scholarly journals Comparative accuracy of floor area, storey enclosure and cubic methods in preparing preliminary estimate in Nigeria

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 315-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Olusegun Akinsiku ◽  
Solomon Olusola Babatunde ◽  
Akintayo Opawole
Keyword(s):  
Preliminary Estimate ◽  
Floor Area ◽  
Comparative Accuracy

Liquefaction evidence for strong Holocene earthquake(s) in the Wabash Valley of southern Indiana-Illinois, with a preliminary estimate of magnitude

1992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen F. Obermeier ◽  
J.R. Martin ◽  
A.D. Frankel ◽  
T.L. Youd ◽  
P.J. Munson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Preliminary Estimate ◽  
Wabash Valley

Augmented reality–assisted pedicle screw insertion: a cadaveric proof-of-concept study

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilo A. Molina ◽  
Nicholas Theodore ◽  
A. Karim Ahmed ◽  
Erick M. Westbroek ◽  
Yigal Mirovsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Augmented Reality ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
User Experience ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Screw Insertion ◽  
Pedicle Screw Insertion ◽  
Insertion Method ◽  
Comparative Accuracy ◽  
Placement Accuracy ◽  
Surgical Field

OBJECTIVEAugmented reality (AR) is a novel technology that has the potential to increase the technical feasibility, accuracy, and safety of conventional manual and robotic computer-navigated pedicle insertion methods. Visual data are directly projected to the operator’s retina and overlaid onto the surgical field, thereby removing the requirement to shift attention to a remote display. The objective of this study was to assess the comparative accuracy of AR-assisted pedicle screw insertion in comparison to conventional pedicle screw insertion methods.METHODSFive cadaveric male torsos were instrumented bilaterally from T6 to L5 for a total of 120 inserted pedicle screws. Postprocedural CT scans were obtained, and screw insertion accuracy was graded by 2 independent neuroradiologists using both the Gertzbein scale (GS) and a combination of that scale and the Heary classification, referred to in this paper as the Heary-Gertzbein scale (HGS). Non-inferiority analysis was performed, comparing the accuracy to freehand, manual computer-navigated, and robotics-assisted computer-navigated insertion accuracy rates reported in the literature. User experience analysis was conducted via a user experience questionnaire filled out by operators after the procedures.RESULTSThe overall screw placement accuracy achieved with the AR system was 96.7% based on the HGS and 94.6% based on the GS. Insertion accuracy was non-inferior to accuracy reported for manual computer-navigated pedicle insertion based on both the GS and the HGS scores. When compared to accuracy reported for robotics-assisted computer-navigated insertion, accuracy achieved with the AR system was found to be non-inferior when assessed with the GS, but superior when assessed with the HGS. Last, accuracy results achieved with the AR system were found to be superior to results obtained with freehand insertion based on both the HGS and the GS scores. Accuracy results were not found to be inferior in any comparison. User experience analysis yielded “excellent” usability classification.CONCLUSIONSAR-assisted pedicle screw insertion is a technically feasible and accurate insertion method.

scholarly journals Comparative Accuracy Analysis of Truck Weight Measurement Techniques

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 745
Author(s):  
Sylwia Stawska ◽  
Jacek Chmielewski ◽  
Magdalena Bacharz ◽  
Kamil Bacharz ◽  
Andrzej Nowak
Keyword(s):  
Measurement Techniques ◽  
Highway Traffic ◽  
Highway Infrastructure ◽  
Measurement Systems ◽  
Motion System ◽  
Weigh In Motion ◽  
Comparative Accuracy ◽  
Bridge Weigh In Motion ◽  
Rational Management ◽  
Truck Weight

Roads and bridges are designed to meet the transportation demands for traffic volume and loading. Knowledge of the actual traffic is needed for a rational management of highway infrastructure. There are various procedures and equipment for measuring truck weight, including static and in weigh-in-motion techniques. This paper aims to compare four systems: portable scale, stationary truck weigh station, pavement weigh-in-motion system (WIM), and bridge weigh-in-motion system (B-WIM). The first two are reliable, but they have limitations as they can measure only a small fraction of the highway traffic. Weigh-in-motion (WIM) measurements allow for a continuous recording of vehicles. The presented study database was obtained at a location that allowed for recording the same traffic using all four measurement systems. For individual vehicles captured on a portable scale, the results were directly compared with the three other systems’ measurements. The conclusion is that all four systems produce the results that are within the required and expected accuracy. The recommendation for an application depends on other constraints such as continuous measurement, installation and operation costs, and traffic obstruction.

Crowd density estimation method based on floor area

2020 ◽  
Vol 1651 ◽  
pp. 012060
Author(s):  
Fujian Feng ◽  
Shuang Liu ◽  
Yongzheng Pan ◽  
Xin He ◽  
Jiayin Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Density Estimation ◽  
Estimation Method ◽  
Floor Area ◽  
Crowd Density Estimation ◽  
Crowd Density
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document