Trace element toxicity relationships to crop production and livestock and human health: implications for management

1998 ◽  
Vol 29 (11-14) ◽  
pp. 1491-1522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umesh C. Gupta ◽  
Subhas C. Gupta
EcoHealth ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Jardine ◽  
Peter Speldewinde ◽  
Scott Carver ◽  
Philip Weinstein

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 1355-1369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Md. Habibullah-Al-Mamun ◽  
Md. Kawser Ahmed ◽  
Md. Saiful Islam ◽  
Anwar Hossain ◽  
Masahiro Tokumura ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merrill Singer ◽  
Nicola Bulled ◽  
Bayla Ostrach

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-52
Author(s):  
Bin Mushambanyi Théodore Munyuli

A study was conducted from 2010 to 2012 around the flower growing areas in central Uganda to generate baseline information on the status of pollinators. Primary data were gathered using a questionnaire that aimed at determining farmers and flower farm officials’ perceptions on the impact of activities carried out inside greenhouses on pollinators, human health, and on crop production in the surroundings. Results indicated that the quantity of pesticides and fertilizers applied daily varied among the different flower farms visited. Bee species richness and abundance varied significantly (P<0.01) according to flower farm location, to the landscape vegetation type, and to field types found in the surrounding of flower farms. Bee richness found around flower farms varied in number from 20 to 40 species in total across seasons and years. Bee density increased significantly with the increase in flower density. Small-scale farmers were aware of the value and importance of pollination services in their farming business. There was no clear evidence of a direct effect of agrochemicals application on bee communities living in the surrounding habitats. There is a need for further research to be conducted on human health risks and for toxicological studies on soils, plants, flowers, and bees in the farm landscape.


Author(s):  
Jake M Robinson ◽  
Ross Cameron ◽  
Brenda Parker

Globally, anthropogenic sound and artificial light pollution have increased to alarming levels. Evidence suggests that these can disrupt critical processes that impact ecosystems and human health. However, limited focus has been given to the potential effects of sound and artificial light pollution on microbiomes. Microbial communities are the foundations of our ecosystems. They are essential for human health and provide myriad ecosystem services. Therefore, disruption to microbiomes by anthropogenic sound and artificial light could have important ecological and human health implications. In this mini-review, we provide a critical appraisal of available scientific literature on the effects of anthropogenic sound and light exposure on microorganisms and discuss the potential ecological and human health implications. Our mini-review shows that a limited number of studies have been carried out to investigate the effects of anthropogenic sound and light pollution on microbiomes. However, based on these studies, it is evident that anthropogenic sound and light pollution have the potential to significantly influence ecosystems and human health via microbial interactions. Many of the studies suffered from modest sample sizes, suboptimal experiments designs, and some of the bioinformatics approaches used are now outdated. These factors should be improved in future studies. This is an emerging and severely underexplored area of research that could have important implications for global ecosystems and public health. Finally, we also propose the photo-sonic restoration hypothesis: does restoring natural levels of light and sound help to restore microbiomes and ecosystem stability?


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document