Expression of Endothelin Peptides and Mrna in the Human Heart

1996 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Plumpton ◽  
M. J. Ashby ◽  
R. E. Kuc ◽  
G. O'Reilly ◽  
A. P. Davenport

1. We have examined the expression of endothelin isoforms and their precursors in the human heart using RIA, HPLC, immunocytochemistry and reverse transcriptase—polymerase chain reaction assays. 2. Highly specific RIAs were used to measure the levels of mature endothelin and big endothelin-1 immunoreactivity in extracts of human right ventricle. There was no significant difference between samples from patients with ischaemic heart disease and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. 3. HPLC coupled with RIAs allowed the separation and identification of the three mature isoforms of endothelin, big endothelin-1 and the C-terminal fragment of big endothelin-1. In extracts of human endocardial endothelial cells, peaks of immunoreactivity that co-eluted with authentic endothelin-1, big endothelin-1 and C-terminal fragment were found. 4. Intense immunocytochemical staining of mature endothelin immunoreactivity was detected in the cytoplasm of endothelial cells of all regions of the heart tested. Big endothelin-1 immunoreactivity mirrored that of the mature peptide and, in two of three individuals tested, big endothelin-2 immunoreactivity was also detected. No big endothelin-3 immunoreactivity was detected in any of the tissues examined. 5. Reverse transcriptase—polymerase chain reaction assays demonstrated endothelin-1 and endothelin-2 mRNA in all three samples of human left ventricle tested. In two of the individuals, additional bands were also detected with the endothelin-2 primers which corresponded to splice variants. There was no evidence for the expression of endothelin-3 mRNA. 6. These data suggest that endothelin-1 is the predominant isoform of endothelin in the human heart and is probably largely synthesized by the endothelial cells within the heart. If released from the endothelial cells in vivo, this potent cardiotonic peptide may play an important paracrine role in human cardiovascular function.

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1379.1-1379
Author(s):  
L. Giardullo ◽  
C. Rotondo ◽  
A. Corrado ◽  
N. Maruotti ◽  
R. Colia ◽  
...  

Background:Previous study evidenced a cross-reactivity between Sars-Cov-2 antibodies and autoimmune tissue antigen involved in connective tissue diseases, as nuclear antigen (NA), extractable nuclear antigen (ENA), histone and collagen (1). No study has been published about the titer of Sars-Cov-2 antibodies in non-infected patients with autoimmune disease.Objectives:To evaluate the titer of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in non-COVID-19 patients and compare it between systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients and healthy controls (HC).Methods:A total of 58 patients with SSc (who fulfilled ACR/EULAR 2013 SSc classification criteria) and 18 HC were enrolled. Sera of all participants were collected, and SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (IgG and IgM) were evaluated by means ELISA. In all participants swabs for SARS-CoV-2 by real-time reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction assay were reported negative. Demographic, clinical, and autoimmune serological characteristics of SSc patients were recorded. The normal distribution was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk’s test. Exclusion criteria was previous or actual Sars-Cov-2 infection. Comparisons between study groups of patients were evaluated by the Student’s t-test or Mann – Whitney U-test as appropriate. The differences between categorial variables were assessed by Pearson chi-square or Fisher’s exact test, as opportune. Statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05.Results:We observed significant differences between SSc patients and HC in serum levels of Sars-Cov-2 antibodies (IgG: 1,4±2,1 AU/ml vs 0,36±0,19 AU/ml respectively (p=0,001); and IgM: 2,5±3,1 AU/ml vs 0,8±0,7 AU/ml (p=0,022)). In 5 SSc patients was found titer of Sars-Cov-2 antibodies (IgG) exceeding the cut-off, but the control of swabs for SARS-CoV-2 by real-time reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction assay were negative. No significative differences in Sars-Cov-2 autoantibodies titer were found in subgroup of SSc patients with or without ILD or PAH, limited or diffuse skin subset, and different autoantibodies profile. Furthermore, antibodies titer was not associated with different drugs (steroid, methotrexate, mofetil-mycophenolate and bosentan) in use.Conclusion:A cross mimicking between Sars-Cov-2 antibodies and antinuclear antibodies or anti ENA could be hypothesized. Further studies are necessary to unravel the reliability of Sars-Cov-2 antibodies detection in autoimmune disease.References:[1]Vojdani, A., Vojdani, E., & Kharrazian, D. (2021). Reaction of human monoclonal antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 proteins with tissue antigens: Implications for autoimmune diseases. Frontiers in Immunology, 11, 3679Disclosure of Interests:None declared


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document