Psychosocial Profile of Rural and Urban Elders in Portugal

2003 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 160-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Constança Paúl ◽  
António M. Fonseca ◽  
Ignácio Martín ◽  
João Amado

In the scope of the ecology-of-aging paradigm, we studied two different groups of independent elderly living in rural versus urban Portuguese settings. The main objectives were: (1) to develop knowledge on aging in different contexts; (2) to analyze the differences in autonomous behavior, social relationships, psychological satisfaction (e.g., morale), and self-perception of general health and quality of life between rural and urban residents; (3) to contribute to the design of policies for the elderly. We did 1.5h home interviews of 234 elderly (117 rural and 117 urban) to collect socio-demographic data, and access the capacity to perform instrumental activities of daily living (IADL Scale) and life satisfaction (Philadelphia Morale Scale). Although all the subjects were to some extent deprived, results show that the two communities are different in some socio-demographic characteristics such as education level and financial situation (favoring urban elderly), and in their level of autonomy (higher in rural elderly); they also differ in their social network (larger for rural elderly), feeling of anxiety (lower in rural elderly), and attitudes toward their own aging (more positive in rural elderly). Both communities have a similar feeling of loneliness and a somewhat negative perception of health and quality of life. All the elderly consider aging-in-place as very important and require more community-based services.

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 29698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleia De Macedo ◽  
Vivian Ulrich ◽  
Antonio Miguel Gonçalves Bós ◽  
Ângelo José Gonçalves Bós

AIMS: To compare the self-perception of health status between rural and urban elderly and their possible associated factors.METHODS: The study consisted of a secondary analysis of data from the National Health Survey of 2013, conducted by the National Institute of Geography and Statistics, which included elderly who lived in rural and urban environments. The dependent variable was the self-perception of health status (evaluated as very good, good, fair, bad and very bad); and the independent variables were socio-demographic factors, clinical data, functionality of the elderly and household data. Relationships between the variables were tested by the chi-square test, and adjusted by self-perception of health status. The analysis were performed through the Epi InfoTM program version 7.2.1, accepting p<0.05 as significant.RESULTS: Rural elderly people were predominantly males, brown, married, illiterate and gainfully employed, despite having a low economic class. Among the rural elderly, self-perceived health status was more often regular or poor, the household was more often enrolled in the Family Health Strategy and most had no complementary health plan. Rural elderly also had better performance in the Basic Activities of Daily Living and worse performance in the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, had less depressive symptoms and less multimorbidity. Rural elderly presented lower chances of self-perception of good or very good health, even adjusting for gender, race, marital status, occupation, socioeconomic class, coverage by the Family Health Strategy, depressive symptoms, multimorbidity, and performance in the Basic Activities of Daily Living.CONCLUSIONS: The rural elderly have worse self-perception of health status than the urban elderly, even controlling socio-demographic, economic, clinical and health access characteristics.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Mulyati Mulyati ◽  
Rasha Rasha ◽  
Kenty Martiatuti

This study aims to determine the influence of social support on the quality of life and welfare of the elderly living with families residing in the Urban and Sub Urban areas. This study was conducted for 3 months starting from July until September 2017. The research method is cross sectional study. This research was conducted in East Jakarta area. The research location was chosen by purposive sampling based on data from local health office. The data collection time will be conducted from July-September 2017 using WHOQOL-BREF for live, Smet and Sarafino quality measurements for the measurement of social support and SWLS Ed Diener for measuring well-being. The results showed no significant differences in quality of life and social support in urban and sub-urban elderly. But there are differencesin the dimensions of social support and information support. There is a correlation between quality of life, social support and the well-being of the elderly. Positive relationship between the quality of life and welfare where the better the quality of life the better the welfare of the elderly. The quality of life and well-being is influenced by the support of awards and support of the instrument. Keyword : elderly, social support, the quality of life, welfare   Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh dukungan social terhadap kualitas hidup dan kesejahteraan lansia yang tinggal dengan keluarga yang berada di daerah Urban dan Sub Urban. Penelitian ini dilakukan selama 3 bulan terhitung mulai bulan juli sampai septembertahun 2017 dengan obyek penelitin lansia yang tinggal dengan keluarga dan lansia yang tinggal  di panti werda. Metode penelitian adalah cross sectional study.  Penelitian ini dilakukan di wilayah Jakarta Timur Pemilihan lokasi penelitian dilakukan secara Purposive Sampling berdasarkan data dari Dinas Kesehatan setempat.  Waktu pengambilan data akan dilakukan pada bulan Juli-September 2017 menggunakan WHOQOL- BREF untuk pengukuran kualtas hidup, Smet dan Sarafino untuk pengukuran dukungan social dan SWLS Ed Diener untuk mengukur kesejahteraan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan tidak terdapat perbedaan yang nyata pada kualitas hidup dan dukungan sosial pada lansia urban dan sub urban . Tetapi terdapat perbedaan pada dimensi dukungan sosial dan dukungan informasi.Terdapat korelasi antara kualitas hidup, dukungan sosial dan kesejahteraan lansia. Hubungan yang positif antara kualitas hidup dengan kesejahteraan dimana semakin baik kualitas hidup maka semakin baik kesejahteraan lansia.Kualitas hidup dan kesejahteraan dipengaruhi oleh dukungan penghargaan dan dukungan instrumen.  Kata kunci : Lansia, Dukungan Sosial, Kualitas Hidup, Kesejahteraan    References  Biro Hukum Departemen Sosial. 1998. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 13 Tahun 1998 Tentang Kesejahteraan Lanjut Usia. Jakarta: Departemen Sosial.BPS. 2000. Statistika Indonesia (Statistical Year Book of Indonesia). BPS,Jakarta.Central Bureau of Statistics (Indonesia). 1993. Population of Indonesia, Result of the 1990 Population Census. Jakarta: Biro Pusat Statistik.Cutrona. 1996. Social support in couple: Marriage as a resources in time of stress. California: Sage Publication. IncCutrona C.E & Russel D.w. 1994. Type of social support and specific stress : Toward a theory of optimal matching. In B.R Sarason, I G. Sarason & G.R. Pierce (Eds), Social support : an international view (pp. 319-366). New York : WileyFelton Bj, Berry C. 1992. Psychology and Aging Do The Source Of Urban Elderly Social support, Determine its Psychological Consequance. Journal Of Pernonality and Social Psychology. Vol 7. 89-87Hardywinoto, Setiabudhi. 2005. Panduan Gerontologi ; Tinjauan dari Berbagai Aspek. Jakarta. PT Gramedia Pustaka UtamaJauhari M. 2003. Status Gizi, Kesehatan dan Kondisi Mental Lansia di Panti Sosial Tresna Werdha Mulia 4 Jakarta (Thesis). Sekolah Pasca Sarjana IPBKuntjico, Zainuddin Sr, 2002 . Dukungan Sosial Pada Lansia, http://www.epsikologi.com/usia/160402.htm, diakses 2 Desember 2016Suhartini R. 2004. Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kemandirian Orang Lanjut Usia (Studi Kasus di Kelurahan Jambangan). [Thesis] . Pasca Sarja. Universitas Airlangga. Surabaya.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-164
Author(s):  
FM Shamim Ahmmed ◽  
Md Saydur Rahman ◽  
Farzana Zafreen ◽  
Rowshan Ara ◽  
Md Ziaul Islam

Introduction: Elderly population in Bangladesh is one of the largest in the world in term of absolute number and ageing is an emerging problem. Elderly are at risk from non-communicable diseases as well as mental problems and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) affects in urban and rural elderly. Objective: To find out and compare HRQoL in urban and rural elderly population of Bangladesh. Materials and Methods:A comparative cross-sectional study was carried out to compare HRQoL in urban and rural elderly. This was a two samples study; 130 each from urban and rural. Total 260 elderly were selected conveniently. Data were collected through face to face interview using a pre-tested semi structured questionnaire of SF-36 v2 HRQoL survey.  This study was carried in urban elderly residing in Ward number 3, Race Course, Cumilla City Corporation and in rural elderly residing in Noapuskuni Village of Babutipara Union, Muradnager Upazila, Cumilla. This one-year study was conducted from 15 July 2017 to 14 June 2018. Results: Majority of the elderly were Muslim (91.5%), female (53.5%), married (59.6%) and from joint family (91%). The mean ± SD age of elderly was 69.26±6.337 years and mean ± SD monthly family income was Tk. 16561.54±9192.076. SF- 36 v2 HRQoL scale; a licensed software-based survey tool was used measure the health-related quality of life of elderly.  Most of the elderly were found with average physical component summary (PCS) (53.1%) and mental component summary (MCS) (50.8%) of HRQoL. Age had significant negative correlation with PCS (p<0.001) and MCS (p<0.001) in urban and rural elderly. Education level of urban and rural elderly had significant positive correlation with PCS (p<0.01) and MCS (p<0.01). Marital status of urban and rural elderly had significant negative correlation with PCS (p<0.001) and MCS (p<0.001) of HRQoL. Among the rural respondents, the mean ± SD of PCS of male was 43.79±5.766 and female was 41.14±6.860. The difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). Mean score of PCS of urban and rural respondents were 45.68±6.366 and 42.43±6.467 respectively. This difference was statistically significant (p<0.001). Mean scores of MCS of urban and rural respondents were 43.96±4.921 and 42.56±7.028 respectively. This difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05). Conclusion: Most of the elderly had average level of health-related quality life. Rural female elderly had significantly lower physical health of HRQoL than that of rural male elderly. Physical dimension of HRQoL of rural elderly was significantly lower than that of urban elderly. JAFMC Bangladesh. Vol 15, No 2 (December) 2019: 161-164


Author(s):  
Jian Zhang ◽  
Dan Li ◽  
Jianmin Gao

Background: China is becoming an aging society, and the proportion of the population aged 60 years and above is increasing. There is a dualistic urban–rural economic structure between urban and rural areas in China, but there are few comparative health studies on the self-assessed health (SAH) status of the elderly between urban and rural areas. The aim of this study is to explore the SAH status of the elderly in China, and to identify the health disparity between the urban and rural elderly. Methods: The data from the fourth wave of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) in 2018 were adopted. A total of 9630 participants aged 60 and above were included in this study. SAH was used as the indicator, measuring the health status. Fairlie decomposition analysis was conducted to find the SAH disparity. Results: The proportion of good SAH of the rural elderly (24.01%) was significantly higher than the urban elderly (19.99%). The association of SAH was widely different between the rural and urban elderly. There was a stronger association between SAH and sleeping time in the urban elderly (Odds ratios (OR) = 3.347 of 4–8 hours; OR = 3.337 of above 8 hours) than the rural elderly (OR = 1.630 of 4–8 hours; OR = 2.293 of above 8 hours). Smoking and social activity were significant only in the urban elderly, while region and assets were significant only in the rural elderly. Drinking (11.45%), region (−33.92%), and assets (73.50%) were the main factors contributing to the urban–rural health disparities. Conclusions: This is the first comparative study examining SAH disparity, focusing on the elderly aged 60 and above in China. From the perspective of drinking, region, and assets, our study highlighted substantial urban–rural health disparities, and provided evidence for policy making on narrowing the health gap between urban and rural areas in China.


2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 298
Author(s):  
Laura Ligiana Dias Szerwieski ◽  
Diógenes Aparício Garcia Cortez ◽  
Rose Mari Bennemann ◽  
Eraldo Schunk Silva ◽  
Lucia Elaine Ranieri Cortez

Aim: to verify the cognitive ability, style and quality of life of elderly primary care users. Method: a cross-sectional, correlational, analytical and descriptive study with a quantitative approach. A total of 252 semi-structured questionnaires were applied to the urban elderly, containing sociodemographic information, cognitive ability assessment and questions regarding style and quality of life. Result: there was a predominance of females with low schooling, presence of cognitive decline in 68.25% (n=172) of the elderly and a significant association between the Health Units (p=0,0351). Discussion: it should be pointed out that elderly people who do not present a decline have a better score in the nutrition component, this data emphasizes that maintaining good eating habits positively influences cognitive ability. Conclusion: the interviewees are young elderly with cognitive decline. Emphasis is given to the importance of nurses acting as health promoters, favoring active aging.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 173
Author(s):  
Anisha Aggarwal ◽  
Anshu Mittal ◽  
Shefali Nayyar ◽  
Ankita Thakral ◽  
HarsimranjitKaur Natt ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document