scholarly journals Laboratory Tests for the Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (02) ◽  
pp. 073-081 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen C. Carroll ◽  
Masako Mizusawa

Abstract Clostridium (reclassified as “Clostridioides”) difficile is an anaerobic, gram-positive bacterium that causes significant disease through elaboration of two potent toxins in patients whose normal gut microbiota has been altered through antimicrobial or chemotherapeutic agents (dysbiosis). The optimum method of laboratory diagnosis is still somewhat controversial. Recent practice guidelines published by professional societies recommend a two-step approach beginning with a test for glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), followed by a toxin test and/or a nucleic acid test. Alternatively, in institutions where established clinical algorithms guide testing, a nucleic acid test alone is acceptable. Nucleic acid tests are the methods of choice in approximately 50% of laboratories in the United States. These tests are considered as the most sensitive methods for detection of C. difficile in stool and are the least specific. Because of the lower specificity with nucleic acid tests, some clinicians believe that toxin enzyme immunoassays are better predictors of disease, despite their known poor performance in certain patient populations. This review will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the currently available test methods for the diagnosis of C. difficile with a brief mention of some novel assays that are currently in clinical trials.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meng Xu ◽  
Xun Liu ◽  
Chuhong Su ◽  
Yuping Zeng ◽  
Jinqian Zhang ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a global health problem. We aim to investigate the changes in the results of viral nucleic acid tests on pharyngeal swabs and feces of patients with COVID-19 and CT imaging of lungs as the disease progresses.MethodsSeven patients with COVID-19 in the third affiliated hospital of Sun Yat-sen University Yuedong Hospital were retrospectively enrolled with clinical features, including imaging staging, and performance characteristics of viral nucleic acid test results of pharyngeal swabs and feces. The dynamic changes of these features were observed during hospitalization, and therapeutic effect and prognosis of patients were evaluated.ResultsThe results of seven cases with COVID-19 were positive for viral nucleic acid tests on pharyngeal swabs early after the onset of symptoms, and then turned negative; while the results of viral nucleic acid tests on feces were persistently positive in the mid-term clinical treatment and recovery period. And the viral nucleic acid test results were capricious in three cases. Pulmonary CT imaging showed characteristic changes in early, advanced and recovery phases.ConclusionThe application of viral nucleic acid detection and pulmonary CT imaging can be used for screening of suspected cases. Fecal nucleic acid test should be recommended as the reference of discharge standard, in order to minimize the risk of transmission from digestive tract.


2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 030006052094906
Author(s):  
Hengwei Fan ◽  
Xiaqing Yu ◽  
Xiaohui Fu ◽  
Hengmei Zhu ◽  
Zhongwei Lv ◽  
...  

The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) nucleic acid test is currently the gold standard for diagnosing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This disease requires high-quality viral nucleic acid tests, and selecting the type of specimen from patients, who are at different disease stages, to use in the nucleic acid test is challenging. This article reports in detail the diagnosis and treatment process for two patients with confirmed COVID-19 and analyzes the results of the SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid tests that were used for different types of specimens (sputum from deep cough, nasopharyngeal swab, and feces). The nucleic acid testing results of sputum from deep cough showed the best performance for positive detection. Our findings provide a reference for selecting the most suitable specimen for the clinical diagnosis of COVID-19 and improving the positive detection rate.


Transfusion ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 395-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lunan Wang ◽  
Le Chang ◽  
Yunzheng Xie ◽  
Chengyin Huang ◽  
Lei Xu ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mei Han ◽  
Jingbo Zou ◽  
Wenguang Tian ◽  
Xiaoyu Wei ◽  
Yang Zhou ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The outbreak of the novel coronavirus in China (COVID-19) represents a significant and urgent threat to global health. We report here five cases of COVID-19 infection patients in our clinical practices who are medically stable and presumed to successfully “cleared” the virus after antiviral treatments. Case presentation: The clinical evaluation depends on the viral nucleic acid test in respiratory specimens by real-time PCR reverse transcription (RT-PCR) assays according to the authorized guidance. We found that the stool samples of these cured patients remain positive in RT-PCR assay while the virus is undetectable in respiratory specimens. RT-PCR molecular diagnostic assay was designed to specifically detect the presence of viral RNA. Thus, the positive result in the fecal specimens implies the existence of viable virions with the patients. Conclusions: This highlights the importance to look closely at the assessment standard of medical treatment, as well as the need for reevaluation of the criteria for the initial screening, prevention, and care of patients with this emerging infection.


Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 100 (48) ◽  
pp. e27933
Author(s):  
Yanru Cui ◽  
Jilin Wang ◽  
Gaofeng Wang ◽  
Xiuguo Xie ◽  
Lizhen Tian

2021 ◽  
pp. 131138
Author(s):  
Yinhuan Wu ◽  
Jun Liu ◽  
Hai-tao Li ◽  
Ting Zhang ◽  
Yi Dong ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 597 ◽  
pp. 113672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fangyuan Zheng ◽  
Sufang Li ◽  
Sunan Wang ◽  
Tao Feng ◽  
Zejun Jiang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document