DEEP BASIN GAS: A NEW EXPLORATION PARADIGM IN THE NAPPAMERRI TROUGH, COOPER BASIN, SOUTH AUSTRALIA

2001 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 185 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.R. Hillis ◽  
J.G.G. Morton ◽  
D.S. Warner ◽  
R.K. Penney
Keyword(s):  
South Australia ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Deep Basin ◽  
Gas Accumulation ◽  
Impermeable Barrier ◽  
Trapped Gas ◽  
Giant Fields ◽  
Rock Section ◽  
Sweet Spots ◽  
Cooper Basin

Deep basin hydrocarbon accumulations have been widely recognised in North America and include the giant fields of Elmworth and Hoadley in the Western Canadian Basin. Deep basin accumulations are unconventional, being located downdip of water-saturated rocks, with no obvious impermeable barrier separating them. Gas accumulations in the Nappamerri Trough, Cooper Basin, exhibit several characteristics consistent with North American deep basin accumulations. Log evaluation suggests thick gas columns and tests have recovered only gas and no water. The resistivity of the entire rock section exceeds 20 Ωm over large intervals, and, as in known deep basin accumulations, the entire rock section may contain gas. Gas in the Nappamerri Trough is located within overpressured compartments which witness the hydraulic isolation necessary for gas saturation outside conventional closure. Furthermore, the Nappamerri Trough, like known deep basin accumulations, has extensive, coal-rich source rocks capable of generating enormous hydrocarbon volumes. The above evidence for a deep basin-type gas accumulation in the Nappamerri Trough is necessarily circumstantial, and the existence of a deep gas accumulation can only be proven unequivocally by drilling wells outside conventional closure.Exploration for deep basin-type accumulations should focus on depositional-structural-diagenetic sweet spots (DSDS), irrespective of conventional closure. This is of particular significance for a potential Nappamerri Trough deep basin accumulation because depositional models suggest that the best net/gross may be in structural lows, inherited from syndepositional lows, that host stacked channel sands within channel belt systems. Limiting exploration to conventionally-trapped gas may preclude intersection with such sweet spots.

Emerging continuous gas plays in the Cooper Basin, South Australia

2012 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 671
Author(s):  
Sandra Menpes ◽  
Tony Hill
Keyword(s):  
Shale Gas ◽  
South Australia ◽  
Flood Plain ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Early Permian ◽  
Gas Shale ◽  
Freshwater Lakes ◽  
Gas Desorption ◽  
Wet Gas ◽  
Cooper Basin

Recent off-structure drilling in the Nappamerri Trough has confirmed the presence of gas saturation through most of the Permian succession, including the Roseneath and Murteree shales. Basin-centred gas, shale gas and deep CSG plays in the Cooper Basin are now the focus of an escalating drilling and evaluation campaign. The Permian succession in the Nappamerri Trough is up to 1,000 m thick, comprising very thermally mature, gas-prone source rocks with interbedded sands—ideal for the creation of a basin-centred gas accumulation. Excluding the Murteree and Roseneath shales, the succession comprises up to 45% carbonaceous and silty shales and thin coals deposited in flood plain, lacustrine and coal swamp environments. The Early Permian Murteree and Roseneath shales are thick, generally flat lying, and laterally extensive, comprising siltstones and mudstones deposited in large and relatively deep freshwater lakes. Total organic carbon values average 3.9% in the Roseneath Shale and 2.4% in the Murteree Shale. The shales lie in the wet gas window (0.95–1.7% Ro) or dry gas window (>1.7% Ro) over much of the Cooper Basin. Thick Permian coals in the deepest parts of the Patchawarra Trough and over the Moomba high on the margin of the Nappamerri Trough are targets for deep CSG. Gas desorption analysis of a thick Patchawarra coal seam returned excellent total raw gas results averaging 21.2 scc/g (680 scf/ton) across 10 m. Scanning electron microscopy has shown that the coals contain significant microporosity.

CUTTAPIRRIE 1—AN OIL DISCOVERY IN THE EARLY JURASSIC OF THE EROMANGA BASIN

1981 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 60
Author(s):  
T. M. Barr ◽  
Bridget C. Youngs
Keyword(s):  
South Australia ◽  
Early Jurassic ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Gas Field ◽  
Oil Accumulation ◽  
Gas Accumulation ◽  
Eromanga Basin ◽  
Cooper Basin

Cuttapirrie 1 discovered a significant oil accumulation at a depth of 8 016 ft in the Early Jurassic Hutton Sandstone of the Eromanga Basin. In addition, it discovered a small gas accumulation at 9 386 ft in the underlying Permo-Triassic Cooper Basin of South Australia. The well was 210 km from the nearest Jurassic oil field and 30 km from the nearest gas field when it was drilled.

Shale gas prospectivity in South Australia

2011 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 718
Author(s):  
Anthony Hill ◽  
Sandra Menpes ◽  
Guillaume Backè ◽  
Hani Khair ◽  
Arezoo Siasitorbaty
Keyword(s):  
Shale Gas ◽  
South Australia ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Gas Generation ◽  
Eastern Australia ◽  
Gas Potential ◽  
Gas Bearing ◽  
Excellent Source ◽  
Cooper Basin

Potential shale gas bearing basins in SA are primarily dominated by thermogenic play types and span the Neoproterozoic to Cretaceous. Whilst companies have only recently commenced exploring for shale gas in the Permian Cooper Basin, strong gas shows have been routinely observed and recorded since exploration commenced in the basin in 1959. The regionally extensive Roseneath and Murteree shales represent the primary exploration focus and reach maximum thicknesses of 103 m and 86 m respectively with TOC values up to 9%. These shales are in the gas window in large parts of the basin, particularly in the Patchawarra and Nappamerri troughs. Outside the Cooper Basin, thick shale sequences in the Crayfish Subgroup of the Otway Basin, in particular the Upper and Lower Sawpit shales and to a lesser extent the Laira Formation, have good shale gas potential in the deeper portions of the basin. TOC averages up to 3% are recorded in these shales in the Penola Trough; maturities in the range of 1.3–1.5% have been modelled. Thick Permian marine shales of the Arckaringa Basin have excellent source rock characteristics, with TOC’s ranging 4.1–7.4% and averaging 5.2% over an interval exceeding 150 m in the Phillipson Trough; however, these Type II source rocks are not sufficiently mature for gas generation anywhere in the Arckaringa Basin. Shale gas has the potential to rival CSM in eastern Australia; its potential is now being explored in SA.

scholarly journals Reservoir characterisation of the Patchawarra Formation within a deep, basin-margin gas accumulation

2014 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Stephens ◽  
Brenton Richards ◽  
Joseph Lim
Keyword(s):  
Gas Flows ◽  
Deep Basin ◽  
Gas Accumulation ◽  
Reservoir Architecture ◽  
Trap Potential ◽  
Gas Fields ◽  
Depositional Setting ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Basin Margin ◽  
Cooper Basin

An exploration program to assess the basin-centred gas (BCG) and stratigraphic trap potential of the Mettika Embayment in the southern Cooper Basin resulted in the discovery of gas at Hornet–1 and Kingston Rule–1. The embayment is a confined fluvial sedimentary depocentre surrounded by prolific gas fields producing from structurally closed anticlines. Gas pay was identified and both wells produced sustained gas flows to surface of between 1.2 and 2.2 MMscf/d after fracture stimulation. Core collected from the Patchawarra Formation sandstone reservoir was analysed to constrain the depositional environment and establish petrophysical properties by routine and special core analysis. An integrated reservoir study was undertaken to understand depositional setting, reservoir architecture, trapping mechanisms, permeability, and saturation controls on productivity. Gas identified in the embayment appears to have accumulated in subtle stratigraphic and combination structural traps against the flanks of existing fields and does not display the geological and physical characteristics of a BCG play. The impact and analysis of hydrocarbon migration and reservoir trapping influences in this basin-margin gas accumulation may be applicable to other under-explored flank and trough plays of the Cooper Basin.

Burial History Reconstruction of the Appalachian Basin in Kentucky, West Virginia, Pennsylvania, and New York, Using 1D Petroleum System Models

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 365-396
Author(s):  
Debra Higley ◽  
Catherine Enomoto
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Vitrinite Reflectance ◽  
Structural Complexity ◽  
Appalachian Basin ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Burial History ◽  
Gas Generation ◽  
Deep Basin ◽  
Utica Shale ◽  
Wet Gas

Nine 1D burial history models were built across the Appalachian basin to reconstruct the burial, erosional, and thermal maturation histories of contained petroleum source rocks. Models were calibrated to measured downhole temperatures, and to vitrinite reflectance (% Ro) data for Devonian through Pennsylvanian source rocks. The highest levels of thermal maturity in petroleum source rocks are within and proximal to the Rome trough in the deep basin, which are also within the confluence of increased structural complexity and associated faulting, overpressured Devonian shales, and thick intervals of salt in the underlying Silurian Salina Group. Models incorporate minor erosion from 260 to 140 million years ago (Ma) that allows for extended burial and heating of underlying strata. Two modeled times of increased erosion, from 140 to 90 Ma and 23 to 5.3 Ma, are followed by lesser erosion from 5.3 Ma to Present. Absent strata are mainly Permian shales and sandstone; thickness of these removed layers increased from about 6200 ft (1890 m) west of the Rome trough to as much as 9650 ft (2940 m) within the trough. The onset of oil generation based on 0.6% Ro ranges from 387 to 306 Ma for the Utica Shale, and 359 to 282 Ma for Middle Devonian to basal Mississippian shales. The ~1.2% Ro onset of wet gas generation ranges from 360 to 281 Ma in the Utica Shale, and 298 to 150 Ma for Devonian to lowermost Mississippian shales.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document