HIV Testing in the US

2010 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
2022 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana M. Tordoff ◽  
Sahar Zangeneh ◽  
Christine M. Khosropour ◽  
Sara N. Glick ◽  
R. Scott McClelland ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 341-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry D. Anaya ◽  
Jaimi N. Butler ◽  
Jeffrey L. Solomon ◽  
Herschel Knapp ◽  
Tuyen Hoang ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 540-550
Author(s):  
Rob Stephenson ◽  
Stephen Sullivan ◽  
Akshay Sharma ◽  
Erin Kahle

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 225-225
Author(s):  
Bruno Palma Granwehr ◽  
Kelly W. Merriman ◽  
Zeena Shelal ◽  
Hadil Bazerbashi ◽  
Patricia A Brock ◽  
...  

225 Background: HIV is a cancer-associated virus classically associated with KS, NHL, and cervical cancer, but more recently with anal cancer, lung, and head and neck cancers. HIV testing and treatment are important for cancer patients for three reasons: 1) HIV treatment is associated with reduced transmission of a cancer-associated virus. 2) HIV treatment is associated with improved outcomes of cancer therapy in many cancers. 3) HIV testing optimizes quality of care, since testing is recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)(A level recommendation) for patients between the ages of 15 and 65 years of age. Since emergency centers (EC’s) commonly provide immunizations and other preventive care, we implemented HIV testing at our cancer center EC. Methods: In our 44 bed cancer center EC with approximately 25,000 annual visits, routine implementation by physician order was implemented in July 2014. EC information technology (IT) assisted in modification of the order sets and facilitated documentation of specific consent for HIV. Educational materials were disseminated to patients and EC providers. A new consent form with integration of HIV consent, including a check box to refuse HIV testing, was implemented on June 19, 2015. Testing results are described through August 2015. Results: HIV testing increased significantly from July 2014 and August 2015. The impact on institutional testing was considerable, increasing from 1.2% of all HIV testing in 2013 to 15.1% to date in 2015. Between July 2014 and August 2015, 1.4% (0.4% incident) of 852 patients screened positive for HIV. Notably, 83% of patients agreed to HIV testing, but less than 20% of patients were actually tested. The highest refusal rate (18.8%) was in patients over age 70 and lowest (9.9%) in those 21-29 years of age. Conclusions: Routine HIV testing is feasible in a comprehensive cancer center ED, but increased awareness is necessary to optimize testing, given the high acceptance rate. Seroprevalence of HIV is comparable to non-cancer center EC’s (0.5-1.2%). These results demonstrate the acceptance by patients of testing for HIV, with implications in reduction of transmission of this cancer-associated virus.


BMJ ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 316 (7137) ◽  
pp. 1037-1037 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Josefson
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 724-734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheri A. Lippman ◽  
André R. S. Périssé ◽  
Valdiléa G. Veloso ◽  
Patrick S. Sullivan ◽  
Susan Buchbinder ◽  
...  

The Brazilian HIV/AIDS epidemic is concentrated among men who have sex with men (MSM), however HIV testing rates among MSM are not commensurate with their risk. Strategies to expand early diagnosis may include use of self-conducted home-based testing kits, which are now available for purchase in the US. In April 2011 we conducted a survey with Brazilian MSM using Facebook to assess HIV testing preferences and acceptability of home-based testing. Among 356 previously tested, HIV-negative MSM, 47% reported a preference for home-based testing, 27% preferred clinic-based testing, and 26% had no preference. Less frequent testers and those who had considered testing but failed to test were more likely to prefer home-based testing. Close to 90% reported that they would use self-test kits; 62% and 54% said they would use home-based testing to make choices about unprotected sex with regular and new partners, respectively. Concerns included difficulty to understand the tests (32%) and receiving results alone (23%). Overall, home-based testing may appeal to MSM and result in increased testing frequency. Research on feasibility and utilization of self-tests in practice is needed.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Zinski ◽  
Sarah M. Dougherty ◽  
Ashutosh Tamhane ◽  
Kelly L. Ross-Davis ◽  
James L. Raper

The Southern states experience the highest rates of HIV and AIDS in the US, and point-of-care (POC) testing outside of primary care may contribute to status awareness in medically underserved populations in this region. To evaluate POC screening and linkage to care at an urban south site, analyses were performed on a dataset of 3,651 individuals from an integrated rapid-result HIV testing and linkage program to describe this test-seeking cohort and determine trends associated with screening, results, and linkage to care. Four percent of the population had positive results. We observed significant differences by test result for age, race and gender, reported risk behaviors, test location, and motivation for screening. The overall linkage rate was 86%, and we found significant differences for clients who were linked to HIV care versus persons whose linkage could not be confirmed with respect to race and gender, location, and motivation. The linkage rate for POC testing that included a comprehensive intake visit and colocated primary care services for in-state residents was 97%. Additional research on integrated POC screening and linkage methodologies that provide intake services at time of testing is essential for increasing status awareness and improving linkage to HIV care in the US.


2013 ◽  
Vol 103 (12) ◽  
pp. e40-e45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maggie Czarnogorski ◽  
James Halloran, CNS ◽  
Caitlin Pedati ◽  
Erin K. Dursa ◽  
Janet Durfee ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 467-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Tolou-Shams ◽  
Selby Conrad ◽  
Alaina Louis ◽  
Sarah Hart Shuford ◽  
Larry K. Brown

Abstract Juvenile offenders are a subgroup of adolescents at particular risk for HIV/STI infection. Although HIV prevalence among these youth is low (<1%) in the US, rates of other STIs, unprotected sexual activity, multiple partners, and incidents of substance use during sex are high compared with other adolescent populations. Many of these youth will enter the adult criminal justice system, which is known to have an extremely high rate of HIV infection. US constitutional mandates provide HIV/STI testing for incarcerated juveniles, but close to 80% of juvenile arrestees are never detained. Moreover, although they engage in similar HIV risk behaviors as those detained, they have limited access to available HIV/STI testing services. Thus, our study examined rates of lifetime HIV testing among a pilot sample of 60 court-involved, substance-using juveniles monitored in the community to explore rates of testing and the reasons related to lifetime testing among a high-risk, yet understudied US juvenile population.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document