The global prevalence of sexual violence against pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Xin Shen ◽  
Hao Dong ◽  
Heng Jiang ◽  
Hui Cao ◽  
Rowan Dowling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Sexual Violence ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Global Prevalence

scholarly journals Global prevalence of latent toxoplasmosis in pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 673-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Rostami ◽  
S.M. Riahi ◽  
H.R. Gamble ◽  
Y. Fakhri ◽  
M. Nourollahpour Shiadeh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Global Prevalence

Global prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections and associated risk factors in pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Taghipour ◽  
Sahar Ghodsian ◽  
Mahdi Jabbari ◽  
Meysam Olfatifar ◽  
Amir Abdoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Parasitic Infections ◽  
Intestinal Parasitic Infections ◽  
Global Prevalence ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
High Prevalence ◽  
Associated Risk Factors

Abstract Background Intestinal parasitic infections (IPIs) during pregnancy, if left untreated, can cause adverse effects for the mothers, foetuses and newborns. However, limited information is available about the global status of IPIs in pregnant women. Here we undertook a meta-analysis to estimate the global prevalence of IPIs and associated risk factors in pregnant women. Methods We searched the PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases for relevant studies that were published between 1 January 1987 and 30 December 2019. A random effects meta-analysis model was used to estimate the pooled prevalence, odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results A total of 114 studies comprising 98 342 pregnant women across 35 countries were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Among IPIs identified from pregnant women, three helminth infections (hookworm 19% [95% CI 15 to 23], Ascaris lumbricoides 17% [95% CI 13 to 21] and Trichuris trichiura 11% [95% CI 7 to 16]) and three protozoan infections (Blastocystis sp. 21% [95% CI 4 to 46], Entamoeba histolytica/dispar 9% [95% CI 3 to 19] and Giardia sp. 8% [95% CI 4 to 13]) were identified as the most prevalent intestinal parasites. Moreover, we found that there was a significant association between IPIs with increased risk of anaemia in pregnant women (OR 2.65 [95% CI 2.08 to 3.37]). The prevalence of IPIs was slightly higher in geophagic pregnant women compared with controls, but this was not significant (OR 1.22 [95% CI 0.87 to 1.71]). According to species, the pooled OR of A. lumbricoides infection had a significantly higher risk in geophagic pregnant women compared with controls (OR 2.66 [95% CI 1.37 to 5.16]). There was a positive relationship between the high prevalence of IPIs in pregnant women living in rural areas compared with urban residents (OR 3.36 [95% CI 1.57 to 7.19]). Conclusions The current review revealed a relatively high prevalence of IPIs in pregnant women, especially in some low- and middle-income countries. These results suggest a need for improved prevention and control efforts to reduce the health risks to pregnant women.

scholarly journals Global prevalence and nature of sexual violence among higher education institution students: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The Lancet ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 398 ◽  
pp. S16
Author(s):  
Bridget Steele ◽  
Elizabeth Nye ◽  
Mackenzie Martin ◽  
Alessandra Sciarra ◽  
G J Melendez-Torres ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Sexual Violence ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Education Institution ◽  
Higher Education Institution ◽  
Global Prevalence

scholarly journals Global Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milad Azami ◽  
Marzieh Parizad Nasirkandy ◽  
Akram Mansouri ◽  
Zahra Darvishi ◽  
Shoboo Rahmati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Helicobacter Pylori ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Helicobacter Pylori Infection ◽  
Analysis Study ◽  
Global Prevalence

Comparison of Perinatal Outcomes of Pregnant Women with SARS, MERS and COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pengming Sun ◽  
Hangjing Gao ◽  
Xiqi Huang ◽  
Huanrui Zheng ◽  
Hongning Cai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Perinatal Outcomes

scholarly journals Clinical features and outcomes of pregnant women with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-jie Gao ◽  
Lei Ye ◽  
Jia-shuo Zhang ◽  
Yang-xue Yin ◽  
Min Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
Meta Analysis

scholarly journals Pooled estimate of vitamin D deficiency among pregnant women in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Angeline Jeyakumar ◽  
Vidhya Shinde ◽  
Reshma Ravindran
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Vitamin D ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Vitamin D Deficiency ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
Study Quality ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Pooled Prevalence ◽  
Women In India

Abstract Background Vitamin D deficiency among pregnant women is a public health concern globally. In India, individual studies report high prevalence. However, lack of national data masks the true burden. This work determined the pooled prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among pregnant women in India through a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis. Methods Three different search engines yielded 15 eligible articles. Study quality was assessed by 10 different criteria and summary of study quality was categorized as per Cochrane standards. Meta-analysis was performed to estimate pooled prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among healthy pregnant women and heterogeneity among selected studies. A sample of n = 4088 was used to study the pooled prevalence among pregnant women. Results The random effects combined estimate was 32.35% (95% CI, (12.58–117.48). High heterogeneity (tau2 = 0.39, I2 = 100%) and high risk of bias was observed among the selected studies. The test for overall effect was observed to be z = 2.54(P = 0.01). Conclusion Pooled estimate > 30% emphasizes the need for screening through antenatal care services and initiate preventive measures to address the deficiency.

scholarly journals The Impact of Diagnostic Criteria for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus on Adverse Maternal Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 666
Author(s):  
Fahimeh Ramezani Tehrani ◽  
Marzieh Saei Ghare Naz ◽  
Razieh Bidhendi Yarandi ◽  
Samira Behboudi-Gandevani
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Gestational Diabetes ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Maternal Outcomes ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Iadpsg Criteria ◽  
The Impact

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the impact of different gestational-diabetes (GDM) diagnostic-criteria on the risk of adverse-maternal-outcomes. The search process encompassed PubMed (Medline), Scopus, and Web of Science databases to retrieve original, population-based studies with the universal GDM screening approach, published in English language and with a focus on adverse-maternal-outcomes up to January 2020. According to GDM diagnostic criteria, the studies were classified into seven groups. A total of 49 population-based studies consisting of 1409018 pregnant women with GDM and 7,667,546 non-GDM counterparts were selected for data analysis and knowledge synthesis. Accordingly, the risk of adverse-maternal-outcomes including primary-cesarean, induction of labor, maternal-hemorrhage, and pregnancy-related-hypertension, overall, regardless of GDM diagnostic-criteria and in all diagnostic-criteria subgroups were significantly higher than non-GDM counterparts. However, in meta-regression, the increased risk was not influenced by the GDM diagnostic-classification and the magnitude of the risks among patients, using the IADPSG criteria-classification as the most strict-criteria, was similar to other criteria. In conclusion, a reduction in the diagnostic-threshold increased the prevalence of GDM, but the risk of adverse-maternal-outcome was not different among those women who were diagnosed through more or less intensive strategies. Our review findings can empower health-care-providers to select the most cost-effective approach for the screening of GDM among pregnant women.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document