scholarly journals The eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS). X-ray observable-to-mass-and-redshift relations of galaxy clusters and groups with weak-lensing mass calibration from the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program Survey

Author(s):  
I-Non Chiu ◽  
V. Ghirardini ◽  
A. Liu ◽  
S. Grandis ◽  
E. Bulbul ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 497 (1) ◽  
pp. 894-905
Author(s):  
Mauro Sereno ◽  
Stefano Ettori ◽  
Giorgio F Lesci ◽  
Federico Marulli ◽  
Matteo Maturi ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Unbiased and precise mass calibration of galaxy clusters is crucial to fully exploit galaxy clusters as cosmological probes. Stacking of weak lensing (WL) signal allows us to measure observable–mass relations down to less massive haloes without extrapolation. We propose a Bayesian inference method to constrain the intrinsic scatter of the mass proxy in stacked analyses. The scatter of the stacked data is rescaled with respect to the individual scatter based on the number of binned clusters. We apply this method to the galaxy clusters detected with the AMICO (Adaptive Matched Identifier of Clustered Objects) algorithm in the third data release of the Kilo-Degree Survey. The results confirm the optical richness as a low-scatter mass proxy. Based on the optical richness and the calibrated WL mass–richness relation, mass of individual objects down to $\sim\! 10^{13}\, \mathrm{M}_\odot$ can be estimated with a precision of ∼20 per cent.


Author(s):  
S Grandis ◽  
J J Mohr ◽  
J P Dietrich ◽  
S Bocquet ◽  
A Saro ◽  
...  

Abstract We forecast the impact of weak lensing (WL) cluster mass calibration on the cosmological constraints from the X-ray selected galaxy cluster counts in the upcoming eROSITA survey. We employ a prototype cosmology pipeline to analyze mock cluster catalogs. Each cluster is sampled from the mass function in a fiducial cosmology and given an eROSITA count rate and redshift, where count rates are modeled using the eROSITA effective area, a typical exposure time, Poisson noise and the scatter and form of the observed X-ray luminosity– and temperature–mass–redshift relations. A subset of clusters have mock shear profiles to mimic either those from DES and HSC or from the future Euclid and LSST surveys. Using a count rate selection, we generate a baseline cluster cosmology catalog that contains 13k clusters over 14,892 deg2 of extragalactic sky. Low mass groups are excluded using raised count rate thresholds at low redshift. Forecast parameter uncertainties for ΩM, σ8 and w are 0.023 (0.016; 0.014), 0.017 (0.012; 0.010), and 0.085 (0.074; 0.071), respectively, when adopting DES+HSC WL (Euclid; LSST), while marginalizing over the sum of the neutrino masses. A degeneracy between the distance–redshift relation and the parameters of the observable–mass scaling relation limits the impact of the WL calibration on the w constraints, but with BAO measurements from DESI an improved determination of w to 0.043 becomes possible. With Planck CMB priors, ΩM (σ8) can be determined to 0.005 (0.007), and the summed neutrino mass limited to ∑mν < 0.241 eV (at 95%). If systematics on the group mass scale can be controlled, the eROSITA group and cluster sample with 43k objects and LSST WL could constrain ΩM and σ8 to 0.007 and w to 0.050.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Keiichi Umetsu

AbstractWeak gravitational lensing of background galaxies provides a direct probe of the projected matter distribution in and around galaxy clusters. Here, we present a self-contained pedagogical review of cluster–galaxy weak lensing, covering a range of topics relevant to its cosmological and astrophysical applications. We begin by reviewing the theoretical foundations of gravitational lensing from first principles, with a special attention to the basics and advanced techniques of weak gravitational lensing. We summarize and discuss key findings from recent cluster–galaxy weak-lensing studies on both observational and theoretical grounds, with a focus on cluster mass profiles, the concentration–mass relation, the splashback radius, and implications from extensive mass-calibration efforts for cluster cosmology.


2015 ◽  
Vol 447 (4) ◽  
pp. 3044-3059 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. A. Giles ◽  
B. J. Maughan ◽  
T. Hamana ◽  
S. Miyazaki ◽  
M. Birkinshaw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 383 ◽  
pp. 012011
Author(s):  
Iacopo Bartalucci ◽  
Ilaria Formicola ◽  
Rossella Martino

2018 ◽  
Vol 482 (1) ◽  
pp. 1352-1378 ◽  
Author(s):  
T McClintock ◽  
T N Varga ◽  
D Gruen ◽  
E Rozo ◽  
E S Rykoff ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 918 (2) ◽  
pp. 72
Author(s):  
Kyle Finner ◽  
Kim HyeongHan ◽  
M. James Jee ◽  
David Wittman ◽  
William R. Forman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document