scholarly journals The 6-4 photoproduct is the trigger of UV-induced replication blockage and ATR activation

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (23) ◽  
pp. 12806-12816 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai-Feng Hung ◽  
Julia M. Sidorova ◽  
Paul Nghiem ◽  
Masaoki Kawasumi
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Multiparameter Flow Cytometry ◽  
Cyclobutane Pyrimidine Dimers ◽  
Pyrimidine Dimers ◽  
Dna Damage Responses ◽  
Atr Activation ◽  
Dna Damage Response Pathway

The most prevalent human carcinogen is sunlight-associated ultraviolet (UV), a physiologic dose of which generates thousands of DNA lesions per cell, mostly of two types: cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) and 6-4 photoproducts (6-4PPs). It has not been possible, in living cells, to precisely characterize the respective contributions of these two lesion types to the signals that regulate cell cycle progression, DNA replication, and cell survival. Here we coupled multiparameter flow cytometry with lesion-specific photolyases that eliminate either CPDs or 6-4PPs and determined their respective contributions to DNA damage responses. Strikingly, only 6-4PP lesions activated the ATR-Chk1 DNA damage response pathway. Mechanistically, 6-4PPs, but not CPDs, impeded DNA replication across the genome as revealed by microfluidic-assisted replication track analysis. Furthermore, single-stranded DNA accumulated preferentially at 6-4PPs during DNA replication, indicating selective and prolonged replication blockage at 6-4PPs. These findings suggest that 6-4PPs, although eightfold fewer in number than CPDs, are the trigger for UV-induced DNA damage responses.

scholarly journals Banp regulates DNA damage response and chromosome segregation during the cell cycle in zebrafish retina

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Swathy Babu ◽  
Yuki Takeuchi ◽  
Ichiro Masai
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Dna Damage Responses

Btg3-associated nuclear protein (Banp) was originally identified as a nuclear matrix-associated protein and it functions as a tumor suppressor. At molecular level, Banp regulates transcription of metabolic genes via a CGCG-containing motif called the Banp motif. However, its physiological roles in embryonic development are unknown. Here we report that Banp is indispensable for DNA damage response and chromosome segregation during mitosis. Zebrafish banp mutants show mitotic arrest and apoptosis in developing retina. We found that DNA replication stress and tp53-dependent DNA damage responses were activated to induce apoptosis in banp mutants, suggesting that Banp is required for integrity of DNA replication and DNA damage repair. Furthermore, in banp mutants, chromosome segregation was not smoothly processed from prometaphase to anaphase, leading to a prolonged M-phase. Our RNA- and ATAC-sequencing identified 31 candidates for direct Banp target genes that carry the Banp motif. Interestingly, two chromosome segregation regulators, cenpt and ncapg, are included in this list. Thus, Banp directly regulates transcription of cenpt and ncapg to promote chromosome segregation during mitosis. Our findings provide the first in vivo evidence that Banp is required for cell-cycle progression and cell survival by regulating DNA damage responses and chromosome segregation during mitosis.

scholarly journals Regulation of Cell Division in Bacteria by Monitoring Genome Integrity and DNA Replication Status

2019 ◽  
Vol 202 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter E. Burby ◽  
Lyle A. Simmons
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Sos Response ◽  
Bacterial Cells ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Content Type

ABSTRACT All organisms regulate cell cycle progression by coordinating cell division with DNA replication status. In eukaryotes, DNA damage or problems with replication fork progression induce the DNA damage response (DDR), causing cyclin-dependent kinases to remain active, preventing further cell cycle progression until replication and repair are complete. In bacteria, cell division is coordinated with chromosome segregation, preventing cell division ring formation over the nucleoid in a process termed nucleoid occlusion. In addition to nucleoid occlusion, bacteria induce the SOS response after replication forks encounter DNA damage or impediments that slow or block their progression. During SOS induction, Escherichia coli expresses a cytoplasmic protein, SulA, that inhibits cell division by directly binding FtsZ. After the SOS response is turned off, SulA is degraded by Lon protease, allowing for cell division to resume. Recently, it has become clear that SulA is restricted to bacteria closely related to E. coli and that most bacteria enforce the DNA damage checkpoint by expressing a small integral membrane protein. Resumption of cell division is then mediated by membrane-bound proteases that cleave the cell division inhibitor. Further, many bacterial cells have mechanisms to inhibit cell division that are regulated independently from the canonical LexA-mediated SOS response. In this review, we discuss several pathways used by bacteria to prevent cell division from occurring when genome instability is detected or before the chromosome has been fully replicated and segregated.

scholarly journals A Role for Histone H2B During Repair of UV-Induced DNA Damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Genetics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 160 (4) ◽  
pp. 1375-1387
Author(s):  
Emmanuelle M D Martini ◽  
Scott Keeney ◽  
Mary Ann Osley
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Chromatin Structure ◽  
Specific Effect ◽  
Cell Killing ◽  
Cyclobutane Pyrimidine Dimers ◽  
Histone H2b ◽  
Uv Sensitivity ◽  
Pyrimidine Dimers

Abstract To investigate the role of the nucleosome during repair of DNA damage in yeast, we screened for histone H2B mutants that were sensitive to UV irradiation. We have isolated a new mutant, htb1-3, that shows preferential sensitivity to UV-C. There is no detectable difference in bulk chromatin structure or in the number of UV-induced cis-syn cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPD) between HTB1 and htb1-3 strains. These results suggest a specific effect of this histone H2B mutation in UV-induced DNA repair processes rather than a global effect on chromatin structure. We analyzed the UV sensitivity of double mutants that contained the htb1-3 mutation and mutations in genes from each of the three epistasis groups of RAD genes. The htb1-3 mutation enhanced UV-induced cell killing in rad1Δ and rad52Δ mutants but not in rad6Δ or rad18Δ mutants, which are defective in postreplicational DNA repair (PRR). When combined with other mutations that affect PRR, the histone mutation increased the UV sensitivity of strains with defects in either the error-prone (rev1Δ) or error-free (rad30Δ) branches of PRR, but did not enhance the UV sensitivity of a strain with a rad5Δ mutation. When combined with a ubc13Δ mutation, which is also epistatic with rad5Δ, the htb1-3 mutation enhanced UV-induced cell killing. These results suggest that histone H2B acts in a novel RAD5-dependent branch of PRR.

Overlapping Roles of the Spindle Assembly and DNA Damage Checkpoints in the Cell-Cycle Response to Altered Chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Genetics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 161 (2) ◽  
pp. 521-534
Author(s):  
Peter M Garber ◽  
Jasper Rine
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Replication Proteins ◽  
Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoints ◽  
Dna Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Mcm Proteins ◽  
Stalled Replication Forks

Abstract The MAD2-dependent spindle checkpoint blocks anaphase until all chromosomes have achieved successful bipolar attachment to the mitotic spindle. The DNA damage and DNA replication checkpoints block anaphase in response to DNA lesions that may include single-stranded DNA and stalled replication forks. Many of the same conditions that activate the DNA damage and DNA replication checkpoints also activated the spindle checkpoint. The mad2Δ mutation partially relieved the arrest responses of cells to mutations affecting the replication proteins Mcm3p and Pol1p. Thus a previously unrecognized aspect of spindle checkpoint function may be to protect cells from defects in DNA replication. Furthermore, in cells lacking either the DNA damage or the DNA replication checkpoints, the spindle checkpoint contributed to the arrest responses of cells to the DNA-damaging agent methyl methanesulfonate, the replication inhibitor hydroxyurea, and mutations affecting Mcm2p and Orc2p. Thus the spindle checkpoint was sensitive to a wider range of chromosomal perturbations than previously recognized. Finally, the DNA replication checkpoint did not contribute to the arrests of cells in response to mutations affecting ORC, Mcm proteins, or DNA polymerase δ. Thus the specificity of this checkpoint may be more limited than previously recognized.

scholarly journals Regulation of DNA-damage responses and cell-cycle progression by the chromatin remodelling factor CHD4

2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (18) ◽  
pp. 3130-3139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie E Polo ◽  
Abderrahmane Kaidi ◽  
Linda Baskcomb ◽  
Yaron Galanty ◽  
Stephen P Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Chromatin Remodelling ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Dna Damage Responses

scholarly journals γH2AX in the S Phase after UV Irradiation Corresponds to DNA Replication and Does Not Report on the Extent of DNA Damage

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (20) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shivnarayan Dhuppar ◽  
Sitara Roy ◽  
Aprotim Mazumder
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Uv Irradiation ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Cyclobutane Pyrimidine Dimers ◽  
Environmental Mutagen ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Pyrimidine Dimers ◽  
Replication Sites ◽  
A Cell

ABSTRACT Ultraviolet (UV) radiation is a major environmental mutagen. Exposure to UV leads to a sharp peak of γH2AX, the phosphorylated form of the histone variant H2AX, in the S phase within an asynchronous population of cells. γH2AX is often considered a definitive marker of DNA damage inside a cell. In this report, we show that γH2AX in the S-phase cells after UV irradiation reports neither on the extent of primary DNA damage in the form of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers nor on the extent of its secondary manifestations in the form of DNA double-strand breaks or in the inhibition of global transcription. Instead, γH2AX in the S phase corresponds to the sites of active replication at the time of UV irradiation. This accumulation of γH2AX at replication sites slows down the replication. However, the cells do complete the replication of their genomes and arrest within the G2 phase. Our study suggests that it is not DNA damage, but the response elicited, which peaks in the S phase upon UV irradiation.

scholarly journals Cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers are predominant DNA lesions in whole human skin exposed to UVA radiation

2006 ◽  
Vol 103 (37) ◽  
pp. 13765-13770 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Mouret ◽  
C. Baudouin ◽  
M. Charveron ◽  
A. Favier ◽  
J. Cadet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Human Skin ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Cyclobutane Pyrimidine Dimers ◽  
Pyrimidine Dimers ◽  
Uva Radiation

scholarly journals The Dark Side of UV-Induced DNA Lesion Repair

Genes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 1450
Author(s):  
Wojciech Strzałka ◽  
Piotr Zgłobicki ◽  
Ewa Kowalska ◽  
Aneta Bażant ◽  
Dariusz Dziga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Uv Light ◽  
Genetic Material ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Dark Side ◽  
Repair System ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Lesion ◽  
Pyrimidine Dimers

In their life cycle, plants are exposed to various unfavorable environmental factors including ultraviolet (UV) radiation emitted by the Sun. UV-A and UV-B, which are partially absorbed by the ozone layer, reach the surface of the Earth causing harmful effects among the others on plant genetic material. The energy of UV light is sufficient to induce mutations in DNA. Some examples of DNA damage induced by UV are pyrimidine dimers, oxidized nucleotides as well as single and double-strand breaks. When exposed to light, plants can repair major UV-induced DNA lesions, i.e., pyrimidine dimers using photoreactivation. However, this highly efficient light-dependent DNA repair system is ineffective in dim light or at night. Moreover, it is helpless when it comes to the repair of DNA lesions other than pyrimidine dimers. In this review, we have focused on how plants cope with deleterious DNA damage that cannot be repaired by photoreactivation. The current understanding of light-independent mechanisms, classified as dark DNA repair, indispensable for the maintenance of plant genetic material integrity has been presented.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document