Histone marks: repairing DNA breaks within the context of chromatin

2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 370-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle M. Miller ◽  
Stephen P. Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Nuclear Dna ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Dsbs

Inherited or acquired defects in detecting, signalling or repairing DNA damage are associated with various human pathologies, including immunodeficiencies, neurodegenerative diseases and various forms of cancer. Nuclear DNA is packaged into chromatin and therefore the true in vivo substrate of damaged DNA occurs within the context of chromatin. Our work aims to decipher the mechanisms by which cells detect DNA damage and signal its presence to the DNA-repair and cell-cycle machineries. In particular, much of our work has focused on DNA DSBs (double-strand breaks) that are generated by ionizing radiation and radiomimetic chemicals, and which can also arise when the DNA replication apparatus encounters other DNA lesions. In the present review, we describe some of our recent work, as well as the work of other laboratories, that has identified new chromatin proteins that mediate DSB responses, control SDB processing or modulate chromatin structure at DNA-damage sites. We also aim to survey several recent advances in the field that have contributed to our understanding of how particular histone modifications and involved in DNA repair. It is our hope that by understanding the role of chromatin and its modifications in promoting DNA repair and genome stability, this knowledge will provide opportunities for developing novel classes of drugs to treat human diseases, including cancer.

scholarly journals In vivo analysis of FANCD2 recruitment at meiotic DNA breaks in Caenorhabditis elegans

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcello Germoglio ◽  
Anna Valenti ◽  
Ines Gallo ◽  
Chiara Forenza ◽  
Pamela Santonicola ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Genetic Interaction ◽  
Model Systems ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
In Vivo Analysis

AbstractFanconi Anemia is a rare genetic disease associated with DNA repair defects, congenital abnormalities and infertility. Most of FA pathway is evolutionary conserved, allowing dissection and mechanistic studies in simpler model systems such as Caenorhabditis elegans. In the present study, we employed C. elegans to better understand the role of FA group D2 (FANCD2) protein in vivo, a key player in promoting genome stability. We report that localization of FCD-2/FANCD2 is dynamic during meiotic prophase I and requires its heterodimeric partner FNCI-1/FANCI. Strikingly, we found that FCD-2 recruitment depends on SPO-11-induced double-strand breaks (DSBs) but not RAD-51-mediated strand invasion. Furthermore, exposure to DNA damage-inducing agents boosts FCD-2 recruitment on the chromatin. Finally, analysis of genetic interaction between FCD-2 and BRC-1 (the C. elegans orthologue of mammalian BRCA1) supports a role for these proteins in different DSB repair pathways. Collectively, we showed a direct involvement of FCD-2 at DSBs and speculate on its function in driving meiotic DNA repair.

scholarly journals A nucleotide resolution map of Top2-linked DNA breaks in the yeast and human genome

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
William H. Gittens ◽  
Dominic J. Johnson ◽  
Rachal M. Allison ◽  
Tim J. Cooper ◽  
Holly Thomas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Cleavage ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Single Strand Breaks ◽  
Human Genomes ◽  
Nucleotide Resolution

Abstract DNA topoisomerases are required to resolve DNA topological stress. Despite this essential role, abortive topoisomerase activity generates aberrant protein-linked DNA breaks, jeopardising genome stability. Here, to understand the genomic distribution and mechanisms underpinning topoisomerase-induced DNA breaks, we map Top2 DNA cleavage with strand-specific nucleotide resolution across the S. cerevisiae and human genomes—and use the meiotic Spo11 protein to validate the broad applicability of this method to explore the role of diverse topoisomerase family members. Our data characterises Mre11-dependent repair in yeast and defines two strikingly different fractions of Top2 activity in humans: tightly localised CTCF-proximal, and broadly distributed transcription-proximal, the latter correlated with gene length and expression. Moreover, single nucleotide accuracy reveals the influence primary DNA sequence has upon Top2 cleavage—distinguishing sites likely to form canonical DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) from those predisposed to form strand-biased DNA single-strand breaks (SSBs) induced by etoposide (VP16) in vivo.

scholarly journals The role of Sp1 in the detection and elimination of cells with persistent DNA strand breaks

NAR Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Polina S Loshchenova ◽  
Svetlana V Sergeeva ◽  
Sally C Fletcher ◽  
Grigory L Dianov
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cancer Therapy ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Dna Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Exogenous Dna ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Specificity Factor ◽  
Dna Strand

Abstract Maintenance of genome stability suppresses cancer and other human diseases and is critical for organism survival. Inevitably, during a life span, multiple DNA lesions can arise due to the inherent instability of DNA molecules or due to endogenous or exogenous DNA damaging factors. To avoid malignant transformation of cells with damaged DNA, multiple mechanisms have evolved to repair DNA or to detect and eradicate cells accumulating unrepaired DNA damage. In this review, we discuss recent findings on the role of Sp1 (specificity factor 1) in the detection and elimination of cells accumulating persistent DNA strand breaks. We also discuss how this mechanism may contribute to the maintenance of physiological populations of healthy cells in an organism, thus preventing cancer formation, and the possible application of these findings in cancer therapy.

scholarly journals ADAR-mediated RNA editing of DNA:RNA hybrids is required for DNA double strand break repair

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia Jimeno ◽  
Rosario Prados-Carvajal ◽  
María Jesús Fernández-Ávila ◽  
Sonia Silva ◽  
Domenico Alessandro Silvestris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Rna Editing ◽  
Genomic Stability ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Editing Enzyme

AbstractThe maintenance of genomic stability requires the coordination of multiple cellular tasks upon the appearance of DNA lesions. RNA editing, the post-transcriptional sequence alteration of RNA, has a profound effect on cell homeostasis, but its implication in the response to DNA damage was not previously explored. Here we show that, in response to DNA breaks, an overall change of the Adenosine-to-Inosine RNA editing is observed, a phenomenon we call the RNA Editing DAmage Response (REDAR). REDAR relies on the checkpoint kinase ATR and the recombination factor CtIP. Moreover, depletion of the RNA editing enzyme ADAR2 renders cells hypersensitive to genotoxic agents, increases genomic instability and hampers homologous recombination by impairing DNA resection. Such a role of ADAR2 in DNA repair goes beyond the recoding of specific transcripts, but depends on ADAR2 editing DNA:RNA hybrids to ease their dissolution.

scholarly journals Clinical PARP inhibitors do not abrogate PARP1 exchange at DNA damage sites in vivo

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (17) ◽  
pp. 9694-9709
Author(s):  
Zhengping Shao ◽  
Brian J Lee ◽  
Élise Rouleau-Turcotte ◽  
Marie-France Langelier ◽  
Xiaohui Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Live Cell Imaging ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
Downstream Effector ◽  
Mutation Analyses ◽  
Molecular Nature

Abstract DNA breaks recruit and activate PARP1/2, which deposit poly-ADP-ribose (PAR) to recruit XRCC1-Ligase3 and other repair factors to promote DNA repair. Clinical PARP inhibitors (PARPi) extend the lifetime of damage-induced PARP1/2 foci, referred to as ‘trapping’. To understand the molecular nature of ‘trapping’ in cells, we employed quantitative live-cell imaging and fluorescence recovery after photo-bleaching. Unexpectedly, we found that PARP1 exchanges rapidly at DNA damage sites even in the presence of clinical PARPi, suggesting the persistent foci are not caused by physical stalling. Loss of Xrcc1, a major downstream effector of PAR, also caused persistent PARP1 foci without affecting PARP1 exchange. Thus, we propose that the persistent PARP1 foci are formed by different PARP1 molecules that are continuously recruited to and exchanging at DNA lesions due to attenuated XRCC1-LIG3 recruitment and delayed DNA repair. Moreover, mutation analyses of the NAD+ interacting residues of PARP1 showed that PARP1 can be physically trapped at DNA damage sites, and identified H862 as a potential regulator for PARP1 exchange. PARP1-H862D, but not PARylation-deficient PARP1-E988K, formed stable PARP1 foci upon activation. Together, these findings uncovered the nature of persistent PARP1 foci and identified NAD+ interacting residues involved in the PARP1 exchange.

scholarly journals A nucleotide resolution map of Top2-linked DNA breaks in the yeast and human genome

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Gittens ◽  
Dominic J. Johnson ◽  
Rachal M. Allison ◽  
Tim J. Cooper ◽  
Holly Thomas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Cleavage ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Single Strand Breaks ◽  
Human Genomes ◽  
Nucleotide Resolution

AbstractDNA topoisomerases are required to resolve DNA topological stress. Despite this essential role, abortive topoisomerase activity generates aberrant protein-linked DNA breaks, jeopardising genome stability. Here, to understand the genomic distribution and mechanisms underpinning topoisomerase-induced DNA breaks, we map Top2 DNA cleavage with strand-specific nucleotide resolution across the S. cerevisiae and human genomes—and use the meiotic Spo11 protein to validate the broad applicability of this method to explore the role of diverse topoisomerase family members. Our data characterises Mre11-dependent repair in yeast, and defines two strikingly different fractions of Top2 activity in humans: tightly localised CTCF-proximal, and broadly distributed transcription-proximal, the latter correlated with gene length and expression. Moreover, single nucleotide accuracy enables us to reveal the influence primary DNA sequence has upon Top2 cleavage—distinguishing canonical DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) from a major population of DNA single-strand breaks (SSBs) induced by etoposide (VP16) in vivo.

scholarly journals The Role of Posttranslational Modifications in DNA Repair

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Miaomiao Bai ◽  
Dongdong Ti ◽  
Qian Mei ◽  
Jiejie Liu ◽  
Xin Yan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Posttranslational Modifications ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Protein Localization ◽  
Complex Structure ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Regulate Protein

The human body is a complex structure of cells, which are exposed to many types of stress. Cells must utilize various mechanisms to protect their DNA from damage caused by metabolic and external sources to maintain genomic integrity and homeostasis and to prevent the development of cancer. DNA damage inevitably occurs regardless of physiological or abnormal conditions. In response to DNA damage, signaling pathways are activated to repair the damaged DNA or to induce cell apoptosis. During the process, posttranslational modifications (PTMs) can be used to modulate enzymatic activities and regulate protein stability, protein localization, and protein-protein interactions. Thus, PTMs in DNA repair should be studied. In this review, we will focus on the current understanding of the phosphorylation, poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation, ubiquitination, SUMOylation, acetylation, and methylation of six typical PTMs and summarize PTMs of the key proteins in DNA repair, providing important insight into the role of PTMs in the maintenance of genome stability and contributing to reveal new and selective therapeutic approaches to target cancers.

scholarly journals Genetic Separation of Sae2 Nuclease Activity from Mre11 Nuclease Functions in Budding Yeast

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (24) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sucheta Arora ◽  
Rajashree A. Deshpande ◽  
Martin Budd ◽  
Judy Campbell ◽  
America Revere ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nuclease Activity ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Endonuclease Activity ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Ends

ABSTRACT Sae2 promotes the repair of DNA double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The role of Sae2 is linked to the Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 (MRX) complex, which is important for the processing of DNA ends into single-stranded substrates for homologous recombination. Sae2 has intrinsic endonuclease activity, but the role of this activity has not been assessed independently from its functions in promoting Mre11 nuclease activity. Here we identify and characterize separation-of-function mutants that lack intrinsic nuclease activity or the ability to promote Mre11 endonucleolytic activity. We find that the ability of Sae2 to promote MRX nuclease functions is important for DNA damage survival, particularly in the absence of Dna2 nuclease activity. In contrast, Sae2 nuclease activity is essential for DNA repair when the Mre11 nuclease is compromised. Resection of DNA breaks is impaired when either Sae2 activity is blocked, suggesting roles for both Mre11 and Sae2 nuclease activities in promoting the processing of DNA ends in vivo. Finally, both activities of Sae2 are important for sporulation, indicating that the processing of meiotic breaks requires both Mre11 and Sae2 nuclease activities.

scholarly journals Recent advances in the nucleolar responses to DNA double-strand breaks

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (17) ◽  
pp. 9449-9461
Author(s):  
Lea Milling Korsholm ◽  
Zita Gál ◽  
Blanca Nieto ◽  
Oliver Quevedo ◽  
Stavroula Boukoura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Ribosomal Dna ◽  
Repetitive Sequences ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Response

Abstract DNA damage poses a serious threat to human health and cells therefore continuously monitor and repair DNA lesions across the genome. Ribosomal DNA is a genomic domain that represents a particular challenge due to repetitive sequences, high transcriptional activity and its localization in the nucleolus, where the accessibility of DNA repair factors is limited. Recent discoveries have significantly extended our understanding of how cells respond to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in the nucleolus, and new kinases and multiple down-stream targets have been identified. Restructuring of the nucleolus can occur as a consequence of DSBs and new data point to an active regulation of this process, challenging previous views. Furthermore, new insights into coordination of cell cycle phases and ribosomal DNA repair argue against existing concepts. In addition, the importance of nucleolar-DNA damage response (n-DDR) mechanisms for maintenance of genome stability and the potential of such factors as anti-cancer targets is becoming apparent. This review will provide a detailed discussion of recent findings and their implications for our understanding of the n-DDR. The n-DDR shares features with the DNA damage response (DDR) elsewhere in the genome but is also emerging as an independent response unique to ribosomal DNA and the nucleolus.

scholarly journals The Dark Side of UV-Induced DNA Lesion Repair

Genes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 1450
Author(s):  
Wojciech Strzałka ◽  
Piotr Zgłobicki ◽  
Ewa Kowalska ◽  
Aneta Bażant ◽  
Dariusz Dziga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Uv Light ◽  
Genetic Material ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Dark Side ◽  
Repair System ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Lesion ◽  
Pyrimidine Dimers

In their life cycle, plants are exposed to various unfavorable environmental factors including ultraviolet (UV) radiation emitted by the Sun. UV-A and UV-B, which are partially absorbed by the ozone layer, reach the surface of the Earth causing harmful effects among the others on plant genetic material. The energy of UV light is sufficient to induce mutations in DNA. Some examples of DNA damage induced by UV are pyrimidine dimers, oxidized nucleotides as well as single and double-strand breaks. When exposed to light, plants can repair major UV-induced DNA lesions, i.e., pyrimidine dimers using photoreactivation. However, this highly efficient light-dependent DNA repair system is ineffective in dim light or at night. Moreover, it is helpless when it comes to the repair of DNA lesions other than pyrimidine dimers. In this review, we have focused on how plants cope with deleterious DNA damage that cannot be repaired by photoreactivation. The current understanding of light-independent mechanisms, classified as dark DNA repair, indispensable for the maintenance of plant genetic material integrity has been presented.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document