scholarly journals Personality traits in old age: Measurement and rank-order stability and some mean-level change.

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 243-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
René Mõttus ◽  
Wendy Johnson ◽  
Ian J. Deary
2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeroen Borghuis ◽  
Jaap J. A. Denissen ◽  
Daniel Leonard Oberski ◽  
Klaas Sijtsma ◽  
Wim H. J. Meeus ◽  
...  

Using data from two large and overlapping cohorts of Dutch adolescents, containing up to seven waves of longitudinal data each (N = 2,230), the present study examined Big Five personality trait stability, change, and codevelopment in friendship and sibling dyads from age 12 to 22. Four findings stand out. First, the one-year rank-order stability of personality traits was already substantial at age 12, increased strongly from early through middle adolescence, and remained rather stable during late adolescence and early adulthood. Second, we found linear mean-level increases in girls’ conscientiousness, in both genders’ agreeableness, and in boys’ openness. We also found temporal dips (i.e., U-shaped mean-level change) in boys’ conscientiousness and in girls’ emotional stability and extraversion. We did not find a mean-level change in boys’ emotional stability and extraversion, and we found an increase followed by a decrease in girls’ openness. Third, adolescents showed substantial individual differences in the degree and direction of personality trait changes, especially with respect to conscientiousness, extraversion, and emotional stability. Fourth, we found no evidence for personality trait convergence, for correlated change, or for time-lagged partner effects in dyadic friendship and sibling relationships. This lack of evidence for dyadic codevelopment suggests that adolescent friends and siblings tend to change independently from each other and that their shared experiences do not have uniform influences on their personality traits.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodica I. Damian ◽  
Marion Spengler ◽  
Andreea Sutu ◽  
Brent Roberts

How much do people’s personalities change or remain stable from high-school to retirement? To address these questions, we used a large US sample (N = 1,795) that assessed people’s personality traits in adolescence and 50 years later. We also used two independent samples, one cross-sectional and one short-term longitudinal (N = 3,934 and N = 38, respectively), to validate the personality scales and estimate measurement error. This was the first study to test personality stability/change over a 50-year time span in which the same data source was tapped (i.e., self-report). This allowed us to use four different methods (rank-order stability, mean-level change, individual-level change, and profile stability) answering different developmental questions. We also systematically tested gender differences. We found that the average rank-order stability was .31 (corrected for measurement error) and .23 (uncorrected). The average mean-level change was half of a standard deviation across personality traits, and the pattern of change showed maturation. Individual-level change also supported maturation, with 20-60% of the people showing reliable change within each trait. We tested three aspects of personality profile stability, and found that overall personality profile stability was .37, distinctive profile stability was .17, and profile normativeness was .51 at baseline and .62 at the follow-up. Gender played little role in personality development across the lifespan. Our findings suggest that personality has a stable component across the lifespan, both at the trait level and at the profile level, and that personality is also malleable and people mature as they age.


2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 705-714 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wafa Jaroudi ◽  
Julia Garami ◽  
Sandra Garrido ◽  
Michael Hornberger ◽  
Szabolcs Keri ◽  
...  

AbstractThere are many factors that strongly influence the aetiology, development, and progression of cognitive decline in old age, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). These factors include not only different personality traits and moods but also lifestyle patterns (e.g. exercise and diet) and awareness levels that lead to cognitive decline in old age. In this review, we discuss how personality traits, mood states, and lifestyle impact brain and behaviour in older adults. Specifically, our review shows that these lifestyle and personality factors affect several brain regions, including the hippocampus, a region key for memory that is affected by cognitive decline in old age as well as AD. Accordingly, appropriate recommendations are presented in this review to assist individuals in decreasing chances of MCI, dementia, AD, and associated symptoms.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amber Gayle Thalmayer ◽  
Gerard Saucier ◽  
Sanjay Srivastava ◽  
John Coleman Flournoy ◽  
Cory Kennedy Costello

Objective: This study investigates a set of variables related to the relative valuing of narrow selfinterest versus the concerns of a larger community. These values likely capture stable dispositions. Additionally, because ethics-relevant values are associated with ongoing cultural and moral socialization, they may develop over time as in May’s theory of “mature” values. Method: We administered eight value-priority scales (Mature Values, Unmitigated Self-Interest, Materialism, Financial Aspirations, and Horizontal and Vertical Individualism and Collectivism) to a national community sample (N = 864, 66% female, 71% White, mean age 36) on four occasions approximately one year apart (Time 4 N = 570). We examined mean-level change as cross-sectional age differences and longitudinal change, and rank-order stability. Correlations with Big Five/Big Six personality traits are reported. Results: As people grew older they increased in Mature Values and Horizontal and Vertical Collectivism, and decreased in Unmitigated Self-Interest, Materialism, and Vertical Individualism. Rank-order stability of the values was nearly as high as personality traits over three years. Stability increased with age for some scales. Discussion: The stability of values scores suggests that they capture dispositional aspects, but age differences and longitudinal trends are also consistent with the hypothesis of socialization toward more inclusive value priorities.


2022 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 233372142110682
Author(s):  
Adeleye A. Adaralegbe ◽  
Henry Egbuchiem ◽  
Oluwatomi Adeoti ◽  
Khuzeman Abbasi ◽  
Esther Ezeani ◽  
...  

Depression and personality traits are independent predictors of dementia or cognitive impairment. Despite the well-established relationship between these two psychosocial factors and dementia, no research has been documented on how personality traits can influence dementia in older adults exhibiting depressive symptoms. This study explores the influence of personality traits on the association between change in depression and dementia in old age. A population-based longitudinal cohort study involving two waves of data collected 5 years apart, containing 2210 American older adults, from the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project to explore if personality traits influence how change in depression predicts the development of dementia. We assessed these relationships while adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics. Change in depression increased the likelihood of dementia at T2 by 4.2% (AOR = 1.04, p = 0.019) in the co-variate adjusted model. Personality traits, overall, did not influence how depression predicts the development of dementia. However, agreeableness individually nullified the effect of depression on the development of dementia, whereas extraversion was the only personality trait that significantly predicted dementia. Prosocial behaviors should be promoted in old age as these appear to be protective. In addition, early life education and a strong social support can keep the depression–dementia spectrum at bay in old age.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessie Sun

People are defined in large part by how they relate to and interact with others. Yet, relatively little research has examined what people actually do to each other during their everyday social interactions. Across seven chapters, this dissertation explores the connections between personality traits, interpersonal behaviors, and social consequences. In Chapter 1, I argue for the centrality of behavior in the conceptualization of interpersonal traits. In Chapter 2, I review the tradeoffs between different methods of capturing interpersonal behavior in everyday life and introduce the dataset that I use in the following four empirical chapters. This dataset (N = 287) includes personality traits, 18 interpersonal behaviors coded from audio recordings of everyday life, and social consequences reported by friends. The first two empirical chapters (Chapters 3–4) examine the psychometric properties of the 18 interpersonal behaviors. Chapter 3 explores their factor structure and suggests that 14 of the behaviors may reflect more general tendencies towards supportiveness, negativity, mockery, and gossip. Chapter 4 addresses one of the most fundamental issues in personality psychology—behavioral consistency—by showing that these interpersonal behaviors show modest amounts of rank-order stability across one year. Chapter 5 demonstrates that personality traits are manifested in concrete interpersonal behaviors and reveals several gender differences in interpersonal behaviors, but limited implications for friend-reported social consequences. In the last empirical chapter (Chapter 6), I conduct metric calibration to make the interpersonal behavioral manifestations of personality traits (based on the correlates from Chapter 5) more concrete and meaningful by mapping frequencies of behaviors to otherwise arbitrary scores on personality trait measures. Finally, I conclude by discussing the complexities of establishing connections between traits and behaviors and the unique value and challenges of measuring actual behavior (Chapter 7).


2020 ◽  
pp. 014616722094936
Author(s):  
Olivia E. Atherton ◽  
Emily Grijalva ◽  
Brent W. Roberts ◽  
Richard W. Robins

The association between personality traits and motivational units, such as life goals, has been a long-standing interest of personality scientists. However, little research has investigated the longitudinal associations between traits and life goals beyond young adulthood. In the present study ( N = 251), we examined the rank-order stability of, and mean-level changes in, the Big Five and major life goals (Aesthetic, Economic, Family/Relationship, Hedonistic, Political, Religious, Social) from college (age 18) to midlife (age 40), as well as their co-development. Findings showed that personality traits and major life goals were both moderately-to-highly stable over 20 years. On average, there were mean-level increases in the Big Five and mean-level decreases in life goals over time. Patterns of co-development suggest people formulate goals consistent with their personality traits, and conversely, investing in goal-relevant contexts is associated with trait change. We discuss the results in light of Social Investment Theory and the developmental regulation literature.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document