scholarly journals CT based radiomic approach on first line pembrolizumab in lung cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Zerunian ◽  
Damiano Caruso ◽  
Alberto Zucchelli ◽  
Michela Polici ◽  
Carlo Capalbo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Roc Curves ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Imaging Biomarkers ◽  
First Line ◽  
Proportional Analysis ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ct ◽  
Texture Parameters

AbstractClinical evaluation poorly predicts outcomes in lung cancer treated with immunotherapy. The aim of the study is to assess whether CT-derived texture parameters can predict overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with first line Pembrolizumab. Twenty-one patients with NSLC were prospectively enrolled; they underwent contrast enhanced CT (CECT) at baseline and during Pembrolizumab treatment. Response to therapy was assessed both with clinical and iRECIST criteria. Two radiologists drew a volume of interest of the tumor at baseline CECT, extracting several texture parameters. ROC curves, a univariate Kaplan-Meyer analysis and Cox proportional analysis were performed to evaluate the prognostic value of texture analysis. Twelve (57%) patients showed partial response to therapy while nine (43%) had confirmed progressive disease. Among texture parameters, mean value of positive pixels (MPP) at fine and medium filters showed an AUC of 72% and 74% respectively (P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meyer analysis showed that MPP < 56.2 were significantly associated with lower OS and PFS (P < 0.0035). Cox proportional analysis showed a significant correlation between MPP4 and OS (P = 0.0038; HR = 0.89[CI 95%:0.83,0.96]). In conclusion, MPP could be used as predictive imaging biomarkers of OS and PFS in patients with NSLC with first line immune treatment.

scholarly journals The Gustave Roussy Immune (GRIm)-Score Variation Is an Early-on-Treatment Biomarker of Outcome in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients Treated with First-Line Pembrolizumab

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 1005
Author(s):  
Edoardo Lenci ◽  
Luca Cantini ◽  
Federica Pecci ◽  
Valeria Cognigni ◽  
Veronica Agostinelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Serum Albumin ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Albumin Concentration ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line

Background: The Gustave Roussy Immune (GRIm)-Score takes into account neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), serum albumin concentration and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and its prognostic value has been investigated in patients treated with immune check-point inhibitors (ICIs). To further assess the prognostic and predictive value of baseline GRIm-Score (GRImT0) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients, we separately investigated two cohorts of patients treated with first-line pembrolizumab or chemotherapy. We also investigated whether GRIm-Score at 45 days since treatment initiation (GRImT1) and GRIm-Score difference between the two timepoints may better predict clinical outcomes (GRImΔ = GRImT0 − GRImT1). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 222 aNSCLC patients: 135 treated with pembrolizumab and 87 treated with chemotherapy as the first-line regimen. NLR, serum albumin and LDH concentrations were assessed at T0 and at T1. According to the GRIm-Score, patients were assigned 1 point if they had NLR > 6, LDH > upper limit normal or albumin < 3.5 g/dL. Patients with a GRIm-Score < 2 were considered as having a low Score. Results: In both cohorts, no difference in terms of overall survival (OS) between patients with low and high GRImT0 was found. Otherwise, median OS and progression free survival (PFS) of the low GRImT1 group were significantly longer than those of the high GRImT1 group in pembrolizumab-treated patients, but not in the CHT cohort (pembrolizumab cohort: low vs. high; median OS not reached vs. 9.2 months, p = 0.004; median PFS 10.8 vs. 2.3 months, p = 0.002). Patients receiving pembrolizumab with stable/positive GRImΔ had better OS (median OS not reached vs. 12.0 months, p < 0.001), PFS (median PFS 20.6 vs. 2.6 months, p < 0.001) and objective response rate (58.2% vs. 7.6%, p = 0.003) compared to patients with negative GRImΔ. Conclusion: Our data shown that GRImT1 and GRImΔ are more reliable peripheral blood biomarkers of outcome compared to GRImT0 in aNSCLC patients treated with pembrolizumab and might represent useful biomarkers to drive clinical decisions in this setting.

scholarly journals The benefits and risks of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy as first-line therapy in small-cell lung cancer: a single-arm meta-analysis of noncomparative clinical studies and randomized control trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiangyun Liu ◽  
Yixuan Zhang ◽  
Miaowen Liu ◽  
Ruoxin Xu ◽  
Fengming Yi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Conventional Chemotherapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

Abstract Background Although pembrolizumab has shown clinical benefit in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), its actual efficacy in combination with a conventional chemotherapy drug has not been determined. We performed this study to discern the efficacy and risk of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy as first-line therapy in SCLC patients. Methods We systematically searched the PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases for relevant studies. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results We identified 2980 articles and included 6 studies (5 were noncomparative open-label studies and 1 was a randomized controlled trial [RCT]) involving 396 patients in our meta-analysis. The pooled median OS (mOS) was 9.6 months (95% CI, 8.0-11.2), and the pooled median PFS (mPFS) was 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.2-6.1). The 1-year overall survival rate (OSR-1y) and 6-month progression-free survival rate (PFSR-6m) were 45.1% (95% CI, 33-57.2%) and 41.6% (95% CI, 24.3-59%), respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) was 38.8% (95% CI, 11.9-65.67%), disease control rate (DCR) was 69.30% (95% CI, 51.6-87.0%), complete response (CR) was 2.20% (95% CI, 0.8-3.7%), partial response (PR) was 34.70% (95% CI, 7.8-61.5%), and stable disease (SD) was 20.90% (95% CI, 9.1-32.6%). The grade 3-4 adverse effect (AE) rate was 20.88% (95% CI, 1.22-54.85%). The most common AEs were neutropenia (90.16%), anemia (53.21%), dysphagia (41.96%), platelet count decrease (34.87%), and esophagitis (32.89%); severe AEs included neutropenia, respiratory failure, pneumonitis, acute coronary syndrome, and colitis/intestinal ischemia. Conclusions The combination of pembrolizumab with conventional chemotherapy is an effective therapeutic schedule with acceptable and manageable efficacy and toxicity in patients with SCLC. More high-quality and well-designed RCTs with large sample sizes are warranted to further validate our findings.

scholarly journals Effect of COPD on Inflammation, Lymphoid Functions and Progression-Free Survival during First-Line Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 1117-1128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Márton Szentkereszty ◽  
Zsolt István Komlósi ◽  
Gergő Szűcs ◽  
Gábor Barna ◽  
Lilla Tamási ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Reliability of imaging biomarkers for response assessment in advanced lung cancer: Influence of expertise and automation.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13547-e13547
Author(s):  
Hubert Beaumont ◽  
Estanislao Oubel ◽  
Antoine Iannessi ◽  
Dag Wormanns
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Measuring System ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Advanced Lung Cancer ◽  
Imaging Biomarkers ◽  
Axial Diameter ◽  
Manual Adjustment ◽  
The Impact

e13547 Background: Image-based biomarkers play an important role in the assessment of the response to therapy. The value of imaging biomarkers relies on their reproducibility, which depends on the reviewer and on the measuring system. This study aims at evaluating the impact of readers’ expertise and automation of measurements. Methods: A retrospective study was performed on 10 patients with at least one Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) lesion, and followed over time (7 time points in average) with Computed Tomography (CT). 2 expert radiologists (ERs) and 5 imaging scientists (ISs) measured the Longest Axial Diameter (LAD) and the volume (VOL) of each lesion at each time point. ERs and ISs segmented the lesions by using a proprietary software providing semi-automatic segmentation processing with manual adjustment. ISs performed an additional session using manual segmentation tools only. From each segmentation, VOL and LAD were automatically computed. The variability of the measurements was calculated by using standard statistics. The response to treatment was assessed according to RECIST thresholds for LAD and with +/-30% thresholds for volume. The inter-reader agreement was measured trough the Kappa coefficient. Finally, the reviewing time with and without automation was analyzed. Results: The use of automated tools by ISs reduced the standard deviation of LAD difference from 10.7% to 8.4%. The inter-reader agreement improved Kappa from 0.57 to 0.68 for LAD, and from 0.52 to 0.69 for VOL. The automation reduced the reviewing time by a factor 4 with respect to the manual assessment. No significant differences in variability were found between ISs and the first ER, but significant differences were observed with respect to the second ER. Conclusions: In a RECIST context, automation improved significantly inter-reader agreement. When using volume as a biomarker, automation not only improved the inter-reader agreement, but also decreased notably the reviewing time. No evidence was found about the influence of the expertise on the volume measurement. The difference in the lesions interpretation by the experts is a relevant factor to account for.

Randomized Phase II Study of Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin or Carboplatin, With or Without Cetuximab, As First-Line Therapy for Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (36) ◽  
pp. 5777-5784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles A. Butts ◽  
David Bodkin ◽  
Edward L. Middleman ◽  
Craig W. Englund ◽  
David Ellison ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival

PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy of cetuximab added to first-line gemcitabine/platinum in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients and MethodsIn this noncomparative, randomized trial, chemotherapy-naïve patients with recurrent/metastatic NSCLC (stage IV or stage IIIB with malignant pleural effusion) were eligible. Patients received cisplatin (75 mg/m2IV, every 3 weeks) or carboplatin (area under the concentration-versus-time curve of 5 intravenously [IV], every 3 weeks), and gemcitabine (1,250 or 1,000 mg/m2IV, days 1 and 8) plus cetuximab (400 mg/m2IV day 1, followed by 250 mg/m2weekly), in arm A, or chemotherapy alone, in arm B. Response rate was the primary end point; safety, progression-free survival, and overall survival were secondary end points.ResultsSixty-five patients were randomly assigned to arm A and 66 to arm B. Partial responses were observed in 18 patients (27.7%; 95% CI, 17.3 to 40.2) in arm A and 12 (18.2%; 95% CI, 9.8 to 29.6) in arm B. Median progression-free survival was 5.09 months for arm A (95% CI, 4.17 to 5.98) and 4.21 months (95% CI, 3.81 to 5.49) in arm B. Median overall survival was 11.99 months (95% CI, 8.80 to 15.18) and 9.26 months (95% CI, 7.43 to 11.79) in arms A and B, respectively. Overall toxicity was acceptable and consistent with the profiles of the individual agents.ConclusionFirst-line treatment with cetuximab plus gemcitabine/platinum is well tolerated and can be administered safely in patients with advanced NSCLC. Differences in response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival suggest that the addition of cetuximab to platinum/gemcitabine may improve clinical outcomes. Larger studies are in progress to address this hypothesis.

scholarly journals The Possibility of Traditional Chinese Medicine as Maintenance Therapy for Advanced Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiru Xu ◽  
Guowang Yang ◽  
Yongmei Xu ◽  
Qing Zhang ◽  
Qi Fu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Chinese Medicine ◽  
Traditional Chinese Medicine ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

Lung cancer has become the leading cause of cancer deaths, with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for around 80% of lung cancer cases. Chemotherapy is the main conventional therapy for advanced NSCLC. However, the disease control achieved with classical chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC is usually restricted to only a few months. Thus, sustaining the therapeutic effect of first-line chemotherapy is an important problem that requires study. Maintenance therapy is given for patients with advanced NSCLC if three is no tumor progression after four to six cycles of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. However, selection of appropriate maintenance therapy depends on several factors, while traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) as maintenance therapy is recommended for all kinds of patients. It has been demonstrated that TCM can prolong the survival time, improve the quality of life (QOL), and reduce the side effects for advanced NSCLC. Although the trials we searched about TCM serving as maintenance therapy is only 9 studies, the results indicate TCM can prolong the progression free survival (PFS) and improve the QOL. So it is possible for TCM to be as maintenance therapy for advanced NSCLC. More rigorous trials are required to further verify its efficacy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document