Enhancing the Status of Family Day Care and Other Child Care Concerns

1979 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 830-831
Author(s):  
MARGARET C. HOLMBERG
1995 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 20-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryla Juchnowski

In order for family day caregivers to increase the status of their profession, they require knowledge of early childhood and confidence in themselves in the work they do. The Certificate in Childcare (Homebased) was developed to be relevant to childcare in the home rather than centre based child care, to be offered in flexible mode with flexible entry and exit points.It is proposed that a professional attitude influences the level of skill of caregivers. The study aimed to monitor whether the course can impact on caregivers' skills, and on how they view their profession. The study was based on an assessment of the child care skills of 58 caregivers which is part of the course requirements. Students were supervised and rated on their performance using the Harms and Clifford Rating Scale for Family Day Care. 70% of students were considered to have demonstrated the required level of competence.Caregivers were also interviewed regarding their attitudes towards the course. Caregivers felt that the course gave them more status and most had plans for further study. Such positive changes can only benefit children and families using Family Day Care


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 225-228
Author(s):  
Bettye M. Caldwell

In the world of day-care research, the status of our knowledge is sufficiently shaky that we must continue to keep an open mind about the service. The knowledge base is growing rapidly, but the conceptual structure that supports it is flimsy and insubstantial. Fortunately, current research efforts are improving this situation. Regardless of whether we like or dislike day care, it is, like the family, here to stay. That realization alone should strengthen our resolve not to compromise on the type of service we create. We have to continue to identify parameters of quality and become good matchmakers in terms of child care, family, and child characteristics. Through such efforts, a network of educare programs that will foster favorable development in children can become a national and global reality.


1995 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margarita Prodromidis ◽  
Michael E. Lamb ◽  
Kathleen J. Sternberg ◽  
C. Phillip Hwang ◽  
Anders G. Broberg

The relations between individual, family, and child care characteristics and children's aggressive and noncompliant behaviours were examined in this study of 140 first-born Swedish children assessed at 16,28,40, and 80 months of age. All of the parents involved in the study had attempted to enrol their children in centre-based day care, but some were accepted instead into family day care settings, while others remained in the exclusive care of their parents. Composite measures of aggression and noncompliance were constructed using data obtained from multiple sources (i.e. mothers, teachers, observers). Child care arrangements and histories were not associated with levels of aggression or noncompliance. Multiple regression analyses suggested that the quality of home care was the best predictor of both aggressive and noncompliant behaviour. Boys were more aggressive than girls, and children with more controlling parents were more noncompliant. Individual differences in aggression (but not noncompliance) were moderately stable over time. Aggression and noncompliance were modestly but reliably related to one another. These results suggest that alternative care of high quality does not lead to noncompliance and aggression.


1994 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 880-882
Author(s):  
Richard E. Isralowitz ◽  
Ismael Abu Saad

Israel, like most other societies, has a variety of subgroups differentiated by ascribed attitudes or characteristics which are imputed to individuals. These differences may be reflected by attitudes which are evaluative statements concerning objects, people, or events. In this study the attitudes of Israeli women—30 veterans and 30 newly arrived from the Soviet republics—toward family day-care services were examined. A number of significant differences between the study cohorts, such as amount of interaction between parents and child-care providers, were found and have implications for provision of service and absorption of immigrants.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 93 (6) ◽  
pp. 1016-1017
Author(s):  

In the United States, the structure, espoused purpose, and quality of child care vary widely. Community programs that provide out-of-home care for infants and preschool children have evolved either with no community regulation or with a variety of different institutional or governmental supports and regulations.1 In general, infant and preschool programs are designed either to provide substitute care when parents work and/or to promote socialization and early education. Frequently, these programs serve children only for a portion of the day and for part of the week and year. Programs that primarily provide substitute care are usually called "day care." Included in this grouping are "family day care" and "large family day care," programs in which children are cared for in someone's home, and "center day care," programs in which children receive care in settings specifically intended for that purpose. The labels traditionally applied to early education programs are "nursery school" or "preschool." These labels are not necessarily mutually exclusive. The American Academy of Pediatrics believes that education, in the broad sense, and the care of infant and preschool children are inseparable.1 In fact, the new terminology applied to these services for young children is "early childhood education/care programs." Young children are constantly learning while they play and while they engage in everyday activities.2,3 Also, young children in educational settings require "care" in the sense of needing to be comforted and to be instructed in the development of health behaviors such as hand washing and controlling their own excretions. In all settings, the safety of children should be assured.


Author(s):  
Arthur J. Frankel

The author discusses the current status of family day care, including its demographics, organization, regulations, quality-control issues, and relevant research on its effects on children, families, and child-care workers. Family day care is a pervasive underground child-care system that merits far more attention by the social work profession in state and national child-care policy considerations. Social workers are in a unique position to help family-day-care providers enter mainstream child care in the United States.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document