Clinicopathologic features and prognostic significance of CD30 expression in de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): results in a homogeneous series from a single institution

Biomarkers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-75
Author(s):  
María Queralt Salas ◽  
Fina Climent ◽  
Gustavo Tapia ◽  
Eva DomingoDomènech ◽  
Santiago Mercadal ◽  
...  
Oncotarget ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (20) ◽  
pp. 33487-33500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoko Tsuyama ◽  
Daisuke Ennishi ◽  
Masahiro Yokoyama ◽  
Satoko Baba ◽  
Reimi Asaka ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
Rasha Haggag ◽  
Naglaa A. Mostafa ◽  
Marwa Nabil ◽  
Hala A. Shokralla ◽  
Neveen F. H. Sidhom

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic role of mammalian target of Rapamycin (mTOR) and C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) in diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients.Patients and methods: This retrospective study was collected data from 64 de novo DLBCL patients, who received standardized R-CHOP therapy at two oncology centers. CXCR4 and mTOR expressions were assessed by immunohistochemistry.Results: Out of the 64 DLBCL patients, 40 patients were positive for CXCR4 (62.5%) and 35 patients for mTOR (54.7%) expressions. CXCR4 expression was positively correlated with mTOR expression (r = 0.7; p < .001). While mTOR expression was significantly associated with high lactate dehydrogenase level (p = .03) and number of extranodal sites one or more (p =.02), CXCR4 expression was significantly associated with high IPI score (p < .001) and ECOG PS (p = .005). Furthermore, theexpression levels of mTOR and CXCR4 were significantly associated with older ages and poor response to treatment (p = .04, <.001 and .04, .03, respectively). After a median Follow up of 22 months, mean ± SD overall survival (OS) was 65.391 ± 4.705. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that patients positive for mTOR and CXCR4 expression had shorter DFS (p = .01 & .02) and OS (p = .02 & .04). Multivariate analysis showed that CXCR4 and mTOR positivity is an independent prognostic factor for significantly poorer DFS (p = .03, and .02 respectively) but not for OS (p = .09 and .08 respectively) in the DLBCL pateints.Conclusion: Our results indicate that the expression of CXCR4 and mTOR may be poor prognostic biomarkers in DLBCL.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8040-8040 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Fu ◽  
K. D. Perry ◽  
L. M. Smith ◽  
C. P. Hans ◽  
T. C. Greiner ◽  
...  

8040 Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) includes at least two prognostically important subgroups, i.e. germinal center B-cell (GCB) and activated B-cell (ABC) DLBCL, which were initially characterized by gene expression profiling and subsequently validated by immunostaining. Bcl-2 has also been identified as a prognostic indicator in the ABC subgroup. However, with the addition of rituximab (R) to standard chemotherapy, the prognostic significance of this subclassification of DLBCL is unclear. Methods: We studied 119 cases of de novo DLBCL including 70 cases treated with R-CHOP and 49 cases treated with CHOP. The cases were assigned to either the GCB or non-GCB subgroups using the methodology described by Hans et al (Blood 2004; 103:275). Characteristics of the patients were compared using the Chi-square test. Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were estimated using the Kaplan Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Results: The median age of the 119 patients was 67 years, ranging from 20 to 90 years, and there were 62 males and 57 females. The clinical characteristics of patients treated with CHOP versus R-CHOP, including the IPI, were comparable. R-CHOP was more effective than CHOP with improved 5-year EFS (63% vs 41%, p=0.013) and OS (78% vs 47%, p<0.001). In both patient groups treated with R-CHOP or CHOP, the GCB subgroup had a significantly better 5-year EFS and OS compared to the non-GCB subgroup (OS: 91% vs 64% for R-CHOP, p=0.0073; 67% vs 31% for CHOP, p=0.034, respectively). Additionally, both the GCB and non-GCB subgroups treated with R-CHOP had a significantly improved OS compared to their respective subgroups receiving CHOP alone (GCB, p=0.015; non-GCB, p=0.019). Bcl-2 expression was not a significant predictor in either the GCB or non-GCB subgroups treated with R-CHOP (OS, GCB: p=0.32; non-GCB: p=0.43). Conclusions: In this retrospective study, we demonstrate that subclassification based on the cell of origin continues to have prognostic significance in patients with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP. Addition of rituximab to CHOP improves the overall survival of patients with DLBCL in both the GCB and non-GCB subgroups. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5309-5309
Author(s):  
Shenxian Qian ◽  
YiFei Zhao

Abstract Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous disease disease with 40% of patients presenting as refractory/relapsing disease following R-CHOP treatment. Recently, CD30 was reported as a useful predictor with favorable clinical outcome. However, CD30 expression patterns and the clinicopathologic features of CD30 positive DLBCL are not well described thus far, Here, we studied149 patients with de novo DLBCL to investigate clinicopathologic features of CD30-positive DLBCL by immunohistochemistry. useing a >0% cut-off,CD30 was expressed in approximately 13% (19)patients with DLBCL, showing a lower frequency of MYC/BCL2 co-expression. The clinic features were very similar between the CD30+ and CD30- groups,such as age, sex, B symptoms, staging, ECOG PS, LDH level, extranodal site involvement, IPI, GCB or non GCB type, bone marrow involvement. By univariate analysis Patients with CD30-positive DLBCLs showed better progression-free survival and overall survival compared with patients with CD30-negative DLBCLs, although the superior outcome of CD30 positivity had minimal effects on DLBCL with MYC/BCL2 co-expression. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) was identified in 8(5.3%) cases, all of which were almost exclusively positive for CD30 expression (8/8) (P < 0·001). We conclude CD30 is expressed in a substantial proportion of DLBCL and CD30 immunohistochemistry may be a useful prognostic marker in R-CHOP treated GCB-DLBCL. The significant association of CD30 with EBV-positive DLBCL suggests a distinct pathobiology for these cases. We concluded that CD30 may be useful as a prognostic marker in rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) treated DLBCLs, indicating favorable outcomes Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8581-8581
Author(s):  
D. Gratzinger ◽  
R. Advani ◽  
S. Zhao ◽  
N. Talreja ◽  
R. J. Tibshirani ◽  
...  

8581 Background: Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cells coexpress VEGF, VEGFR1 and VEGFR2. In patients (pts) treated with CHOP chemotherapy alone, VEGFR1 predicted improved overall survival (OS) while microvessel density (MVD) predicted poorer OS; VEGF and VEGFR2 were not predictive (Lab Invest. 2008;88:38). We now assess these factors in pts treated with R-CHOP. Methods: 162 pts with de novo DLBCL treated with R-CHOP and median followup of 44 months were evaluated retrospectively with immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays. Scoring: VEGF, VEGFR1, VEGFR2, and phosphoVEGFR2 (pVEGFR2) in lymphoma cells (categorical variable) <5%, none; 5–30%, weak; >30%, strong. MVD (continuous variable): average CD34+ microvessels/4 hpf. Statistics: univariate Cox proportional hazards regression, and multivariate Cox regression for testing independence from the International Prognostic Index (IPI) for two endpoints, OS and progression-free survival (PFS). Pearson chi-square testing for independence of variables. Results: VEGF and MVD did not correlate with OS or PFS. Pts with higher VEGFR2 (53%) had poorer OS but not PFS independent of the IPI (z=3.15, p=0.0016; 2 yr OS 100%/84%/76%). Pts with any pVEGFR2 (13%) had worse PFS independent of IPI (z=1.98, p=0.048) and a trend toward poor OS (p=0.056). VEGFR1 did not correlate with OS or PFS in the group as a whole. Since VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 expression correlate strongly (Χ2=56, p =9.8E-12) opposing associations with outcome could be masked. On subset analysis the 39% of pts with weak VEGFR2 had better OS with higher VEGFR1 (z=-1.64, p=0.016; 2 yr OS 68%/85%/92%). Conclusions: In contrast to our prior observations in CHOP treated pts, in DLBCL treated with R-CHOP MVD was not prognostically significant. The association of VEGFR1 with better OS was previously seen with CHOP alone, whereas the correlation of VEGFR2 and phosphorylated VEGFR2 with poorer OS was only seen with R-CHOP. Independent confirmation will be important, especially because multiple comparisons were made with 5 predictors and 2 endpoints tested. It is possible that VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 oppose each other functionally; future studies are indicated to address the mechanism of this effect. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Author(s):  
Carla Isabelly Rodrigues‐Fernandes ◽  
Lucas Guimarães Abreu ◽  
Raghu Radhakrishnan ◽  
Danyel Elias da Cruz Perez ◽  
Gleyson Kleber Amaral‐Silva ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 105 (4) ◽  
pp. 1133-1139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Motoko Yamaguchi ◽  
Toshiyuki Ohno ◽  
Kouji Oka ◽  
Masanori Taniguchi ◽  
Motohiro Ito ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document