scholarly journals The Waitsia Field, onshore North Perth Basin, Western Australia

2016 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil Tupper ◽  
Eric Matthews ◽  
Gareth Cooper ◽  
Andy Furniss ◽  
Tim Hicks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Characteristics ◽  
Development Planning ◽  
Upper Permian ◽  
Depth Interval ◽  
Lower Permian ◽  
Minimal Processing ◽  
Gas Field ◽  
Full Field ◽  
Field Development ◽  
Primary Porosity

The Waitsia Field represents a new commercial play for the onshore north Perth Basin with potential to deliver substantial reserves and production to the domestic gas market. The discovery was made in 2014 by deepening of the Senecio–3 appraisal well to evaluate secondary reservoir targets. The well successfully delineated the extent of the primary target in the Upper Permian Dongara and Wagina sandstones of the Senecio gas field but also encountered a combination of good-quality and tight gas pay in the underlying Lower Permian Kingia and High Cliff sandstones. The drilling of the Waitsia–1 and Waitsia–2 wells in 2015, and testing of Senecio-3 and Waitsia-1, confirmed the discovery of a large gas field with excellent flow characteristics. Wireline log and pressure data define a gross gas column in excess of 350 m trapped within a low-side fault closure that extends across 50 km2. The occurrence of good-quality reservoir in the depth interval 3,000–3,800 m is diagenetically controlled with clay rims inhibiting quartz cementation and preserving excellent primary porosity. Development planning for Waitsia has commenced with the likelihood of an early production start-up utilising existing wells and gas processing facilities before ramp-up to full-field development. The dry gas will require minimal processing, and access to market is facilitated by the Dampier–Bunbury and Parmelia gas pipelines that pass directly above the field. The Waitsia Field is believed to be the largest conventional Australian onshore discovery for more than 30 years and provides impetus and incentive for continued exploration in mature and frontier basins. The presence of good-quality reservoir and effective fault seal was unexpected and emphasise the need to consider multiple geological scenarios and to test unorthodox ideas with the drill bit.

The Clipper Field, Blocks 48/19a, 48/19c, UK North Sea

2003 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 691-698
Author(s):  
M. J. Sarginson
Keyword(s):  
North Sea ◽  
Upper Permian ◽  
Lower Permian ◽  
Reservoir Properties ◽  
Gas Field ◽  
Field Development ◽  
Matrix Permeability ◽  
Recoverable Reserves ◽  
Reservoir Permeability ◽  
Sandstone Formation

AbstractThe Clipper Gas Field is a moderate-sized faulted anticlinal trap located in Blocks 48/19a, 48/19c and 48/20a within the Sole Pit area of the southern North Sea Gas Basin. The reservoir is formed by the Lower Permian Leman Sandstone Formation, lying between truncated Westphalian Coal Measures and the Upper Permian evaporitic Zechstein Group which form source and seal respectively. Reservoir permeability is very low, mainly as a result of compaction and diagenesis which accompanied deep burial of the Sole Pit Trough, a sub basin within the main gas basin. The Leman Sandstone Formation is on average about 715 ft thick, laterally heterogeneous and zoned vertically with the best reservoir properties located in the middle of the formation. Porosity is fair with a field average of 11.1%. Matrix permeability, however, is less than one millidarcy on average. Well productivity depends on intersecting open natural fractures or permeable streaks within aeolian dune slipface sandstones. Field development started in 1988. 24 development wells have been drilled to date. Expected recoverable reserves are 753 BCF.

Achieving Cementing Improvement in Horizontal Tight Gas Field Development

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pungki Ariyanto ◽  
Mohamed.A.. A. Najwani ◽  
Yaseen Najwani ◽  
Hani Al Lawati ◽  
Jochen Pfeiffer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tight Gas ◽  
Cement Slurry ◽  
Tight Sandstone ◽  
Gas Field ◽  
Full Field ◽  
Field Development ◽  
Horizontal Drain ◽  
Tight Reservoir ◽  
Design For All ◽  
Zonal Isolation

Abstract This paper outlines how a drilling team is meeting the challenge of cementing a production liner in deep horizontal drain sections in a tight sandstone reservoir. It is intended to show how the application of existing technologies and processes is leading to performance gain and improvements in cementing quality. The full field development plan of the tight reservoir gas project in the Sultanate of Oman is based on drilling around 300 wells targeting gas producing horizons at measured depths of around 6,000m MD with 1,000m horizontal sections. Effective cement placement for zonal isolation is critical across the production liner in order to contain fracture propagation in the correct zone. The first few attempts to cement the production liner in these wells had to overcome many challenges before finally achieving the well objectives. By looking at the complete system, rather than just the design of the cement slurry, the following criteria areas were identified: –Slurry design–Mud removal and cement slurry placement–Liner hanger and float equipment Improvements have been made in each of these areas, and the result has been delivery of a succesfully optimised liner cementing design for all future horizontal wells.

Reservoir to market: generating project value by coupling surface facilities with reservoir data in integrated asset modelling

2017 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 652
Author(s):  
Stephen Stokes
Keyword(s):  
Supply Chain ◽  
Development Planning ◽  
Cutting Edge ◽  
Concept Design ◽  
Full Spectrum ◽  
Full Field ◽  
Field Development ◽  
Cost Reductions ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Assessing Sensitivity

Reservoir to market is a cutting-edge integrated asset modelling (IAM) initiative that is deployed to deliver robust field development and concept design solutions with enhanced project economics. The approach offers the potential to identify supply-chain cost reductions across the full spectrum of upstream developments, from full field development planning to individual equipment item modification. The process offers particular value in Greenfield and Brownfield development planning, in identifying and assessing sensitivity options and in definition of the optimum concept.

Implications of accurate geomechanical modelling and systematic core testing for sanding evaluation and sand control decisions – a case study from Perth Basin

2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 267
Author(s):  
Sadegh Asadi ◽  
Abbas Khaksar ◽  
Mark Fabian ◽  
Roger Xiang ◽  
David N. Dewhurst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Management Strategies ◽  
Mechanical Tests ◽  
Well Test ◽  
Sand Production ◽  
Gas Field ◽  
Stress Regime ◽  
Full Field ◽  
Field Development ◽  
Sand Control ◽  
Rock Mechanical Properties

Accurate knowledge of in-situ stresses and rock mechanical properties are required for a reliable sanding risk evaluation. This paper shows an example, from the Waitsia Gas Field in the northern Perth Basin, where a robust well centric geomechanical model is calibrated with field data and laboratory rock mechanical tests. The analysis revealed subtle variations from the regional stress regime for the target reservoir with significant implications for sanding tendency and sand management strategies. An initial evaluation using a non-calibrated stress model indicated low sanding risks under both initial and depleted pressure conditions. However, the revised sanding evaluation calibrated with well test observations indicated considerable sanding risk after 500 psi of pressure depletion. The sanding rate is expected to increase with further depletion, requiring well intervention for existing producers and active sand control for newly drilled wells that are cased and perforated. This analysis indicated negligible field life sanding risk for vertical and low-angle wells if completed open hole. The results are used for sand management in existing wells and completion decisions for future wells. A combination of passive surface handling and downhole sand control methods are considered on a well-by-well basis. Existing producers are currently monitored for sand production using acoustic detectors. For full field development, sand catchers will also be installed as required to ensure sand production is quantified and managed.

THE STRATIGRAPHY OF THE BASAL TRIASSIC SANDSTONE, NORTH PERTH BASIN, WESTERN AUSTRALIA

1971 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 59
Author(s):  
P. Hosemann
Keyword(s):  
Western Australia ◽  
Lower Triassic ◽  
Upper Permian ◽  
Lower Permian ◽  
Gas Field ◽  
Depositional History ◽  
History Of ◽  
Near Shore ◽  
Strand Line ◽  
Triassic Sandstone

The Basal Triassic Sandstone is the basal member of the Lower Triassic Kockatea Shale. It is widely distributed adjacent to, and on the Precambrian Greenough Block in the northern Perth Basin, Western Australia. This member is lowermost Lower Triassic in age in the subsurface of the Don-gara gas field. In outcrop on the Greenough Block, the member is represented by a thin basal conglomerate, conformably overlain by upper Lower Triassic Kockatea Shale. In this stratigraphic study, detailed well-to-well correlations and lithologic studies were integrated to reconstruct the depositional history of the interval encompassing the Basal Triassic Sandstone. This sandstone is a composite of near-shore marine, and strand line accumulations deposited around the flanks and on the Greenough Block during a Lower Triassic marine transgression. The sandstone bodies were deposited on a drowned, topography of low relief, on progressively truncated Permian formations and Precambrian basement. The topography was formed following uplift and tilting of the Greenough Block and the overlying Lower Permian formations during mild Upper Permian tectonism.

Subsurface-to-Economics Closing the Loop on Uncertainty Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Galvin Shergill ◽  
Adrian Anton ◽  
Kwangwon Park
Keyword(s):  
Measurement Errors ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Uncertainty Modeling ◽  
Weather Forecast ◽  
Oil And Gas Industry ◽  
Development Planning ◽  
Gas Field ◽  
Field Development ◽  
Development Scenarios ◽  
Uncertainty Model

Abstract We are all aware that our future is uncertain. Although some aspects can be predicted with more certainty and others with less, essentially everything is uncertain. Uncertainty exists because of lack of data, lack of resources, and lack of understanding. We cannot measure everything, so there are always unknowns. Even measurements include measurement errors. Also, we do not always have enough resources to analyze the data obtained. In addition, we do not have a full understanding of how the world, or the universe, works (Park 2011). Every day we find ourselves in situations where we must make many decisions, big or small. We tend to make the decisions based on a prediction, despite knowing that it is uncertain. For instance, imagine how many decisions are made by people every day based on the probability of it raining tomorrow (i.e., based on the weather forecast). To have a good basis for making a decision, it is of critical importance to correctly model the uncertainty in the forecast. In the oil and gas industry, uncertainties are large and complex. Oil and gas fields have been developed and operated despite tremendous uncertainty in a variety of areas, including undiscovered media and unpredictable fluid in the subsurface, wells, unexpected facility and equipment costs, and economic, political, international, environmental, and many other risks. Another important aspect of uncertainty modeling is the feasibility of verifying the uncertainty model with the actual results. For example, in the weather forecast it was announced that the probability of raining the next day was 20%. And the next day it rained. Do we say the forecast was wrong? Can we say the forecast was right? In order to make sure the uncertainty model is correct; we should strictly verify all the assumptions and follow the mathematically, statistically, proven-to-be-correct methodology to model the uncertainty (Caers et al. 2010; Caers 2011). In this paper, we show an effective, rigorous method of modeling uncertainty in the expected performance of potential field development scenarios in the oil and gas field development planning given uncertainties in various domains from subsurface to economics. The application of this method is enabled by using technology as described in a later section.

The Clipper Field, Blocks 48/19a, 48/19c, UK North Sea

1991 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 417-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. T. Farmer ◽  
A. P. Hillier
Keyword(s):  
North Sea ◽  
Upper Permian ◽  
Lower Permian ◽  
Reservoir Properties ◽  
Gas Field ◽  
Initial Development ◽  
Reservoir Performance ◽  
Matrix Permeability ◽  
Reservoir Permeability ◽  
Sandstone Formation

AbstractThe Clipper Gas Field is a moderate-sized faulted anticlinal trap located in Blocks 48/19a and 48/19c within the Sole Pit area of the southern North Sea gas basin. The reservoir is formed by the Lower Permian Leman Sandstone Formation, lying between truncated Westphalian Coal Measures and the Upper Permian evaporitic Zechstein Group which form source and seal respectively. Reservoir permeability is very low, mainly as a result of compaction and diagenesis which accompanied deep burial of the Sole Pit Trough, a sub-basin within the main gas basin. The Leman Sandstone Fm. is on average about 715 ft thick, laterally heterogeneous and zoned vertically with the best reservoir properties about the middle of the formation. Porosity is fair with a field average of 11.1%. Matrix permeability, however, is less than 1 millidarcy on average and is so low that some intervals in the field will not flow gas unless stimulated. Steep dipping zones of natural fractures occur in certain areas of the field; these commonly allow high flow rates to be achieved from large blocks of low-permeability matrix. Expected recoverable reserves from the most favourable part of the field are 558 BCF and Clipper Field is now being developed in conjunction with part of the adjacent Barque Gas Field. Later development of the remainder of Clipper Field will depend upon reservoir performance in the initial development area.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document