scholarly journals Extended Treatment with Apixaban for Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in the Netherlands: Clinical and Economic Effects

TH Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 02 (03) ◽  
pp. e315-e324
Author(s):  
Lisa de Jong ◽  
Judith Gout-Zwart ◽  
Jelena Stevanovic ◽  
Harrie Rila ◽  
Mike Koops ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Case Analysis ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Economic Effects ◽  
Base Case ◽  
Base Case Analysis ◽  
Extended Treatment ◽  
Recurrent Vte

Background Dutch guidelines advise extended anticoagulant treatment with direct oral anticoagulants or vitamin K antagonists for patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism (VTE) who do not have high bleeding risk. Objectives The aim of this study was to analyze the economic effects of extended treatment of apixaban in the Netherlands, based on an updated and adapted previously published model. Methods We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis simulating a population of 1,000 VTE patients. The base-case analysis compared extended apixaban treatment to no treatment after the first 6 months. Five additional scenarios were conducted to evaluate the effect of different bleeding risks and health care payers' perspective. The primary outcome of the model is the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in costs (€) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), with one QALY defined as 1 year in perfect health. To account for any influence of the uncertainties in the model, probabilistic and univariate sensitivity analyses were conducted. The treatment was considered cost-effective with an ICER less than €20,000/QALY, which is the most commonly used willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold for preventive drugs in the Netherlands. Results The model showed a reduction in recurrent VTE and no increase in major bleeding events for extended treatment in all scenarios. The base-case analysis showed an ICER of €9,653/QALY. The probability of being cost-effective for apixaban in the base-case was 70.0% and 91.4% at a WTP threshold of €20,000/QALY and €50,000/QALY, respectively. Conclusion Extended treatment with apixaban is cost-effective for the prevention of recurrent VTE in Dutch patients.

Cost Effectiveness of Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin for the Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3177-3177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig D. Seaman ◽  
Margaret V. Ragni ◽  
Kenneth J. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Base Case ◽  
Minor Bleeding ◽  
Old Patients ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Recurrent Vte

Abstract Abstract 3177 Background: Rivaroxaban is an oral anticoagulant administered once daily that works by direct inhibition of factor Xa. It has been found to be noninferior to warfarin in the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE). Whether rivaroxaban is cost effective in the prevention of recurrent VTE, however, is not known. Methods: To assess the cost effectiveness of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in the prevention of recurrent VTE, we built a Markov state transition model over a 10-year time horizon. The base case analysis consisted of a hypothetical cohort of 60-year-old patients who were diagnosed with their first VTE and received secondary prophylaxis with either rivaroxaban or warfarin for 6 months. Cost estimates were derived from the Healthcare and Utilization Project (HCUP) and other sources. Probabilities for VTE recurrence and mortality and for major and minor bleeding were based on the EINSTEIN PE trial (NEJM 2012; 366: 1287–97). Outcomes included costs in 2011 United States dollars, quality adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICERs) over 10 years from a societal perspective. Results: Base case results are shown in the Table, showing total medication and other medical costs associated with each strategy. Compared with warfarin, the rivaroxaban strategy cost less ($4057 vs $7004) and was more effective (9.30 QALYs vs 9.16 QALYs). Thus, warfarin was dominated by rivaroxaban. In sensitivity analyses, results were most sensitive to changes in the probability of major bleeding with rivaroxaban. As shown in the Figure, when major bleeding with rivaroxaban (base case 1.1%) was less than 4.5%, the ICRE was within the $100,000 per QALY gained acceptability threshold range. Results favoring rivaroxaban were robust to individual variation of other parameter values. Conclusion: Prophylactic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban appears to be a cost effective, and perhaps cost saving, alternative to warfarin for the prevention of recurrent VTE. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Rivaroxaban - Prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound ablation for palliation of refractory painful bone metastases

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Matthew D. Bucknor ◽  
Frandics P. Chan ◽  
Jessica Y. Matuoka ◽  
Patti K. Curl ◽  
James G. Kahn
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Bone Metastases ◽  
Time Horizon ◽  
Focused Ultrasound ◽  
Case Analysis ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Base Case ◽  
Base Case Analysis ◽  
Painful Bone Metastases

Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to determine if magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) is cost-effective compared with medication, for refractory pain from bone metastases in the United States. Methods We constructed a Markov state transition model using TreeAge Pro software (TreeAge Software, Inc., Williamstown, MA, USA) to model costs, outcomes, and the cost-effectiveness of a treatment strategy using MRgFUS for palliative treatment of painful bone metastases compared with a Medication Only strategy (Figure 1). Model transition state probabilities, costs (in 2018 US$), and effectiveness data (quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]) were derived from available literature, local expert opinion, and reimbursement patterns at two U.S. tertiary academic medical centers actively performing MRgFUS. Costs and QALYs, discounted at three percent per year, were accumulated each month over a 24-month time horizon. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Results In the base-case analysis, the MRgFUS treatment strategy costs an additional $11,863 over the 2-year time horizon to accumulate additional 0.22 QALYs, equal to a $54,160/QALY ICER, thus making MRgFUS the preferred strategy. One-way sensitivity analyses demonstrate that for the base-case analysis, the crossover point at which Medication Only would instead become the preferred strategy is $23,341 per treatment. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses demonstrate that 67 percent of model iterations supported the conclusion of the base case. Conclusions Our model demonstrates that MRgFUS is cost-effective compared with Medication Only for palliation of painful bone metastases for patients with medically refractory metastatic bone pain across a range of sensitivity analyses.

scholarly journals The Cost-Effectiveness of 13-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine in Seven Chinese Cities

Vaccines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 1368
Author(s):  
Yan Li ◽  
Huaqing Wang ◽  
Wesley Furnback ◽  
Bruce C. M. Wang ◽  
Shuiqing Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Indirect Effects ◽  
Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine ◽  
Case Analysis ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Vaccination Rate ◽  
Base Case ◽  
Base Case Analysis ◽  
The Cost

Objective: This study estimates the cost-effectiveness of vaccination with the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) among infants in Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Chengdu, Karamay, Qingdao, and Suzhou. Methods: A previously published cost-effectiveness model comparing vaccination with PCV13 to no vaccination was localized to the included Chinese cities. A systematic literature review was undertaken to identify age-specific incidence rates for pneumococcal bacteremia, pneumococcal meningitis, pneumonia, and otitis media (AOM). Age-specific direct medical costs of treating the included pneumococcal diseases were taken from the Chinese Health Insurance Association database. The base case analysis evaluated vaccine efficacy using direct effect and indirect effects (DE+ IDE). A subsequent scenario analysis evaluated the model outcomes if only DE was considered. A vaccination rate of 70% was used. The model reported outcomes over a one-year period after it was assumed the vaccine effects had reached a steady state (5–7 years after vaccine introduction) to include the direct and indirect effects of vaccination. Health outcomes were discounted at 5% during the steady-state period. Results: Vaccination with PCV13 was cost-effective in the base case analysis for all included cities with the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) ranging from 1145 CNY(Shenzhen) to 15,422 CNY (Qingdao) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. PCV13 was the dominant strategy in Shanghai with lower incremental costs and higher incremental QALYs. PCV13 remained cost-effective in the DE-only analysis with all ICERs falling below a cost-effectiveness threshold of three times GDP per capita in each city. Conclusions: Vaccination with PCV13 was a cost-effective strategy in the analyzed cities for both the DE-only and DE + IDE analyses. PCV13 became very cost-effective when a vaccination rate was reached where IDE is observed.

P5239Cost-effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J King ◽  
S Bhat ◽  
L J Heath ◽  
C G Derington ◽  
Z Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Relative Risk ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
Cost Effectiveness Ratio ◽  
Major Bleed ◽  
Recurrent Vte

Abstract Background Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are at least as effective as low-molecular weight heparins (LMWH) at preventing recurrence after cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CA-VTE). DOACs are also oral and far less costly, but they may confer a higher bleeding risk than LMWH. Purpose To estimate the cost-effectiveness of DOACs and LMWHs for CA-VTE. Methods We developed a health state transition model to estimate recurrent VTE, bleeding events, quality-adjusted life years (QALY), and direct healthcare costs (2018 United States dollars) associated with DOACs vs. LMWH use. The model had four states: (1) long-term anticoagulation (first 3 months after VTE), (2) extended anticoagulation (more than 3 months after VTE), (3) off anticoagulants, and (4) death. We used a United States healthcare sector perspective, 3-month cycle length, and 1-year time horizon. Event probabilities were derived from the Hokusai Cancer VTE trial and other literature. Event and medication costs were obtained from national sources. We used a threshold of less than $50,000 per QALY gained to define cost-effectiveness. Results Compared to LMWH, DOACs were less costly (mean costs: $8,477 vs. $33,917 per year) and similarly effective (mean QALY: 0.616 vs. 0.622). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $4,479,374 per QALY gained with LMWH, indicating that DOACs are cost-effective (Table 1). In threshold analyses, LMWH therapy only became cost-effective when DOAC recurrent VTE risk increased to at least 72% (relative risk vs. LMWH, 6.19) or DOAC clinically relevant bleeding increased to at least 39% (relative risk vs. LMWH, 10.09). Scenarios Recurrent VTE, % Major bleed, % Mean difference DOAC − LMW ICER DOAC LMWH Relative Risk DOAC LMWH Relative Risk Cost QALY Base case 8.1 11.6 0.71 6.8 4.0 1.75 −$25,440 (−26,496, −24,274) −0.006 (−0.019, 0.008) $4,479,374 DOAC outcome rate threshold at which LMWH becomes cost-effective*   Recurrent VTE 71.5 11.7 6.19 – – – −$6,064 (−7,534, −4,627) −0.121 (−0.136, −0.108) $49,886   Major Bleed – – – 38.9 4.0 10.09 −$2,192 (−3,400, −704) −0.044 (−0.056, −0.030) $49,878 DOAC = direct oral anticoagulant, ICER = incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, LMWH = low-molecular-weight heparin, VTE = venous thromboembolism. Values are mean (95% Uncertainty Interval). Uncertainty was derived from 1,000 stochastic model iterations. *Represents the minimum increased risk with DOAC that would result in LMWH achieving an ICER <$50K per QALY gained. Conclusion In this simulation study, DOACs were a cost-effective oral alternative to LMWH for the treatment of CA-VTE. For LMWH to be cost-effective, DOAC event rates needed to be far higher than what is likely to be observed in clinical practice. Acknowledgement/Funding Agency for Health Research and Quality R18HS026156

scholarly journals Cost-effectiveness of home versus hospital management of children at onset of type 1 diabetes: the DECIDE randomised controlled trial

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. e043523
Author(s):  
Zoe McCarroll ◽  
Julia Townson ◽  
Timothy Pickles ◽  
John W Gregory ◽  
Rebecca Playle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Case Analysis ◽  
Base Case ◽  
Base Case Analysis ◽  
Home Management ◽  
Randomised Controlled

ObjectiveThe aim of this economic evaluation was to assess whether home management could represent a cost-effective strategy in the patient pathway of type 1 diabetes (T1D). This is based on the Delivering Early Care In Diabetes Evaluation trial (ISRCTN78114042), which compared home versus hospital management from diagnosis in childhood diabetes and found no statistically significant difference in glycaemic control at 24 months.DesignCost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomised controlled trial.SettingEight paediatric diabetes centres in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.Participants203 clinically well children aged under 17 years, with newly diagnosed T1D and their carers.Outcome measuresThe base-case analysis adopted n National Health Service (NHS) perspective. A scenario analysis assessed costs from a broader societal perspective. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as cost per mmol/mol reduction in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), was based on the mean difference in costs between the home and hospital groups, divided by mean differences in effectiveness (HbA1c). Uncertainty was considered in terms of the probability of cost-effectiveness.ResultsAt 24 months postintervention, the base-case analysis showed a difference in costs between home and hospital, in favour of home management (mean difference −£2,217; 95% CI −£2825 to −£1,609; p<0.001). Home care dominated, with an ICER of £7434 (saved) per mmol/mol reduction of HbA1c. The results of the scenario analysis also favoured home management. The greatest driver of cost differences was hospitalisation during the initiation period.ConclusionsHome management from diagnosis of children with T1D who are medically stable represents a less costly approach for the NHS in the UK, without impacting clinical effectiveness.Trial registration numberISRCTN78114042.

Comparison of Cost-Effectiveness of Anticoagulation with Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban and Apixaban in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Across Countries

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1164-1164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Krejczy ◽  
Job Harenberg ◽  
Svetlana Marx ◽  
Konrad Obermann ◽  
Martin Wehling
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Markov Model ◽  
Case Analysis ◽  
Base Case ◽  
German Population ◽  
Base Case Analysis ◽  
Chads2 Score ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Markov Decision Model ◽  
The Cost

Abstract Abstract 1164 The three new oral anticoagulants (NOAC) dabigatran 110mg bid and 150mg bid, investigated in the RE-LY trial, rivaroxaban 20mg od of the ROCKET trial, and apixaban 5mg bid of the ARISTOTLE trial showed equivalent or superior efficacy and safety compared to warfarin in these patients. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis for these NOACs in Germany and compared the quality of life (QALY), incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICER), and total costs across those countries form where these data are published. The base case population was a hypothetical cohort of patients 65 years or older with AF who were at increased risk for stroke (CHADS2-score >1) and had no contraindications to anticoagulation. The time horizon was based on the life expectancy of the German population. The QALYs, health insurance costs, and ICER for the NOACs compared with warfarin were calculated for each study. The sensitivity analysis was performed for different base case prices. The Markov decision model was adopted using the TreeAge Pro 2011 program. The data of the outcomes of ischemic stroke and cerebral embolism, major and intracerebral haemorrhage, myocardial infarction, and mortality were taken from the 3 studies comparing the NOAC with INR-adjusted warfarin. Prices for clinical events and for outpatient care were taken from the institute for payment regulations in German hospitals (InEK). The base-case analysis of a 65 years old person with a >2 CHADS2 score using the data from the RE-LY study resulted in 11.41 QALYs for warfarin, 11.53 QALYs for dabigatran 110mg bid, 11.66 QALYs for dabigatran 150 mg bid. ICERs per QALY were 49640€ for dabigatran 110 mg bid and 49590€ for dabigatran 150 mg bid versus warfarin. The same base-case analysis using the data from the ROCKET AF study resulted in 10.79 QALYs for warfarin versus 11.05 QALYs for rivaroxaban. ICERs per QALY were 48980€ for rivaroxaban versus warfarin. The base-case analysis using the data from the ARISTOTLE study resulted and 11.04 QALYs for warfarin versus 11.38 QALYs for apixaban. ICERs per QALY were 49720€ for apixaban versus warfarin. According the Markov Model the daily value based daily prices were 1.25€ for dabigatran 110 mg bid, 2.50€ for dabigatran 150 mg bid, 2.60€ for rivaroxaban, and 3.10€ for apixaban in Germany. The model was highly sensitive to the daily costs for the NOACs but relatively insensitive to other model inputs. Calculating the range of NOAC prices from 0.2 to 10 Euro versus the ICERs dabigatran 110 mg bid produced the highest increase of ICERs over this range of daily costs (Tukey-Kramer test, p<0.05) Comparing these data across countries using the published data shows that the willingness to pay per QALY as well as differences in treatment costs between substantially influences the daily prices of the NOACs. The data demonstrate the necessity to analyse the cost-effectiveness separately for every study due to differences in the INR-adjusted warfarin treated control group. The better the outcome during treatment with warfarin the lower is the benefit of the NOAC. The tendency of the cost-effectiveness calculated by the Markov model is comparable across countries. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Cost-utility of two minimally-invasive surgical techniques for operable oropharyngeal cancer: Transoral robotic surgery versus transoral laser microsurgery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enea Parimbelli ◽  
Federico Soldati ◽  
Lorry Duchoud ◽  
Gian Luca Armas ◽  
John R. de Almeida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Case Analysis ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Cost Utility ◽  
Transoral Robotic Surgery ◽  
Base Case ◽  
Base Case Analysis ◽  
Hospital Perspective ◽  
Decision Analytical Model ◽  
The Cost

AbstractImportanceTransoral robotic surgery (TORS) and transoral laser micro-surgery (TLM) are two different but competing minimally invasive techniques to surgically remove operable oropharyngeal squamous cell cancers (OPSCC). As of now, no comparative analysis as to the cost-utility of these techniques exists.ObjectiveRecent population-level data suggest for TORS and TLM equivalent tumor control, but different total costs, need for adjuvant chemoradiation, and learning curves. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare TORS and TLM from the cost-utility (C/U) point of view using a decision-analytical model from a Swiss hospital perspective.DesignOur decision-analytical model combines decision trees and a Markov model to compare TORS and TLM strategies. Model parameters were quantified using available literature, original cost data from two Swiss university tertiary referral centers, and utilities elicited directly from a Swiss population sample using standard gamble. C/U and sensitivity analyses were used to generate results and gauge model robustness.SettingSwiss hospital perspectiveInterventionCost-utility analysisMain outcome measureComparative cost-utility data from TLM and TORSResultsIn the base case analysis TLM dominates TORS. This advantage remains robust, even if the costs for TORS would reduce by up to 25%. TORS begins to dominate TLM, if less than 59,7% patients require adjuvant treatment (pTorsAlone>0.407), whereby in an interval between 55%-62% (pTorsAlone 0.38-0.45) cost effectiveness of TORS is sensitive to the prescription of adjuvant CRT. Also, exceeding 29% of TLM patients requiring a re-operation for inadequate margins renders TORS more cost-effective.ConclusionTLM is more cost-effective than TORS. However, this advantage is sensitive to various parameters i.e. the number of re-operations and adjuvant treatment.Key pointsQuestionCompare cost-utility of TORS versus TLMFindingsIn the base case analysis TLM dominates TORS, even if the costs for TORS would reduce by up to 25%. TORS begins to dominate TLM, if less than 59,7% patients require adjuvant treatment, whereby in an interval between 55%-62% cost effectiveness of TORS is sensitive to the prescription of adjuvant CRT. Exceeding 29% of TLM patients requiring a re-operation for inadequate margins renders TORS more cost-effective.MeaningTLM is more cost-effective than TORS. However, this advantage is sensitive to the number of re-operations and adjuvant treatment

The Cost-Effectiveness of Oral Triptan Therapy in Sweden

Cephalalgia ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Ramsberg ◽  
M Henriksson
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Scientific Literature ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Base Case ◽  
Migraine Treatment ◽  
Base Case Analysis ◽  
Effectiveness Model ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Substantial Uncertainty

The literature suggests that triptans are cost effective compared with older types of migraine treatment. However, which of the triptans that is most cost effective has not been established. We compared the costs and effects of triptan treatment from a Swedish societal perspective, using evidence from the literature. A probabilistic cost-effectiveness model was constructed to investigate the costs and effects of treating a single attack in a typical migraine patient. The end-point used in the base-case analysis was sustained pain free without any adverse events (SNAE). We searched the scientific literature for meta-analyses reporting the efficacy of oral triptans. All treatments except rizatriptan 10 mg and eletriptan 40 mg were dominated. The incremental cost per SNAE of rizatriptan 10 mg compared with eletriptan 40 mg was approximately €100. There was substantial uncertainty concerning the results, but probabilistic analysis showed that rizatriptan 10 mg and eletriptan 40 mg had the highest probability of being cost-effective.

scholarly journals Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation for the US of Fondaparinux Compared to Argatroban in the Management of Suspected HIT

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4727-4727
Author(s):  
Ahmed Aljabri ◽  
Mahdi Gharaibeh ◽  
Yvonne Huckleberry ◽  
Hussam Kutbi ◽  
Yuval Raz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Wholesale Price ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Case Analysis ◽  
Base Case ◽  
Base Case Analysis ◽  
Off Label ◽  
Primary Base

Abstract Introduction. The relative efficacy and safety of fondaparinux and argatroban in the management of suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) have been documented. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis of both agents in terms of cost and adverse events averted. Methods. We developed a two-armed decision tree model to simulate a cohort of patients with suspected or confirmed HIT managed with argatroban or fondaparinux, using published efficacy data and probabilities of developing HIT-related VTE or major bleeding. The primary base case analysis considered our institutional cost while the secondary analysis used the Average Wholesale Price. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) was performed to confirm findings and one-way sensitivity analysis to evaluate additional scenarios. Results. In the primary base case analysis, fondaparinux dominated argatroban treatment as it was less expensive in managing suspected HIT ($154 vs. $2,064) and more effective in terms of adverse events averted (0.998878 vs. 0.995739). This was confirmed in PSA in terms of both cost ($154 vs. $1,999) and adverse events averted (0.9988711 vs. 0.9957212). Sensitivity analysis showed that the total costs of argatroban would never be less than fondaparinux based on our assumptions. In the secondary analysis, fondaparinux was less expensive ($362 vs. $3722) and more effective in terms of adverse event averted (0.998878 vs. 0.995739). The PSA confirmed these findings both in terms of cost ($343 vs. $3477) adverse events averted. (0.9988711 vs. 0.9957212). Conclusions. The cost savings from a once-daily SC fondaparinux injection with limited laboratory monitoring are more advantageous than IV argatroban infusion that requires continuous titration. Disclosures Off Label Use: Fondaparinux is used as "off-label" for the management of patients with suspected or confirmed HIT.

scholarly journals Optimizing the use of the Men-ACWY conjugated vaccine to control the developing meningococcal W disease outbreak in the Netherlands, a rapid analysis

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert Jan van Hoek ◽  
Mirjam Knol ◽  
Hester de Melker ◽  
Jacco Wallinga
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Vaccination Campaign ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Reproductive Number ◽  
Base Case ◽  
Case Scenario ◽  
Base Case Scenario ◽  
Catch Up ◽  
The Impact

AbstractBackgroundThere is a developing outbreak of Neisseria meningitidis serotype W (MenW) in the Netherlands. In response, those aged 14 months and 14 years are vaccinated with the conjugated MenACWY vaccine. In the spring of 2018 we aimed to explore the impact of adding a one-off catch-up campaign targeting those aged 15-18 years on the transmission of MenW and the cost-effectiveness of such a campaign.MethodsWe estimated the growth rate of the MenW outbreak and quantified the impact of various targeted vaccination strategies on the reproductive number, and subsequently projected the future incidence with and without vaccination. Future cases were expressed in costs and QALYS and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was obtained.ResultsWe estimate a reproductive number of around 1.4 (95%CI 1.2-1.7) over the period February 2016-February 2018. Adding the catch-up campaign reduces the reproductive number five years earlier than without a catch-up campaign, to a level around 1.2. The vaccination campaign, including the catch-up, will prevent around 100 cases per year in our base case scenario. Given the projected impact and realistic assumptions on costs and QALYs, adding the catch-up can be considered cost-effective using a threshold of €20,000 per QALY.ConclusionAdding the catch-up campaign targeting those aged 15-18 brings the impact of vaccination on reducing transmission five years forward and directly prevents a high-incidence age group from carriage and disease. Such a campaign can be considered cost-effective. Our study did underpin the decision to introduce a catch-up campaign in spring 2019. Furthermore, our applied method can be of interest for anyone solving vaccine allocation questions in a developing outbreak.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document