Rosellinia bunodes. [Descriptions of Fungi and Bacteria].

Author(s):  
A. Sivanesan

Abstract A description is provided for Rosellinia bunodes. Information is included on the disease caused by the organism, its transmission, geographical distribution, and hosts. HOSTS: On arrowroot, Artocarpus integer, avocado, banana, cacao, camphor, cassava, Centrosemapubescens, Cinchona, Citrus, coffee, Colocasia antiquorum, Crotalaria, Desmodium gyroides, Dryobalanops aromatica, Erythrina, ginger, Gliricidia, Grevillea robusta, Hibiscus rosa-sinensis, Holigarna longifolia, Indigofera, Inga laurina, Leucaena glauca, Litsea, pepper (black), Petiveria alliacea, Phyllanthus, rattan, rubber, Schleichera trijuga, tea, Tephrosia and yams. DISEASE: Black root rot, mainly of tropical and subtropical woody hosts; plurivorous but described mostly from cacao (Theobroma cacao), quinine (Cinchona spp.), coffee (Coffea spp.), rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) and tea (Camellia sinensis). Wilt and death of the whole plant or single branches may be the first signs of attack. At the collar the mycelial sheet is at first cream-white shading to purplish-black and may extend well above the soil surface in damp conditions. On the root surface the firm, black, branching strands are firmly applied and thicken into irregular knots. In the cortex the strands have a black periphery and white core; in the wood they appear thread-like and black or sometimes as dots in transverse section. In culture the mycelium is white, later buff with black strands. GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION: Widespread in tropical America and also in Central African Republic, India (Nilgris, Maharashtra). Indonesia (Java, Sumatra), Malaysia (W.), Philippines. Sri Lanka (Ceylon) and Zaire Republic (CMI Map 358, ed. 2, 1970). Additional records not yet mapped are Honduras, Panama. TRANSMISSION: As mycelium from surface oreanic litter and woody debris.

Author(s):  
E. Punithalingam

Abstract A description is provided for Ascochyta rabiei. Information is included on the disease caused by the organism, its transmission, geographical distribution, and hosts. HOSTS: On Cicer arietinum. DISEASE: Blight of gor chick pea (Cicer arietinum), attacks all above-ground parts of the plant; circular lesions on leaves and pods and elongate ones on petioles and stems. The pycnidia form in concentric areas on these lesions and in severe attacks the whole plant is killed. GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION: Restricted to the Mediterranean region, S.E. Europe, S.W. Asia and also reported from Tanzania (CMI Map 151, ed. 2, 1966). Additional areas not yet mapped are: Lebanon, Turkey, USSR (Azerbaijan, Republic of Georgia, Moldavia). TRANSMISSION: Infection is carried both on and within the seed. Seed infestation in pods showing infection was 50-80%. Seed formation, size and germination and seedling growth are adversely affected (12: 264; 49, 3059). Conida are presumably dispersed by water-splash and viability is retained in host debris on the soil surface between crop seasons.


Author(s):  
A. Sivanesan

Abstract A description is provided for Rosellinia arcuata. Information is included on the disease caused by the organism, its transmission, geographical distribution, and hosts. HOSTS: Plurivorous; important on Camellia sinensis. DISEASE: Black root rot mainly of tropical and subtropical woody hosts; plurivorous but only of serious importance on tea (Camellia sinensis). The advancing edge of the mycelium is white, shading to black. On the root surface the black network of strands gives a woolly appearance and beneath the bark star-like fans of white mycelium spread out on the wood. On tea the fungus may spread up the stem fan a short distance; the bush often dies suddenly, the leaves remaining attached for some time. GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION: Records of this fungus are apparently infrequent. It has been reported from Central African Republic, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia (Java, Sumatra), Kenya, Papua New Guinea, Sri Lanka, Zaire Republic. TRANSMISSION: As mycelium from surface organic litter and woody debris and possibly also through spores.


2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 197-201
Author(s):  
Jonathan D. Sammons ◽  
Daniel K. Struve

Abstract Biostimulants are used to reduce the stress associated with non-dormant (summer dug) harvest of field-grown nursery stock; however, the effectiveness of biostimulant treatment is uncertain. This study tested the effects of three application methods of Bioplex™ (a commonly used biostimulant) to container-grown red oak seedlings on whole plant transpirational water use and growth before and after root pruning. Root pruning was used to simulate field harvest; it removed 59% of the seedling's total root surface area. Bioplex™ application by foliar spray, soil drench or a combination of foliar spray and soil drench, significantly reduced whole plant transpirational water use by 15% for three days after application, relative to untreated control seedlings. Root pruning significantly reduced whole plant transpiration, compared to non-root-pruned seedlings, and had a greater effect on transpiration than any Bioplex™ treatment. The previous season's Bioplex treatment had no effect on the spring growth flush following fall root pruning. Root pruning in fall significantly reduced root and total plant dry weights the following spring. Although Bioplex™ applications significantly reduced transpiration for three days after application, there does not seem to be any long-term beneficial effect when used to mediate summer digging transplant stress.


1974 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-88
Author(s):  
J.J. Schuurman ◽  
L. Knot

Westerwolds ryegrass was grown in tubes on artificial soil profiles at N rates equivalent to 25, 50 or 100 kg/ha with a water table maintained 70 cm below the soil surface. Average results/plant after 13 weeks at low and high N were: DM yield of tops 5.0 and 14.6 g, water consumption 2660 and 4850 cm2, DM yield of roots 1.4 and 3.4 g, total length of all primary roots 2589 and 3374 cm, number of primary roots 103 and 161, number of secondary roots in topsoil 63 and 83 and in subsoil 71 and 83, and total root surface area 1084 and 1736 cm2. ADDITIONAL ABSTRACT: L. multiflorum plants were grown on sandy soil in asbestos tubes with an inner diameter of 15 cm, and 75 cm high, and supplied with 25, 50 or 100 kg N/ha. The soil water level was maintained at 70 cm below soil level. Top growth 8 and 13 weeks after sowing was progressively enhanced by the 2 higher rates, weight increments amounting to at least 72 and 188 %, respectively. These growth increases were accompanied by augmented water consumption, as well as root growth and numbers. (Abstract retrieved from CAB Abstracts by CABI’s permission)


Author(s):  
J. F. Bradbury

Abstract A description is provided for Corynebacterium betae. Information is included on the disease caused by the organism, its transmission, geographical distribution, and hosts. HOSTS: On Beta vulgaris, both red beet and mangold. Rarely seen on sugar beet. DISEASE: Silvering disease of red beet. Systemic symptoms are first seen on a small percentage of plants 6-8 weeks old. One or more leaves show silvering along the veins. The whole leaf becomes affected and cracks may appar in places in the upper epidermis; these expose parts of the tissue beneath and give a roughened appearance to the leaf. Symptoms spread to other leaves and the plant wilts and dies, sometimes in only a few days, sometimes in several weeks. Lesions may develop on the leaves of healthy plants nearby. These may be either silvery spots 1-5 mm diam., with centres often showing cracks, or a silvery and perhaps cracked band at the edge of the leaf. The spores do not appear to spread, but the marginal silvering extends along the veins and becomes systemic, involving the whole leaf and, eventually, to the whole plant. Plants in flower may show silvering of bracts and seed clusters. Petioles, stems and roots show no consistent internal symptoms. GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION: United Kingdom, Republic of Ireland. TRANSMISSION: In the seed of infected plants. About 1-2% of the young plants (stecklings) arising from such seed show infection a few weeks after sowing. Transmission from plant to plant occurs both within the seedbed and to neighbouring seedbeds up to at least 50 yards downwind. This seems to be mainly in wind blown droplets in the autumn and may be serious if the autumn is wet. Also readily transmitted on knives used to trim the roots of stecklings before planting out. Various insects, larvae and slugs failed to transmit the disease in experiments (Keyworth & Howell, 1961).


Author(s):  
M. Rodríguez

Abstract A description is provided for Meliola trichostroma. Information is included on the disease caused by the organism, its transmission, geographical distribution, and hosts. DISEASE: Meliola trichostroma parasitizes a cultivated plant very frequent in tropical America, but without the production of evident symptoms of any disease in the host. HOSTS: Psidium araca, P. guajava, P. guineense, P. pomiferum. GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION: Brazil, British Guiana, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Ecuador, Honduras, Jamaica, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Puerto Rico, Dominican Republic, Surinam, Trinidad & Tobago, Venezuela. TRANSMISSION: By air-borne ascospores.


Author(s):  
C. Booth

Abstract A description is provided for Endothia eugeniae. Information is included on the disease caused by the organism, its transmission, geographical distribution, and hosts. HOST: Eugenia caryophyllus. DISEASE: Acute dieback of clove, Cryprosporella dieback of clove. Symptoms usually include a progressive dieback of branches, leading to the main stem so as to produce a 'stag-headed' condition or even the death of the whole tree. If infection occurs near the base of the stem of young trees the whole plant will die suddenly with the leaves brown but still adhering to the branches. Affected wood is sharply demarcated from healthy tissues by a dark, reddish-brown stain, there is profuse production of gum in the wood and the vessels are occluded by tyloses (32, 508). GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION: Zanzibar, Malaysia. TRANSMISSION: By splash-dispersed airborne conidia produced in pycnidia which appear around the point of infection. Perithecia are found on infected tissues at a later stage of the disease and there is no doubt that airborne ascospores also contribute to spread of the disease. The fungus enters the host through wounds in the stem, generally caused by harvesting or pruning. Root infection through wounds can also occur (32, 508).


Author(s):  
E. Punithalingam

Abstract A description is provided for Didymella chrysanthemi. Information is included on the disease caused by the organism, its transmission, geographical distribution, and hosts. HOSTS: Chrysanthemum cinerariifolium, C. morifolium. Also by inoculation on Chrysanthemum carinatum, Cichorium endivia, Cynara scolymus, Dahlia variabilis, Helianthus annuus, Lactuca sativa, Rudbeckia hirta and Zinnia elegans (47, 1154). DISEASE: Generally referred to as ray blight of chrysanthemum (29, 215; 35, 878) and sometimes called black rot (43, 97) or Ascochytosis of chrysanthemum (48, 185). On blossoms usually infection is observed on the side but may later spread until all the florets are involved. The fungus causes tissue discolouration of the floret progressively upward from the receptacle and the affected petals turn light brown. In most cases the fungus grows down into the peduncle for several cms causing it to turn black and weaken and finally droop. The fungus frequently infects unopened buds and their peduncles, darkening the bracts and stems tissue. Leaf infection is common on plants with diseased flowers resulting in irregular blotches 2-3 cm wide. On stems frequently black girdling lesions several cms long appear usually starting at a node (Baker, Dimock & Davis, 1949). Ray blight of chrysanthemums is one of the serious diseases of cut flowers (37, 702) and occurs in commercial plantings both on greenhouse and outdoor chrysanthemums (39, 79, 585) causing severe lossess (29, 215; 36, 102). Because of the seriousness of the disease, countries like Germany (42, 446) and Norway (43, 2217) had to amend their Plant Inspection ordinance and adopt stringent quarantine regulations so as to prohibit the importation of chrysanthemum cuttings or plants without certification of their derivation from mother plants. Recently, a computer simulator programme Mycos based on weather data has been designed and tested showing that the simulator can determine qualitatively seasons of high and low disease incidence (57, 2551). GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION: Africa, Asia, Australasia & Oceania, Europe and North America (CMI Map 406, ed. 2, 1973). New records not mapped are: Europe (Austria, Italy, Northern Ireland). TRANSMISSION: By ascospores, conidia, mycelia and sclerotia dispersed during wet periods by rain splash, air currents and by workmen on clothing, tools or hands (Baker, Dimock & Davis, 1949). Ascospore discharge has been reported to be regulated by environmental factors such as moisture and, depending on the isolate, by light at a constant air temp. of 20°C. Water sprinkling or heavy dew have been claimed to induce explosive disharge of ascospores. Max. number of ascospores have been trapped in an outbreak of D. chrysanthemi blight in field grown chrysanthemums just after an evening thunder shower, while much lower concentrations have been present during dew periods at night (53, 1412). Ascospores have been observed to be discharged for a mean horizontal distance of 3.1 mm with a max. of 6.2 mm, requiring initial velocities of discharge of 21 and 50 m/sec., respectively. The terminal velocity of the ascospores has been calculated to be 1 × 10-3m/sec. (53, 1413). The fungus overwinters as mycelia or pycnidia or as developing pseudothecia. Pseudothecia which mature in late summer and autumn have been claimed to provide much of the primary inoculum for infection of developing buds and flowers in the autumn and winter (29, 215). Sclerotia of D. chrysanthemi buried in soil subjected to normal glasshouse watering were found dead after 30 weeks and those in compost were not pathogenic after 8 weeks (45, 3066). The fungus has been claimed to survive by colonizing the root surface of chrysanthemum cuttings and still remain pathogenic to unrooted cuttings after 12 weeks as an epiphyte on the roots. Survival on the colonized roots of other plants has been claimed to be not > 8 weeks. Also it has been claimed that the fungus is commonly distributed on rooted cuttings without causing symptoms and therefore passing inspection by growers and quarantine officers (46, 341). The thick-walled mycelium has been reported to help the fungus to survive adverse conditions (48, 328h). Cultures of the fungus maintained by storing agar blocks from the originals in tubes with 10 ml. sterile distilled water either at 1°C or 10-12°C for 20-25 months have been claimed to remain viable without loss of virulence (41, 374).


2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (03) ◽  
pp. 475-480
Author(s):  
Ryan B. Aldridge ◽  
Katherine M. Jennings ◽  
Sushila Chaudhari ◽  
David W. Monks ◽  
Wesley J. Everman ◽  
...  

AbstractGreenhouse and field studies were conducted to determine tolerance of blueberry to saflufenacil. Greenhouse studies included five saflufenacil rates (0, 50, 100, 200, and 400 g ai ha−1) and three southern highbush blueberry cultivars (‘Legacy’, ‘New Hanover’, and ‘O’Neal’) and one rabbiteye blueberry cultivar (‘Columbus’). Saflufenacil treatments were soil applied into each pot when blueberry plants were approximately 30-cm tall. Visible injury (purpling/reddening of foliage and leaf abscission) ranged from 3% to 12%, 3% to 42%, 0% to 43%, and 0% to 29% with saflufenacil from 50 to 400 g ha−1 in Columbus, Legacy, New Hanover, and O’Neal, respectively, at 28 d after treatment. Regardless of injury, plant growth (change in height), soil plant analysis development, and whole-plant dry biomass of all cultivars did not differ among saflufenacil rates. Field studies were conducted in Burgaw, NC, to determine the tolerance of nonbearing (<3-yr-old and not mature enough to produce fruit) and bearing (>3-yr-old and mature enough to produce fruit) southern highbush blueberry (‘Duke’) to saflufenacil application at pre-budbreak or during the vegetative growth stage. Treatments included three rates of saflufenacil (50, 100, and 200 g ha−1), glyphosate (870 g ae ha−1), glufosinate (1096 g ai ha−1), glyphosate (870 g ha−1) + saflufenacil (50 g ha−1), glufosinate (1096 g ha−1) + saflufenacil (50 g ha−1), and hexazinone (1,120 g ai ha−1), applied POST-directed to the soil surface beneath blueberry plants in a 76-cm band on both sides of the blueberry planting row. The maximum injury from treatments containing saflufenacil was ≤11% in both nonbearing and bearing blueberry. No negative effects on plant growth or fruit yield were observed from any treatments. Results from both greenhouse and field studies suggest that saflufenacil applied at 50 (1X commercial use rate) and 100 g ha−1 is safe to use in blueberry.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document