scholarly journals Modeling the impact of patient treatment preference on health outcomes in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 474-483
Author(s):  
Emma van Eijndhoven ◽  
Michelle Brauer ◽  
Rebecca Kee ◽  
Joanna MacEwan ◽  
Lisa Mucha ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 721
Author(s):  
Afshin Derakhshani ◽  
Zahra Asadzadeh ◽  
Hossein Safarpour ◽  
Patrizia Leone ◽  
Mahdi Abdoli Shadbad ◽  
...  

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS) that is characterized by inflammation which typically results in significant impairment in most patients. Immune checkpoints act as co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory molecules and play a fundamental role in keeping the equilibrium of the immune system. Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), as inhibitory immune checkpoints, participate in terminating the development of numerous autoimmune diseases, including MS. We assessed the CTLA-4 and PD-L1 gene expression in the different cell types of peripheral blood mononuclear cells of MS patients using single-cell RNA-seq data. Additionally, this study outlines how CTLA-4 and PD-L1 expression was altered in the PBMC samples of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients compared to the healthy group. Finally, it investigates the impact of various MS-related treatments in the CTLA-4 and PD-L1 expression to restrain autoreactive T cells and stop the development of MS autoimmunity.


Author(s):  
Brown Hannah

In this Publication Perspective, lead author Hannah Brown, Senior Research Executive at Ipsos Healthcare, London, UK, provides a summary of the recently published article 'Physician and patient treatment decision-making in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Europe and the USA', from Neurodegenerative Disease Management, that assessed factors used in treatment decision-making for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in both the 5EU (UK/Germany/France/Italy/Spain) and the US.


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott D. Newsome ◽  
Bernd C. Kieseier ◽  
Shifang Liu ◽  
Xiaojun You ◽  
Elizabeth Kinter ◽  
...  

Background: In the pivotal phase III 2-year ADVANCE study, subcutaneous peginterferon beta-1a 125 mcg every 2 weeks demonstrated significant improvements in clinical outcomes, including disability endpoints, in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Here, we aim to further evaluate disability data from ADVANCE, and explore associations between confirmed disability progression (CDP), functional status, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods: In total, 1512 patients were randomized to placebo or peginterferon beta-1a 125 mcg every 2 or 4 weeks. After 1 year, patients on placebo were re-randomized to peginterferon beta-1a every 2 or 4 weeks. CDP was defined as ⩾1.0 point increase from a baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score ⩾ 1.0, or ⩾1.5-point increase from baseline 0, confirmed 12 or 24 weeks after onset. Results: Peginterferon beta-1a every 2 weeks significantly reduced risk of 12- and 24-week CDP at 1 year compared with placebo (12-week CDP: 6.8% versus 10.5%, p = 0.038; 24-week CDP: 4% versus 8.4%, p = 0.0069, peginterferon beta-1a every 2 weeks versus placebo, respectively). Benefits were maintained over 2 years (11.2% and 7.7%, peginterferon beta-1a every 2 weeks in 12- and 24-week CDP, respectively). Approximately 90% of patients with 24-week CDP had simultaneous worsening by ⩾1 point in at least one functional system score, most commonly pyramidal. Displaying a 24-week CDP was associated with worse scores on the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) scale and several HRQoL instruments; the impact of CDP was attenuated by treatment with peginterferon beta-1a every 2 weeks. Conclusions: Peginterferon beta-1a has the potential to prevent/delay worsening of disability in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis. Furthermore, improved benefits in disability status with peginterferon beta-1a were also associated with improved functional status and HRQoL [ ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00906399].


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. e042480
Author(s):  
Stefan Braune ◽  
Fabian Rossnagel ◽  
Heidi Dikow ◽  
Arnfin Bergmann

ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of drug diversity on treatment effectiveness in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in Germany.DesignThis study employs real-world data captured in-time during clinical visits in 67 German neurology outpatient offices of the NeuroTransData (NTD) multiple sclerosis (MS) registry between 1 January 2010 and 30 June 2019, including 237 976 visits of 17 553 patients with RRMS. Adherence and clinical effectiveness parameters were analysed by descriptive statistics, time-to-event analysis overall and by disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) stratified by administration modes (injectable, oral and infusion). Three time periods were compared: 2010–2012, 2013–2015 and 2016–2018.ResultsBetween 2010 and 2018, an increasing proportion of patients with RRMS were treated with DMTs and treatment was initiated sooner after diagnosis of MS. Introduction of oral DMT temporarily induced higher readiness to switch. Comparing the three index periods, there was a continuous decrease of annualised relapse rates, less frequent Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) progression and increasing periods without relapse, EDSS worsening and with stability of no-evidence-of-disease-activity 2 and 3 criteria, lower conversion rates to secondary progressive MS on oral and on injectable DMTs.ConclusionSparked by the availability of new mainly oral DMTs, RRMS treatment effectiveness improved clinically meaningful between 2010 and 2018. As similar effects were seen for injectable and oral DMTs more than for infusions, a better personalised treatment allocation in many patients is likely. These results indicate that there is an overall beneficial effect for the whole patient with MS population as a result of the greater selection of available DMTs, a benefit beyond the head-to-head comparative efficacy, resulting from an increased probability and readiness to individualise MS therapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document