hygiene training courses during the year before the study were higher than those who had not (t (372)=3.41, P< 0.001). The results of the present study showed that the practice of hand hygiene with alcohol-containing hand rubs is common among Iranian Muslim nurses and is not influenced by their religious beliefs toward alcohol.


2021 ◽  
pp. 2101531
Author(s):  
Catharina C. Moor ◽  
Remy L.M. Mostard ◽  
Jan C. Grutters ◽  
Paul Bresser ◽  
Marlies S. Wijsenbeek

1987 ◽  
Vol 72 (s16) ◽  
pp. 10P-10P ◽  
Author(s):  
N Hounslow ◽  
Thai Wiseman ◽  
J D Stephens ◽  
Christine Marks ◽  
M J Vandenburg

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document