scholarly journals Structural basis of transcriptional stalling and bypass of abasic DNA lesion by RNA polymerase II

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (11) ◽  
pp. E2538-E2545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Wang ◽  
Celine Walmacq ◽  
Jenny Chong ◽  
Mikhail Kashlev ◽  
Dong Wang
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Structural Motif ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Abasic Site ◽  
Structural Explanation ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Abasic Sites

Abasic sites are among the most abundant DNA lesions and interfere with DNA replication and transcription, but the mechanism of their action on transcription remains unknown. Here we applied a combined structural and biochemical approach for a comprehensive investigation of how RNA polymerase II (Pol II) processes an abasic site, leading to slow bypass of lesion. Encounter of Pol II with an abasic site involves two consecutive slow steps: insertion of adenine opposite a noninstructive abasic site (the A-rule), followed by extension of the 3′-rAMP with the next cognate nucleotide. Further studies provided structural insights into the A-rule: ATP is slowly incorporated into RNA in the absence of template guidance. Our structure revealed that ATP is bound to the Pol II active site, whereas the abasic site is located at an intermediate state above the Bridge Helix, a conserved structural motif that is cirtical for Pol II activity. The next extension step occurs in a template-dependent manner where a cognate substrate is incorporated, despite at a much slower rate compared with nondamaged template. During the extension step, neither the cognate substrate nor the template base is located at the canonical position, providing a structural explanation as to why this step is as slow as the insertion step. Taken together, our studies provide a comprehensive understanding of Pol II stalling and bypass of the abasic site in the DNA template.

scholarly journals Mechanism of RNA polymerase II bypass of oxidative cyclopurine DNA lesions

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (5) ◽  
pp. E410-E419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Celine Walmacq ◽  
Lanfeng Wang ◽  
Jenny Chong ◽  
Kathleen Scibelli ◽  
Lucyna Lubkowska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Active Site ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Abasic Site ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Dna Lesion ◽  
Trigger Loop ◽  
Pyrimidine Dimers ◽  
Bulky Dna Lesions

In human cells, the oxidative DNA lesion 8,5′-cyclo-2'-deoxyadenosine (CydA) induces prolonged stalling of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) followed by transcriptional bypass, generating both error-free and mutant transcripts with AMP misincorporated immediately downstream from the lesion. Here, we present biochemical and crystallographic evidence for the mechanism of CydA recognition. Pol II stalling results from impaired loading of the template base (5′) next to CydA into the active site, leading to preferential AMP misincorporation. Such predominant AMP insertion, which also occurs at an abasic site, is unaffected by the identity of the 5′-templating base, indicating that it derives from nontemplated synthesis according to an A rule known for DNA polymerases and recently identified for Pol II bypass of pyrimidine dimers. Subsequent to AMP misincorporation, Pol II encounters a major translocation block that is slowly overcome. Thus, the translocation block combined with the poor extension of the dA.rA mispair reduce transcriptional mutagenesis. Moreover, increasing the active-site flexibility by mutation in the trigger loop, which increases the ability of Pol II to accommodate the bulky lesion, and addition of transacting factor TFIIF facilitate CydA bypass. Thus, blocking lesion entry to the active site, translesion A rule synthesis, and translocation block are common features of transcription across different bulky DNA lesions.

scholarly journals RNA polymerase II trapped on a molecular treadmill: Structural basis of persistent transcriptional arrest by a minor groove DNA binder

2022 ◽  
Vol 119 (3) ◽  
pp. e2114065119
Author(s):  
Juntaek Oh ◽  
Tiezheng Jia ◽  
Jun Xu ◽  
Jenny Chong ◽  
Peter B. Dervan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Minor Groove ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
Rna Pol Ii ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
X Ray ◽  
A Minor ◽  
Insight Into

Elongating RNA polymerase II (Pol II) can be paused or arrested by a variety of obstacles. These obstacles include DNA lesions, DNA-binding proteins, and small molecules. Hairpin pyrrole-imidazole (Py-Im) polyamides bind to the minor groove of DNA in a sequence-specific manner and induce strong transcriptional arrest. Remarkably, this Py-Im–induced Pol II transcriptional arrest is persistent and cannot be rescued by transcription factor TFIIS. In contrast, TFIIS can effectively rescue the transcriptional arrest induced by a nucleosome barrier. The structural basis of Py-Im–induced transcriptional arrest and why TFIIS cannot rescue this arrest remain elusive. Here we determined the X-ray crystal structures of four distinct Pol II elongation complexes (Pol II ECs) in complex with hairpin Py-Im polyamides as well as of the hairpin Py-Im polyamides–dsDNA complex. We observed that the Py-Im oligomer directly interacts with RNA Pol II residues, introduces compression of the downstream DNA duplex, prevents Pol II forward translocation, and induces Pol II backtracking. These results, together with biochemical studies, provide structural insight into the molecular mechanism by which Py-Im blocks transcription. Our structural study reveals why TFIIS fails to promote Pol II bypass of Py-Im–induced transcriptional arrest.

Structural Biology of RNA Polymerase II Transcription: 20 Years On

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Osman ◽  
Patrick Cramer
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Focal Point ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Cellular Regulation ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Associated Proteins ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii Transcription

Gene transcription by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) is the first step in the expression of the eukaryotic genome and a focal point for cellular regulation during development, differentiation, and responses to the environment. Two decades after the determination of the structure of Pol II, the mechanisms of transcription have been elucidated with studies of Pol II complexes with nucleic acids and associated proteins. Here we provide an overview of the nearly 200 available Pol II complex structures and summarize how these structures have elucidated promoter-dependent transcription initiation, promoter-proximal pausing and release of Pol II into active elongation, and the mechanisms that Pol II uses to navigate obstacles such as nucleosomes and DNA lesions. We predict that future studies will focus on how Pol II transcription is interconnected with chromatin transitions, RNA processing, and DNA repair.

scholarly journals The Myc Transactivation Domain Promotes Global Phosphorylation of the RNA Polymerase II Carboxy-Terminal Domain Independently of Direct DNA Binding

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 2059-2073 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria H. Cowling ◽  
Michael D. Cole
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Transactivation Domain ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Terminal Domain ◽  
Ctd Phosphorylation

ABSTRACT Myc is a transcription factor which is dependent on its DNA binding domain for transcriptional regulation of target genes. Here, we report the surprising finding that Myc mutants devoid of direct DNA binding activity and Myc target gene regulation can rescue a substantial fraction of the growth defect in myc −/− fibroblasts. Expression of the Myc transactivation domain alone induces a transcription-independent elevation of the RNA polymerase II (Pol II) C-terminal domain (CTD) kinases cyclin-dependent kinase 7 (CDK7) and CDK9 and a global increase in CTD phosphorylation. The Myc transactivation domain binds to the transcription initiation sites of these promoters and stimulates TFIIH binding in an MBII-dependent manner. Expression of the Myc transactivation domain increases CDK mRNA cap methylation, polysome loading, and the rate of translation. We find that some traditional Myc transcriptional target genes are also regulated by this Myc-driven translation mechanism. We propose that Myc transactivation domain-driven RNA Pol II CTD phosphorylation has broad effects on both transcription and mRNA metabolism.

scholarly journals Human Mediator Enhances Activator-Facilitated Recruitment of RNA Polymerase II and Promoter Recognition by TATA-Binding Protein (TBP) Independently of TBP-Associated Factors

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (17) ◽  
pp. 6229-6242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shwu-Yuan Wu ◽  
Tianyuan Zhou ◽  
Cheng-Ming Chiang
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Associated Factors ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Basal Transcription ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Promoter Recognition ◽  
Stimulation Of

ABSTRACT Mediator is a general cofactor implicated in the functions of many transcriptional activators. Although Mediator with different protein compositions has been isolated, it remains unclear how Mediator facilitates activator-dependent transcription, independent of its general stimulation of basal transcription. To define the mechanisms of Mediator function, we isolated two forms of human Mediator complexes (Mediator-P.5 and Mediator-P.85) and demonstrated that Mediator-P.5 clearly functions by enhancing activator-mediated recruitment of RNA polymerase II (pol II), whereas Mediator-P.85 works mainly by stimulating overall basal transcription. The coactivator function of Mediator-P.5 was not impaired when TATA-binding protein (TBP) was used in place of TFIID, but it was abolished when another general cofactor, PC4, was omitted from the reaction or when Mediator-P.5 was added after pol II entry into the preinitiation complex. Moreover, Mediator- P.5 is able to enhance TBP binding to the TATA box in an activator-dependent manner. Our data provides biochemical evidence that Mediator functions by facilitating activator-mediated recruitment of pol II and also promoter recognition by TBP, both of which can occur in the absence of TBP-associated factors in TFIID.

scholarly journals RNA polymerase II senses obstruction in the DNA minor groove via a conserved sensor motif

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (44) ◽  
pp. 12426-12431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Xu ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Deanna Gotte ◽  
Fei Yang ◽  
Alissa A. Hare ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcription Elongation ◽  
Minor Groove ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Dna Minor Groove ◽  
Minor Groove Binders ◽  
Groove Binders

RNA polymerase II (pol II) encounters numerous barriers during transcription elongation, including DNA strand breaks, DNA lesions, and nucleosomes. Pyrrole-imidazole (Py-Im) polyamides bind to the minor groove of DNA with programmable sequence specificity and high affinity. Previous studies suggest that Py-Im polyamides can prevent transcription factor binding, as well as interfere with pol II transcription elongation. However, the mechanism of pol II inhibition by Py-Im polyamides is unclear. Here we investigate the mechanism of how these minor-groove binders affect pol II transcription elongation. In the presence of site-specifically bound Py-Im polyamides, we find that the pol II elongation complex becomes arrested immediately upstream of the targeted DNA sequence, and is not rescued by transcription factor IIS, which is in contrast to pol II blockage by a nucleosome barrier. Further analysis reveals that two conserved pol II residues in the Switch 1 region contribute to pol II stalling. Our study suggests this motif in pol II can sense the structural changes of the DNA minor groove and can be considered a “minor groove sensor.” Prolonged interference of transcription elongation by sequence-specific minor groove binders may present opportunities to target transcription addiction for cancer therapy.

scholarly journals Structural basis of nucleosome transcription mediated by Chd1 and FACT

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas Farnung ◽  
Moritz Ochmann ◽  
Maik Engeholm ◽  
Patrick Cramer
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Histone Chaperone ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
Histone H2a ◽  
Binding Region ◽  
Chromatin Remodeler ◽  
Pol Ii

AbstractEfficient transcription of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) through nucleosomes requires the help of various factors. Here we show biochemically that Pol II transcription through a nucleosome is facilitated by the chromatin remodeler Chd1 and the histone chaperone FACT when the elongation factors Spt4/5 and TFIIS are present. We report cryo-EM structures of transcribing Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pol II−Spt4/5−nucleosome complexes with bound Chd1 or FACT. In the first structure, Pol II transcription exposes the proximal histone H2A−H2B dimer that is bound by Spt5. Pol II has also released the inhibitory DNA-binding region of Chd1 that is poised to pump DNA toward Pol II. In the second structure, Pol II has generated a partially unraveled nucleosome that binds FACT, which excludes Chd1 and Spt5. These results suggest that Pol II progression through a nucleosome activates Chd1, enables FACT binding and eventually triggers transfer of FACT together with histones to upstream DNA.

scholarly journals Opposite roles of transcription elongation factors Spt4/5 and Elf1 in RNA polymerase II transcription through B-form versus non-B DNA structures

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Xu ◽  
Jenny Chong ◽  
Dong Wang
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Trinucleotide Repeat ◽  
Transcription Elongation ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Cag Repeat ◽  
Elongation Factors ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Dna Structures

Abstract Transcription elongation can be affected by numerous types of obstacles, such as nucleosome, pausing sequences, DNA lesions and non-B-form DNA structures. Spt4/5 and Elf1 are conserved transcription elongation factors that promote RNA polymerase II (Pol II) bypass of nucleosome and pausing sequences. Importantly, genetic studies have shown that Spt4/5 plays essential roles in the transcription of expanded nucleotide repeat genes associated with inherited neurological diseases. Here, we investigate the function of Spt4/5 and Elf1 in the transcription elongation of CTG•CAG repeat using an in vitro reconstituted yeast transcription system. We found that Spt4/5 helps Pol II transcribe through the CTG•CAG tract duplex DNA, which is in good agreement with its canonical roles in stimulating transcription elongation. In sharp contrast, surprisingly, we revealed that Spt4/5 greatly inhibits Pol II transcriptional bypass of CTG and CAG slip-out structures. Furthermore, we demonstrated that transcription elongation factor Elf1 individually and cooperatively with Spt4/5 inhibits Pol II bypass of the slip-out structures. This study uncovers the important functional interplays between template DNA structures and the function of transcription elongation factors. This study also expands our understanding of the functions of Spt4/5 and Elf1 in transcriptional processing of trinucleotide repeat DNA.

scholarly journals Structural basis of human transcription–DNA repair coupling

Nature ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 598 (7880) ◽  
pp. 368-372
Author(s):  
Goran Kokic ◽  
Felix R. Wagner ◽  
Aleksandar Chernev ◽  
Henning Urlaub ◽  
Patrick Cramer
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Conformational Changes ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Elongation Factor ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
Elongation Complex ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Dna Lesion

AbstractTranscription-coupled DNA repair removes bulky DNA lesions from the genome1,2 and protects cells against ultraviolet (UV) irradiation3. Transcription-coupled DNA repair begins when RNA polymerase II (Pol II) stalls at a DNA lesion and recruits the Cockayne syndrome protein CSB, the E3 ubiquitin ligase, CRL4CSA and UV-stimulated scaffold protein A (UVSSA)3. Here we provide five high-resolution structures of Pol II transcription complexes containing human transcription-coupled DNA repair factors and the elongation factors PAF1 complex (PAF) and SPT6. Together with biochemical and published3,4 data, the structures provide a model for transcription–repair coupling. Stalling of Pol II at a DNA lesion triggers replacement of the elongation factor DSIF by CSB, which binds to PAF and moves upstream DNA to SPT6. The resulting elongation complex, ECTCR, uses the CSA-stimulated translocase activity of CSB to pull on upstream DNA and push Pol II forward. If the lesion cannot be bypassed, CRL4CSA spans over the Pol II clamp and ubiquitylates the RPB1 residue K1268, enabling recruitment of TFIIH to UVSSA and DNA repair. Conformational changes in CRL4CSA lead to ubiquitylation of CSB and to release of transcription-coupled DNA repair factors before transcription may continue over repaired DNA.

scholarly journals The FACT Complex Travels with Elongating RNA Polymerase II and Is Important for the Fidelity of Transcriptional Initiation In Vivo

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (22) ◽  
pp. 8323-8333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul B. Mason ◽  
Kevin Struhl
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Transcriptional Initiation ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Coding Regions

ABSTRACT The FACT complex facilitates transcription on chromatin templates in vitro, and it has been functionally linked to nucleosomes and putative RNA polymerase II (Pol II) elongation factors. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells, FACT specifically associates with active Pol II genes in a TFIIH-dependent manner and travels across the gene with elongating Pol II. Conditional inactivation of the FACT subunit Spt16 results in increased Pol II density, transcription, and TATA-binding protein (TBP) occupancy in the 3′ portion of certain coding regions, indicating that FACT suppresses inappropriate initiation from cryptic promoters within coding regions. Conversely, loss of Spt16 activity reduces the association of TBP, TFIIB, and Pol II with normal promoters. Thus, FACT is required for wild-type cells to restrict initiation to normal promoters, thereby ensuring that only appropriate mRNAs are synthesized. We suggest that FACT contributes to the fidelity of Pol II transcription by linking the processes of initiation and elongation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document