The New Task of Swedish Universities

1998 ◽  
Vol 3 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 113-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Göran Brulin
Keyword(s):  
Local Environment ◽  
Working Life ◽  
Research Process ◽  
Academic Role ◽  
The Third ◽  
Practice Based Research ◽  
Continuous Interaction ◽  
University Colleges ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government

In 1997 the law governing higher education and research in Sweden added a third task to the work to be done by the Swedish Universities: they were now no longer expected just to educate and to do research but also to relate to and collaborate with their local environment. The present article argues that this third task implies a new form of knowledge, viz., knowledge generated in interactive cooperation with practitioners. The change in the law has encountered resistance from the research establishment. However, there are good reasons for the universities to change from a position of noble seclusion towards continuous interaction with their environment. Three arguments are proposed that articulate the need to actively involve the world of practice in the research process. The National Institute for Working Life received an assignment from the government to promote the implementation of the universities ' third task. A program was started by approaching and involving primarily the 20 university colleges in networking and development activities. It seems that action-oriented, practice-based research can more easily find a foothold in these institutions. It cannot be denied that the third task has started to put new, challenging demands on the typical academic role.

scholarly journals Public and Private Ownership in the Iranian Constitution: Principle 44, A Barrier for Development

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 73
Author(s):  
Ahmad Torabi
Keyword(s):  
Case Studies ◽  
Economic Impacts ◽  
Private Ownership ◽  
Public Ownership ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
The Third ◽  
Public Property ◽  
Legal Challenges ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government

The Iranian legislator has sought to protect public property and public ownership in the Iranian Constitution in accordance with Islamic principles, terms and procedures. There are a number of principles that have been directly applied to this purpose; however, one principle has had a very significant impact on government domination of the economy of Iran: principle 44. This principle does not directly describe public property; rather, it aims to determine the areas that are under public ownership and are administered by the government. However, the principle has some contradictions and legal challenges in itself. In addition, the supplementary law that has been enacted to provide the areas for the enforcement of principle 44 fails to secure the aims of the legislator. Therefore, this paper analyses legal challenges of the principle, as well as its supplementary law, and gives suggestions to solve the challenges.This paper is divided into four sections. The first section provides an analysis of the principle itself, and its relationship and consistency with other principles of the constitution. In the second section, the Law of Implementation of Principle 44 and the legal challenges that arise from it will be discussed. The third section focuses on the negative economic impacts of this law, as well as case studies of it. Lastly, the paper provides a summary of suggestions to amend this law.

The Censorship of British Drama 1900-1968 Volume 3

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve Nicholson
Keyword(s):  
Samuel Beckett ◽  
British Library ◽  
Volume Analysis ◽  
Royal Court ◽  
The Third ◽  
Paperback Edition ◽  
John Osborne ◽  
British Drama ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government

This is the third volume in a new paperback edition of Steve Nicholson’s comprehensive four-volume analysis of British theatre censorship from 1900-1968, based on previously undocumented material in the Lord Chamberlain's Correspondence Archives in the British Library and the Royal Archives at Windsor. Focusing on plays we know, plays we have forgotten, and plays which were silenced for ever, Censorship of British Drama demonstrates the extent to which censorship shaped the theatre voices of this decade. The book charts the early struggles with Royal Court writers such as John Osborne and with Joan Littlewood and Theatre Workshop; the stand-offs with Samuel Beckett and with leading American dramatists; the Lord Chamberlain’s determination to keep homosexuality off the stage, which turned him into a laughing stock when he was unable to prevent a private theatre club in London's West End from staging a series of American plays he had banned, including Arthur Miller's A View from the Bridge and Tennessee Williams's Cat on a Hot Tin Roof; and the Lord Chamberlain’s attempts to persuade the government to give him new powers and to rewrite the law. This new edition includes a contextualising timeline for those readers who are unfamiliar with the period, and a new preface.

A Bankers’ Bank

2020 ◽  
pp. 85-107
Author(s):  
Einar Lie
Keyword(s):  
Monetary Union ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Central Banks ◽  
International Context ◽  
The Third ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government

This chapter details the Storting’s passing of a new law in 1892 which superseded all former laws pertaining to Norges Bank. As with the bank’s foundations of 1816, the 1892 act reflected its era and responded to the perceptions and needs of that period. The new law facilitated the transformation of the regionalized bank of issue into an institution more closely resembling central banks elsewhere. Discussions on the legal framework were thus held with varying intensity from the 1870s and onwards. Three conditions in particular influenced the process and the final character of the law. The first was the international context the law itself was a part of. The second condition was the integration and centralization process already underway in Norway. The third significant condition was the conflict between the government authorities that framed Norway’s entry into the Scandinavian Monetary Union.

scholarly journals The law of bare life

2021 ◽  
Vol 72 (S1) ◽  
pp. 186-211
Author(s):  
Ian Ward
Keyword(s):  
British History ◽  
Bare Life ◽  
The Third ◽  
The Past ◽  
Uk Government ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Uk

2020 proved to be a remarkable year. Not the least remarkable was the realisation that, in a moment of perceived crisis, the instinctive response of the UK Government was to sweep away various so-called rights and liberties which might, in a calmer moment, have been presumed fundamental, and to rule by means of executive fiat. The purpose of this article is to interrogate both the premise and the consequence. Because, on closer inspection, there is nothing at all remarkable about how the Government reacted, for the same reason that there was little that was unprecedented about the experience of COVID-19. History is full of pandemics and epidemics, and government invariably acts in the same way. The first part of this article will revisit a particular theory of governance, again proved by history; that which brings together ‘bio-politics’ and the jurisprudence of the ‘exception’. The second part of the article will then revisit a prescient moment in British history; another disease, another panicked government, another lockdown. In the third, we will reflect further on the experience of COVID-19 and wonder what might be surmised from our foray into the past.

scholarly journals MANDATORY LICENSE LICENSE AS ONE OF THE OBJECTIVES OF LIMITATION OF PATENT EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devi cantika
Keyword(s):  
Third Party ◽  
Patent Holder ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
The Third ◽  
Patent Rights ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Third Party ◽  
The Government

A patent is a special right granted based on the law by the government to a person or legal entity that has an invention in the field of technology. Patents as ownership regimes with exclusive rights are not limitless. Countries may regulate exceptions to the exclusive rights covered by the patent. Provided that the exception is not without legitimate reasons contrary to the normal exploitation of the patent and does not harm the reasonable interests of the Patent Holder, and continues to take into account the interests of the third party. One form of limiting exclusive patent rights is the rule regarding compulsory license.Keywords: patents, exclusive rights, compulsory licenses

scholarly journals Inkonstitusionalitas Pajak Bumi dan Bangunan Sektor Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara di Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Argo Trinandityo
Keyword(s):  
Coal Mining ◽  
Income Tax ◽  
Mining Sector ◽  
The Third ◽  
Government Power ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
Community Cooperation

Tax shall reflect the community cooperation and participation in order to fund the nation’s development. As the main source of the country’s income, tax payment always has special treat from the law, such as the priority payment from the certain people (in example debtor) before any other payment obliged to them. Indonesia as a Nation of Laws (rechtstaat), and not a Power State (machtstaat), therefore shall to give law as the main guidance for the nation in every action. The Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945 (UUD 45) as the Constitution shall limit the Government power, including the power to tax. Therefore, the regulation related to tax and any levy imposed for the country must be regulated by a Law/Act. As the consequences, tax without a Law will be unconstitutional. Indonesia Land and Building Tax for Mineral and Coal Mining Sector (PBB Minerba) still referring to Law of Land and Building Tax, which has very distinguished character with the PBB Minerba itself. Until now, PBB Minerba have not regulated by a certain Law/Act as obliged by the third amendment of constitution UUD 45.

scholarly journals MANDATORY LICENSE AS ONE OF THE OBJECTIVES OF LIMITATION OF PATENT EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devi cantika
Keyword(s):  
Third Party ◽  
Patent Holder ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
The Third ◽  
Patent Rights ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Third Party ◽  
The Government

AbstractA patent is a special right granted based on the law by the government to a person or legal entity that has an invention in the field of technology. Patents as ownership regimes with exclusive rights are not limitless. Countries may regulate exceptions to the exclusive rights covered by the patent. Provided that the exception is not without legitimate reasons contrary to the normal exploitation of the patent and does not harm the reasonable interests of the Patent Holder, and continues to take into account the interests of the third party. One form of limiting exclusive patent rights is the rule regarding compulsory license.Keywords: patents, exclusive rights, compulsory licenses

Pengaturan Waralaba Di Indonesia: Perspektif Hukum Bisnis

Liquidity ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-166
Author(s):  
Muchtar Riva’i
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Small And Medium Enterprises ◽  
Economic Community ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
Medium Enterprises ◽  
Article 5 ◽  
Laws And Regulations

The law arrangement of franchise law was first explicitly regulated by the Government Regulation No. 16 of 1997 which is then updated by Government Regulation No. 42 of 2007 to be created in an agreement that at least contains clauses as stipulated by Article 5 of the Government Regulation. However, franchise arrangements also associated with a variety of other laws and regulations applicable in Indonesia. This article is going to state that the importance of partnerships with small and medium enterprises as an effort to encourage the involvement of the wider economic community.

Peranan KPPU Bagi Pemangku Kepentingan Dalam Menegakkan Undang-Undang Larangan Praktik Monopoli Di Indonesia

Liquidity ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 190-200
Author(s):  
Muchtar Riva’i ◽  
Darwin Erhandy
Keyword(s):  
Stakeholder Participation ◽  
The People ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
Law Commission

The establishment of the KPPU is to control the implementation of the Act. No. 5/1999 on Concerning the Ban on Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition in Indonesia. Various duties and authority of the KPPU contained in Article 35 and Article 36 of the Act. But in reality, KPPU does not have executorial rights so that the various decisions of the commission often could not be implemented. Therefore internally strengthening of institutional existence by way of amending the Law Commission is very appropriate to be used by the government and parliament agenda. Externally, stakeholder participation is something very urgent and that the KPPU’s strategic optimally capable of performing their duties according to its motto: “Healthy competition Welfare of the people”.

Regulatory Guillotine in the Field of Industrial Safety

2020 ◽  
pp. 22-28
Author(s):  
E.V. Klovach ◽  
◽  
A.S. Pecherkin ◽  
V.K. Shalaev ◽  
V.I. Sidorov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Preventive Measures ◽  
Regulatory System ◽  
Industrial Safety ◽  
State Control ◽  
Regulatory Impact ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
Executive Body

In Russia, the reform of the regulatory guillotine is being implemented in the field of control and supervisory activity. It should result in a new regulatory system formed according to the principles specified in the key federal laws: «On state control (supervision) and municipal control in the Russian Federation» (Law on Control) and «On mandatory requirements in the Russian Federation» (Law on Mandatory Requirements) adopted in August 2020. In the field of industrial safety, this process was launched by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation № 1192, which will come into force on January 1, 2021. The main provisions are discussed in the article, which are related to the Law on Control and the Law on Mandatory Requirements. The Law on Control establishes the priority of preventive measures aimed at reducing the risk of causing harm in relation to the control activities, the grounds for carrying out control (supervisory) activities, the types of these activities in the forms of interaction with the controlled person and without such, the procedure for presentation of the results of control (supervisory) activity. The Law on Mandatory Requirements establishes that the provisions of regulatory legal acts should enter into force either from March 1 or September 1, but not earlier than 90 days after their official publication, and their validity period should not exceed 6 years. The drafts of regulatory legal acts developed by the federal executive bodies are subject to regulatory impact assessment. With a view to ensuring systematization of mandatory require ments, their register is kept. The federal executive body prepares a report on the achievement of the goals of mandatory requirements introduction. By January 1, 2021, 10 resolutions of the Government of the Russian Federation, 48 federal norms and rules in the field of industrial safety and 9 other regulatory legal acts of Rostechnadzor should be adopted. The drafts of all the documents are already prepared, some of the acts are completing the process of discussion and approval.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document