Fluvoxamine: Safety Profile in Extensive Post-Marketing Surveillance

Background and aim In January 2013, a novel vaccine against Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B, the multicomponent meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB), was approved by the European Medicines Agency. We aimed to evaluate the safety profile of this vaccine. Methods: All adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) reported from Germany since the vaccine’s launch in Germany in November 2013 through December 2016 were reviewed and analysed. Results: Through December 2016, a total of 664 individual case safety reports (ICSR) notifying 1,960 AEFI were received. A majority of vaccinees for whom AEFI were reported were children 2 to 11 years of age (n = 280; 42.2%) followed by infants and toddlers aged 28 days to 23 months (n = 170; 25.6%). General disorders and administration site conditions was the System Organ Class (SOC) with the majority of AEFI (n = 977; 49.8%), followed by nervous system disorders (n = 249; 12.7%), and skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (n = 191; 9.7%). Screening of patient records for immune-mediated and neurological diseases did not raise any safety signal in terms of an increased proportional reporting ratio (PRR). Conclusions: The safety profile described in the Summary of Product Characteristics, in general, is confirmed by data from spontaneous reporting. No safety concerns were identified.

Download Full-text

P647 Post-marketing evaluation of reported adverse events of a multi-strain probiotic product confirms that change in manufacturing site had no impact on safety profile

Journal of Crohn s and Colitis ◽

10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz203.775 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S534-S535

Author(s):

V Panetta ◽

I Simonelli ◽

A Bacchieri ◽

S Papetti ◽

E De Stefani ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Safety Profile ◽

System Organ Class ◽

Safety Report ◽

Post Marketing Surveillance ◽

The Us ◽

The Usa ◽

Post Marketing ◽

Probiotic Product ◽

System Organ

Abstract Background In 2016, the manufacturing site of the multi-strain probiotic product VSL#3 changed. The present work is aimed at verifying if this change had an impact on the safety profile of the product. Methods The safety reports from post-marketing surveillance in the USA received by Alfasigma in the years 2014–2015 were compared with those received in the years 2017–2018. 2016 was not considered, because the product on the market during this year could likely come from both manufacturing sites. VSL#3 is sold in the US market as a medical food. Most of the reports were from consumers and were not medically confirmed. However, this happened in both periods, so no bias is introduced in the comparison. Each single safety report contained one or more adverse events (AEs), coded with MedDRA. The comparison between the two periods concerned primarily the number of safety reports in relation to the number of units sold. Given the similarity of trends between the total number of safety reports and sales in the two periods, the frequencies of the AEs and serious AEs were also compared at the System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term (PT) level. Results More than 70% of subjects reporting an AE were women in both periods under comparison; mean age was 58; phone was the most frequent means (overall 76%). Table 1 summarises the main results. Sales and number of safety reports were higher in the second than in the first period. However, the ratio between number of reports and sales was higher in the 2014–2015 period compared with the 2017–2018 period: 3.5 vs. 2.9 reports per 10,000 units sold, respectively. Similar results were obtained when stratifying the described ratios by formulation. The percentages of reports with at least one serious AE were respectively 3.2% in the first period and 2.5% in the second. The two periods appeared to be similar even with respect to the percentages of AEs and serious AEs by SOC and PT, being the AEs under the Gastrointestinal SOC the most frequently reported, as expected. Conclusion The analyzed data show that the manufacturing site change had no impact on the safety profile of VSL#3.

Download Full-text