Differences between Oral and Written Discourse and the Acquisition of Reading Proficiency
Examines discourse conflicts between the structure of written text and the oral expectations of young readers. Twenty-eight second grade students read and retold two stories: one with oral and one with written discourse structures. ANOVA results suggest that written discourse stories were more difficult to comprehend. In addition, an interaction appeared between familiarity with written discourse structures and comprehension of the two story versions. As familiarity with written discourse structures increased, the interference effect on reading comprehension decreased. Oral reading error results paralleled these findings, suggesting that expectations based on a knowledge of oral discourse structures may, in some cases, actually interfere with the reading comprehension of young readers.