The Impact of Special Needs Students at a Further Education College: A Report on a Questionnaire Survey

1990 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 83-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Shimman
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
William John Andrews

The effect COVID-19 is having on students and teachers, in academic and emotional ways remains to be understood. This research explored impact on level 3-5 science students attending an FE college in NI, and the science teaching staff. Primary outcome involved analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on academic progress, and emotional state during times of remote teaching, and the perceived impact of remote learning on subject knowledge. Feedback was generated using a mixed-methods approach of questionnaires followed by semi-structured focus groups. Analysis of n=11 staff and n=84 student questionnaire responses, using a mix of Likert type, short and long response questions, showed that while remote learning is overall seen as somewhat positive as it allows more structure, it is perceived neutrally in terms of student receptiveness. Students feel their development as scientists, and emotional wellbeing have been negatively impacted. Lecturing staff, while utilising a number of platforms to encourage engagement, felt overall negatively about online learning. Implications and further analysis will be presented.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 01-08
Author(s):  
Van Der Rowe

Students with special needs are one of the most vulnerable groups in our society. Special needs students require distinct treatment and attention to function and make sense of the world. The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the routine and the special attention that are normally available to these students when they are in face-to-face school. One of the most anticipated aspects of face-to-face school is participating in physical education (PE) and sports, which provides physical, social, and psychological benefits for special needs students. However, the pandemic has forced schools online and has changed the ascetics of PE and sports. Furthermore, like a third-world country, Jamaica does not have the technological resources needed to fully engage special needs students in PE. As a result, this study sought to investigate the challenges that are facing special needs students and teachers in PE while conducting classes online during the COVID-19 pandemic, from the teacher’s perspective. The research took the form of a qualitative approach while utilizing a multiple case study design that used a purposive sampling method in selecting the four (out of 11) most prominent public special education schools in Jamaica. The results revealed that student participation in PE was significantly impacted. In some cases, up to 80% of the students were unaccounted for in PE classes since the start of the pandemic. The challenges were seen as magnified twofold, ranging from physical, psychological, social, environmental, and societal issues. The results of this study raise serious concerns about the physical health of students with special needs, with Jamaica struggling to reduce physical inactivity rates and chronic lifestyle diseases. The risk of special needs students developing secondary disabilities because of sedentary lifestyles practices is very worrying.  A lack of physical activity also means lower levels of socialization and increased psychological issues that could worsen with the strict COVID-19 lockdown measures, internet connectivity issues, and lack of devices.


2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (04) ◽  
pp. 3533-3543
Author(s):  
Dr. Ayman Ramadan Soliman Zhran ◽  
Dr. Turki Fahed Almasaeid ◽  
Dr. Mostafa Mohamed Abo Elnour

2003 ◽  
Vol 27 (08) ◽  
pp. 301-304
Author(s):  
Gavin Reid ◽  
Mark Hughson

Aims and Method We conducted a postal questionnaire survey of the practice of rapid tranquillisation among 215 consultant psychiatrists in the West of Scotland, before and after the withdrawal of droperidol by the manufacturer. Results One hundred and eighty questionnaires (84% of those sent) were returned. Droperidol had been used extensively, often combined with lorazepam, for rapid tranquillisation. The main replacement suggested for droperidol was haloperidol. About half of the respondents to our survey chose to comment on the withdrawal of droperidol. More than half of the comments were unfavourable, including lack of an adequate replacement and lack of consultation with the psychiatric profession. Clinical Implications The abrupt withdrawal of droperidol, partly for commercial reasons, was regrettable. There was no time for an adequate evaluation of possible replacement medications and a lack of consultation with the profession regarding the impact on clinical care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document