scholarly journals Global Climate Model Ensemble Approaches for Future Projections of Atmospheric Rivers

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. 1136-1151 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.C. Massoud ◽  
V. Espinoza ◽  
B. Guan ◽  
D.E. Waliser
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Zhao

<p>Atmospheric rivers (ARs) are narrow, elongated, synoptic jets of water vapor that play important roles in the global water cycle and regional weather and climate extremes. Accurate climate projections of high impact global severe flood and drought events hinge on the climate models' ability to simulate and predict the AR phenomenon. This presentation will provide a systematic evaluation of the AR statistics and characteristics simulated by the GFDL new generation high resolution global climate model participating in the CMIP6 High Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HiResMIP). The analyses include the historical period (1950-2014) compared against the ERA-Interim reanalysis results as well as future projections under global warming scenarios. The AR characteristics such as the spatial distribution, frequency, and intensity are explored in conjunction with large-scale circulation patterns such as the El Niño–Southern Oscillation, the Arctic Oscillation, and the Pacific-North-American teleconnections pattern. Potential changes in AR characteristics with global warming scenarios and their implications to weather and climate extremes will be discussed.</p>


Atmosphere ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 867
Author(s):  
Dong Wang ◽  
Jiahong Liu ◽  
Weiwei Shao ◽  
Chao Mei ◽  
Xin Su ◽  
...  

Evaluating global climate model (GCM) outputs is essential for accurately simulating future hydrological cycles using hydrological models. The GCM multi-model ensemble (MME) precipitation simulations of the Climate Model Intercomparison Project Phases 5 and 6 (CMIP5 and CMIP6, respectively) were spatially and temporally downscaled according to a multi-site statistical downscaling method for the Hanjiang River Basin (HRB), China. Downscaled precipitation accuracy was assessed using data collected from 14 meteorological stations in the HRB. The spatial performances, temporal performances, and seasonal variations of the downscaled CMIP5-MME and CMIP6-MME were evaluated and compared with observed data from 1970–2005. We found that the multi-site downscaling method accurately downscaled the CMIP5-MME and CMIP6-MME precipitation simulations. The downscaled precipitation of CMIP5-MME and CMIP6-MME captured the spatial pattern, temporal pattern, and seasonal variations; however, precipitation was slightly overestimated in the western and central HRB and precipitation was underestimated in the eastern HRB. The precipitation simulation ability of the downscaled CMIP6-MME relative to the downscaled CMIP5-MME improved because of reduced biases. The downscaled CMIP6-MME better simulated precipitation for most stations compared to the downscaled CMIP5-MME in all seasons except for summer. Both the downscaled CMIP5-MME and CMIP6-MME exhibit poor performance in simulating rainy days in the HRB.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Chang ◽  
W. D. Graham ◽  
S. Hwang ◽  
R. Muñoz-Carpena

Abstract. Projecting water availability under various possible future climate scenarios depends on the choice of Global Climate Model (GCM), evapotranspiration (ET) estimation method and Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) trajectory. The relative contribution of each of these factors must be evaluated in order to choose an appropriate ensemble of future scenarios for water resources planning. In this study variance-based global sensitivity analysis and Monte Carlo filtering were used to evaluate the relative sensitivity of projected changes in precipitation (P), ET and water availability (defined here as P–ET) to choice of GCM, ET estimation method and RCP trajectory over the continental United States (US) for two distinct future periods: 2030–2060 (future period 1) and 2070–2100 (future period 2). A total of 9 GCMs, 10 ET methods and 3 RCP trajectories were used to quantify the range of future projections and estimate the relative sensitivity of future projections to each of these factors. In general, for all regions of the US, changes in future precipitation are most sensitive to the choice of GCM, while changes in future ET are most sensitive to the choice of ET estimation method. For changes in future water availability, the choice of GCM is the most influential factor in the cool season (December–March) and the choice of ET estimation method is most important in the warm season (May–October) for all regions except the South East US where GCM and ET have approximately equal influence throughout most of the year. Although the choice of RCP trajectory is generally less important than the choice of GCM or ET method, the impact of RCP trajectory increases in future period 2 over future period 1 for all factors. Monte Carlo filtering results indicate that particular GCMs and ET methods drive the projection of wetter or drier future conditions much more than RCP trajectory; however the set of GCMs and ET methods that produce wetter or drier projections varies substantially by region. Results of this study indicate that, in addition to using an ensemble of GCMs and several RCP trajectories, a range of regionally-relevant ET estimation methods should be used to develop a robust range of future conditions for water resource planning under climate change.


ISCORD 2013 ◽  
2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusuke Harada ◽  
Masayo Ueda ◽  
Hiroki Matsushita ◽  
Masaru Matsuzawa

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (24) ◽  
pp. 9838-9856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoya Shimura ◽  
Nobuhito Mori ◽  
Hajime Mase

Abstract Future projections of extreme ocean surface wave climates were carried out with single-model ensemble experiments of the atmospheric global climate model MRI-AGCM3.2H. The ensemble experiments of MRI-AGCM3.2H consist of four future sea surface temperature (SST) ensembles and three perturbed physics (PP) ensembles. This study showed that future changes in extreme wave heights strongly depend on the global climate model (GCM) performance to simulate tropical cyclones (TCs), indicating a need to acknowledge that results in a study that employs a low-performance model are not able to account for extreme waves associated with TCs (TC waves). The spatial distribution of future changes in non-TC extreme wave heights on the global scale was similar to that for mean wave heights; namely, wave heights increase over the middle-to-high latitudes in the Southern Ocean and central North Pacific and decrease over midlatitudes and the North Atlantic, although the magnitude of future changes for extreme wave heights is greater than for mean wave heights. The variance of future changes mainly depends on differences in physics among PP ensemble experiments rather than differences in SST ensembles. The 10-yr return wave heights of TC waves over the western North Pacific showed either an increase or a decrease of 30% for different regions, maximally. The spatial distribution of future changes in TC waves can be explained by an eastward shift of TC tracks.


2012 ◽  
Vol 114 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 813-822 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noah S. Diffenbaugh ◽  
Filippo Giorgi

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Sippel ◽  
Jakob Zscheischler ◽  
Miguel D. Mahecha ◽  
Rene Orth ◽  
Markus Reichstein ◽  
...  

Abstract. The Earth's land surface and the atmosphere are strongly interlinked through the exchange of energy and matter (e.g. water and carbon). This coupled behaviour causes various land–atmosphere feedbacks and an insufficient understanding of these feedbacks contributes to uncertain global climate model projections. For example, a crucial role of the land surface in exacerbating summer heat waves in mid-latitude regions has been identified empirically for high-impact heatwaves, but individual climate models differ widely in their respective representation of land-atmosphere coupling. Here, we combine an ensemble of observations-based and simulated temperature (T) and evapotranspiration (ET) datasets and investigate coincidences of T anomalies with ET anomalies as a proxy for land-atmosphere interactions during periods of anomalously warm temperatures. We demonstrate that a relatively large fraction of state-of-the-art climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) archive produces systematically too frequent coincidences of high T anomalies with negative ET anomalies in mid-latitude regions during the warm season and in several tropical regions year-round. Further, we show that these coincidences (high T, low ET), as diagnosed by the land-coupling coincidence metrics, are closely related to the variability and extremes of simulated temperatures across a multi-model ensemble. Thus, our approach offers a physically consistent, diagnostic-based avenue to evaluate these ensembles, and subsequently reduce model biases in simulated and predicted extreme temperatures. Following this idea, we derive a land-coupling constraint based on the spread of 54 combinations of T-ET benchmarking datasets and consequently retain only a subset of CMIP5 models that produce a land-coupling behaviour that is compatible with these observations-based benchmark estimates. The constrained multi-model projections exhibit lower temperature extremes in regions where models show substantial spread in T-ET coupling, and in addition, biases in the climate model ensemble are consistently reduced.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document