scholarly journals Longer observation time increases adenoma detection in the proximal colon – a prospective study

2017 ◽  
Vol 05 (12) ◽  
pp. E1289-E1298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Klare ◽  
Henrik Phlipsen ◽  
Bernhard Haller ◽  
Henrik Einwächter ◽  
Andreas Weber ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims Longer observation times are associated with increased adenoma detection rates (ADR) in the entire colon. However, adenomas in the proximal colon are at risk of being missed during colonoscopy. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of observation time on detection of adenomatous polyps in the proximal colon. Patients and methods This was a prospective study at a university hospital in Germany. Colonoscopies were conducted using magnetic endoscope imaging (MEI) in order to determine the exact position of the scope. Exact observation times spent for the detection of polyps in the proximal and distal colon segments were assessed. The primary outcome was adenoma detection in the proximal colon. ROC curves were generated in order to test the correlation between observation time and adenoma detection. Logistic regression analysis was used to check for interfering factors. Results A total 480 procedures with 538 polyps were available for analysis. The overall adenoma detection rate was 38.5 %. ADR in the proximal colon was 28.0 %. There was a significant association between observation time in the proximal colon and the detection of proximal adenomas (P < 0.001). The impact of the time factor on ADR was stronger in the proximal compared to the distal colon (P = 0.030). A net period of 4 min 7 sec was found to be the minimum time span for sufficient adenoma detection in the proximal colon. Conclusion Observation time is significant in terms of adenoma detection in the proximal colon. The impact of observation time on ADR is stronger in the proximal compared to the distal colon. In the proximal colon a minimum time span of 4 minutes should be spent in order to ensure adequate adenoma detection.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02819492

Author(s):  
Alexander Poszler ◽  
Benjamin Walter ◽  
Christina Aulehner-Forlenza ◽  
Bernhard Haller ◽  
Mohamed Abdelhafez ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and aims Colon diverticula (CD) and adenomatous polyps are frequently found during colonoscopy. Data from the literature contains inconsistent information about whether patients with CD have a higher risk for colon adenomas. A positive correlation might influence the current guidelines for screening colonoscopies. The aim of this study was to examine whether presence of CD is associated with endoscopic adenoma detection. Materials and methods This was a prospective study at 2 centers in Germany. Patients with an indication for colonoscopy were included. The number and localization of diverticula were recorded. Detected polyps were resected, and histopathological results were captured. Logistic regression models were fitted to the data to evaluate the association between CD and adenoma detection. Results A total of 938 colonoscopies was included. CD occurred in 49.1 % of the colonoscopies. The polyp and adenoma detection rates (PDR, ADR) were 50.3 % and 32.3 %. In 37.5 % of the patients with diverticula, at least 1 adenoma was detected, whereas this was the case in 27.3 % in the absence of diverticula. The presence of diverticula was positively correlated with the detection of adenomas in univariate analysis (p = 0.001), but no significant association could be found in multivariable analysis (p = 0.775). Increasing age (p < 0.001), male sex (p = 0.005), and longer withdrawal time (p < 0.001) were significant predictors for adenoma detection in the multivariable analysis. Similar results were also observed for both the distal and the proximal colon. Discussion Diverticula and adenomas are frequently found during colonoscopies. However, diverticula disease was not significantly associated with adenoma detection after adjustment for relevant prognostic factors. Older age, male sex, and duration of withdrawal time are predictors for the detection of adenomatous polyps.


2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. S119
Author(s):  
R.K. Ryu ◽  
R.J. Lewandowski ◽  
A.C. Eifler ◽  
R. Salem ◽  
R.A. Omary ◽  
...  

Lung Cancer ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 295-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hazel R Scott ◽  
Donald C McMillan ◽  
Duncan J.F Brown ◽  
Lynn M Forrest ◽  
Colin S McArdle ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 1716-1722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martijn V. Verhagen ◽  
Gerard L. Guit ◽  
Gerrit Jan Hafkamp ◽  
Kees Kalisvaart

Cancer ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 109 (7) ◽  
pp. 1344-1354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter W. H. Lee ◽  
Tracy T. C. Kwan ◽  
Dora L. W. Kwong ◽  
Jonathan S. T. Sham ◽  
Edmond H. N. Pow ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document