Cultural Proficiency: Supporting the Development of Cultural Competence in Mentoring Relationships

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (14) ◽  
pp. 104-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Cornish ◽  
Melissa White
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Competence ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Cultural Proficiency ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Mentoring Relationships ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Language Pathology ◽  
Potential Impact ◽  
Linguistic Influences ◽  
Culturally Proficient

The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association's (ASHA's) Strategic Pathway to Excellence calls for increased cultural competence of association members (ASHA, 2016a). This objective, fueled by a longstanding recognition of the need to educate ASHA members about the influence of culture and language on assessment and intervention (ASHA, 1985, 2004), has resulted in a greater number of resources for acquiring these knowledge and skills. However, little has been written about how mentors can facilitate the development of cultural competence among new and future professionals. In order to share this knowledge, mentors must exercise “cultural proficiency” (ASHA, 2016b). Culturally proficient mentors demonstrate an awareness of the variables that exist between the mentor and mentee as well as the clinician and client. They work strategically to help mentees develop their own awareness of cultural and linguistic influences, and apply this during clinical decision making. This article explores the critical need for cultural proficiency in mentoring relationships with our students and clinical fellows, methods for exercising cultural proficiency, and its potential impact on service provision in speech-language pathology and audiology.

scholarly journals Conscious Clinical Education: The Evidence-Based Education—Clinical Education Model

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (04) ◽  
pp. 279-288
Author(s):  
Mark DeRuiter ◽  
Sarah M. Ginsberg
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Education ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Graduate Programs ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Clinical Educators ◽  
Language Pathology ◽  
Education Model

AbstractThe fields of speech-language pathology and audiology, collectively referred to as communication sciences and disorders, are driven by evidence-based practice (EBP). As accountability in clinical service delivery continues to increase, there are few who would argue that encouraging clinicians to engage in methods that have withstood the rigors of peer-review is the wrong approach. Graduate students are typically given many opportunities to learn about the evidence for their discipline, and graduate programs are required to provide these opportunities under accreditation standards. While EBP is critical to our discipline's clinical function, we assert that evidence-based education (EBE) is equally as important as EBP to our discipline's function in educating our students. This article discusses EBP and EBE with a focus on elements that may not have been considered in the past, particularly within the complex dynamic of the EBE and clinical education interface. We present current and proposed models, including a new model of EBE in clinical education. We share insights into how the new and proposed models fit within the broader context of clinical decision making and the scholarship of teaching and learning. We conclude by addressing future needs for the education of clinical educators.

scholarly journals Moving Beyond Traditional Understandings of Evidence-Based Practice: A Total Evidence and Knowledge Approach (TEKA) to Treatment Evaluation and Clinical Decision Making in Speech-Language Pathology

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (05) ◽  
pp. 370-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arlene McCurtin ◽  
Carol-Anne Murphy ◽  
Hazel Roddam
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Explicit Knowledge ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Total Evidence ◽  
Management Approach ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Language Pathology

AbstractEvidence-based practice (EBP) is a well-established framework for supporting clinical decision making in the discipline of speech-language pathology. The benefits of using evidence to inform clinical practice are acknowledged by clinicians and researchers alike. Even so, after over two decades of EBP advocacy, much clinical uncertainty remains and models supporting the evaluation of interventions require review and reconsideration. The EBP model, while promoting positive principles, can be argued to be conceptually flawed because it suffers from a lack of attention to and explicit valuing of other forms of knowledge crucial to the formation of realistic and judiciously informed decisions. We propose that the evaluation of interventions would be better supported by an explicit knowledge management approach reflecting a range of evidence and knowledge. One worked example is presented to demonstrate what using such an approach can produce in terms of intervention information.

scholarly journals Guided Online Case Scenarios Support Development of Clinical Decision-Making Skills in Speech-Language Pathology Master’s Students

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Krystal Werfel ◽  
Gabriella Reynolds
Keyword(s):  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Master's Students ◽  
Aural Rehabilitation ◽  
Self Reflection ◽  
Language Pathology ◽  
Flipped Classrooms

Flipped classrooms are increasingly recommended by scholars of teaching and learning, and some have argued that active learning is the key ingredient in this model’s success. This paper describes the creation and implementation of online guided case study scenarios using the test function of a learning management system, as well as evaluation of their effectiveness based on (a) performance of students on separate graded case study assignments and (b) student self-reflection of learning and feedback elicited in an end-of-course survey. The case studies were developed for use in a master’s level speech-language pathology course on aural rehabilitation that occurs during the summer semester.

Beyond the Big Screen: Avatars Prepare Graduate Students for Real-World Practice

2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 50-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacy Williams ◽  
Linda R. Schreiber
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Virtual Simulation ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Client Data ◽  
Language Pathology ◽  
Virtual Simulations

Abstract This article explores the potential of virtual simulation technology in preparing university students for real-world experiences. SimuCase™, a Web-based virtual simulation application designed to support best practice in speech-language pathology, is described. The research base for learning via virtual simulations also is described. This type of simulation using case studies encourages the user to select and analyze client data to improve clinical decision-making skills in the area of assessment and supports Knowledge and Skills Assessment competencies of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.

The Influence of Linguistic Bias Upon Speech-Language Pathologists’ Attitudes Toward Clinical Scenarios Involving Nonstandard Dialects of English

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Catherine Easton ◽  
Sarah Verdon
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Service Provision ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Linguistic Diversity ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Speech Language Pathologists ◽  
Clinical Scenarios ◽  
Language Pathology

Purpose Variation within languages, including dialects, takes on an indexical function, marking belonging and connection. Meanwhile, attitudes toward these speech varieties become marked by linguistic bias. Within the speech-language pathology profession, research evidence, assessment tools, and intervention programs have largely been designed for and by the White, English-speaking middle class. As such, linguistic bias with a preference for standardized dialects is prevalent in the training and practice of the speech-language pathology profession, resulting in discriminatory and racialized practices. Method To investigate the influence of linguistic bias upon speech-language pathologists' (SLPs') clinical decision making, data were collected from 129 Australian SLPs via an online survey. Inferential statistics were used to investigate the relationship between clinical decision making and SLPs' attitudes toward nonstandard dialects as well as personal and professional factors. A content analysis of extended responses was conducted to identify themes in clinical decision making. Results SLPs with more years of experience and those who had received professional development were significantly more likely to seek out more information before making a diagnosis, while those with more negative attitudes toward linguistic diversity were significantly more likely to identify a disorder than a difference. SLPs provided a range of justifications for their clinical decision making, but few acknowledged the influence of their own attitudes and bias upon their decision making. Conclusions SLPs' linguistic bias towards speakers of nonstandard dialects has the potential to impact upon their clinical judgment of difference versus disorder and lead to inequality of service provision for speakers who do not express themselves in standardized forms. Before the profession can truly move toward an antiracist approach of equitable service provision for all, SLPs must engage in critical self-reflection to disrupt the adherence of the speech-language pathology profession to standardized “White” norms of communication.

How To Practice “Undefensively”

2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 54-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Leslie ◽  
Kate Krival
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Speech Language Pathologists ◽  
Internal Resources ◽  
Language Pathology ◽  
Decision Making Processes

Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) are increasingly challenged by the medical complexities our patients present and gripped by the fear of litigation, if patients decline physically under our care. One response to these pressures may be to practice defensive medical speech-language pathology. We propose that best practice is ethically achieved by deliberately using specific external and internal resources to practice undefensively. We suggest how consideration of these materials and processes will help SLPs ensure evaluation and clinical decision-making processes are as effective, evidence-based, and transparent to patients, caregivers, administrators, and payers as possible.

Clinical Teaching Methods for Stimulating Students' Critical Thinking

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (11) ◽  
pp. 3-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha J. Procaccini ◽  
Nancy J. Carlino ◽  
Denise M. Joseph
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Teaching Methods ◽  
Clinical Teaching ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Clinical Educators ◽  
Integral Role ◽  
Language Pathology

Critical thinking is a prerequisite to making any sound clinical decision. Many students entering into the fields of speech-language pathology and audiology are not equipped with the necessary critical thinking skills to formulate evidence-based clinical decisions. Clinical educators play an integral role in facilitating the development of students' critical thinking skills. Most clinical educators recognize the significance of, and implications for implementing teaching methods which foster critical thinking. However, many clinical educators demonstrate uncertainty about which methods to employ and how to implement such methods. This article will discuss the selection and implementation of effective teaching methods for developing students' critical thinking.

scholarly journals Cultural Competence and Self-Efficacy After Study Abroad Experiences

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 1896-1909
Author(s):  
Beatriz de Diego-Lázaro ◽  
Kevin Winn ◽  
María Adelaida Restrepo
Keyword(s):  
Service Learning ◽  
Cultural Competence ◽  
Study Abroad ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Cultural Awareness ◽  
Clinical Skills ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Mixed Methods Approach ◽  
Language Pathology ◽  
Journal Entries

Purpose Cultural competence is crucial for the successful provision of speech, language, and hearing services. The purpose of this study was to assess and describe gains in cultural awareness, cultural competence, and self-efficacy after service-learning study abroad experiences and to examine whether gains in these areas are related to higher clinical skills ratings in speech-language pathology and audiology students. Method Sixteen speech-language pathology and audiology students participated in two international study abroad experiences (Nicaragua and Malawi). Students completed a survey on cultural awareness, competence, and self-efficacy beliefs and journal entries before, during, and after their trips. In addition, the supervisors assessed the clinical skills of the students by the end of the trip. The researchers applied a mixed-methods approach to analyze data from the survey, clinical ratings, and journals. Results Students showed significant increases in cultural awareness, competence, and self-efficacy. Gains in self-efficacy and cultural awareness were highly correlated with students' clinical ratings in cultural competence as judged by their supervisors. Two main themes were identified from the journal entries: continuing community involvement and growth in cultural self-efficacy. Conclusion Service-learning study abroad experiences help students develop cultural awareness and competence skills and increase their self-efficacy beliefs. Using a mixed-methods approach can help identify strengths and weaknesses in the training of speech-language pathology and audiology students with regard to cultural competence. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.12642647

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document