The influence of patient-related factors on the frequency and duration of psycho-oncological sessions in a university cancer center

Author(s):  
Martina Madl ◽  
Marietta Lieb* ◽  
Katharina Schieber ◽  
Yesim Erim
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryoichi Miyamoto ◽  
Toshiro Ogura ◽  
Amane Takahashi ◽  
Akifumi Kimura ◽  
Shinichi Matsudaira ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is currently an accepted approach for liver surgery in select patients. The correlation between the intraoperative position and the presence of gravity-dependent atelectasis (GDA) has been well discussed. However, LLR is performed in the left half lateral position, and the relationship between this position and the presence of GDA remains unclear. We evaluated the extent to which the intraoperative left half lateral position affects the presence of GDA. Furthermore, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify potential risk factors for LLR postoperative complications with a special emphasis on the presence of GDA by comparing various patient-, liver- and surgery-related factors in a retrospective cohort. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 129 patients who underwent LLR in the left half lateral position at the Saitama Cancer Center in Saitama, Japan between March 2011 and July 2020. The frequency and duration of GDA were investigated. We divided the cohort into with GDA and without GDA groups based on a cutoff value (≥ 5 days, n = 61 and < 5 days, n = 68, respectively). Using multivariate analysis, the duration of GDA and several risk factors for LLR postoperative complications were independently assessed. Results Postoperative GDA was observed in 61 patients (47%) and lasted for 1 to 8 days in these patients. The mean duration of GDA was 4.3 days. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed a GDA duration of 5 days or more (odds ratio [OR], 2.03; p = 0.001) and an operating time > 388 minutes (OR, 5.31; p < 0.001) to be independent risk factors for LLR postoperative complications. Conclusions The incidence and duration of postoperative GDA are considered useful predictors of postoperative complications, and these predictors should be assessed to improve the short-term outcomes of patients undergoing LLR.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1519-1519
Author(s):  
Morgan RL Lichtenstein ◽  
Melissa Beauchemin ◽  
Sahil Doshi ◽  
Rohit Raghunathan ◽  
Cynthia Law ◽  
...  

1519 Background: The past decade has seen a dramatic increase in the number of Food and Drug Administration approvals of oral anti-cancer drugs (OACDs). Most OACD prescriptions require coordination between providers, payers, specialty pharmacists, and financial assistance organizations, which can delay drug receipt. We evaluated median time to OACD receipt (TTR) from initial OACD prescription submission and assessed clinical and process-related factors associated with TTR. Methods: We prospectively collected data on all new OACD prescriptions for adult oncology patients at a large, urban outpatient cancer center from 1/1/2018 to 12/31/2019. We collected patient demographic, medical, and insurance data; prescription submission and delivery dates; and interactions with payers and financial assistance groups. TTR was defined as the number of days from OACD initial prescription to patient receipt of the drug. We estimated the median TTR across all patients and used multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with TTR above the median. Results: The cohort included 1080 patients who were prescribed 1269 new OACDs. Of these prescriptions, 84% (N=1069) were received, and 71% (N=896) required prior authorization. The median patient age was 66, 44% identified as Non-Hispanic White (White), 25% of patients had commercial insurance, 16% had Medicaid alone, and 58% had Medicare alone or in combination with another plan. The median TTR per patient was 7 days (IQR 0 – 142; 25% ≥ 14 days and 5% ≥ 30 days). In unadjusted analyses, insurance and race/ethnicity were associated with TTR. Compared with patients covered by Medicaid, those with Medicare and supplemental insurance (a partial, not free-standing plan) had nearly 2.5 times the odds of TTR >7 days controlling for other factors. Race/ethnicity showed a trend toward longer TTR with Non-Hispanic Black (Black) patients having a longer TTR compared to White patients, controlling for other factors. We did not observe statistically significant effects of either comorbidity or prior authorization requirement on TTR. Conclusions: Though the majority of oncology patients prescribed OACDs receive the drug, 71% of prescriptions required prior authorization and a quarter of patients waited at least two weeks. Disparities in TTR are primarily driven by financial factors, specifically insurance type.[Table: see text]


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17559-e17559
Author(s):  
Maryam Shabihkhani ◽  
Steven Yu ◽  
Dongyun Yang ◽  
Heinz-Josef Lenz ◽  
Afsaneh Barzi

e17559 Background: Hispanics (H) have lower CRC related mortality compared to Whites (W). However, over the past decade H have appreciated less improvement in CRC mortality. Given that treatments (TX) for early stage CRC is unchanged we speculate that the gap is due to poorer outcome in the MET setting. Delivery of HC is identified as one of the factor for poor outcomes. We examined the relationship between HC delivery (public or private hospital) and TX as the drivers of poorer outcome in H. Methods: We identified CRC patients (pts) with at least one cycle of chemotherapy (CT) in the first line MET setting at Los Angeles County Hospital (LAC-public hospital) and Norris Cancer Center (NCC-Private hospital) between 2004-2011. Demographics; tumor and TX related factors were collected. Primary endpoint was TTP (time from first day to progression on first line CT). Descriptive statistics were used to describe the population and where appropriate chi-square, Wilcoxon, and log-rank tests were used for comparison between the groups. Results: 251 pts, 45%H, 26%W, 20% Asian (A) and 9%Black (B) were included. The median age of the population was 55 (21-82) years. 55% of pts were male.74 % of pts had de-novo MET disease. 48% of pts had left sided, 27% right sided and 25% rectal cancer. 71% of pts treated at LAC and 29% at NCC. 46% of pts at LAC and 56% at NCC received bevacizumab (BEV) as part of their TX (p= 0.26). Median TTP in H was 10.2 months (m) (95% CI: 8.1-11.8), and in W was 16.8 m (95% CI: 11.2-27.2; P<0.05). Hispanics who were TX at LAC had longer TTP in comparison to H at NCC (p= 0.01). In multivariate analysis, race remained a significant predictor of TTP (p=0.001). Conclusions: H are the largest and fastest growing minority in the US, identification of factors of disparate outcome is crucial. This study revealed a significant association between race and TTP. Use of BEV for MET CRC became a standard TX in 2004 and since then TX is mostly unchanged. Our cohort received homogenous TX with regards to use of BEV. The results show that H regardless of HC setting have shorter TTP than W suggesting an inherent biological difference in the tumor or response to TX. Future biomarker studies will shed light on the cause.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. e769-e776
Author(s):  
Renee A. Cowan ◽  
Elyse Shuk ◽  
Maureen Byrne ◽  
Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum ◽  
Dennis S. Chi ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE: Disparities exist between population subgroups in the use of gynecologic oncologists and high-volume hospitals. The objectives of this study were to explore the experiences of black women obtaining ovarian cancer (OC) care at a high-volume center (HVC) and to identify patient-, provider-, and systems-related factors affecting their access to and use of this level of care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one semistructured interviews were conducted as part of an institutional review board–approved protocol with women who self-identified as black or African American, treated for OC at a single HVC from January 2013 to May 2017. Recurring themes were identified in transcribed interviews through the process of independent and collaborative thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Five themes were identified: (1) internal attributes contributing to black women’s ability/desire to be treated at an HVC, (2) pathways to high- and low-volume centers, (3) obstacles to obtaining care, (4) potential barriers for black women interested in treatment at an HVC, and (5) suggestions for improving HVC use by black women. Study participants who successfully accessed care were comfortable navigating the health care system, understood the importance of self-advocacy, and valued the expertise of an HVC. Barriers to obtaining care at an HVC included lack of knowledge about the HVC, lack of referral, transportation difficulties, and lack of insurance coverage. CONCLUSION: In this qualitative study, black women treated at an HVC shared attributes and experiences that helped them access care. There is a need to collaborate with black communities and establish interventions to reduce barriers, facilitate access, and disseminate information about the value of receiving care for OC at an HVC.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 109-109
Author(s):  
Yael Schenker ◽  
Michael W. Rabow ◽  
Megan Crowley-Makota ◽  
Mallory Marie Waters ◽  
Michelle Nkumsah ◽  
...  

109 Background: Rates of early specialty palliative care utilization remain low, despite increasing familiarity and favorable attitudes amongst cancer center oncologists. In this context, understanding organizational barriers to specialty palliative care use becomes critical. Methods: We conducted a qualitative interview study with 74 medical oncologists practicing at 3 U.S. academic cancer centers with well-established specialty palliative care clinics. The in-depth interview guide elicited experiences and views related to outpatient palliative care. For this analysis, we focused on organizational factors influencing palliative care use, defined as the structural arrangements and social patterns that facilitate or impede implementation of best practices in healthcare. The team conducted mixed deductive and inductive coding, using Cabana’s quality improvement framework as a starting point. Key concepts were iteratively refined with interdisciplinary input. Two coders applied the final codebook to all transcripts, with disagreements reviewed and resolved by team consensus. Results: Participating oncologists were 68% male, specialized in solid tumors (61%), hematologic malignancies (32%), or both (7%), and had been practicing oncology for a mean of 17 (SD 12) years. Organizational factors impeding early specialty palliative care utilization included: the perceived burden on patients from spending more time at clinic appointments, which was balanced against the value added from specialty palliative care; social, financial, and disease-related factors interfering with patients’ ability to attend additional specialty visits; the clinic name, with concern that patients equated ‘palliative care’ with death, dying or giving up; an unwieldy referral process without availability of same-day appointments; and inadequate communication between oncologists and palliative care specialists. Conclusions: Even when oncologists are aware of the evidence and agree with recommended practices, organizational factors may impede adherence to oncologic and palliative care guidelines. Addressing these barriers could improve use of outpatient specialty palliative care.


2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 13 ◽  
pp. 2529-2530
Author(s):  
Yao Tong ◽  
Peipei Wei ◽  
Shuang Wang ◽  
Qiuying Sun ◽  
Yanzheng Cui ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 13 ◽  
pp. 2411-2412
Author(s):  
Yao Tong ◽  
Peipei Wei ◽  
Shuang Wang ◽  
Qiuying Sun ◽  
Yanzheng Cui ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 433-433
Author(s):  
Gabrielle Beck ◽  
Gary Deimling ◽  
Boaz Kahana ◽  
Eva Kahana ◽  
Erin Phelps ◽  
...  

Abstract Previous research has identified cancer and cancer-treatment related effects on survivors’ mental impairment including memory and concentration. However, research has not systematically examined the relative impact of cancer in the context of age and other age-related health challenges common in later life. This paper compares the effects of cancer-related factors with other health challenges faced by 471 older adult long-term survivors from an NCI-funded study of a randomly selected tumor registry sample from a major comprehensive cancer center. Having had chemotherapy is associated with several cognitive outcomes including memory and concentration. Survivors who reported more cancer-related symptoms during treatment reported a greater number of cognitive symptoms even decades after treatment. Importantly, other comorbid health problems as well as social factors were found to be important in explaining symptoms of cognitive impairment in this older adult sample. These findings suggest that health care and mental health providers consider the range of health challenges, including those related to cancer and its treatment, as they provide patient centered care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document