Anesthesia considerations and post-operative pain management in pregnant women with chronic opioid use

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 149-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mieke A. Soens ◽  
Jingui He ◽  
Brian T. Bateman
2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 455-464
Author(s):  
Josh Bleicher, MD, MS ◽  
Jordan Esplin, BS ◽  
Allison N. Blumling, MS ◽  
Jessica N. Cohan, MD, MAS ◽  
Mark Savarise, MD, MBA, FACS ◽  
...  

Objective: Interventions aimed at limiting opioid use are widespread. These are most often targeted toward prescribers or health systems. Patients’ perspectives are too often absent during the creation of such interventions. This qualitative study aims to understand patient experiences with education about perioperative pain control, from preoperative expectation-setting to post-operative pain control strategies and ultimately opioid disposal.Design: We performed semistructured interviews focused on patient experiences in the perioperative period. Content from interview transcripts was analyzed using a constant comparative method.Setting: All participants underwent surgery at a single, academic tertiary-care center.Participants: Adult patients who had a general surgery operation in the prior 60 days.Outcome measure: Key themes from interviews about perioperative pain management, specifically related to preoperative expectation-setting and post-operative education.Results: Patients identified gaps in communication and education in three main areas: preoperative expectation setting of post-operative pain; post-operative pain control strategies, including use of opioid medications; and the importance of appropriate opioid disposal. Failure to set expectations led to either significant patient anxiety preoperatively or poor preparation for home discharge. Poor education on pain control strategies led to misinformation on when and how to use opioids. Lack of education on opioid disposal led to most participants failing to properly dispose of leftover medication.Conclusions: Gaps in education surrounding post-operative pain and opioid use can lead to patient anxiety, inappropriate use of opioids, and poor disposal rates of leftover medications. Future interventions aimed at patient education to improve pain management and opioid stewardship should be created with an understanding of patient experiences and perceptions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0046
Author(s):  
Zachary T. Thier ◽  
Kenna C. Altobello ◽  
Tyler A. Gonzalez ◽  
J. Ben Jackson

Category: Bunion; Other Introduction/Purpose: More than 200,000 surgeries for hallux valgus correction occur annually in the United States. Due to the post-operative pain associated with the procedure, opioids are often prescribed to help manage pain. The opioid epidemic has led to a 78-billion-dollar economic impact. Given the lack of objective data on opioid use and the difficulty of addressing a patient’s post-operative pain, we sought to quantify, through a prospective analysis, patient’s narcotic use after hallux valgus surgery. Objective data may help guide the surgeon in the type and number of opioids utilized after surgery. Methods: Adult patients undergoing primary hallux valgus surgery were recruited from two surgeon’s institution. At the pre- operative visit, patients were consented and completed a demographical questionnaire. Data was collected from the operative and PACU record, as well as the 2-week post-operative visit. A simple statistical analysis was performed to determine average quantity and type of opioid and non-opioid pain medication used in the PACU and for post-operative pain management. Results: 33 subjects were prospectively enrolled and followed. The average time until the first post-operative clinic visit was 13.53 days. The average opioid pain medication consumption during this period was 20.766 (0-66) pills, with a morphine milligram equivalents (MME)/kg of body weight at 1.69. (78.8%) were prescribed hydrocodone/acetaminophen 5/325mg and 7 subjects (21.2%) were prescribed oxycodone/acetaminophen 5/325 for post-operative pain management. 84.8% of subjects (28/33) received a local block, including 2 femoral, 2 ankle, 13 popliteal, 3 sciatic, 3 adductor canal, 4 popliteal and saphenous, and 1 popliteal and adductor canal. 24.2% (8/33) of subjects received opioid pain medication in the PACU post-operatively with a MME/kg of body weight at 0.135 per subject. Conclusion: Based on our prospective study, we recommend an initial prescription of 30 5mg hydro/oxycodone pain pills, as this represents the 3rd quartile of consumption.


2021 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 62-70
Author(s):  
Steven Weisman

Introduction: Post-operative pain is a common type of acute pain that can require therapeutic intervention. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used to manage post-operative pain and help reduce or eliminate the use of opioids. Current pain management guidelines recommend administration of NSAIDs as first line therapy to all post-operative surgical patients, unless contraindicated, as one method to minimize opioid use. Methods: This article is based on previously conducted studies and does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author. Literature for controlled trials involving naproxen in a peri-procedural setting was included. Comprehensive meta-analyses and individual clinical trial reports were summarized. Results: Naproxen was shown to have significant efficacy in treating pain following different surgical interventions, eliminating, or reducing the use of rescue opioids in many trials. Importantly, naproxen did not demonstrate an increased rate of bleeding or other adverse events in this elevated-risk population. Conclusion: As a generally safe and effective medication, clinical consideration should be given to naproxen when developing any comprehensive, patient-specific, pain management plan.


2020 ◽  
Vol 159 (2) ◽  
pp. e16
Author(s):  
Jaimie Lee ◽  
Amanda Shepherd-Littlejohn ◽  
Lee Huynh Nguyen ◽  
Melissa M. Parker ◽  
Camille Roque ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 097-099
Author(s):  
C LaPorte ◽  
MD Rahl ◽  
OR Ayeni ◽  
TJ Menge

Foot & Ankle arthroscopy is an increasingly rapid field in the treatment of multiple hip conditions, owing to its important diagnostic and therapeutic benefit. As these patients lack a consistent pain relief plan, effective post-operative pain control appears to be a concern. Several methods were used to identify a method that decreases post-operative pain, narcotic intake and hospital and treatment system costs. This article aims to study and report the relevant findings of the previous paper “Post-operative pain management strategies in hip arthroscopy.” Latest research encourages the use of a multimodal approach to the treatment of postoperative pain in hip arthroscopic patients. In tandem with peripheral nerve blocks or intraoperative anesthetic injection a pre- and after-operative analgesic regimen is used, patients experience lower discomfort and post-operative narcotic use. Different methods are similar in post-operative pain and opioid use. However, of those undergoing Intraarticular (IA) or Local Anesthetic Infiltration (LAI), postoperative risks relative to peripheral nervous blocks are smaller. Latest trials have demonstrated that the best and most reliable, multi-modal treatment for the reduction of postoperative pain in these patients may be intraoperative techniques such as IA injection or LAI in combination with a pre and postoperative analgesy. Furthermore, failure to use the peripheral nerve block can result in lower anesthesia procedural fees and operating room turnover, thereby lowering patients’ costs and increasing facility effectiveness.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennie Yoo ◽  
Mary Han ◽  
Gemma Jamena ◽  
Phyllis Pei ◽  
Hillary Baldocchi ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Implementation of new practices in large health care settings is difficult. Staff are already overwhelmed, and practice deviation is common. With time-constrained visits, providers struggle to address complex problems. Three scenarios were identified where frontline practice standardization would improve patient outcomes: sedation and analgesia for intubated patients (inpatient), colorectal cancer screenings (outpatient), and safety measures for opioid prescriptions (outpatient). We implemented these practices through a cloud-based solution designed for frontline health care staff, fostering peer-accountability and transparency of processes. OBJECTIVE 1) Introduce a standard approach to sedation and analgesia for intubated patients. 2) Increase colorectal cancer screenings for the clinic population. 3) Improve opioid safety for patients with chronic opioid use. METHODS Practices were implemented through a cloud-based app (Elemeno Health, Oakland, CA) that allows frontline health care teams to access an organization’s best practices through interactive decision guides, smart checklists, and how-to videos from any device. In a pediatric ICU, we first delivered a Critical Care Comfort Algorithm (CALM) for titrating sedative and analgesia medications, a bottom-up self-assessment for frontline staff to evaluate their performance, and a top-down audit checklist for charge nurses to complete. For multiple community health centers, we created colorectal cancer screening practice decision guides for medical assistants (MA) and providers, and deployed the practices through a 3-week gamified contest between individual clinics conducted through the app. For the opioid safety initiative, we created a Provider Chronic Pain Management Workflow checklist, Provider Pain Evaluation Guide, and a MA checklist for medication reconciliation; implementation was paired with a 2-month inter-clinic competition. RESULTS Within 2 weeks of the formal roll-out of the Pediatric ICU charge nurse audit tool, 107 checklists were completed and 83% of intubated patients were on the sedation protocol. During the gamified 3 weeks for colorectal cancer screening, 2107 checklists were completed with engagement from 74% of MAs and 80% of providers. MAs appeared to habituate to the practice with ongoing practice post-competition; there was a 70% increase in colorectal cancer screenings 1 year post-intervention. During the contest period for increased opioid safety, naloxone prescription increased from <10/month to 27/month for new prescriptions and 21/month for renewals. Opioid contracts with historically negligible adherence increased to 45/month for new contracts and 53/month for renewed contracts. There was also a 70% increase in referrals to the Behavioral Health Pain Management Program. CONCLUSIONS Our clinical improvement initiative using cloud-based real-time actionable and trackable decision guides facilitated staff engagement with standardized protocols for pediatric analgesia and sedation, led to a significant increase in colorectal cancer screenings with high levels of provider and staff participation, and improved opioid safety and utilization of behavioral support resources for patients with chronic opioid use. The cloud-based application empowers staff with just-in-time access to microlearning tools and resources to manage patient care, simplifying management’s ability to train staff at scale. Standardizing practice and streamlining workflows liberalizes valuable face-to-face time with patients and improves patient safety.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document