scholarly journals Comparison of ROX and HACOR scales to predict high-flow nasal cannula failure in patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Fernando Valencia ◽  
Oscar David Lucero ◽  
Onofre Casas Castro ◽  
Andrey Alexandrovich Sanko ◽  
Peter Alfonso Olejua
Keyword(s):  
Operating Characteristic ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Nasal Cannula ◽  
Composite Outcome ◽  
High Flow Nasal Cannula ◽  
Predictive Capacity ◽  
Discrimination Capacity

AbstractThe pandemic of SARSCov2 infection has created a challenge in health services worldwide. Some scales have been applied to evaluate the risk of intubation, such as the ROX and HACOR. The objective of this study is to compare the predictive capacity of the HACOR scale and the ROX index and define the optimal cut-off points. Study of diagnostic tests based on a retrospective cohort. Composite outcome was the proportion of patients that needed endotracheal intubation (ETI) or died of COVID19 pneumonia. Discrimination capacity was compared by the area under the curve of each of the two scales and the optimal cut-off point was determined using the Liu method. 245 patients were included, of which 140 (57%) required ETI and 152 (62%) had the composite end result of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) failure. The discrimination capacity was similar for the two scales with an area under receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.71 and 0.72 for the HACOR scale for the ROX index, respectively. The optimal cut-off point for the ROX index was 5.6 (sensitivity 62% specificity 65%), while the optimal cut-off point for the HACOR scale was 5.5 (sensitivity 66% specificity 65%). The HACOR scale and the ROX index have a moderate predictive capacity to predict failures to the HFNC strategy. They can be used in conjunction with other clinical variables to define which patients may require invasive mechanical ventilation.

scholarly journals Comparison of the Discrimination Capacity of the ROX and HACOR Scales to Predict High-flow Nasal Cannula Failure in Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oscar Lucero ◽  
Carlos Fernando Valencia ◽  
Onofre Casas Castro ◽  
Andrey Sanko ◽  
Peter Alfonso Olejua
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Tests ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Orotracheal Intubation ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Composite Outcome ◽  
High Flow Nasal Cannula ◽  
Predictive Capacity ◽  
Discrimination Capacity

Abstract BackgroundThe pandemic of SARSCov2 infection has created a challenge in health services worldwide. Some scales have been applied to evaluate the risk of intubation, such as the ROX and HACOR. The objective of this study is to compare the predictive capacity of the HACOR scale and the ROX index and define the optimal cut-off points.MethodsStudy of diagnostic tests based on a retrospective cohort. Composite outcome was the proportion of patients that needed orotracheal intubation or died of COVID19 pneumonia. Discrimination capacity was compared by the area under the curve of each of the two scales and the optimal cut-off point was determined using the Liu method.Results245 patients were included, of which 140 (57.14%) required OTI and 152 (62.04%) had the composite end result of HFNC failure. The discrimination capacity was similar for the two scales with an AUROC of 0.71 and 0.72 for the HACOR scale for the ROX index, respectively. The optimal cut-off point for the ROX index was 5.62 (sensitivity 62% specificity 65%), while the optimal cut-off point for the HACOR scale was 5.5 (sensitivity 66% specificity 65%).ConclusionsThe HACOR scale and the ROX index have a moderate predictive capacity to predict failures to the HFNC strategy. They can be used in conjunction with other clinical variables to define which patients may require invasive mechanical ventilation.

scholarly journals Application of high-flow nasal cannula in hypoxemic patients with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Hu ◽  
Qiang Zhou ◽  
Ruiqiang Zheng ◽  
Xuyan Li ◽  
Jianmin Ling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saturation Index ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Treatment Success ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Oxygenation Index ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Nasal Cannula ◽  
Respiratory Support ◽  
High Flow Nasal Cannula

Abstract Background: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy provides effective respiratory support in patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure. However, the efficacy of HFNC for patients with COVID-19 has not been established. This study was performed to assess the efficacy of HFNC for patients with COVID-19 and describe early predictors of HFNC treatment success in order to develop a prediction tool that accurately identifies the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with COVID-19 who underwent HFNC in 2 hospitals in Wuhan between 1 January and 1 March 2020. Overall survival, the success rate of HFNC treatment and respiratory variables to predict the outcome of HFNC treatment were evaluated.Results: A total of 105 patients were analyzed. Of these, 65 patients (61.9%) showed improved oxygenation and were successfully withdrawn from HFNC. The oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2), Oxygen saturation index (SpO2/FiO2) and respiratory rate-oxygenation index (ROX index: SpO2/FiO2*RR) at 6h, 12h and 24h of HFNC initiation were closely related to the prognosis. The best predictor was the ROX index at 24h after initiating HFNC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.874). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, young age, gender of female, and lower SOFA score all have predictive value, while a ROX index greater than 6.10 at 24 h after initiation was significantly associated with HFNC success (OR, 104.212; 95% CI, 11.399-952.757; p＜0.001).Conclusions: Our study indicated that HFNC was an effective way of respiratory support in the treatment of severe COVID-19. The ROX index greater than 6.10 at 24 h after initiating HFNC was a good predictor of successful HFNC treatment.

scholarly journals Efficacy of High-flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy in Patients with Mild Hypercapnia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lingling Su ◽  
Qinyu Zhao ◽  
Taotao Liu ◽  
Yujun Xu ◽  
Weichun Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oxygen Therapy ◽  
Medical Information ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Predictive Performance ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Nasal Cannula ◽  
Intubation Rate ◽  
High Flow Nasal Cannula ◽  
Inpatient Hospitalization ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Objectives: To investigate the indications of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy among patients with mild hypercapnia and to explore the predictors of intubation when HFNC fails.Methods: This retrospective study was conducted based on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. Adult patients with mild hypercapnia (45<PaCO2≤60 mmHg) received either HFNC or noninvasive ventilation (NIV) oxygen therapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was implemented to increase between-group comparability. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival and cumulative intubation rates, while 28-day mortality, 48-hour and 28-day intubation rates were compared using the Chi-square test. The predictive performances of HR/SpO2 and the ROX index (the ratio of SpO2/FiO2 to respiratory rate) at 4 hours were assessed regarding HFNC failure, which was determined if intubation was given within 48 hours after the initiation of oxygen therapy. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for HR/SpO2 and the ROX index were calculated and compared.Results: A total of 524,520 inpatient hospitalization records were screened, 106 patients in HFNC group and 106 patients in NIV group were successfully matched. No significant difference in 48-hour intubation rate between the HFNC group and the NIV group (14.2% vs. 8.5%, P=0.278); patients receiving HFNC had higher 28-day intubation rate (26.4% vs. 14.2%, P=0.029), higher 28-day mortality (17.9% vs. 8.5%, P=0.043), longer ICU length of stay (4.4 vs. 3.3 days, P=0.019), compared to those of NIV group. The AUC of HR/SpO2 at 4 hours after the initiation of HFNC yielded around 0.660 for predicting 48-hour intubation, greater than that of the ROX index with an AUC of 0.589 (P<0.01).Conclusions: HFNC therapy cannot completely replace NIV for patients with mild hypercapnia. As opposed to the ROX index, a modest, yet improved predictive performance is demonstrated using HR/SpO2 in predicting the failure of HFNC among these patients.

scholarly journals High flow nasal cannula in asthmatic children with suspected COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valéria Cabral Neves ◽  
Joyce de Oliveira de Souza ◽  
Adriana Koliski ◽  
Bruno Silva Miranda ◽  
Debora Carla Chong e Silva
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Respiratory Rate ◽  
Clinical Data ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Nasal Cannula ◽  
High Flow Nasal Cannula ◽  
Gradual Improvement ◽  
Arterial Blood

Abstract Introduction: The use of a high-flow nasal cannula as an alternative treatment for acute respiratory failure can reduce the need for invasive mechanical ventilation and the duration of hospital stays. Objective: The present study aimed to describe the use of a high-flow nasal cannula in pediatric asthmatic patients with acute respiratory failure and suspected COVID-19. Methods: To carry out this research, data were collected from medical records, including three patients with asthma diagnoses. The variables studied were: personal data (name, age in months, sex, weight, and color), clinical data (physical examination, PRAM score, respiratory rate, heart rate, and peripheral oxygen saturation), diagnosis, history of the current disease, chest, and laboratory radiography (arterial blood gases and reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction). Clinical data were compared before and after using a high-flow nasal cannula. Results: After the application of the therapy, a gradual improvement in heart, respiratory rate, PaO2/FiO2 ratio, and the Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure score was observed. Conclusion: The simple and quick use of a high-flow nasal cannula in pediatric patients with asthma can be safe and efficient in improving their respiratory condition and reducing the need for intubation.

scholarly journals The Role of High Flow Nasal Cannula in COVID-19 Associated Pneumomediastinum and Pneumothorax

Healthcare ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 620
Author(s):  
Francesca Simioli ◽  
Anna Annunziata ◽  
Giorgio Emanuele Polistina ◽  
Antonietta Coppola ◽  
Valentina Di Spirito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subcutaneous Emphysema ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Nasal Cannula ◽  
High Flow Nasal Cannula ◽  
High Resolution Computed Tomography ◽  
Positive Role ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Non Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Critical Patients

Background: Pneumomediastinum, subcutaneous emphysema and pneumothorax are not rarely observed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Such complications can worsen gas exchange and the overall prognosis in critical patients. The aim of this study is to investigate what predisposing factors are related to pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax in SARS-CoV2-Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), what symptoms may predict a severe and potentially fatal complication and what therapeutical approach may provide a better outcome. Methods: In this single center cohort study, we recorded data from 45 critically ill COVID-19 patients who developed one or more complicating events among pneumomediastinum, subcutaneous emphysema and pneumothorax. All patients showed ARDS and underwent non-invasive ventilation (NIV) at baseline. Patients with mild to moderate ARDS and pneumomediastinum/pneumothorax (n = 25) received High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC), while patients with severe ARDS and pneumomediastinum/pneumothorax underwent HFNC (n = 10) or invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) (n = 10). Results: Pneumomediastinum/pneumothorax developed in 10.5% of subjects affected by SARS-coV2-ARDS. Dyspnea affected 40% and cough affected 37% of subjects. High resolution computed tomography of the chest showed bilateral diffuse ground glass opacities (GGO) in 100% of subjects. Traction bronchiolectasis, reticulation, crazy paving and distortion were observed in 64%. Furthermore, 36% showed subcutaneous emphysema. Non-severe ARDS cases received HFNC, and 76% patients recovered from pneumomediastinum/pneumothorax over a median follow up of 5 days. Among severe ARDS cases the recovery rate of pneumomediastinum/pneumothorax was 70% with the HFNC approach, and 10% with IMV. Conclusion: HFNC is a safe and effective ventilatory approach for critical COVID-19 and has a positive role in associated complications such as pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax.

scholarly journals Update on the Role of High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Infants with Bronchiolitis

Children ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 66
Author(s):  
Valentina Fainardi ◽  
Lara Abelli ◽  
Maria Muscarà ◽  
Giovanna Pisi ◽  
Nicola Principi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oxygen Therapy ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Nasal Cannula ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
High Flow Nasal Cannula ◽  
Multicenter Studies ◽  
Good Tolerability

Bronchiolitis (BR), a lower respiratory tract infection mainly caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), can be very severe. Presently, adequate nutritional support and oxygen therapy remain the only interventions recommended to treat patients with BR. For years, mild BR cases were treated with noninvasive standard oxygen therapy (SOT), i.e., with cold and poorly or totally non-humidified oxygen delivered by an ambient headbox or low-flow nasal cannula. Children with severe disease were intubated and treated with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). To improve SOT and overcome the disadvantages of IMV, new measures of noninvasive and more efficient oxygen administration have been studied. Bi-level positive air way pressure (BiPAP), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) are among them. For its simplicity, good tolerability and safety, and the good results reported in clinical studies, HFNC has become increasingly popular and is now widely used. However, consistent guidelines for initiation and discontinuation of HFNC are lacking. In this narrative review, the role of HFNC to treat infants with BR is discussed. An analysis of the literature showed that, despite its widespread use, the role of HFNC in preventing respiratory failure in children with BR is not precisely defined. It is not established whether it can offer greater benefits compared to SOT and when and in which infants it can replace CPAP or BiPAP. The analysis of the results clearly indicates the need for multicenter studies and official guidelines. In the meantime, HFNC can be considered a safe and effective method to treat children with mild to moderate BR who do not respond to SOT.

scholarly journals Risk Categories in COVID-19 Based on Degrees of Inflammation: Data on More Than 17,000 Patients from the Spanish SEMI-COVID-19 Registry

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 2214
Author(s):  
Manuel Rubio-Rivas ◽  
Xavier Corbella ◽  
Francesc Formiga ◽  
Estela Menéndez Fernández ◽  
María Martín Escalante ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Nasal Cannula ◽  
High Flow Nasal Cannula ◽  
Icu Admission ◽  
Inflammatory Parameters ◽  
Risk Categories

(1) Background: The inflammation or cytokine storm that accompanies COVID-19 marks the prognosis. This study aimed to identify three risk categories based on inflammatory parameters on admission. (2) Methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with COVID-19, collected and followed-up from 1 March to 31 July 2020, from the nationwide Spanish SEMI-COVID-19 Registry. The three categories of low, intermediate, and high risk were determined by taking into consideration the terciles of the total lymphocyte count and the values of C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase, ferritin, and D-dimer taken at the time of admission. (3) Results: A total of 17,122 patients were included in the study. The high-risk group was older (57.9 vs. 64.2 vs. 70.4 years; p < 0.001) and predominantly male (37.5% vs. 46.9% vs. 60.1%; p < 0.001). They had a higher degree of dependence in daily tasks prior to admission (moderate-severe dependency in 10.8% vs. 14.1% vs. 17%; p < 0.001), arterial hypertension (36.9% vs. 45.2% vs. 52.8%; p < 0.001), dyslipidemia (28.4% vs. 37% vs. 40.6%; p < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (11.9% vs. 17.1% vs. 20.5%; p < 0.001), ischemic heart disease (3.7% vs. 6.5% vs. 8.4%; p < 0.001), heart failure (3.4% vs. 5.2% vs. 7.6%; p < 0.001), liver disease (1.1% vs. 3% vs. 3.9%; p = 0.002), chronic renal failure (2.3% vs. 3.6% vs. 6.7%; p < 0.001), cancer (6.5% vs. 7.2% vs. 11.1%; p < 0.001), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (5.7% vs. 5.4% vs. 7.1%; p < 0.001). They presented more frequently with fever, dyspnea, and vomiting. These patients more frequently required high flow nasal cannula (3.1% vs. 4.4% vs. 9.7%; p < 0.001), non-invasive mechanical ventilation (0.9% vs. 3% vs. 6.3%; p < 0.001), invasive mechanical ventilation (0.6% vs. 2.7% vs. 8.7%; p < 0.001), and ICU admission (0.9% vs. 3.6% vs. 10.6%; p < 0.001), and had a higher percentage of in-hospital mortality (2.3% vs. 6.2% vs. 23.9%; p < 0.001). The three risk categories proved to be an independent risk factor in multivariate analyses. (4) Conclusion: The present study identifies three risk categories for the requirement of high flow nasal cannula, mechanical ventilation, ICU admission, and in-hospital mortality based on lymphopenia and inflammatory parameters.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document