Sustaining social licence—the application of social impact assessment across the operational lifecycle

2014 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 187
Author(s):  
Sheridan Coakes ◽  
Karen Lamb

Most Australian resource companies, including those in the oil and gas sector, recognise that effective community engagement enhances their corporate reputation and underpins their social licence to operate. Industry-leading companies also understand the importance of assessing and managing the socio-economic impacts of their projects and operations with the same rigour as environmental, health and safety impacts. Some companies, however, fail to see the value of applying outcomes of robust socio-economic impact assessments (SEIA) to long-term business planning and performance monitoring; instead they use the approach as a one-off assessment process. This paper discusses the value of applying SEIA to inform business planning in a company’s social and environmental functions. The methods and techniques that are presented may assist companies in: developing an improved understanding of socially-related impacts, their significance and appropriate management strategies;documenting socio-economic contributions locally and regionally to illustrate higher order impacts and afford improved management of operational impacts;assessing community resilience, to inform, prioritise and structure community investment planning and capacity building;designing and structuring engagement to meet business objectives and reporting requirements;understanding communities, their engagement preferences, values, needs and opportunities to afford the development of more genuine relationships and partnerships; and,developing appropriate indicators to effectively monitor social impacts. Such outputs can assist in greater efficiencies, streamlining of assessment processes and improved relationships in the long-term. Where appropriate, this paper presents case studies to illustrate the application of such techniques and their value in meeting business, government and community needs and expectations.

Author(s):  
Fatema Abdulla AlNoaimi ◽  
Thomas A. Mazzuchi

Oil and gas projects are at high risk and the reasons can be the adoption of complex technology, participation of different parties, etc. Oil and gas industries are often vulnerable to risks and hazards, but they overcome these problems by following tools and techniques of risk management, which results in employee and organizations safety. Based on the facts, this research report aims to evaluate and identify the risk management strategies and procedures and assess the efficiency of risk management tools in the Oil and Gas Company in the Kingdom of Bahrain. The survey was conducted among two groups using quantitative as well as qualitative methods.  One hundred twenty-four participants comprising of Engineers, Superintendents, Fire and Safety Officers, HR Managers, Health and Safety Environment Officers were among the respondents of the Survey Questionnaire. For the semi-structured interview, managers from supply and marine, Operation Specialist, Acting Manager of Health, Safety and Environment (HSE), Managers of Operational Plant Department were selected. The data collected through the survey question was analyzed using statistical analysis. The data collected through the survey questions were later imported to IBM SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science) version 23.0 and performed descriptive analysis to explain the participants’ characteristics, discrete variables expressed as frequencies and percentages and continuous variables expressed as mean and SD. The reliability of the instrument was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. This research indicated that around 56 % of the engineers and majority of the participating managers agree and strongly agree that the company has the Oil and Gas Company in the Kingdom of Bahrain have has implemented several safety precautions, training, and appropriate risk management tools to ensure the safety of the employees and work to eliminate any risk which could be hazardous to life and property. 


2003 ◽  
Vol 3 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 35-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.K. Herz ◽  
A.T. Lipkow

This paper presents the approach taken and the tools developed and advanced within the European research project CARE-W (Computer Aided REhabilitation of Water networks) for strategic rehabilitation investment planning as a complement to short-term performance monitoring and annual rehabilitation (rehab) budget allocation planning. In a first step, future rehab needs are quantified with a cohort-survival model from the present stock of assets taking into account the specific service lives of its components. Utility managers may choose in the short and medium range from many rehab options: doing more or less, sooner or later, on particular network components and with specific rehab technologies at lower or higher cost. So, in a second step, alternative medium-term rehab programs are specified and tested for their effects. The annual costs and benefits of these alternative rehab programs are forecast with the cohort-survival model beyond the rehab program period to capture the long-term effects of rehabilitating these long-lived assets. Advantages and disadvantages of alternative rehab programs are systematically compared to find out which one is most appropriate under local constraints. However, whereas the survival of network components can be forecast over very long periods with sufficient accuracy, many other characteristics of the water supply system that must be considered for finding the best network rehab strategy may take unforeseeable paths into the far future. Therefore, a scenario writing tool was developed allowing consistent scenarios for particular water utilities to be created and to test whether the alternative rehab programs are robust enough to meet all eventualities of the future. This approach is illustrated by a case study from East Germany.


Author(s):  
Arsalan Razmjoei ◽  
Leila Ebrahimi Ghavam Abadi ◽  
Amin Delavar ◽  
Hamid Reza Pakbaz

Introduction: The overall oil and gas industries are considered as the most important industry in the country, where a significant part of the budget depends on it. The significant health and safety implications of these industries have been highlighted by staff and stakeholders as well. Methods: The present study was conducted to identify and assess the safety and health risks of the Fars Mountain 1 Seismology project using the HAZAN method in 2016 and 2017. The HTA was used to analyze the main tasks of the main occupations: digger, surveyor, shooter, drivers and helicopter pilot. The risk assessment process identified in the HAZAN method was based on qualitative matrix. In HAZAN, 50 health and safety risks were identified. Results: The results showed that 8 risk (16درصد) were unacceptable, 25 unsatisfactory (50درصد) and 17 (34درصد) were acceptable. Conclusion: The results showed that the processes of aviation and land transport, as well as traffic on mountain routes, are the most expensive activities of the project. Finally, management solutions were proposed to reduce the risk level of the most important project activities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document