The Characteristics of Cyclical and Non-Cyclical Mastalgia: A Prospective Study using a Modified McGill Pain Questionnaire

Background: DBS is an established treatment option in refractory dystonia, and motor outcomes have been extensively evaluated instead of the usually neglected NMS (e.g., pain). Objective: To describe the non-motor symptoms (NMS) after Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) surgery for refractory generalized inherited/idiopathic dystonia in a prospective study. Design and setting: A prospective study that evaluated patients in the Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo. Methods: This study evaluated patients before and one year after DBS surgery. We applied the following scales: Burke-Fahn-Marsden Rating Scale (BFMRS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Non-Motor Symptoms Scale for Parkinson’s Disease (NMSS-PD), Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire-8 (PDQ8) Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) and McGill pain questionnaire. Results: 11 patients (38.35 ± 11.30 years) underwent surgery (36.3% women). Motor BFMRS subscore was 64.36 ± 22.94 at baseline and 33.55 ± 17.44 after surgery (p=0.003, 47.9% improvement on motor symptoms). HADS scores remained unchanged. NMSS-PD had a significant change after DBS, from 70.91 ± 59.07 to 37.18 ± 55.05 (p=0.013, 47,5% improvement). Seven patients reported pain before DBS surgery, and after one year, four patients reported chronic pain (i.e., pain improved by 42.28%). BPI’s severity and interference scores were 4.61 ± 2.84 and 4.12 ± 2.67, respectively before surgery, and 2.79 ± 2.31 (0.00–6.25) and 1.12 ± 1.32 (0.00–3.00) after DBS (p=0.043 and p=0.028). NPSI total score was 15.29 ± 13.94 before DBS, and reduced to 2.29 ± 2.98 afterward (p=0.028). McGill’s total score was 9.00 ± 3.32 before DBS, achieving 2.71 ± 2.93 after surgery (p=0.028), mostly driven by the sensory sub-score. Conclusions: We found that DBS improves NMS in dystonia, including chronic pain, anxiety, gastrointestinal symptoms, besides the already established improvement in QoL and motor symptoms.

Download Full-text

Impact of non-adherent Ibuprofen foam dressing in the lives of patients with venous ulcers

Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões ◽

10.1590/0100-69912017002002 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 44 (2) ◽

pp. 116-124 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

GERALDO MAGELA SALOMÉ ◽

LYDIA MASAKO FERREIRA

Keyword(s):

Lower Limb ◽

Venous Ulcer ◽

Tissue Type ◽

Control Group ◽

Mcgill Pain Questionnaire ◽

Pain Questionnaire ◽

Venous Ulcers ◽

Numerical Scale ◽

The Moment ◽

A Prospective Study

ABSTRACT Objective : to evaluate pain in patients with lower limb venous ulcer who used non-adherent Ibuprofen foam dressing (IFD). Methods : we conducted a prospective study of patients with lower limb venous ulcers treated from April 2013 to August 2014. We used the Numerical Scale and McGill Pain Questionnaire, performing the assessments at the moment of inclusion of the patient in the study and every eight days thereafter, totaling five consultations. We divided the patients into two groups: 40 in the Study Group (SG), who were treated with IFD, and 40 in the Control Group (CG), treated with primary dressing, according to tissue type and exudate. Results : at the first consultation, patients from both groups reported intense pain. On the fifth day, SG patients reported no pain and the majority of CG reported moderate pain. Regarding the McGill Pain Questionnaire, most patients of both groups reported sensations related to sensory, affective, evaluative and miscellaneous descriptors at the beginning of data collection; after the second assessment, there was slight improvement among the patients in the SG. After the third consultation, they no longer reported the mentioned descriptors. CG patients displayed all the sensations of these descriptors until the fifth visit. Conclusion : non-adherent Ibuprofen foam dressing is effective in reducing the pain of patients with venous ulcers.

Download Full-text

Postoperative Pain Following Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Prospective Study

Foot & Ankle International ◽

10.3113/fai.2008.1063 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 29 (11) ◽

pp. 1063-1068 ◽

Cited By ~ 26

Author(s):

Loretta B. Chou ◽

Dominic Wagner ◽

Daniela M. Witten ◽

Gabriel J. Martinez-Diaz ◽

Nancy S. Brook ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Postoperative Pain ◽

Prospective Study ◽

Pain Intensity ◽

Short Form ◽

Mcgill Pain Questionnaire ◽

Foot And Ankle ◽

Preoperative Pain ◽

Level Of Evidence ◽

Experienced Pain ◽

A Prospective Study

Background: Orthopaedic procedures have been reported to have the highest incidence of pain compared to other types of operations. There are limited studies in the literature that investigate postoperative pain. Materials and Methods: A prospective study of 98 patients undergoing orthopedic foot and ankle operations was undertaken to evaluate their pain experience. A Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) was administered preoperatively and postoperatively. Results: The results showed that patients who experienced pain before the operation anticipated feeling higher pain intensity immediately postoperatively. Patients, on average, experienced higher pain intensity 3 days after the operation than anticipated. The postoperative pain intensity at 3 days was the most severe, while postoperative pain intensity at 6 weeks was the least severe. Age, gender and preoperative diagnosis (acute versus chronic) did not have a significant effect on the severity of pain that patients experienced. Six weeks following the operation, the majority of patients felt no pain. In addition, the severity of preoperative pain was highly predictive of their anticipated postoperative pain and 6-week postoperative pain, and both preoperative pain and anticipated pain predict higher immediate postoperative pain. Conclusion: The intensity of patients' preoperative pain was predictive of the anticipated postoperative pain. Patients' preoperative pain and anticipated postoperative pain were independently predictive of the 3-day postoperative pain. The higher pain intensity a patient experienced preoperatively suggested that their postoperative pain severity would be greater. Therefore, surgeons should be aware of these findings when treating postoperative pain after orthopaedic foot and ankle operations. Level of Evidence: II, Prospective Comparative Study

Download Full-text