First Workshop for Detection of Heparin-induced Antibodies: Validation of the Heparin-induced Platelet-activation Test (HIPA) in Comparison with a PF4/Heparin ELISA

1999 ◽  
Vol 81 (04) ◽  
pp. 625-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Eichler ◽  
U. Budde ◽  
S. Haas ◽  
H. Kroll ◽  
R. M. Loreth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Activation ◽  
Cross Reactivity ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Functional Assay ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Danaparoid Sodium ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Iga Antibodies ◽  
Heparin Complexes

Summary Background. No data exist regarding the inter-laboratory reproducibility of the heparin-induced-platelet-activation (HIPA) test, the most widely used functional assay in Germany for the detection of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) antibodies. Methods. Nine laboratories used an identical protocol to test eight different sera with the HIPA test. Five laboratories also tested the sera with a platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin-complex ELISA. Cross-reactivity with danaparoid-sodium was assessed using 0.2 aFXa units instead of heparin in the HIPA test. Results. Two of nine laboratories had no discrepant HIPA test results. Four laboratories differed in one sample, one reported two discrepant results, and two laboratories reported more than two discrepant results. Cross-reactivity with danaparoid-sodium test results differed among laboratories. PF4/heparin ELISA results were identical in all five laboratories. Conclusion. The HIPA test requires strict quality control measures. Using both a sensitive functional assay (HIPA test) and a PF4/heparin ELISA will allow detection of antibodies directed to antigens other than PF4/heparin complexes as well as detection of IgM and IgA antibodies with PF4/heparin specificity.

scholarly journals Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein and Anti-Platelet Factor 4 Antibody Responses Induced by COVID-19 Disease and ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccination

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Greinacher ◽  
Kathleen Selleng ◽  
Julia Mayerle ◽  
Raghavendra Palankar ◽  
Jan Wesche ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Activation ◽  
Molecular Mimicry ◽  
Cross Reactivity ◽  
Platelet Factor 4 ◽  
Antibody Responses ◽  
Spike Protein ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Activation Assay ◽  
Heparin Complexes

Abstract Background: Some recipients of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca develop antibody-mediated vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), associated with cerebral venous and other unusual thrombosis resembling autoimmune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. A prothrombotic predisposition is also observed in Covid-19. We explored whether antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein induced by Covid-19 cross-react with platelet factor 4 (PF4/CXLC4), the protein targeted in both VITT and autoimmune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.Methods: Immunogenic epitopes of PF4 and SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were compared via prediction tools and 3D modelling software (IMED, SIM, MacMYPOL). Sera from 222 PCR-confirmed Covid-19 patients from five European centers were tested by PF4/heparin ELISA, heparin-dependent and PF4-dependent platelet activation assays. Immunogenic reactivity of purified anti-PF4 and anti-PF4/heparin antibodies from patients with VITT were tested against recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Results: Three motifs within the spike protein sequence share a potential immunogenic epitope with PF4. Nineteen of 222 (8.6%) Covid-19 patient sera tested positive in the IgG-specific PF4/heparin ELISA, none of which showed platelet activation in the heparin-dependent activation assay, including 10 (4.5%) of the 222 Covid-19 patients who developed thromboembolic complications. Purified anti-PF4 and anti-PF4/heparin antibodies from two VITT patients did not show cross-reactivity to recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Conclusions: The antibody responses to PF4 in SARS-CoV-2 infection and after vaccination with COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca differ. Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein do not cross-react with PF4 or PF4/heparin complexes through molecular mimicry. These findings make it very unlikely that the intended vaccine-induced immune response against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein would itself induce VITT.

scholarly journals Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and cardiovascular surgery

Hematology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
pp. 536-544
Author(s):  
Allyson M. Pishko ◽  
Adam Cuker
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Antiplatelet Agent ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Functional Assay ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Heparin Complexes ◽  
Institutional Experience ◽  
History Of ◽  
Postoperative Setting

Abstract Clinicians generally counsel patients with a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) to avoid heparin products lifelong. Although there are now many alternative (nonheparin) anticoagulants available, heparin avoidance remains challenging for cardiac surgery. Heparin is often preferred in the cardiac surgery setting based on the vast experience with the agent, ease of monitoring, and reversibility. To “clear” a patient with a history of HIT for cardiac surgery, hematologists must first confirm the diagnosis of HIT, which can be challenging due to the ubiquity of heparin exposure and frequency of thrombocytopenia in patients in the cardiac intensive care unit. Next, the “phase of HIT” (acute HIT, subacute HIT A/B, or remote HIT) should be established based on platelet count, immunoassay for antibodies to platelet factor 4/heparin complexes, and a functional assay (eg, serotonin release assay). As long as the HIT functional assay remains positive (acute HIT or subacute HIT A), cardiac surgery should be delayed if possible. If surgery cannot be delayed, an alternative anticoagulant (preferably bivalirudin) may be used. Alternatively, heparin may be used with either preoperative/intraoperative plasma exchange or together with a potent antiplatelet agent. The optimal strategy among these options is not known, and the choice depends on institutional experience and availability of alternative anticoagulants. In the later phases of HIT (subacute HIT B or remote HIT), brief intraoperative exposure to heparin followed by an alternative anticoagulant as needed in the postoperative setting is recommended.

scholarly journals Polymorphisms of protein tyrosine phosphatase CD148 influence FcγRIIA-dependent platelet activation and the risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (6) ◽  
pp. 1309-1316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jérôme Rollin ◽  
Claire Pouplard ◽  
Marie-Pierre Gratacap ◽  
Dorothée Leroux ◽  
Marc-Antoine May ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Activation ◽  
Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase ◽  
Tyrosine Phosphatase ◽  
Src Family Kinases ◽  
Cross Linking ◽  
Signaling Proteins ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Protein Tyrosine ◽  
Heparin Complexes

Abstract Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is due primarily to IgG antibodies specific to platelet factor 4/heparin complexes (PF4/Hs) that activate platelets via FcγRIIA. CD148 is a protein tyrosine phosphatase that regulates Src kinases and collagen-induced platelet activation. Three polymorphisms affecting CD148 (Q276P, R326Q, and D872E) were studied in HIT patients and 2 control groups, with or without antibodies to PF4/Hs. Heterozygote status for CD148 276P or 326Q alleles was less frequent in HIT patients, suggesting a protective effect of these polymorphisms. Aggregation tests performed with collagen, HIT plasma, and monoclonal antibodies cross-linking FcγRIIA showed consistent hyporesponsiveness of platelets expressing the 276P/326Q alleles. In addition, platelets expressing the 276P/326Q alleles exhibited a greater sensitivity to the Src family kinases inhibitor dasatinib in response to collagen or ALB6 cross-linking FcγRIIA receptors. Moreover, the activatory phosphorylation of Src family kinases was considerably delayed as well as the phosphorylation of Linker for activation of T cells and phospholipase Cγ2, 2 major signaling proteins downstream from FcγRIIA. In conclusion, this study shows that CD148 polymorphisms affect platelet activation and probably exert a protec-tive effect on the risk of HIT in patients with antibodies to PF4/Hs.

Partially desulfated heparin modulates the interaction between anti-protamine/heparin antibodies and platelets

2016 ◽  
Vol 115 (02) ◽  
pp. 324-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rabie Jouni ◽  
Heike Zöllner ◽  
Ahmad Khadour ◽  
Jan Wesche ◽  
Anne Grotevendt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Activation ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Standard Drug ◽  
Platelet Surface ◽  
Minimal Impact ◽  
Platelet Survival ◽  
Heparin Complexes ◽  
The Impact

SummaryProtamine (PRT) is the standard drug to neutralise heparin. PRT/heparin complexes induce an immune response similar to that observed in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Partially desulfated heparin (ODSH) was shown to interfere with anti-platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies (Abs), which are responsible for HIT. In this study, we analyse the impact of ODSH on the interaction between anti-PRT/heparin Abs and platelets. The ability of ODSH to prevent anti-PRT/heparin Ab-induced platelet destruction in vivo was investigated using the NOD/ SCID mouse model. ODSH improved platelet survival in the presence of PRT, heparin and anti-PRT/heparin Abs (median platelet survival after 300 minutes (min) with 20 μg/ml ODSH: 75 %, range 70–81 % vs without ODSH: 49%, range 44–59%, p=0.006). Furthermore, when ODSH was applied 60 min after Ab injection platelet survival was improved (median platelet survival after 300 min with ODSH: 83 %, range 77–93 % vs without ODSH: 59 %, range 29–61 %, p=0.02). In in vitro experiments ODSH inhibited platelet activation at concentrations > 16 μg/mL (p< 0.001), as well as PRT/heparin complex binding to platelets (mean fluorescence intensity [MFI] without ODSH: 85 ± 14 vs with ODSH: 15 ± 0.6, p=0.013). ODSH also displaced pre-bound complexes from the platelet surface (MFI without ODSH: 324 ± 43 vs with 32 μg/ml ODSH: 53 ± 9, p< 0.001). While interfering with platelet activation by anti-PRT/heparin Abs, up to a concentration of 16 μg/ml, ODSH had only minimal impact on neutralisation of heparin by PRT. In conclusion, our study shows that ODSH is able to inhibit platelet activation and destruction suggesting a potential clinical use to reduce anti-PRT/heparin Ab-mediated adverse effects.

scholarly journals Fibronectin modulates formation of PF4/heparin complexes and is a potential factor for reducing risk of developing HIT

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 133 (9) ◽  
pp. 978-989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krystin Krauel ◽  
Patricia Preuße ◽  
Theodore E. Warkentin ◽  
Catja Trabhardt ◽  
Sven Brandt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Activation ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Heparin Binding ◽  
Plasma Fibronectin ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Washed Platelet ◽  
Plasma Factor ◽  
Heparin Complexes ◽  
Patient Groups

Abstract Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is caused by platelet-activating anti–platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies. Platelet activation assays that use “washed” platelets are more sensitive for detecting HIT antibodies than platelet-rich plasma (PRP)–based assays. Moreover, heparin-exposed patients vary considerably with respect to the risk of PF4/heparin immunization and, among antibody-positive patients, the risk of subsequent “breakthrough” of clinical HIT with manifestation of thrombocytopenia. We used washed platelets and PRP, standard laboratory HIT tests, and physicochemical methods to identify a plasma factor interfering with PF4/heparin complexes and anti-PF4/heparin antibody–platelet interaction, thus explaining differences in functional assays. To investigate a modulating risk for PF4/heparin immunization and breakthrough of HIT, we also tested 89 plasmas from 2 serosurveillance trials. Fibronectin levels were measured in 4 patient groups exhibiting different degrees of heparin-dependent immunization and expression of HIT. The heat-labile plasma protein, fibronectin, inhibited PF4 binding to platelets in a dose-dependent fashion, particularly in washed (vs PRP) systems. Fibronectin also inhibited PF4/heparin binding to platelets, anti-PF4/heparin antibody binding to PF4/heparin complexes, and anti-PF4/heparin antibody–induced platelet activation as a result of PF4/heparin complex disruption. In addition, plasma fibronectin levels increased progressively among the following 4 patient groups: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)+/serotonin-release assay (SRA)+/HIT+ &lt; ELISA+/SRA+/HIT− ∼ ELISA+/SRA−/HIT− &lt; ELISA−/SRA−/HIT−. Altogether, these findings suggest that fibronectin interferes with PF4/heparin complex formation and anti-PF4/heparin antibody–induced platelet activation. Reduced fibronectin levels in washed platelet assays help to explain the greater sensitivity of washed platelet (vs PRP) assays for HIT. More importantly, lower plasma fibronectin levels could represent a risk factor for PF4/heparin immunization and clinical breakthrough of HIT.

scholarly journals Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: in vitro studies on the interaction of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and low-sulfated heparin, with platelet factor 4 and anti-PF4/heparin antibodies

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 119 (5) ◽  
pp. 1248-1255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krystin Krauel ◽  
Christine Hackbarth ◽  
Birgitt Fürll ◽  
Andreas Greinacher
Keyword(s):  
Factor Xa ◽  
Platelet Factor 4 ◽  
Thrombin Inhibitors ◽  
Direct Thrombin Inhibitors ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Alternative Anticoagulation ◽  
Heparin Complexes ◽  
History Of

Abstract Heparin is a widely used anticoagulant. Because of its negative charge, it forms complexes with positively charged platelet factor 4 (PF4). This can induce anti-PF4/heparin IgG Abs. Resulting immune complexes activate platelets, leading to the prothrombotic adverse drug reaction heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). HIT requires treatment with alternative anticoagulants. Approved for HIT are 2 direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI; lepirudin, argatroban) and danaparoid. They are niche products with limitations. We assessed the effects of the DTI dabigatran, the direct factor Xa-inhibitor rivaroxaban, and of 2-O, 3-O desulfated heparin (ODSH; a partially desulfated heparin with minimal anticoagulant effects) on PF4/heparin complexes and the interaction of anti-PF4/heparin Abs with platelets. Neither dabigatran nor rivaroxaban had any effect on the interaction of PF4 or anti-PF4/heparin Abs with platelets. In contrast, ODSH inhibited PF4 binding to gel-filtered platelets, displaced PF4 from a PF4-transfected cell line, displaced PF4/heparin complexes from platelet surfaces, and inhibited anti-PF4/heparin Ab binding to PF4/heparin complexes and subsequent platelet activation. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban seem to be options for alternative anticoagulation in patients with a history of HIT. ODSH prevents formation of immunogenic PF4/heparin complexes, and, when given together with heparin, may have the potential to reduce the risk for HIT during treatment with heparin.

Pathophysiology of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

2000 ◽  
Vol 124 (11) ◽  
pp. 1657-1666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabrizio Fabris ◽  
Sarfraz Ahmad ◽  
Giuseppe Cella ◽  
Walter P. Jeske ◽  
Jeanine M. Walenga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Activation ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Platelet Factor 4 ◽  
Thrombin Inhibitors ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Cellular Activation ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
New Information ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Release Assay

Abstract Objective.—This review of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), the most frequent and dangerous side effect of heparin exposure, covers the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of this disease syndrome. Data Sources and Study Selection.—Current consensus of opinion is given based on literature reports, as well as new information where available. A comprehensive analysis of the reasons for discrepancies in incidence numbers is given. The currently known mechanism is that HIT is mediated by an antibody to the complex of heparin–platelet factor 4, which binds to the Fc receptor on platelets. New evidence suggests a functional heterogeneity in the anti-heparin-platelet factor 4 antibodies generated to heparin, and a “superactive” heparin-platelet factor 4 antibody that does not require the presence of heparin to promote platelet activation or aggregation has been identified. Up-regulation of cell adhesion molecules and inflammatory markers, as well as preactivation of platelets/endothelial cells/leukocytes, are also considered to be related to the pathophysiology of HIT. Issues related to the specificity of currently available and new laboratory assays that support a clinical diagnosis are addressed in relation to the serotonin-release assay. Past experience with various anticoagulant treatments is reviewed with a focus on the recent successes of thrombin inhibitors and platelet GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors to combat the platelet activation and severe thrombotic episodes associated with HIT. Conclusions.—The pathophysiology of HIT is multifactorial. However, the primary factor in the mediation of the cellular activation is due to the generation of an antibody to the heparin-platelet factor 4 complex. This review is written as a reference for HIT research.

Serologic Results in >1000 Patients With Suspected Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 410-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suresh G. Shelat ◽  
Anne Tomaski ◽  
Eleanor S. Pollak
Keyword(s):  
Laboratory Diagnosis ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Functional Assay ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Release Assay ◽  
Pathogenic Antibodies

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) can lead to life-threatening and limb-threatening thrombosis. HIT is thought to be initiated by the interaction of pathogenic antibodies toward a complex platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin (PF4:H), which can activate platelets and predispose to thrombosis. As such, the laboratory diagnosis of HIT includes antigenic and functional assays to detect antibodies directed at PF4:H complexes. We performed a retrospective analysis of 1017 consecutive samples tested by serotonin-release assay and by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Most samples showed no serologic evidence of HIT, whereas 4% to 5% of samples demonstrated both antigenic and functional serological evidence for HIT. Approximately 12% to 18% of samples showed immunologic evidence of anti-PF4:H antibodies but without functional evidence of serotonin release in vitro. Interestingly, a small minority of samples (0.7%) caused serotonin release but were negative in the ELISA. The results are presented using cutoff values established at our hospital and for the ELISA manufacturer. This study provides a pretest probability of the serologic results from an antigenic assay (ELISA) and a functional assay (serotonin-release assay) in patients clinically suspected of having HIT.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document