scholarly journals Structural origins of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase open promoter complex stability

2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (40) ◽  
pp. e2112877118
Author(s):  
Ruth M. Saecker ◽  
James Chen ◽  
Courtney E. Chiu ◽  
Brandon Malone ◽  
Johanna Sotiris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Promoter Strength ◽  
Transcription Bubble ◽  
Template Strand ◽  
Solution Studies ◽  
Active Site Cleft ◽  
Promoter Dna

The first step in gene expression in all organisms requires opening the DNA duplex to expose one strand for templated RNA synthesis. In Escherichia coli, promoter DNA sequence fundamentally determines how fast the RNA polymerase (RNAP) forms “open” complexes (RPo), whether RPo persists for seconds or hours, and how quickly RNAP transitions from initiation to elongation. These rates control promoter strength in vivo, but their structural origins remain largely unknown. Here, we use cryoelectron microscopy to determine the structures of RPo formed de novo at three promoters with widely differing lifetimes at 37 °C: λPR (t1/2 ∼10 h), T7A1 (t1/2 ∼4 min), and a point mutant in λPR (λPR-5C) (t1/2 ∼2 h). Two distinct RPo conformers are populated at λPR, likely representing productive and unproductive forms of RPo observed in solution studies. We find that changes in the sequence and length of DNA in the transcription bubble just upstream of the start site (+1) globally alter the network of DNA–RNAP interactions, base stacking, and strand order in the single-stranded DNA of the transcription bubble; these differences propagate beyond the bubble to upstream and downstream DNA. After expanding the transcription bubble by one base (T7A1), the nontemplate strand “scrunches” inside the active site cleft; the template strand bulges outside the cleft at the upstream edge of the bubble. The structures illustrate how limited sequence changes trigger global alterations in the transcription bubble that modulate the RPo lifetime and affect the subsequent steps of the transcription cycle.

scholarly journals Structural origins of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase open promoter complex stability

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth M. Saecker ◽  
James Chen ◽  
Courtney E. Chiu ◽  
Brandon Malone ◽  
Johanna Sotiris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Promoter Strength ◽  
Transcription Bubble ◽  
Template Strand ◽  
Solution Studies ◽  
Active Site Cleft ◽  
Promoter Dna

AbstractThe first step of gene expression in all organisms requires opening the DNA duplex to expose one strand for templated RNA synthesis. In Escherichia coli, promoter DNA sequence fundamentally determines how fast the RNA polymerase (RNAP) forms “open” complexes (RPo), whether RPo persists for seconds or hours, and how quickly RNAP transitions from initiation to elongation. These rates control promoter strength in vivo but their structural origins remain largely unknown. Here we use cryo-electron microscopy to determine structures of RPo formed de novo at three promoters with widely differing lifetimes at 37°C: λPR (t1/2 ∼ 10 hours), T7A1 (t1/2 ∼ 4 minutes), and a point mutant in λPR (λPR-5C) (t1/2 ∼ 2 hours). Two distinct RPo conformers are populated at λPR, likely representing productive and unproductive forms of RPo observed in solution studies. We find that changes in the sequence and length of DNA in the transcription bubble just upstream of the start site (+1) globally alter the network of DNA-RNAP interactions, base stacking, and strand order in the single-stranded DNA of the transcription bubble; these differences propagate beyond the bubble to upstream and downstream DNA. After expanding the transcription bubble by one base (T7A1), the nontemplate-strand “scrunches” inside the active site cleft; the template-strand bulges outside the cleft at the upstream edge of the bubble. The structures illustrate how limited sequence changes trigger global alterations in the transcription bubble that modulate RPo lifetime and affect the subsequent steps of the transcription cycle.

scholarly journals T4 early promoter strength probed in vivo with unribosylated and ADP-ribosylated Escherichia coli RNA polymerase: a mutation analysis

Microbiology ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 146 (10) ◽  
pp. 2643-2653 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Sommer ◽  
Vida Salniene ◽  
Egle Gineikiene ◽  
Rimas Nivinskas ◽  
Wolfgang Rüger
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Mutation Analysis ◽  
Promoter Strength ◽  
Early Promoter

scholarly journals Genomic Studies with Escherichia coli MelR Protein: Applications of Chromatin Immunoprecipitation and Microarrays

2004 ◽  
Vol 186 (20) ◽  
pp. 6938-6943 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Grainger ◽  
Timothy W. Overton ◽  
Nikos Reppas ◽  
Joseph T. Wade ◽  
Eiji Tamai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation ◽  
Positive Control ◽  
Transcription Activator ◽  
Genechip Array ◽  
Genomic Studies ◽  
Affymetrix Genechip Array ◽  
Promoter Dna

ABSTRACT Escherichia coli MelR protein is a transcription activator that is essential for melibiose-dependent expression of the melAB genes. We have used chromatin immunoprecipitation to study the binding of MelR and RNA polymerase to the melAB promoter in vivo. Our results show that MelR is associated with promoter DNA, both in the absence and presence of the inducer melibiose. In contrast, RNA polymerase is recruited to the melAB promoter only in the presence of inducer. The MelR DK261 positive control mutant binds to the melAB promoter but cannot recruit RNA polymerase. Further analysis of immunoprecipitated DNA, by using an Affymetrix GeneChip array, showed that the melAB promoter is the major, if not the sole, target in E. coli for MelR. This was confirmed by a transcriptomics experiment to analyze RNA in cells either with or without melR.

scholarly journals Mg2+ ions do not induce expansion of the melted DNA region in the open complex formed by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase at a cognate synthetic Pa promoter. A quantitative KMnO4 footprinting study.

2001 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 495-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Loziiński ◽  
K L Wierzchowski
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rate Constants ◽  
Dna Melting ◽  
Transcription Bubble ◽  
Population Distributions ◽  
Promoter Dna ◽  
Transcription Complexes ◽  
Dna Strand ◽  
Sigma 70

Footprinting studies of prokaryotic open transcription complexes (RPO), based on oxidation of pyrimidine residues by KMnO4 and/or OsO4 at a single oxidant dose, have suggested that the extent of DNA melting in the transcription bubble region increases in the presence of Mg . In this work, quantitative KMnO4 footprinting in function of the oxidant dose of RPO, using Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (E(sigma)70) at a fully functional synthetic promoter Pa having -35 and -10 consensus hexamers, has been used to determine individual rate constants of oxidation of T residues in this region at 37degrees C in the absence of Mg2+ and in the presence of 10 mM MgCl2, and to evaluate therefrom the effect of Mg2+ on the extent of DNA melting. Population distributions of end-labeled DNA fragments corresponding to oxidized Ts were quantified and analyzed according to the single-hit kinetic model. Pseudo-first order reactivity rate constants, ki, thus obtained demonstrated that Mg2+ ions bound to RPO merely enhanced the reactivity of all 11 oxidizable thymines between the +3 and -11 promoter sites by a position-dependent factor: 3-4 for those located close to the transcription start point +1 in either DNA strand, and about 1.6 for those located more distantly therefrom. On the basis of these observations, we conclude that Mg2+ ions bound to RPO at Pa do not influence the length of the melted DNA region and propose that the higher reactivity of thymines results mainly from lower local repulsive electrostatic barriers to MnO4 diffusion around carboxylate binding sites in the catalytic center of RPO and promoter DNA phosphates.

scholarly journals Structure of a bacterial RNA polymerase holoenzyme open promoter complex

eLife ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Bae ◽  
Andrey Feklistov ◽  
Agnieszka Lass-Napiorkowska ◽  
Robert Landick ◽  
Seth A Darst
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Bubble Formation ◽  
Thermus Aquaticus ◽  
Transcription Bubble ◽  
Template Strand ◽  
Bacterial Rna ◽  
Promoter Complex ◽  
Primary Means ◽  
Promoter Dna ◽  
Biochemical Analyses

Initiation of transcription is a primary means for controlling gene expression. In bacteria, the RNA polymerase (RNAP) holoenzyme binds and unwinds promoter DNA, forming the transcription bubble of the open promoter complex (RPo). We have determined crystal structures, refined to 4.14 Å-resolution, of RPo containing Thermus aquaticus RNAP holoenzyme and promoter DNA that includes the full transcription bubble. The structures, combined with biochemical analyses, reveal key features supporting the formation and maintenance of the double-strand/single-strand DNA junction at the upstream edge of the −10 element where bubble formation initiates. The results also reveal RNAP interactions with duplex DNA just upstream of the −10 element and potential protein/DNA interactions that direct the DNA template strand into the RNAP active site. Addition of an RNA primer to yield a 4 base-pair post-translocated RNA:DNA hybrid mimics an initially transcribing complex at the point where steric clash initiates abortive initiation and σA dissociation.

scholarly journals Interactions between RNA polymerase and the core recognition element are a determinant of transcription start site selection

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (21) ◽  
pp. E2899-E2905 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irina O. Vvedenskaya ◽  
Hanif Vahedian-Movahed ◽  
Yuanchao Zhang ◽  
Deanne M. Taylor ◽  
Richard H. Ebright ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Transcription Start Site ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Specific Protein ◽  
Start Site ◽  
Transcription Start ◽  
Transcription Bubble ◽  
Recognition Element

During transcription initiation, RNA polymerase (RNAP) holoenzyme unwinds ∼13 bp of promoter DNA, forming an RNAP-promoter open complex (RPo) containing a single-stranded transcription bubble, and selects a template-strand nucleotide to serve as the transcription start site (TSS). In RPo, RNAP core enzyme makes sequence-specific protein–DNA interactions with the downstream part of the nontemplate strand of the transcription bubble (“core recognition element,” CRE). Here, we investigated whether sequence-specific RNAP–CRE interactions affect TSS selection. To do this, we used two next-generation sequencing-based approaches to compare the TSS profile of WT RNAP to that of an RNAP derivative defective in sequence-specific RNAP–CRE interactions. First, using massively systematic transcript end readout, MASTER, we assessed effects of RNAP–CRE interactions on TSS selection in vitro and in vivo for a library of 47 (∼16,000) consensus promoters containing different TSS region sequences, and we observed that the TSS profile of the RNAP derivative defective in RNAP–CRE interactions differed from that of WT RNAP, in a manner that correlated with the presence of consensus CRE sequences in the TSS region. Second, using 5′ merodiploid native-elongating-transcript sequencing, 5′ mNET-seq, we assessed effects of RNAP–CRE interactions at natural promoters in Escherichia coli, and we identified 39 promoters at which RNAP–CRE interactions determine TSS selection. Our findings establish RNAP–CRE interactions are a functional determinant of TSS selection. We propose that RNAP–CRE interactions modulate the position of the downstream end of the transcription bubble in RPo, and thereby modulate TSS selection, which involves transcription bubble expansion or transcription bubble contraction (scrunching or antiscrunching).

scholarly journals Effects of distortions by A-tracts of promoter B-DNA spacer region on the kinetics of open complex formation by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase.

2003 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 909-920 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iwona K Kolasa ◽  
Tomasz Łoziński ◽  
Kazimierz L Wierzchowski
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Specific Interaction ◽  
Structural Data ◽  
Structural Morphology ◽  
Promoter Dna ◽  
Sigma Subunit ◽  
Kinetics Of

A-tracts in DNA due to their structural morphology distinctly different from the canonical B-DNA form play an important role in specific recognition of bacterial upstream promoter elements by the carboxyl terminal domain of RNA polymerase alpha subunit and, in turn, in the process of transcription initiation. They are only rarely found in the spacer promoter regions separating the -35 and -10 recognition hexamers. At present, the nature of the protein-DNA contacts formed between RNA polymerase and promoter DNA in transcription initiation can only be inferred from low resolution structural data and mutational and crosslinking experiments. To probe these contacts further, we constructed derivatives of a model Pa promoter bearing in the spacer region one or two An (n = 5 or 6) tracts, in phase with the DNA helical repeat, and studied the effects of thereby induced perturbation of promoter DNA structure on the kinetics of open complex (RPo) formation in vitro by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. We found that the overall second-order rate constant ka of RPo formation, relative to that at the control promoter, was strongly reduced by one to two orders of magnitude only when the A-tracts were located in the nontemplate strand. A particularly strong 30-fold down effect on ka was exerted by nontemplate A-tracts in the -10 extended promoter region, where an involvement of nontemplate TG (-14, -15) sequence in a specific interaction with region 3 of sigma-subunit is postulated. A-tracts in the latter location caused also 3-fold slower isomerization of the first closed transcription complex into the intermediate one that precedes formation of RPo, and led to two-fold faster dissociation of the latter. All these findings are discussed in relation to recent structural and kinetic models of RPo formation.

scholarly journals Direct binding of TFEα opens DNA binding cleft of RNA polymerase

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung-Hoon Jun ◽  
Jaekyung Hyun ◽  
Jeong Seok Cha ◽  
Hoyoung Kim ◽  
Michael S. Bartlett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
Transcription Bubble ◽  
Cryo Electron Microscopy ◽  
Direct Binding ◽  
Binding Cleft ◽  
Promoter Dna ◽  
Winged Helix Domain

AbstractOpening of the DNA binding cleft of cellular RNA polymerase (RNAP) is necessary for transcription initiation but the underlying molecular mechanism is not known. Here, we report on the cryo-electron microscopy structures of the RNAP, RNAP-TFEα binary, and RNAP-TFEα-promoter DNA ternary complexes from archaea, Thermococcus kodakarensis (Tko). The structures reveal that TFEα bridges the RNAP clamp and stalk domains to open the DNA binding cleft. Positioning of promoter DNA into the cleft closes it while maintaining the TFEα interactions with the RNAP mobile modules. The structures and photo-crosslinking results also suggest that the conserved aromatic residue in the extended winged-helix domain of TFEα interacts with promoter DNA to stabilize the transcription bubble. This study provides a structural basis for the functions of TFEα and elucidates the mechanism by which the DNA binding cleft is opened during transcription initiation in the stalk-containing RNAPs, including archaeal and eukaryotic RNAPs.

scholarly journals In vivo cycling of the Escherichia coli transcription factor FNR between active and inactive states

Microbiology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 151 (12) ◽  
pp. 4063-4070 ◽  
Author(s):  
David P. Dibden ◽  
Jeffrey Green
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Oxygen Availability ◽  
Anaerobic Conditions ◽  
Aerobic Conditions ◽  
Fnr Protein ◽  
Transcription Regulators ◽  
Aerobic And Anaerobic ◽  
Aerobic And Anaerobic Conditions

FNR proteins are transcription regulators that sense changes in oxygen availability via assembly–disassembly of [4Fe–4S] clusters. The Escherichia coli FNR protein is present in bacteria grown under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Under aerobic conditions, FNR is isolated as an inactive monomeric apoprotein, whereas under anaerobic conditions, FNR is present as an active dimeric holoprotein containing one [4Fe–4S] cluster per subunit. It has been suggested that the active and inactive forms of FNR are interconverted in vivo, or that iron–sulphur clusters are mostly incorporated into newly synthesized FNR. Here, experiments using a thermo-inducible fnr expression plasmid showed that a model FNR-dependent promoter is activated under anaerobic conditions by FNR that was synthesized under aerobic conditions. Immunoblots suggested that FNR was more prone to degradation under aerobic compared with anaerobic conditions, and that the ClpXP protease contributes to this degradation. Nevertheless, FNR was sufficiently long lived (half-life under aerobic conditions, ∼45 min) to allow cycling between active and inactive forms. Measuring the abundance of the FNR-activated dms transcript when chloramphenicol-treated cultures were switched between aerobic and anaerobic conditions showed that it increased when cultures were switched to anaerobic conditions, and decreased when aerobic conditions were restored. In contrast, measurement of the abundance of the FNR-repressed ndh transcript under the same conditions showed that it decreased upon switching to anaerobic conditions, and then increased when aerobic conditions were restored. The abundance of the FNR- and oxygen-independent tatE transcript was unaffected by changes in oxygen availability. Thus, the simplest explanation for the observations reported here is that the FNR protein can be switched between inactive and active forms in vivo in the absence of de novo protein synthesis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document