Trait Adjective Rating Task

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tian Lin ◽  
Elizabeth Ankudowich ◽  
Natalie C. Ebner
Keyword(s):  
Rating Task ◽  
Trait Adjective

Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Naturalness in Speakers of Varying Gender Identities

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (7) ◽  
pp. 2054-2069
Author(s):  
Brandon Merritt ◽  
Tessa Bent
Keyword(s):  
Spontaneous Speech ◽  
Identification Accuracy ◽  
Rating Task ◽  
Gender Identification ◽  
Identification Task ◽  
Male And Female ◽  
Perceptual Evaluation ◽  
Speech Training ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Speech Naturalness

Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate how speech naturalness relates to masculinity–femininity and gender identification (accuracy and reaction time) for cisgender male and female speakers as well as transmasculine and transfeminine speakers. Method Stimuli included spontaneous speech samples from 20 speakers who are transgender (10 transmasculine and 10 transfeminine) and 20 speakers who are cisgender (10 male and 10 female). Fifty-two listeners completed three tasks: a two-alternative forced-choice gender identification task, a speech naturalness rating task, and a masculinity/femininity rating task. Results Transfeminine and transmasculine speakers were rated as significantly less natural sounding than cisgender speakers. Speakers rated as less natural took longer to identify and were identified less accurately in the gender identification task; furthermore, they were rated as less prototypically masculine/feminine. Conclusions Perceptual speech naturalness for both transfeminine and transmasculine speakers is strongly associated with gender cues in spontaneous speech. Training to align a speaker's voice with their gender identity may concurrently improve perceptual speech naturalness. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.12543158

The Breadth-Based Adjective Rating Task (BART) as an indirect measure of self-esteem

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Karpinski ◽  
Brian Versek ◽  
Jennifer Steinberg
Keyword(s):  
Self Esteem ◽  
Rating Task ◽  
Indirect Measure

Visual Categorization and Object Representation in Monkeys and Humans

2002 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Sigala ◽  
F. Gabbiani ◽  
N. K. Logothetis
Keyword(s):  
Object Representation ◽  
Rating Task ◽  
Linear Boundary ◽  
Conditional Probabilities ◽  
Diagnostic Features ◽  
Categorization Task ◽  
Visual Categorization ◽  
Perceptual Features ◽  
Subordinate Categorization

We investigated the influence of a categorization task on the extraction and representation of perceptual features in humans and monkeys. The use of parameterized stimuli (schematic faces and fish) with fixed diagnostic features in combination with a similarity-rating task allowed us to demonstrate perceptual sensitization to the diagnostic dimensions of the categorization task for the monkeys. Moreover, our results reveal important similarities between human and monkey visual subordinate categorization strategies. Neither the humans nor the monkeys compared the new stimuli to class prototypes or based their decisions on conditional probabilities along stimulus dimensions. Instead, they classified each object according to its similarity to familiar members of the alternative categories, or with respect to its position to a linear boundary between the learned categories.

Effect of Type of Task and Number of Inspectors on Performance of an Industrial Inspection-Type Task

1995 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 182-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harold Stanislaw
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Forced Choice ◽  
Sensory Memory ◽  
Long Term Memory ◽  
Rating Task ◽  
Term Memory ◽  
Industrial Inspection ◽  
Inspection Task ◽  
Practical Implications

Two hundred forty subjects working alone and in pairs performed three different versions of a task similar to industrial inspection: a rating task and spatial and temporal two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) tasks. Performance was worse on the rating task than on the 2AFC tasks, and the spatial and temporal 2AFC tasks were performed equally well. These results could signify that performance is impaired more by demands made on long-term memory than by demands made on perception and sensory memory, or that asking subjects to compare items is fundamentally different from, and easier than, asking subjects to judge items in absolute terms. Individual differences in performance were marked, but performance was inconsistent across different versions of the inspection task. When subjects worked in pairs, performance was comparable to that obtained by requiring items to pass two inspections by individual subjects. However, a single inspection by subject pairs required less time than two inspections by individual subjects. The practical implications of these findings are discussed.

Groove Rating Task

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petr Janata ◽  
Stefan T. Tomic ◽  
Jason M. Haberman
Keyword(s):  
Rating Task

Hedonic Rating Task

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soo-Hee Choi ◽  
Hyeongrae Lee ◽  
Jeonghun Ku ◽  
Kang Joon Yoon ◽  
Jae-Jin Kim
Keyword(s):  
Rating Task ◽  
Hedonic Rating

Task Involvement and Satisficing with Motivational Scales

1995 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 211-223
Author(s):  
Frank W. Wicker ◽  
Yehsoon Park ◽  
Erin McCann ◽  
Douglas Hamman
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Personality Characteristics ◽  
Rating Task ◽  
Previous Evidence ◽  
Task Involvement ◽  
Strong Potential ◽  
Potential Source ◽  
Source Of Error ◽  
Related Personality ◽  
Rating Bias

Three measures related to motivation to perform a rating task accurately were obtained from 49 students, who also performed goal-attribute ratings. Less motivated students surpassed more motivated ones on several indices of rating bias. Previous evidence for differential relationships among goal attributes was clearly replicated only with the ratings of more motivated subjects. These findings suggest that many respondents may strive for “satisfactory” rather than optimal goal ratings (“satisficing”), that this tendency is a strong potential source of error with such data, but that individual differences related to satisficing may be used to examine such effects and partially bracket them out. It is suggested that measures of subjects' motivation or other related personality characteristics be routinely gathered when multiple ratings from subjects are required.

“He killed a chicken, but it didn’t die”

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jidong Chen
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Choice ◽  
Choice Task ◽  
State Change ◽  
Rating Task ◽  
Linguistic Typology ◽  
Mandarin Speakers ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
Shi Ji

Abstract Mandarin contrasts typologically with English in its lexicalization of state change (Talmy 2000). The majority of Mandarin monomorphemic verbs is moot about or implies a state change, whereas English has many monomorphemic verbs (e.g. kill) that entail a state change. This study investigates empirically the nuanced lexicalization of state-change implicature in Mandarin monomorphemic verbs and its implications for the linguistic typology of encoding state change. Two experiments were conducted with adult native Mandarin speakers: a rating task about the acceptability of sentences that expressed a failure of fulfilment of a state-change (e.g. Zhangsan sha le ji, ke shi ji mei si ‘Zhangsan killed a chicken, but it didn’t die’) and a multiple-choice task that probed the preferred interpretation of monomorphemic state-change verbs. The results of both studies reveal a significant effect of verb types and post hoc comparisons show a cline of state-change implicature in the target verbs.

Look before you move

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 396-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tania Leal
Keyword(s):  
Native Speakers ◽  
Syntactic Analysis ◽  
Left Periphery ◽  
Rating Task ◽  
Advanced Learners ◽  
Visual Rating ◽  
Proficiency Levels ◽  
Left Dislocation ◽  
Clitic Left Dislocation ◽  
Discourse Interface

The present study examines whether, as proposed by the Interface Hypothesis (Sorace, 2011), the syntax-discourse interface is especially vulnerable to non-native optionality even at very advanced levels. I focus on the acquisition of Clitic Left Dislocation in Spanish (CLLD), a structure that involves both syntax and discourse, when it combines with other structures at the left periphery (iterative topics, Fronted Focus, and wh-constructions). CLLD is a realization of topicalization requiring the integration of syntactic and discourse knowledge. This study provides data from an audio-visual rating task completed by 120 learners of Spanish of different proficiency levels and 27 monolingual native speakers. Results showed evidence that the most advanced learners had acquired the restrictions of these structures in a native-like way and supports López’s (2009) syntactic analysis of CLLD, whereby CLLD is generated through movement so that the pragmatic features [+anaphor]/[+contrast] can be assigned to the dislocated element.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document