scholarly journals Acute Perforation of a Malignant Ulcer of the Pylorus Resembling a Case of Acute Appendicitis

1902 ◽  
Vol 146 (9) ◽  
pp. 228-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. A. CODMAN
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Malignant Ulcer ◽  
Acute Perforation

scholarly journals Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in common acute abdominal conditions

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 4460
Author(s):  
Shashank Deshmukh ◽  
A. Manmadha Kishan
Keyword(s):  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Intestinal Obstruction ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Acute Intestinal Obstruction ◽  
Ct Findings ◽  
Perforation Peritonitis ◽  
Good For ◽  
Operative Findings ◽  
Acute Perforation

Background: Ultrasound evaluation is cheap, easily available, even at rural level, and can predict need for surgical intervention in majority of conditions. It involves no exposure to radiation, can diagnose easily, can be repeated any number of times for follow up. Disadvantages are that it is user dependent and distended bowel containing air prevents satisfactory evaluation of abdomen. The objective was to study diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in common acute abdominal conditions.Methods: All patients presenting to the emergency Department of General Surgery, Narayana general hospital, Nellore with abdominal pain of acute onset and who were diagnosed to be suffering from acute appendicitis, acute perforation peritonitis, acute intestinal obstruction, acute pancreatitis, acute calculous cholecystitis were included in the present study.Results: Diagnostic accuracy of USG for acute appendicitis was little bit low with sensitivity of 71.8% and specificity of 59.1% for operative findings and similar for CT findings. For acute perforation peritonitis it was still very low with sensitivity of 42.9% and specificity of 66.7% for operative findings and similar for CT findings. It was very good for acute intestinal obstruction with sensitivity of 90.9% and specificity of 83.3%, but here it was low compared to CT findings. It was also pretty good for diagnosing acute calculus cholecystitis in comparison with operative as well as CT findings.Conclusions: USG can be used as a diagnostic tool for diagnosis of acute intestinal obstruction and acute calculus cholecystitis but doubtful role in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and acute perforation peritonitis and acute pancreatitis. 

Nonfocused Enhanced CT Evaluation of Acute Appendicitis Increases Length of Stay in the Emergency Department but Does Not Increase Perforation Rate

2008 ◽  
Vol 74 (6) ◽  
pp. 488-493
Author(s):  
Paul J. Riesenman ◽  
Kathryn P. Riesenman ◽  
Taylor J. Stone ◽  
Stephanie K. Beidler ◽  
Christelle D. Douillet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Radiographic Evaluation ◽  
Oral Contrast ◽  
Perforation Rate ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Enhanced Ct ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Acute Perforation

Nonfocused enhanced CT (NFECT) using intravenous and oral contrast is highly sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis but requires additional time for transit of oral contrast and imaging interpretation. The aim of this study was to review our use of NFECT for the evaluation of acute appendicitis. Over a 2-year period, 295 adult patients presented to our emergency department and were diagnosed with acute appendicitis. Of these patients, 240 (81%) had undergone some form of cross-sectional imaging of the abdomen, and the majority (n = 193 [65%]) had NFECT scans performed during their evaluation. Fifty-five (19%) patients did not undergo cross-sectional radiographic evaluation (nonimaging group). Compared with the nonimaging group, patients who underwent NFECT were older (37 vs 32 years; P = 0.015) and more likely to be female (49% vs 20%; P < 0.001). Length of stay in the emergency department was significantly greater for patients who underwent NFECT (606 vs 321 minutes; P < 0.001), but there was no significant difference in the rate of acute appendiceal perforation (15% vs 9%; P = 0.297). In conclusion, use of NFECT for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis nearly doubles the patient's time in the emergency department with no significant increase in the acute perforation rate.

Angiocentric lymphoma masquerading as acute appendicitis

1999 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 378-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huh ◽  
S-M Hong ◽  
Kim ◽  
B-S Kim ◽  
K-H Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Angiocentric Lymphoma

Surgery for Acute Appendicitis May Be Delayed

2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
MARY ANN MOON
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis

Schistosomal Appendicitis in Pregnancy

Swiss Surgery ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 121-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Halkic ◽  
Abdelmoumene ◽  
Gintzburger ◽  
Mosimann
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Schistosoma Haematobium ◽  
Acute Inflammation ◽  
The Body ◽  
Parasitic Infections ◽  
Common Complication ◽  
Surgical Infection ◽  
High Prevalence ◽  
Potential Challenge ◽  
In Pregnancy

Acute appendicitis is the most common acute surgical infection during pregnancy. Although usually pyogenic in origin, parasitic infections account for a small percentage of cases. Despite the relatively high prevalence of acute appendicitis in our environment, it is not commonly associated with schistosomiasis. We report here the association of pregnancy and appendicitis caused by Schistosoma haematobium. Schistosomiasis is very common complication of pregnancy in hyperendemic areas. Schistosome egg masses can lodge throughout the body and cause acute inflammation of the appendix, liver and spleen. Congestion of pelvic vessels during pregnancy facilitates passage of eggs into the villi and intervillous spaces, causing an inflammatory reaction. Tourism and immigration make this disease a potential challenge for practitioners everywhere.

Improving diagnosis of acute appendicitis with atypical findings by Tc-99m HMPAO leukocyte scan

2002 ◽  
Vol 41 (01) ◽  
pp. 37-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Shung-Shung ◽  
S. Yu-Chien ◽  
Y. Mei-Due ◽  
W. Hwei-Chung ◽  
A. Kao
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
False Positive ◽  
False Positive Rate ◽  
Accurate Method ◽  
Clinical Findings ◽  
Pathological Findings ◽  
Lower Quadrant ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Positive Rate

Summary Aim: Even with careful observation, the overall false-positive rate of laparotomy remains 10-15% when acute appendicitis was suspected. Therefore, the clinical efficacy of Tc-99m HMPAO labeled leukocyte (TC-WBC) scan for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in patients presenting with atypical clinical findings is assessed. Patients and Methods: Eighty patients presenting with acute abdominal pain and possible acute appendicitis but atypical findings were included in this study. After intravenous injection of TC-WBC, serial anterior abdominal/pelvic images at 30, 60, 120 and 240 min with 800k counts were obtained with a gamma camera. Any abnormal localization of radioactivity in the right lower quadrant of the abdomen, equal to or greater than bone marrow activity, was considered as a positive scan. Results: 36 out of 49 patients showing positive TC-WBC scans received appendectomy. They all proved to have positive pathological findings. Five positive TC-WBC were not related to acute appendicitis, because of other pathological lesions. Eight patients were not operated and clinical follow-up after one month revealed no acute abdominal condition. Three of 31 patients with negative TC-WBC scans received appendectomy. They also presented positive pathological findings. The remaining 28 patients did not receive operations and revealed no evidence of appendicitis after at least one month of follow-up. The overall sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values for TC-WBC scan to diagnose acute appendicitis were 92, 78, 86, 82, and 90%, respectively. Conclusion: TC-WBC scan provides a rapid and highly accurate method for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in patients with equivocal clinical examination. It proved useful in reducing the false-positive rate of laparotomy and shortens the time necessary for clinical observation.

TO DETERMINE THE ROLE OF CA125 IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinod Kumar ◽  
Bhupen Songra ◽  
Richa Jain ◽  
Deeksha Mehta
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Clinical Diagnosis ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Ca 125 ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Serum Samples ◽  
Roc Curve Analysis ◽  
Surgery Department

Background: the present study was under taken to determine the role of CA-125 in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA), to prevent its complications and also in preventing negative appendicectomies in tertiary care hospital. Methods: The study was conducted at a tertiary care and research center between 01/03/2018 to 30/06/2019. Patients admitted to the surgery department with diagnosis of AA were considered for the study. After informed consent, a, standardized history was obtained as a case Performa. Serum samples from all the cases with clinical diagnosis of AA were obtained and stored. Only the cases with histopathologically approved AA were included in the study. Cases operated for clinical diagnosis of AA, but not histopathologically proven AA was not included in the study. CA125 levels in cases with definitive diagnosis of AA were measured. Results: In present study, ROC curve analysis revealed the sensitivity of 87.27 % and specificity of 90.91 % when the CA 125 cut-off value of > 16.8 was taken to diagnose acute appendicitis. AUC was 0.911 with a standard error of 0.0292. Conclusion: In this study we have observed that CA125 showed a positive correlation with acute appendicitis, that was statistically not significant (P>0.05). We didn’t evaluate the correlation with the disease severity. We consider that CA125 can be used as a marker in acute appendicitis cases although further research is still needed. Keywords: CA125, Acute Appendicitis, Surgery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document