Staphylococcus aureus in a Single Positive Blood Culture: Causes and Outcome

2002 ◽  
Vol 34 (9) ◽  
pp. 645-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riad Khatib ◽  
Courtney Schaffer ◽  
Leonard B. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Blood Culture ◽  
Positive Blood Culture ◽  
Single Positive

scholarly journals Clinical Significance of Staphylococcus aureus in a Single Positive Blood Culture Bottle

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Raymond Go ◽  
Douglas Challener ◽  
Cristina Corsini Campioli ◽  
M Rizwan Sohail ◽  
Raj Palraj ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Infective Endocarditis ◽  
Blood Culture ◽  
Clinical Significance ◽  
Positive Blood Culture ◽  
Blood Culture Bottle ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Culture Bottle ◽  
Single Positive ◽  
Clinically Significant

Abstract Clinical significance of a single positive blood culture bottle (SPBCB) with Staphylococcus aureus is unclear. We aimed to assess the significance of a SPBCB by looking at the associated outcomes. We performed a retrospective, multicenter study of patients with a SPBCB with S. aureus using data collected from both electronic health records and the clinical microbiology laboratory. Overall, 534 patients with S. aureus bacteremia were identified and 118 (22.1%) had a SPBCB. Among cases with a SPBCB, 106 (89.8%) were classified as clinically significant while 12 (10.2%) were considered contaminated or of unclear significance. A majority (92.4%) of patients received antibiotic therapy but patients with clinically significant bacteremia were treated with longer courses (25.9 vs 5.7 days, P<0.001). Significant differences in both frequency of echocardiography (65.1% vs 84.6%, P<0.001), and infective endocarditis diagnosis (3.8% vs 14.2%, P=0.002) were seen in those with a single positive blood culture bottle compared to those with multiple positive bottles. A longer hospital length of stay, and higher 90-day, 6-month, and 1-year mortality rates were seen in patients with multiple positive blood culture bottles. A SPBCB with S. aureus was common among our patients. While this syndrome has a more favorable prognosis as compared to those with multiple positive blood cultures, clinicians should remain concerned as it portends a risk of infective endocarditis and mortality.

scholarly journals 301. Penicillin Versus Cefazolin or Anti-staphylococcal Penicillins for Penicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S149-S149
Author(s):  
Mohammed Aldhaeefi ◽  
Jeffrey Pearson ◽  
Sanjat Kanjilal ◽  
Brandon Dionne
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Blood Culture ◽  
Positive Blood Culture ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Similar Distribution ◽  
Clinical Failure ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia ◽  
Definitive Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia is a significant cause of mortality. Penicillin (PCN) may have a role in the treatment of penicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (PSSA) bacteremia as it has a narrower spectrum of activity than cefazolin and is better tolerated than antistaphylococcal penicillins (ASPs). The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of PCN versus cefazolin or ASPs in the treatment of PSSA bacteremia. Methods This is a single-center, retrospective study at a tertiary academic medical center. All patients with a PSSA blood culture from January 1, 2012 to September 1, 2019 were screened. Patients were excluded if they were treated with a definitive antibiotic (defined as antimicrobial therapy received 72 hours after positive blood culture) other than the study comparators, or if they received combination antibiotic therapy >72 hours from the initial positive blood culture result. The primary outcome was 60-day clinical failure, which was a composite endpoint of change in antibiotic after 72 hours of definitive therapy, recurrence of PSSA bacteremia, infection-related readmission, or all-cause mortality. Results Of 277 patients with PSSA bacteremia, 101 patients were included in the study; 62 (61%) were male and 11 (11%) had a β-lactam allergy. At baseline, 40 patients (40%) had hardware, 25 (25%) had an intravenous line, 6 (6%) were on dialysis, and 4 (4%) had active IV drug use, with similar distribution across antibiotic groups. Penicillin was the most common antibiotic used (Table 1). There was a significant difference among groups with respect to the 60-day clinical failure (log-rank p=0.019). In terms of unadjusted 60-day clinical failure, penicillin had similar outcomes to cefazolin (95% CI -0.29 to 0.104, p=0.376), however, it had statistically significant better outcomes in comparison to the ASPs, nafcillin or oxacillin (95% CI 0.023 to 0.482, p=0.031) (Table 1). Table 1. 60-day outcomes of PSSA bacteremia Conclusion Penicillin is effective and safe in the treatment of PSSA bacteremia and may be preferable to antistaphylococcal penicillins Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals 2559. Incidence and Clinical Impact of Discordant Genotypic and Phenotypic Categorization of Methicillin Susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S70-S70
Author(s):  
Jessica Gulliver ◽  
Brittney Jung-Hynes ◽  
Derrick Chen
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Blood Culture ◽  
Positive Blood Culture ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Laboratory Data ◽  
Rapid Identification ◽  
Clinical Impact ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia ◽  
Oxacillin Resistance ◽  
Initial Hospitalization

Abstract Background Methicillin-susceptible/methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA/MRSA) can be directly identified from positive blood culture bottles using molecular methods. This provides faster results than traditional phenotypic testing, but discrepancies between the two are occasionally found. We sought to determine the incidence and clinical impact of such discrepancies. Methods Positive blood culture bottles are routinely tested in the hospital clinical laboratory for mecA via Xpert MRSA/SA BC (PCR), and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) via MicroScan PC33 is performed on recovered S. aureus isolates; discrepancies between PCR and AST are resolved by repeat and supplemental (Kirby-Bauer) testing. A retrospective review of medical and laboratory data from January 2015 to December 2017 was performed on all patients that had discordant PCR and AST results. Results Approximately 1,200 PCR assays were performed from January 2015 to December 2017, and there were 5 (0.4%) cases with discordant AST Results. Four cases were classified as MSSA by PCR but MRSA by AST, and 1 case was classified as MRSA by PCR but MSSA by AST. For the former group, antimicrobial therapy was changed in 2 patients to cover MRSA and 1 patient was readmitted, while the remaining 2 patients were already being treated for MRSA; for the latter case, this patient was treated for MRSA during the initial hospitalization, but was readmitted with disseminated MSSA and subsequently deceased. Based on genetic targets identified by PCR and cefoxitin and oxacillin AST, discrepancies were likely due to borderline oxacillin resistance (BORSA) (n = 1), presence of an SCCmec variant not detected by PCR (n = 1), or undetermined (n = 3). Conclusion Rapid identification of MRSA bacteremia via PCR provides actionable information to direct empiric treatment. While highly accurate, PCR results are infrequently not corroborated by AST. This rare possibility should be considered when modifying therapy based on initial PCR results, and there should be close communication between the clinical team and laboratory for these challenging cases. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Clinical Outcomes of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Bloodstream Infections: Study of a 2-State Monoclonal Outbreak

2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 1057-1062 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Silvia Munoz-Price ◽  
Teresa Zembower ◽  
Sudhir Penugonda ◽  
Paul Schreckenberger ◽  
Mary Alice Lavin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Blood Culture ◽  
Acinetobacter Baumannii ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Positive Blood Culture ◽  
Culture Result ◽  
Blood Culture Result ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Single Positive

Objective.To characterize the clinical outcomes of patients with bloodstream infection caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii during a 2-state monoclonal outbreak.Design.Multicenter observational study.Setting.Four tertiary care hospitals and 1 long-term acute care hospital.Methods.A retrospective medical chart review was conducted for all consecutive patients during the period January 1, 2005, through April 30, 2006, for whom 1 or more blood cultures yielded carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii.Results.We identified 86 patients from the 16-month study period. Their mortality rate was 41%; of the 35 patients who died, one-third (13) had positive blood culture results for carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii at the time of death. Risk factors associated with mortality were intensive care unit stay, malignancy, and presence of fever and/or hypotension at the time blood sample for culture was obtained. Only 5 patients received adequate empirical antibiotic treatment, but the choice of treatment did not affect mortality.Fifty-seven patients (66.2%) had a single positive blood culture result for carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii; the only factor associated with a single positive blood culture result was the presence of decubitus ulcers. Interestingly, during the study period, a transition from single to multiple positive blood culture results was observed. Four patients, 3 of whom were in a burn intensive care unit, were bacteremic for more than 30 days (range, 36–86 days).Conclusions.To our knowledge, this is the first time a study has described 2 patterns of bloodstream infection with A. baumannii: single versus multiple positive blood culture results, as well as a subset of patients with prolonged bacteremia.

Clinical significance of follow-up blood culture in patients with a single Staphylococcus aureus-positive blood culture

2019 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-212
Author(s):  
Taeeun Kim ◽  
Seung Cheol Lee ◽  
Min Jae Kim ◽  
Jiwon Jung ◽  
Heungsup Sung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Blood Culture ◽  
Clinical Significance ◽  
Positive Blood Culture

How to investigate and manage a patient with a Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Katia Florman ◽  
Howell T Jones ◽  
Rachel Moores
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Blood Culture ◽  
Positive Blood Culture ◽  
Systematic Approach ◽  
Transoesophageal Echocardiography ◽  
Significant Morbidity ◽  
Patient Assessment ◽  
High Relapse Rate ◽  
Focus Of Infection

Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia is common, and associated with significant morbidity and mortality as a result of its high relapse rate and the risk of complicated infection. A positive blood culture for S. aureus should prompt a thorough patient assessment to identify a potential focus of infection, and the risk factors for the development or presence of complicated infection. Clinical management depends on the patient's characteristics and presenting features. This article gives a systematic approach to the patient with S. aureus bacteraemia, including points to look for on history and examination, the markers of complicated infection, and when to request transoesophageal echocardiography and further imaging. Treatment principles outlined include the rationale for choice of antibiotic treatment and need to involve infection specialists.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document