Evolution of Platelet Activation Parameters During Septic Shock in Intensive Care Unit

Platelets ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Fanny Vardon-Bounes ◽  
Cédric Garcia ◽  
Alexandra Piton ◽  
Jennifer Series ◽  
Marie-Pierre Gratacap ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Desy Rusmawatiningtyas ◽  
Nurnaningsih Nurnaningsih

Background Septic shock remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in children admitted to the intensive care unit. Recent investigations from developed countries have reported mortality rates of 20-30%. Few studies have reported mortality rates from pediatric septic shock in intensive care settings in developing countries with limited resources.  Objective  To determine the current mortality rates for pediatric patients with septic shock in a developing country.Methods A retrospective study was conducted in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) at DR. Sardjito General Hospital. Medical records and charts were reviewed and recorded for diagnoses of septic shock, from November 1st, 2011 to June 30th, 2014. Results  A database of all PICU admissions was assembled, and cases with diagnoses of septic shock were reviewed. The final data consisted of 136 patients diagnosed with septic shock. Septic shock was defined as a clinical suspicion of sepsis, manifested by hyperthermia or hypothermia, and accompanied by hypoperfusion  The overall mortality rate for the study cohort was 88.2%.  The median age of patients was 16 months, with 52.2% males. Median initial PRISM III and PELOD scores were 10 and 22, respectively. The median length of PICU stay was 4 days. A total of 48.5% of the subjects were in need of crystalloid and colloid fluid at a median amount of 40 mL/kg. The median time required to complete the initial resuscitation was 60 minutes. Mechanical ventilator support in the first 24 hours was required in 79.4% of the cases. Fluid overload of > 10% (FO>10%) was found in 58.8% of the subjects.Conclusion The mortality rate in pediatric septic shock in our hospital is very high. There is a higher incidence of fluid overload in the non-survival group .


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyung-Jun Kim ◽  
Kyeongman Jeon ◽  
Byung Ju Kang ◽  
Jong-Joon Ahn ◽  
Sang-Bum Hong ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Rapid response systems (RRSs) improve patients’ safety, but the role of dedicated doctors within these systems remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate patient survival rates and differences in types of interventions performed depending on the presence of dedicated doctors in the RRS. Methods Patients managed by the RRSs of 9 centers in South Korea from January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2017, were included retrospectively. We used propensity score-matched analysis to balance patients according to the presence of dedicated doctors in the RRS. The primary outcome was in-hospital survival. The secondary outcomes were the incidence of interventions performed. A sensitivity analysis was performed with the subgroup of patients diagnosed with sepsis or septic shock. Results After propensity score matching, 2981 patients were included per group according to the presence of dedicated doctors in the RRS. The presence of the dedicated doctors was not associated with patients’ overall likelihood of survival (hazard ratio for death 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93‒1.20). Interventions, such as arterial line insertion (odds ratio [OR] 25.33, 95% CI 15.12‒42.44) and kidney replacement therapy (OR 10.77, 95% CI 6.10‒19.01), were more commonly performed for patients detected using RRS with dedicated doctors. The presence of dedicated doctors in the RRS was associated with better survival of patients with sepsis or septic shock (hazard ratio for death 0.62, 95% CI 0.39‒0.98) and lower intensive care unit admission rates (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.37‒0.75). Conclusions The presence of dedicated doctors within the RRS was not associated with better survival in the overall population but with better survival and lower intensive care unit admission rates for patients with sepsis or septic shock.


2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 399-405
Author(s):  
Cyril Pernod ◽  
◽  
Antoine Lamblin ◽  
Andrei Cividjian ◽  
Patrick Gerome ◽  
...  

1971 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 327-332
Author(s):  
Roy G. Fitzgerald

This is an autobiographical account of an episode of life-threatening endotoxin shock experienced in the intensive care unit of a university-affiliated V.A. hospital. It was written within a day of the event by a psychiatrist interested in sharing with other physicians and nurses his harrowing time as a patient. He has added some afterthoughts as his perspective has broadened. The account presents the moment-to-moment events as he perceived them as well as his thoughts, feelings and fantasies. The ambiguities of being a psychiatrist-patient with its passivity-control, intellectual defenses, denial and fears of death are prominent in his thoughts.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven P LaRosa ◽  
Steven M. Opal

Sepsis, along with the multiorgan failure that often accompanies this condition, is a leading cause of mortality in the intensive care unit. Although modest improvements in the prognosis have been made over the past two decades and promising new therapies continue to be investigated, innovations in the management of septic shock are still required. This chapter discusses the definitions, epidemiology, and pathogenesis (including microbial factors, host-derived mediators, and organ dysfunction) relating to sepsis. Management of severe sepsis and septic shock is also described.  This review contains 5 figures, 11 tables, and 99 references. Keywords:Organ dysfunction, sepsis, septic shock, infection, bacteremia, fluid resuscitation, vasopressor


This case focuses on detecting sepsis through early goal-directed therapies by asking the question: Does aggressive correction of hemodynamic disturbances in the early stages of sepsis improve outcomes? Early goal-directed therapies are aimed at restoring a balance between oxygen delivery and oxygen demand. Patients included in the study were adults presenting to the emergency room with severe sepsis or septic shock. Study results indicated that most patients with severe sepsis or septic shock should be managed with aggressive hemodynamic monitoring and support immediately on presentation in the emergency department (or, if this is not possible, in the intensive care unit) for 6 hours or until there is resolution of hemodynamic disturbances.


Antibiotics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 760
Author(s):  
Hsiao-Chin Wang ◽  
Chen-Chu Liao ◽  
Shih-Ming Chu ◽  
Mei-Yin Lai ◽  
Hsuan-Rong Huang ◽  
...  

It is unknown whether neonatal ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens and inappropriate initial antibiotic treatment is associated with poor outcomes after adjusting for confounders. Methods: We prospectively observed all neonates with a definite diagnosis of VAP from a tertiary level neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in Taiwan between October 2017 and March 2020. All clinical features, therapeutic interventions, and outcomes were compared between the MDR–VAP and non-MDR–VAP groups. Multivariate regression analyses were used to investigate independent risk factors for treatment failure. Results: Of 720 neonates who were intubated for more than 2 days, 184 had a total of 245 VAP episodes. The incidence rate of neonatal VAP was 10.1 episodes/per 1000 ventilator days. Ninety-six cases (39.2%) were caused by MDR pathogens. Neonates with MDR–VAP were more likely to receive inadequate initial antibiotic therapy (51.0% versus 4.7%; p < 0.001) and had delayed resolution of clinical symptoms (38.5% versus 25.5%; p = 0.034), although final treatment outcomes were comparable with the non-MDR–VAP group. Inappropriate initial antibiotic treatment was not significantly associated with worse outcomes. The VAP-attributable mortality rate and overall mortality rate of this cohort were 3.7% and 12.0%, respectively. Independent risk factors for treatment failure included presence of concurrent bacteremia (OR 4.83; 95% CI 2.03–11.51; p < 0.001), septic shock (OR 3.06; 95% CI 1.07–8.72; p = 0.037), neonates on high-frequency oscillatory ventilator (OR 4.10; 95% CI 1.70–9.88; p = 0.002), and underlying neurological sequelae (OR 3.35; 95% CI 1.47–7.67; p = 0.004). Conclusions: MDR–VAP accounted for 39.2% of all neonatal VAP in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), but neither inappropriate initial antibiotics nor MDR pathogens were associated with treatment failure. Neonatal VAP with concurrent bacteremia, septic shock, and underlying neurological sequelae were independently associated with final worse outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document