Comparisons and Suggestions on Chinese General Aviation Safety Management

CICTP 2020 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhihui Xie
Keyword(s):  
Safety Management ◽  
Aviation Safety ◽  
General Aviation

Pelaksanaan Pengawasan Keselamatan Penerbangan di Bandar Udara SM. Badaruddin II Palembang

WARTA ARDHIA ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-98
Author(s):  
Lita Yarlina ◽  
Evy Lindasari
Keyword(s):  
Management System ◽  
Gap Analysis ◽  
Safety Management ◽  
Performance Indicator ◽  
Aviation Safety ◽  
General Aviation ◽  
Civil Aviation ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
System Control ◽  
Safety Regulation

Safety is a major factor every flight. National aviation safety oversight is one of the functions that are the responsibility of coaching the Derectorate General of Civil Aviation to encure compliance with the standards, procedures and regulations, in order to see the fulfillment of the terms and condition in general aviation safety standards and safe operation of airports in particular that carried out by the organizers airports and other stakeholders. The method of analisys used to determine the operational supervision airport is gap analysis between the observation and collection of primary data from airport managers with operational safety performance indicator airport contained in KM, 24 2009 on Civil Aviation Safety Regulation Part 139 on the airport (aerodrome) issued by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation. The analysis showed that the safety oversight of the airport operation in airport Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin II Palembang in the surveillance system consists of four systems which are airport management system, air side system control, the airport environment systems, inspection systems and reporting systems and safety management system has been appropriate and meets CASR 139.Pengawasan keselamatan penerbangan nasional merupakan salah satu fungsi pembinaan yang menjadi tanggung jawab Direktorat Jenderal Perhubungan Udara memastikan kesesuaian standar, prosedur dan peraturan terkait, guna melihat pemenuhan peraturan dan ketentuan standar dan keselamatan penerbangan pada umumnya dan keselamatan operasi bandar udara pada khususnya yang dilaksanakan oleh penyelenggara bandar udara dan pemangku kepentingan lainnya. Metode analisis yang digunakan untuk mengetahui pelaksanaan pengawasan operasional bandar udara adalah metode analisis kesenjangan (gap analysis)antara hasil observasi dan pengumpulan data primer dari pengelola bandar udara dengan performance indicator keselamatan operasional bandar udara yang terdapat dalam KM. 24 Tahun 2001 tentang Peraturan Keselamatan Penerbangan Sipil Bagian 139 (Civil Aviation Safety Regulation Part 139) tentang Bandar Udara (Aerodrome). Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa pengawasan keselamatan operasi Bandar udara di Bandar udara Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin II Palembang dalam sistem pengawasan terdiri dari 4 sistem yaitu sistem manajemen bandar udara, sistem control sisi udara, sistem lingkungan bandar udara, sistem pemeriksaan dan sistem pelaporan dan sistem Manajemen keselamatan sudah sesuai dan sudah memenuhi referensi CASR 139.

scholarly journals Diversification of Aviation Safety Management on the Basis of Differences Between GA and CAT

2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-160
Author(s):  
Marta Galant ◽  
Jerzy Merkisz ◽  
Monika Kardach ◽  
Marta Maciejewska
Keyword(s):  
Safety Management ◽  
Aviation Safety ◽  
The State ◽  
General Aviation ◽  
Air Transport ◽  
Accurate Assessment ◽  
Management Processes ◽  
Depth Analysis

Abstract Due to the binding regulations, safety management processes in Poland, are carried out equally, regardless of the type of aviation. The article aims to present a proposal for the separation of Commercial Air Transport (CAT) and General Aviation (GA) in these processes to provide a more accurate assessment of the Polish aviation safety state. The key issue leading to further considerations is the comparison of the number of undesired events and their types in GA and CAT. Subsequently, an in-depth analysis of the State Safety Programm is presented, allowing for more detailed conclusions. The analysis presented in the paper indicates that it would be reasonable to separate particular types of aviation in the safety management processes. It was pointed out that the differences between GA and CAT are so significant that treating them together can lead to false and wrong conclusions.

scholarly journals Analysis of the possibilities of general aviation safety increasing through the use of new technologies

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (12) ◽  
pp. 87-94
Author(s):  
Marta Galant
Keyword(s):  
New Technologies ◽  
Safety Management ◽  
Aviation Safety ◽  
General Aviation ◽  
Security Systems ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Commercial Aviation ◽  
Current State ◽  
Potential Benefits ◽  
Joint Treatment

The paper presents an analysis of the current state of aviation safety in Poland and an assessment of the possibility of its improvement. It has been pointed out that the specificity of general and commercial aviation practically does not allow their joint treatment in security management. The SHELL concept and the proposal to develop it for use in the design of security systems were discussed. This allowed to indicate the security systems application possibilities. Sequentially potential benefits of the proposed implementation of technology in general aviation were analyzed. The article is summarized by application conclusions which are also the future directions of the development of safety management in general aviation.

scholarly journals DID TECHNOLOGY IMPROVE SAFETY? AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF CONTROLLED FLIGHT INTO TERRAIN ACCIDENTS

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng-Hua Yang ◽  
Alex
Keyword(s):  
Developed Countries ◽  
Aviation Safety ◽  
General Aviation ◽  
Flight Safety ◽  
Warning Systems ◽  
Commercial Aircraft ◽  
Mandatory Requirement ◽  
Civil Aircraft ◽  
Technological Improvements

Aviation safety has been affected greatly by technological improvements. A series of Ground Proximity Warning Systems (GPWSs) were developed to prevent accidents during Controlled Flight into Terrain (CFIT). This study analyzed the role of GPWS (or Enhanced GPWS, EGPWS) in flight safety history to determine how effective GPWS/EGPWS was in terms of preventing CFIT. The result showed a substantial increase in CFIT accidents due to the rapid growth of aviation development. This situation improved after the mandatory installation of GPWSs in commercial aircraft. However, the legal requirement did not apply to all general aviation. Most CFIT accidents have involved general aviation aircraft that do not have GPWS/EGPWS installed on board. Thus, the mandatory requirement should apply to all civil aircraft. CFIT accidents have also been reduced considerably in developed countries whereas they remain a major issue in developing countries.

Review and Implementation Analysis of Safety Management Systems in Aviation Design

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-32
Author(s):  
Heidi C. Kim
Keyword(s):  
Safety Management ◽  
Federal Aviation Administration ◽  
Aviation Safety ◽  
Management Systems ◽  
Federal Regulations ◽  
Safety Management Systems ◽  
Regulatory Requirements ◽  
Management Processes ◽  
Part 121 ◽  
Air Carriers

In January of 2015, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) released an 80-page document outlining Safety Management Systems (SMS) for Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 121 air carriers. This advisory circular provides a description of regulatory requirements, methods of development, and implementation of an SMS (Federal Aviation Administration, 2015). The release of this document began a race to implement SMS across aviation. An all-encompassing Safety Management System currently does not apply to the manufacturing of airplane parts. This research will examine current safety management processes in place for applicants and holders of supplemental type certificates (STC). Upon review of current procedures, a model for an SMS will be created specific to supplemental type certificate applicants and holders. This SMS process created for STC holders will ultimately improve aviation safety. The FAA should mandate this framework for all applicants pursuing and holding a supplemental type certificate.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document