scholarly journals Assessing Medication Adherence Simultaneously by Electronic Monitoring and Pill Count in Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Hypertension

2010 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. A. W. van Onzenoort ◽  
W. J. Verberk ◽  
A. G. H. Kessels ◽  
A. A. Kroon ◽  
C. Neef ◽  
...  
Diabetes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 815-P
Author(s):  
MEGUMI SHIOMI ◽  
YOICHI TANAKA ◽  
MOMOKA KUROBUCHI ◽  
TESSHU TAKADA ◽  
KATSUYA OTORI

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond L. Ownby ◽  
Christopher Hertzog ◽  
Sara J. Czaja

Medication adherence has been increasingly recognized as an important factor in elderly persons’ health. Various studies have shown that medication non-adherence is associated with poor health status in this population. As part of a study of the effects of two interventions to promote medication adherence in patients treated for memory problems, information on medication adherence and cognitive status was collected at 3-month intervals. Twenty-seven participants (16 men, 11 women, age 71-92 years) were assigned to control or treatment conditions and adherence was evaluated with an electronic monitoring device. Cognitive status was evaluated at 3- month intervals beginning in April of 2003 and continuing through September of 2006. We have previously reported on the effectiveness of these interventions to promote adherence. In this paper, we examine the relations of cognitive status and adherence over time using a partial least squares path model in order to evaluate the extent to which adherence to cholinesterase medications was related to cognitive status. Adherence predicted cognitive status at later time points while cognition did not, in general, predict adherence. Results thus suggest that interventions to ensure high levels of medication adherence may be important for maintaining cognitive function in affected elderly people.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhinav Grover ◽  
Mansi Oberoi ◽  
Harmeet Rehan ◽  
Lalit Gupta ◽  
Madhur Yadav

ABSTRACTBackgroundIt is imperative that non-compliance to statins be identified and addressed to optimize the clinical benefit of statins. Patient self-reporting methods are convenient to apply in clinical practice but need to be validated.ObjectiveWe studied the concordance of a patient self-report method, MMAS (Morisky eight item medication adherence scale) with pill count method in measuring adherence to statins and their correlation with extended lipid profile parameters and serum HMGCoA-R (hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase) enzyme levels.MethodsMMAS and pill count method were used to measure the adherence to statins in patients on statins for any duration. Patients were subjected to estimation of extended lipid profile and serum HMGCoA-R levels at the end of 3 months follow-up.ResultsOut of a total of 200 patients included in the study, 117 patients had low adherence (score less than 6 on MMAS) whereas 65 and 18 patients had medium (score 6 to less than 8) and high adherence (score of 8) respectively. Majority of patients who had low adherence to statins by MMAS were nonadherent by pill count method yielding concordance of 96.5%. Medium or high adherence to statins by MMAS method had concordance of 89.1% with pill count method. The levels of total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein-cholesterol, apolipoprotein B and HMGCoA-R were significantly negatively correlated with compliance measured by pill count and MMAS with similar correlation coefficients. HMGCoA-R levels demonstrated a plateau phenomenon with levels being 9-10 ng/ml when compliance to statin therapy was greater than 60% by pill count and greater than 6 on Morisky scale.ConclusionIn conclusion, MMAS and pill count methods showed concordance in measuring adherence to statins. These methods need to be explored further for their interchangeability as surrogates for biomarker levels.


Author(s):  
Caitlin J. Cain ◽  
Andrea R. Meisman ◽  
Kirstin Drucker ◽  
Evrosina I. Isaac ◽  
Tanvi Verma ◽  
...  

Previous research suggests that children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL) often have difficulty adhering to complex treatment regimens during the maintenance phase of therapy. Measurement of treatment adherence can be done via objective (e.g., electronic monitoring (EM), pharmacological assays) or subjective methods (patient, parent, or physician reports). This paper provides an illustration of recommended strategies for comparing discrepancies between two objective measures of medication adherence (e.g., behavioral adherence using electronic monitoring versus pharmacological adherence using 6-mercaptopurine (6MP) metabolite data) within a relatively large cohort of pediatric patients with ALL or LBL (N = 139) who had longitudinal data for both measures of medication adherence over a 15-month period. Additionally, individual- and family-level factors such as gender, socioeconomic status, household environment, and dose intensity will be examined to identify possible sources of discrepancies between adherence measures. This information will provide practical advice for physicians, healthcare providers, and psychologists in identifying nonadherence and the caveats therein so patients achieve the best possible health outcomes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S245-S245
Author(s):  
Seung Hyun Kim ◽  
Jungseo Lee ◽  
Jung Jin Kim ◽  
Yujin Lee

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 1625-1633
Author(s):  
Jennifer Dotta-Celio ◽  
Adriano Alatri ◽  
Isabella Locatelli ◽  
Monique Salvi ◽  
Olivier Bugnon ◽  
...  

AbstractBackground Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have the advantage of being administered orally at a fixed dose without laboratory monitoring, in contrast to the frequent international normalized ratio measurements used to adjust for vitamin K antagonists dosing. Rivaroxaban, has a short half-life. The anticoagulation effect rapidly decreases if medication adherence is suboptimal. Objective The purpose of this quantitative study (called RIVA) is to longitudinally describe adherence to rivaroxaban (implementation and persistence) in patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Setting The community pharmacy of the Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Switzerland in collaboration with the angiology division of the Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV). Methods This is an observational study. Patients received rivaroxaban for 3 or 6 months: 15 mg twice a day during the first 3 weeks and then 20 mg once a day until the end of the treatment. Adherence was measured using electronic monitoring. Implementation and adherence were modelled using a generalized estimating equation model. Persistence was represented using a Kaplan–Meier survival curve. Main outcome measure Medication adherence (implementation and persistence). Results Thirty-one consecutive patients were included (68% male, mean age: 47 years old). The collected adherence data consisted of 57 inter-visit phases, 2899 electronic monitoring openings and a median follow-up of 92 days (IQR: 87; 100). Implementation to rivaroxaban was initially high [96.3 (92.8; 98.1)] but decreased during the first 3 weeks, until it reached 89.3 (76.0; 95.6). After the switch from twice a day 15 mg to a once a day 20 mg regimen, implementation increased again and remained stable [95.4 (92.2; 97.3)] for 90 days. Four patients who experienced adverse events discontinued the treatment before the end of the study and were considered non-persistent (clinically appropriate discontinuation). Conclusion Adherence to rivaroxaban in deep vein trombosis is high in persistent patients. Discontinuation is related to rivaroxaban adverse effects/toxicity. Implementation should be reinforced during the twice a day-phase, and this first 3-week experience should help patients and healthcare professionals choose the best timing for the once a day phase.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document