scholarly journals Assessment of Polymorphism of the VDR Gene and Serum Vitamin D Values in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (07) ◽  
pp. 425-431
Author(s):  
Thais Walverde Siqueira ◽  
Edward Araujo Júnior ◽  
Rosiane Mattar ◽  
Silvia Daher
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Vitamin D ◽  
Gestational Diabetes ◽  
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Serum Vitamin ◽  
Vdr Gene ◽  
Serum Vitamin D ◽  
Vitamin D Levels ◽  
Significant Difference

Objective To evaluate the relationship between vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphism (FokI [rs10735810]) and serum vitamin D concentration in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methods A prospective case-control study that recruited healthy pregnant women (control group) (n = 78) and women with GDM (GDM group) (n = 79), with no other comorbidities. Peripheral blood samples were collected in the 3rd trimester of gestation, and all of the pregnant women were followed-up until the end of the pregnancy and the postpartum period. Serum vitamin D concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). For genomic polymorphism analysis, the genomic DNA was extracted by the dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide/cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (DTAB/CTAB) method, and genotyping was performed by the polymerase chain reaction – restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) technique, using the restriction enzyme FokI. The Student-t, Mann-Whitney, chi-squared, and Fischer exact tests were used for the analysis of the results. Results There was no significant difference between the pregnant women in the control and GDM groups regarding serum vitamin D levels (17.60 ± 8.89 ng/mL versus 23.60 ± 10.68 ng/mL; p = 0.1). Also, no significant difference was detected between the FokI genotypic frequency when the 2 groups were compared with each other (p = 0.41). Conclusion There was no association between the FokI polymorphism and the development of GDM, nor was there any change in serum vitamin D levels in patients with GDM.

scholarly journals Serum vitamin D levels in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arif Zengin ◽  
Suleyman Ahbab ◽  
Esra Ataoglu ◽  
Betul Cavusoglu Turker ◽  
Evrim Cakir
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Vitamin D ◽  
Gestational Diabetes ◽  
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Serum Vitamin ◽  
Serum Vitamin D ◽  
Vitamin D Levels

scholarly journals Sufficience serum vitamin D before 20 weeks of pregnancy reduces the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao-Yan Yue ◽  
Chun-Mei Ying
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Vitamin D ◽  
Gestational Diabetes ◽  
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Protective Factor ◽  
Serum Vitamin ◽  
Confounding Factors ◽  
Serum Vitamin D ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract Objective Our aim was to evaluate the relationship between serum vitamin D levels before 20 weeks of pregnancy and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Methods This study is a retrospective study. We analyzed the relationship between serum 25 (OH) D level before 20 weeks of pregnancy (first antenatal examination) and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Age, parity and pre-pregnancy body mass index were used as confounding factors. 8468 pregnant women were enrolled in this study between January 2018 and March 2020 at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University. Adjusted smoothing splinespline plots, subgroup analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to estimate the relative risk between 25(OH)D and gestational diabetes mellitus. Results After fully adjusting the confounding factors, serum vitamin D is a protective factor in gestational diabetes mellitus (OR = 0.90). Compared with vitamin D deficiency, vitamin D insufficiency (OR = 0.78), sufficience (OR = 0.82) are a protective factor for gestational diabetes mellitus. Conclusion Sufficience vitamin D before 20 weeks of pregnancy is a protective factor for gestational diabetes mellitus. Vitamin D > 20 ng/mL can reduce the risk of GDM, which is not much different from the effect of > 30 ng/mL. The protective effect of vitamin D is more significant in obese pregnant women.

scholarly journals Serum Vitamine D3 Level in Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

2021 ◽  
pp. 90-98
Author(s):  
Riham M. Enab ◽  
Amal A. El Sokary ◽  
Heba A. Mourad ◽  
Amal E. Mahfouz
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Vitamin D ◽  
Gestational Diabetes ◽  
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Vitamin D3 ◽  
Serum Vitamin ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Vitamin D3 is synthesized in skin and sequentially metabolized in liver and kidney in humans. It is well known for its function in maintaining calcium and phosphorus homeostasis and promoting bone mineralization. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate vitamin D3 level in pregnant women who were suffering from gestational diabetes mellitus and comparing it with the control groups. Materials and Methods: This case control study was conducted on 100 pregnant women who were attending the inpatient and outpatient clinics of Obstetrics department, Tanta University Hospital, who were divided into two equal groups.Group A (control group): Fifty apparently healthy pregnant women at 24th-28th weeks of gestation. Group B (study group): Fifty pregnant women had gestational diabetes. Results: There is significant increase between the two studied groups according to HbA1c, also there is decrease between the two groups as regards VIT D. Mean HbA1c % was statistically significant higher in the study group versus control group. There was statistical significant difference noted between mean serum level of vitamin D among the two studied groups. A statistically significant negative correlation was observed between serum 25 OH vitamin D and HbA1c among our cases (r=- 0.745) (p ≤ 0.001). Mean serum vitamin D was significantly lower in cases with complications than those with normal outcome. Conclusion: Vitamin D deficiency may have a positive relationship with gestational diabetes mellitus.

scholarly journals Estimation of maternal serum vitamin D levels and its correlation with gestational diabetes mellitus

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 3348
Author(s):  
Anupriya Narain ◽  
Alka Goel ◽  
Parul Goyal
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Vitamin D ◽  
Gestational Diabetes ◽  
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Vitamin D Deficiency ◽  
Serum Vitamin ◽  
Hypovitaminosis D ◽  
P Value ◽  
Serum Vitamin D ◽  
Vitamin D Levels

Background: Several studies in the past two decades have proved beyond doubt that there is a high prevalence of hypovitaminosis D worldwide including India which has almost taken the shape of a pandemic. The study aims to determine the prevalence of hypovitaminosis D in the pregnant population of Delhi and its correlation with gestational diabetes mellitus.Methods: This prospective cross sectional observational study was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Dr R.M.L Hospital, New Delhi over a period of 1 year and 4 months. Four hundred term patients were enrolled randomly from amongst the patients admitted in labor room or antenatal ward at PGIMER, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital who fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. 3-4ml of fasting blood samples were collected of all the enrolled women and were analysed for total serum calcium levels and serum vitamin D levels. History of presence of gestational diabetes mellitus was noted along with any treatment history. The 25(OH)D levels for each subject was recorded and correlation of vitamin D levels with gestational diabetes mellitus was analysed. Statistical analysis was done using ANOVA/ Kruska Wallis test and Chi-Square test/ Fisher’s exact test. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results: The overall prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in the present study was 86.25%. The overall mean serum vitamin D level was 14.06±9.43 ng/ml. Thirty five out of 37 GDM patients had hypovitaminosis D i.e. 94.59%. The prevalence of hypovitaminosis D among non-GDM population was 85.40%. The association between GDM and Vitamin D deficiency was statistically non- significant in the present study with p value=0.186.Conclusions: There is a very high prevalence of hypovitaminosis D in pregnant females attending present institute i.e. 86.25%. Although 94.59 % of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus patients had vitamin D deficiency, there is no statistically significant association between Gestational diabetes mellitus and serum vitamin D levels.

scholarly journals Correlation between low serum vitamin D levels and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus among pregnant women in the rural area attending tertiary care center

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 102-107
Author(s):  
Dr. Kiranmai G. ◽  
◽  
Dr. Bommi Indira ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Vitamin D ◽  
Blood Glucose ◽  
Gestational Diabetes ◽  
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Fasting Blood Glucose ◽  
Serum Vitamin ◽  
Serum Vitamin D ◽  
Vitamin D Levels ◽  
The Mean

Background: Diabetes mellitus with the first onset in pregnancy is known as gestational diabetesmellitus (GDM) which is a common complication of pregnancy. Maternal vitamin D status has beenassociated with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) but the evidence is inconsistent. Duringpregnancy, this deficiency is even more critical. It appears that vitamin D insufficiency duringpregnancy may be associated with maternal hazards. Methods: This study included 200 pregnantwomen. 100 women already diagnosed with GDM were taken as cases and 100 normal pregnantwomen were taken as control. All the patients included were subjected to detailed history taking.BMI matched in cases and controls. Blood samples were taken from both cases and control ant sentfor Vitamin-D level, HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, and 2hrs postprandial glucose test. Results:Overall 78% of Indian women are vitamin D deficient in the present study. The mean maternalserum vitamin D levels were 9.25±6.07 in GDM cases and in the controls the mean is 18.11±7.86.The difference was statistically significant reflecting that the mean serum vitamin D was decreasedin women with GDM. Vitamin D levels correlated significantly with the fasting blood glucose, thefasting serum insulin, and the HbA1c levels, the P-value in all these correlations were <0.0001.Conclusions: Low maternal serum vitamin d levels were associated with gestational diabetesmellitus. There is a statistically significant negative correlation between glycemic control and vitaminD levels in serum in the whole study population.

scholarly journals Vitamin D status and association with gestational diabetes mellitus in a pregnant cohort in Iceland

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin S. Magnusdottir ◽  
Ellen A. Tryggvadottir ◽  
Ola K. Magnusdottir ◽  
Laufey Hrolfsdottir ◽  
Thorhallur I. Halldorsson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Vitamin D ◽  
Gestational Diabetes ◽  
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Vitamin D Status ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Vitamin D Levels ◽  
25Ohd Concentration

Background: Vitamin D deficiency has been associated with an increased risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), one of the most common pregnancy complications. The vitamin D status has never previously been studied in pregnant women in Iceland. Objective: The aim of this research study was to evaluate the vitamin D status of an Icelandic cohort of pregnant women and the association between the vitamin D status and the GDM incidence. Design: Subjects included pregnant women (n = 938) who attended their first ultrasound appointment, during gestational weeks 11–14, between October 2017 and March 2018. The use of supplements containing vitamin D over the previous 3 months, height, pre-pregnancy weight, and social status were assessed using a questionnaire, and blood samples were drawn for analyzing the serum 25‑hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) concentration. Information regarding the incidence of GDM later in pregnancy was collected from medical records. Results: The mean ± standard deviation of the serum 25OHD (S-25OHD) concentration in this cohort was 63±24 nmol/L. The proportion of women with an S-25OHD concentration of ≥ 50 nmol/L (which is considered adequate) was 70%, whereas 25% had concentrations between 30 and 49.9 nmol/L (insufficient) and 5% had concentrations < 30 nmol/L (deficient). The majority of women (n = 766, 82%) used supplements containing vitamin D on a daily basis. A gradual decrease in the proportion of women diagnosed with GDM was reported with increasing S-25OHD concentrations, going from 17.8% in the group with S-25OHD concentrations < 30 nmol/L to 12.8% in the group with S-25OHD concentrations ≥75 nmol/L; however, the association was not significant (P for trend = 0.11). Conclusion: Approximately one-third of this cohort had S-25OHD concentrations below adequate levels (< 50 nmol/L) during the first trimester of pregnancy, which may suggest that necessary action must be taken to increase their vitamin D levels. No clear association was observed between the vitamin D status and GDM in this study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document