Cardiac Ischemic Complications Following Cardiac Surgery - Angiographic Findings and Predictors of In-hospital Mortality

Introduction While there are rigourous assessments made of trainees’ knowledge through formal examinations, objective assessments of technical skills are not available. Little is known about the safety of allowing resident trainees to perform cardiac surgical operations. Methods Peri-operative date was prospectively collected on all patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), aortic valve replacement (AVR) or a combined procedure between 1998 and 2005. Teaching-cases were identified by resident records and defined as cases which the resident performed skin to skin. Pre-operative characteristics were compared between teaching and non-teaching cases. Short-term adverse events were defined as a composite of: in-hospital mortality, stroke, intra- or post-operative intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) insertion, myocardial infarction, renal failure, wound infection, sepsis or return to the operating room. Intermediate adverse outcomes were defined as hospital readmission for any cardiac disease or late mortality. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models were used to adjust for differences in age, acuity, and medical co-morbidities. Outcomes were compared between teaching and non-teaching cases. Results 6929 cases were included, 895 of which were identified as teaching-cases. Teaching-cases were more likely to have an EF<40%, pre-operative IABP, CHF, combined CABG/AVRs or total arterial grafting cases (all p<0.01). However, a case being a teaching-case was not a predictor of in-hospital mortality (OR=1.02, 95%CI 0.67–1.55) or the composite short-term outcome (OR=0.97, 95%CI 0.75–1.24). The Kaplan-Meier event-free survival of staff and teaching-cases was equivalent at 1, 3, and 5 years: 80% vs. 78%, 67% vs. 66%, and 58% vs. 55% (log-rank p=0.06). Cox proportional hazards regression modeling did not demonstrate teaching-case to be a predictor of late death or re-hospitalization (HR=1.05, 95%CI 0.94 –1.18). Conclusions Teaching-cases were more likely to have greater acuity and complexity than non-teaching cases. Despite this, teaching cases did no worse than staff cases in the short or intermediate term. Allowing residents to perform cardiac surgery does not appear to adversely affect patient outcomes.

Download Full-text

Lack of Association between Preoperative Statin Use and Respiratory and Neurologic Complications after Cardiac Surgery

Anesthesiology ◽

10.1097/aln.0000000000001569 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 126 (5) ◽

pp. 799-809 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Ryu Komatsu ◽

Huseyin Oguz Yilmaz ◽

Jing You ◽

C. Allen Bashour ◽

Shobana Rajan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Intensive Care Unit ◽

Cardiac Surgery ◽

Intensive Care ◽

Hospital Mortality ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Odds Ratio ◽

Hospital Length Of Stay ◽

Neurologic Complications ◽

Prolonged Ventilation ◽

Statin Use

Abstract Background Statins may reduce the risk of pulmonary and neurologic complications after cardiac surgery. Methods The authors acquired data for adults who had coronary artery bypass graft, valve surgery, or combined procedures. The authors matched patients who took statins preoperatively to patients who did not. First, the authors assessed the association between preoperative statin use and the primary outcomes of prolonged ventilation (more than 24 h), pneumonia (positive cultures of sputum, transtracheal fluid, bronchial washings, and/or clinical findings consistent with the diagnosis of pneumonia), and in-hospital all-cause mortality, using logistic regressions. Second, the authors analyzed the collapsed composite of neurologic complications using logistic regression. Intensive care unit and hospital length of stay were evaluated with Cox proportional hazard models. Results Among 14,129 eligible patients, 6,642 patients were successfully matched. There was no significant association between preoperative statin use and prolonged ventilation (statin: 408/3,321 [12.3%] vs. nonstatin: 389/3,321 [11.7%]), pneumonia (44/3,321 [1.3%] vs. 54/3,321 [1.6%]), and in-hospital mortality (52/3,321 [1.6%] vs. 43/3,321 [1.3%]). The estimated odds ratio was 1.06 (98.3% CI, 0.88 to 1.27) for prolonged ventilation, 0.81 (0.50 to 1.32) for pneumonia, and 1.21 (0.74 to 1.99) for in-hospital mortality. Neurologic outcomes were not associated with preoperative statin use (53/3,321 [1.6%] vs. 56/3,321 [1.7%]), with an odds ratio of 0.95 (0.60 to 1.50). The length of intensive care unit and hospital stay was also not associated with preoperative statin use, with a hazard ratio of 1.04 (0.98 to 1.10) for length of hospital stay and 1.00 (0.94 to 1.06) for length of intensive care unit stay. Conclusions Preoperative statin use did not reduce pulmonary or neurologic complications after cardiac surgery.

Download Full-text

Abstract 2301: Frail Elderly Patients at Increased Risk for Mortality and Prolonged Institutional Care After Cardiac Surgery

Circulation ◽

10.1161/circ.118.suppl_18.s_702 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽

Author(s):

Dana H Lee ◽

Billie Jean Martin ◽

Alexandra M Yip ◽

Karen J Buth ◽

Gregory M Hirsch

Keyword(s):

Renal Failure ◽

Cardiac Surgery ◽

Elderly Patients ◽

Hospital Mortality ◽

Frail Elderly ◽

Independent Predictor ◽

Institutional Care ◽

Biological Age ◽

Younger Patients ◽

Frail Patients

Patients referred for cardiac surgery are increasingly older, but chronological age does not always capture biological age. This study assessed frailty, as a functional parameter of biological age, as a predictor of mortality or prolonged institutional care. Functional measures of frailty and clinical preoperative data were collected for all cardiac surgery patients at a single center (2004 –2007). Based on the Katz Index of Activities of Daily Living, frailty was defined as any impairment in feeding, bathing, dressing, transferring, toileting, continence, or ambulation, or dementia. The impact of frailty on in-hospital mortality or institutional discharge (other hospital or nursing facility) was assessed with multivariate logistic regression. The interaction of frailty and age was examined, with non-frail patients age<70 as the referent group. Results: Of 3096 patients, 133 (4.3%) were frail. Frail patients were older, more likely to be female, have COPD, CHF, EF<40%, recent MI, pre-operative renal failure, cerebrovascular disease, greater acuity, and more complex operations (p<0.05). Frail patients experienced higher rates of mortality, sepsis, delirium, post-operative renal failure, and transfusion (p<0.001). A greater proportion of frail patients than non-frail patients (49% vs. 9%) were discharged to a setting other than home. In the risk-adjusted models, frailty was an independent predictor of mortality (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.0 –3.2) or institutional discharge (OR 6.4, 95% CI 4.1–9.9). Furthermore, frail elderly (age≥70) patients had greater risk of institutional discharge (OR 22.7, CI 12.4 – 41.7) than frail younger patients (OR 6.5, CI 3.4 –12.5) or non-frail elderly patients (OR 3.5, CI 2.6 – 4.6). Similarly, frail elderly patients had greater risk of mortality (OR 4.0, CI 1.9 – 8.1) than frail younger patients (OR 1.9, CI 0.8 – 4.7) or non-frail elderly patients (OR 2.4, CI 1.7–3.5). Frailty was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality and prolonged institutional care. Frailty combined with older age further discriminated those at highest risk. Special consideration should be given to the management of frail elderly patients who have surgical cardiac disease.

Download Full-text