DISEASE-SPECIFIC SURVIVAL FOR A NEW T-STAGE OF OROPHARYNGEAL CANCER

2000 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 402-404
Author(s):  
Francesco Carinci ◽  
Antonio Farina ◽  
Alessandro Bovicelli ◽  
Stefano Pelucchi ◽  
Carlo Calearo
Keyword(s):  
Oropharyngeal Cancer ◽  
Disease Specific Survival ◽  
T Stage ◽  
Disease Specific

scholarly journals Development and Validation of Nomograms to Predict Prognosis of Oral and Oropharyngeal Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma: A SEER-Based Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
muyuan liu ◽  
Litian Tong ◽  
Manbin Xu ◽  
Xiang Xu ◽  
Bin Liang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Seer Database ◽  
Disease Specific Survival ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
T Stage ◽  
N Stage ◽  
Disease Specific

Abstract Background: Due to the low incidence of mucoepidermoid carcinoma, there lacks sufficient studies for determining optimal treatment and predicting prognosis. The purpose of this study was to develop prognostic nomograms, to predict overall survival and disease-specific survival (DSS) of oral and oropharyngeal mucoepidermoid carcinoma patients, using the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Methods: Clinicopathological and follow-up data of patients diagnosed with oral and oropharyngeal mucoepidermoid carcinoma between 2004 and 2017 were collected from the SEER database. The Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test was employed to identify single prognostic factors. Multivariate Cox regression was utilized to identify independent prognostic factors. C-index, area under the ROC curve (AUC) and calibration curves were used to assess performance of the prognostic nomograms. Results: A total of 1230 patients with oral and oropharyngeal mucoepidermoid carcinoma were enrolled in the present study. After multivariate Cox regression analysis, age, sex, tumor subsite, T stage, N stage, M stage, grade and surgery were identified as independent prognostic factors for overall survival. T stage, N stage, M stage, grade and surgery were identified as independent prognostic factors for disease-specific survival. Nomograms were constructed to predict the overall survival and disease-specific survival based on the independent prognostic factors. The fitted nomograms possessed excellent prediction accuracy, with a C-index of 0.899 for OS prediction and 0.893 for DSS prediction. Internal validation by computing the bootstrap calibration plots, using the validation set, indicated excellent performance by the nomograms. Conclusion: The prognostic nomograms developed, based on individual clinicopathological characteristics, in the present study, accurately predicted the overall survival and disease-specific survival of patients with oral and oropharyngeal mucoepidermoid carcinoma.

Colon and Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors: Are They Really One Disease? A Single-Institution Experience over 15 Years

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. 717-726 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justine S. Broecker ◽  
Cecilia G. Ethun ◽  
Lauren M. Postlewait ◽  
Nina Le ◽  
Mia Mcinnis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Lymphovascular Invasion ◽  
Tumor Biology ◽  
Institutional Setting ◽  
Disease Specific Survival ◽  
Single Institution ◽  
Transanal Resection ◽  
T Stage ◽  
Survival Differences ◽  
Disease Specific

Colon and rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are often studied as one entity. Recent evidence suggests that worse outcomes are associated with colon compared with rectal NETs; direct comparisons are lacking. Our aim was to assess clinicopathologic, treatment, and survival differences between these diseases. All patients who underwent resection of colorectal NETs at one institution from 2000 to 2014 were included and analyzed. Of 29 patients, 12(41%) had colon and 17 (59%) had rectal NETs. Baseline demographics were similar between groups, although colon patients tended to be symptomatic at presentation (67% vs 44%, P = 0.41). Eighty-three per cent of colon patients underwent surgical resection, whereas 77 per cent of rectal patients underwent endoscopic or transanal resection ( P = 0.003). Colon patients had larger (3.4 cm vs 0.7 cm, P = 0.03), higher T-stage (T3/T4: 91% vs 14%, P = 0.003), higher grade tumors (42% vs 12%, P = 0.09) with more lymph nodes (58% vs 24%, P = 0.12) and lymphovascular invasion positivity (58% vs 24%, P = 0.32). Five-year disease-specific survival was 53% versus 80 per cent for colon and rectal patients, respectively ( P = 0.22). After excluding high-grade tumors, colon NETs were associated with lymphovascular invasion positivity (100% vs 17%, P = 0.05) and advanced T-stage (80% vs 8%, P = 0.01). Colon and rectal 5-year disease-specific survival was 67 versus 80 per cent ( P = 0.86). Colon and rectal NETs clinically seem to be distinct entities. Colon tumors have more aggressive clinicopathologic features, which may translate to worse outcomes. These differences in tumor biology may demand distinct management and should be further studied in a multi-institutional setting.

The prognostic utility of hemoglobin and lymphocytopenia in bladder-sparing therapy.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 370-370
Author(s):  
Michael Drumm ◽  
Hannah Johnson Roberts ◽  
William U. Shipley ◽  
Andrzej Niemierko ◽  
Niall M. Heney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Lymphocyte Count ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Disease Specific Survival ◽  
Trimodality Therapy ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
T Stage ◽  
Bladder Sparing ◽  
Disease Specific

370 Background: Many patients with bladder cancer are found to have laboratory derrangements such as anemia and lymphocytopenia prior to treatment, though their prognostic value is unknown. We examined pretreatment lab values and clinical outcomes in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who underwent bladder sparing trimodality therapy (TMT). Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 181 patients with T2-T4a bladder cancer who underwent TMT between 2001 and 2013. Pretreatment absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and hemoglobin (Hgb) values were collected, and cut-off values were established to be 1.5*10^9/L, 3.12, and 12 g/dl, respectively. Overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared with Kaplan Meier survival probabilities and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis, controlling for gender, age, completeness of TURBT, response to TMT, cystectomy, clinical T stage, and hydronephrosis. Results: Median follow-up was 47 months. On univariate analysis, patients with a low pretreatment lymphocyte count had poorer OS (p = 0.03) than patients with a higher pretreatment lymphocyte count (5 year OS rates: 54% and 71%, respectively). Patients with pretreatment anemia had poorer OS (p = 0.001) and DSS (p < 0.001) than patients with a higher pretreatment hemoglobin count, (5 year OS rates: 39% and 65%; 5 year DSS rates: 39% and 72%, respectively). On multivariate analysis, pretreatment anemia was significantly associated with poorer OS (HR 2.58, 95% CI 1.36–4.90) and DSS (HR 3.23, 95% CI 1.62–6.43), whereas complete response to TMT was significantly associated with improved OS (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.13–0.43) and DSS (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.14–0.59). Complete response to TMT was significantly associated with improved DFS (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.21–0.61), and a higher clinical T stage was associated with poorer DFS (HR 2.38, 95% CI 1.19–4.75). Conclusions: When adjusting for clinical factors, pretreatment anemia remained an independent predictor of overall and disease-specific survival following TMT. Further prospective validation of lab values and clinical outcomes in MIBC are needed.

1140: Prognostic Nomogram for Disease-Specific Survival of Patients with Untreated Androgen Independent Prostate Cancer

2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 310-310
Author(s):  
Robert S. Svatek ◽  
Pierre I. Karakiewicz ◽  
Michael J. Shulman ◽  
Jose Karam ◽  
Paul Perrotte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Disease Specific Survival ◽  
Disease Specific ◽  
Androgen Independent
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document