Understanding champion behaviour in a health-care information system development project – how multiple champions and champion behaviours build a coherent whole

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joeri van Laere ◽  
Lena Aggestam
1997 ◽  
Vol 36 (01) ◽  
pp. 30-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Lanzola ◽  
M. Stefanelli ◽  
S. Falasconi

Abstract:A new research paradigm is emerging based on the multi-agent system architectural framework, allowing human and software agents to interoperate and thus cooperate within common application areas. Within a multi-agent system, the different “views of the world” of knowledgeable agents are to be bridged through their commitment to common ontologies and terminologies. We developed a general methodology for the design or integration of new components into a Health-care Information System conceived as a network of software and human agents. In our view, ontological and terminological services are entrusted to dedicated agents, namely ontology and terminology servers, allowing the configuration of suitable application ontologies for distributed applications. The role is described that such servers, operatively coordinated in order to preserve semantic coherence, should play within a distributed Health-care Information System.


1998 ◽  
Vol 37 (03) ◽  
pp. 302-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Timpka ◽  
M. Ljunggren ◽  
V. Vimarlund

AbstractThe perception of risk exposure among design team members during the early phases of information system development projects can provide valuable strategic information for clinical organizations. To develop a typology of perceived risks during information system development projects in health care, interviews were performed with key team members from a specialist clinic, primary health care, and an informatics research group, during the requirements specification. Phenomenological data analysis and secondary integration of the results in available theories were performed. System objectives, the user requirements definition procedure, the communication pattern between design team members and project management were found to be perceived as the main risk areas. In the secondary analysis, the technical factors, identified as preventing a maximization of the use of the resources, were lack of informatics knowledge among economic decision makers and differences between customers and suppliers regarding their views on the nature of system design. During the implementation of a given strategy, decision makers may consider the requests of their own sponsors in the first place and maximize the use ofthe project resources in the second place. Informatics knowledge plays a key role in risk perception during the development of an information system in health care. Political considerations by team members are important to take into regard, since these may influence technical and economic decisions.


Author(s):  
C.N. Gorga ◽  
J.N. Marchaukoski ◽  
M.S. Sunye ◽  
O.R.P. Bellon ◽  
L. Silva ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Abou Bakar Nauman ◽  
Romana Aziz ◽  
A.F.M. Ishaq

This chapter examines the causes of failure in a Web-based information system development project and finds out how complexity can lead a project towards failure. Learning from an Information System Development Project (ISDP) failure plays a key role in the long-term success of any organization desirous of continuous improvement via evaluation and monitoring of its information systems (IS) development efforts. This study reports on a seemingly simple (but only deceptively so) failed ISDP to inform the reader about the various complexities involved in ISDPs in general, and in developing countries in particular. An existing framework from contemporary research is adopted to map the complexities found in the project under study and the critical areas, which lead to the decreased reliability and failure in Web-based information system development, are highlighted.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document